The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis
An epic battle between environmentalists and loggers left much of the spotted owl's habitat protected. Now the celebrity species faces a new threat—a tougher owl
- By Craig Welch
- Photographs by Gary Braasch
- Smithsonian magazine, January 2009, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
When barred owls started moving into spotted owl habitat, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initially proposed killing hundreds of the invaders. After an outcry from scientists and the public, wildlife managers instead plan to launch smaller studies to see if culling barred owls prompts the spotted birds to return. Even proponents of the approach acknowledge that the idea raises a thorny question: When is it appropriate to kill one species to help another?
Scientists and wildlife officials have taken extreme measures when species collide. Government marksmen on the Columbia River below Bonneville Dam shoot rubber bullets and explode firecrackers to drive away sea lions fattening up on endangered salmon. Downriver, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been relocating a colony of Caspian terns, which feast on endangered salmon and steelhead. In 2005, government contractors shot Arctic foxes outside Barrow, Alaska, to protect ground-nesting shorebirds. Not long ago, government-sponsored hunters in central Washington killed coyotes that preyed on the world's last remaining pygmy rabbits.
A scientist in California collecting museum specimens recently shot a few barred owls near abandoned spotted owl nests. Two weeks later, a spotted owl returned to the area. "He flew up, sat in the branch and was sitting there, like, ‘Where's my mouse?'" says Kent Livezey, a wildlife biologist with the Fish and Wildlife Service and a member of the scientific work group trying to design barred owl control experiments. "He'd been hanging around."
Joe Buchanan, a biologist at Washington's Department of Fish and Wildlife, advocates targeted hunts if the evidence indicates that culling barred owls creates havens for spotted owls. But he acknowledges there are limits: "We can't push barred owls back to the Mississippi River."
Forsman supports shooting barred owls only to determine a cause-effect relationship between the two birds. Anything beyond that strikes him as impractical. "You could shoot barred owls until you're blue in the face," he said. "But unless you're willing to do it forever, it's just not going to work."
It would be several weeks before Forsman could tell for certain, to his delight, that the pair of spotted owls near Greasy Creek had again defied the odds and reared two young hatchlings. Yet Forsman isn't sanguine about the spotted owl's chances, particularly in northern areas like the Olympic Peninsula, where the barred owl concentration is high. "Whether barred owls will completely replace spotted owls...it's not clear," he says. "I would say the most optimistic view is that at some point we'll end up with a population that's largely barred owls, with a few scattered pairs of spotted owls."
Yet after nearly four decades of tracking these birds, Forsman won't discount nature's capacity to surprise again. "No one really knows how this will play out in the long run," he says. Some elements of life in these ancient moss-draped forests remain shrouded in mystery.
Craig Welch lives in Seattle and is writing a book about wildlife thieves.
Gary Braasch's most recent book is Earth Under Fire: How Global Warming is Changing the World.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Owls Hunting Environmental Preservation Oregon Forests
Additional Sources
A Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl: Report of the Interagency Scientific Committee To Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl, published by the USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, 1990









Comments (18)
How simple minded is this journalism? Almost entirely ignoring the main issue of habitat loss (federal forests are only one third of the radically altered forest habitat in the PNW), and instead taking the easy path to focus the story on the bad guy (barred owls) and good guys (spotted owls). Historic clearcutting of old growth forests, and now, short term rotation of second growth forests, are the clear culprit. It's the logging management system that's the problem -- extraction/conversion -- not the barred owl. C'mon, use proper science for your articles!!
Posted by Shawn Cardinall on January 29,2013 | 10:04 PM
Spotted Owls and Barred Owls are in fact the same biological species. They are two races of the same species, separated by the continental ice sheet during the last glacial maximum only 15,000 years ago. What has happened since is that the Barred Owl has reclaimed much of its previous territory across southern Canada, and is now merging once again with its relict western race. This kind of thing happens all the time with many different biological species, whereby geographically isolated races form for a while but do not differentiate to the point where interbreeding with other races is no longer possible. Honestly, some of these wildlife management people (who are not necessarily scientists by any means) act like they are 'creationists' who believe that each 'species' is a concise and immutable created entity. This is just nonsense. There is genetic variation in each of the eastern and western gene pools of this species, and as these merge the genetic variation within the entire population will increase. It's evolution in action- live with it. Species are not static clones of one type.
Posted by Dr. David E. Hill on June 12,2012 | 12:24 AM
Oh yes, how "wise" they were in the management of Yellowstone - and they sure made a mess of that, didn't they? (see Michael Crichton's videos for a thorough expose of that foolishness.) No, we do not need to sacrifice one species for another - next will be the golden winged vs. blue winged warblers. The environmentalists need to knock it off - it's time they realized we are not God, and despite all efforts, they cannot save birds from one another without royally screwing up the rest of the ecological balance.
Posted by rusureuwant2know on March 27,2012 | 09:48 PM
If Science "believes" that Darwin is correct, then why are they concerned about the Bard Owl, is the concept of "The survival of the fittest" not appropriate anymore, professing to be wise, they became fools, Romans 1:22 New Testament. This is just too funny!! We puny humans have no ability to control created nature!
Posted by 1stLogVietnam on March 19,2012 | 10:35 PM
Is the barred owl is used as a scapecoat and excuse to lumber the rest of the old forest off?
I agree with the experts who wrote and said that the old growth forest should be preserved for many other reasons not only as habitat for the spotted owl but due to finding new drugs in such old places as was done with Taxol, a cancer drug found in such places.
Maybe people should just live a more sustainable lifestyle that includes growing food locally and trading it with restaurants and making a living and that probably would not lead to a lot of taxes collected as would happen in the lumber business. It could lead to more topsoil being created and people living healthier and even employing others to also help in growing local vegetables like in this case here:
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/garden/living-off-the-land-in-maine-even-in-winter.html?pagewanted=all
government turns around and writes 400 page draft environmental impact statements about the rationale of killing owls to let other owls live --- well that is taxpayer wasted money and we would be better off just living sustainable livelihoods not lumbering. thank you.
Posted by gudrun scott on March 1,2012 | 08:16 PM
What's wrong with Barred Owls making a presence there. They might have not been there for hundreds or even thousands of years but, to have balance in nature there must be change. The strong will survive. There are times when without the help of humans introducing species that other species overtake the home range of other animals. This could be part of the process of evolution.
Leave it alone or maybe stop clear cutting the home range of Barred Owls making them move their home range into a less dominant owls territory.
Derek Fritz
Posted by Derek Fritz on September 29,2011 | 03:01 PM
As a former Humboldt county resident, it's gratifying to know that the decimation of our timber industry, the loss of ten thousand good paying jobs and the economic misery that the entire region has suffered since those fateful prophetic prognostications emanated from those omniscient biologists, wasn't for naught. After all, how can one put a price on delaying for twenty years the inevitable demise of a species on Mother Nature's hit list, even when that price is measured out in human misery?
Posted by Jeff Patterson on July 14,2011 | 02:06 PM
We work at a wildlife center in Everson, WA. We have been getting a lot of barred owls in recently, and we have both witnessed their overall sweet disposition. And then we hear that people are planning to murder these innocent raptors, and for what? What do we gain out of it? (Jenny)
Barred owls have no less right to exist than Spotted owls. Barred Owls are wonderful creatures with their own voices. Now excuse us while we go tube feed a seagull. (Cheri)
Posted by Jenny and Cheri Foster on December 19,2010 | 04:35 PM
I cannot estimate how valid all of the science was that led to the listing of the NSO, but the listing was inevitable, since it served to protect remaining old-growth forest on Federal lands. The public had simply reached the point that cutting of old-growth, especially by clearcutting, was not considered acceptable. Most people equate old-growth with any forest composed of trees greater than 24 inches in diameter, though most of these may be second-growth, the product of either fire or past forest management. We have successfully moved much of our sustainable forest management practices out of the country by imposing severe restrictions upon wise and sustainable management. This, even in those areas of our vast Federal forest system where good, sustainable management can be done without causing significant effects to fish and wildlife resources. As usual, we simply went too far in one direction. Unfortunately, this may have increased the overall level of environmental impact substantially on a world-wide basis, since we import our wood from countries that provide minimal environmental protection. In the southern portion of the coastal range of the spotted owl, including much of northern California, the owl does quite well in managed forests, due to the abundance of prey species that forest management produces. Lets keep both the owl scientists and forest management scientists in communication, so that cooperative science leads the way, not the fear of chainsaws. The use of forest products in construction offsets a substantial amount of carbon dioxide production by providing an alternative to steel and concrete, while also maintaining viable rural industry in a region where it has all but disappeared, leaving destitute people in it's wake.
Posted by Marc Jameson on May 28,2010 | 07:04 PM
"barred and spotted owls ... are so closely related that they sometimes crossbreed, blurring species boundaries and diluting spotted owl genes."
By the very definition of SPECIES, one of these has been misnamed. Since they interbreed, they are the SAME species.
Posted by Frank Weigert on January 10,2010 | 08:22 AM
thank this help me alot on my history project obout the spotted owls
Posted by patty on April 15,2009 | 06:10 PM
As a retired BLM wildlife biologist, it was my pleasure to work with Dr. Eric Fosrman for over thirty years. From 1975 through about 1995, I worked primarily on Spotted owls but had opportunity to work with other noted individuals on everything from small mammals and birds to fungi and vascular plants. What this has shown is that the importance of the remaining old growth, virgin forests of the northwest cannot be overstated. This importance has been eclipsed by a single species focus on the spotted owl. These forests gave us taxol, a anti-cancer drug found in the bark of the Yew tree, very few of which existed outside of the natural, native forests, or second growth. At present, work on several species of fungi show promise as anti-inflamatory drugs and one species in particular has been effective in controlling several strains of tuberculosis bacteria. To date, very little of the biological resources found in the native forests have been screened. To lose the remnants of remaining native forest would be a travisty to mankind, not just the timber industry.
Posted by Gerald Mires on February 1,2009 | 06:39 PM
Of course they don't want to kill barred owls. The newcomer has provided more leverage in this "managed crisis" The plan is to keep the spotted owl at extinction levels (guess who's counting the owls?)to maintain control over federal forests. I've seen several spotted owls, and they were all in 2nd+ growth forests. These are wild animals with a built in ability to adapt. When are we going to realize that we can't freeze time in the moment when we thought it was best?
Posted by Nikole Jacoby on January 9,2009 | 12:10 AM
As humans, we have a duty to protect the enivironment from ourselves as we do our best to co-exist with it; however, when cases like this where a stronger, more "fit" animal comes along and causes the extinction of another animal it is simply natural for this to happen. To me, targeted hunts are ethically similar to the destruction of habits for timber. We need to protect habitats but also not interfere with the natural order of things even if that the extinction of some animals.
Posted by Zach Blake on January 9,2009 | 09:20 PM
"bully" "invader" "murderous" "feathery missile" Poetic license notwithstanding, Smithsonian really should keep an eye on its writers' absurb anthropomorphisms. It diminishes science in general and confuses our understanding of natural processes.
Posted by Sydney Brillo Duodenum on January 7,2009 | 08:38 PM
As a forester I call for NSOs and love to find them even when it makes my timber harvests more complex. It saddens me to see barred owls displacing NSOs in forests where loggers and NSOs have coexisted for many decades. To elaborate on the connection between logging and the NSO, I would like to make the following points. NSOs may prefer old growth type forests and trees but this is unclear since the majority of NSO studies have been conducted in parks with old growth. Certainly, many spotted owls are thriving in second growth forests. Barred owls are much more dependent on old growth. Responsible, sustainable logging can and does happen in tandum with protection of spotted owls. With fire suppression, required foraging areas for NSOs, are less abundant. NSOs frequently move adjacent to openings created by logging for foraging oportunities. The timber industry has come a long way since the report you cited from 1990. It would be nice to see more balanced reporting in this prestigious publication.
Posted by Harlan Tranmer on December 31,2008 | 04:42 PM
The barred owls slowly and steadily came west along the southern edge of the boreal forest in Canada...just look up the observation records there over a series of decades. They have then progress south here on the West Coast. Why does this article again repeat the meme that they may have skipped across the Great Plains?
Posted by west on December 30,2008 | 04:07 PM
Interesting how nature can throw us a curve ball. Great pictures too.
Posted by thelma w gannon on December 25,2008 | 06:26 AM