(Page 3 of 3)
When barred owls started moving into spotted owl habitat, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initially proposed killing hundreds of the invaders. After an outcry from scientists and the public, wildlife managers instead plan to launch smaller studies to see if culling barred owls prompts the spotted birds to return. Even proponents of the approach acknowledge that the idea raises a thorny question: When is it appropriate to kill one species to help another?
Scientists and wildlife officials have taken extreme measures when species collide. Government marksmen on the Columbia River below Bonneville Dam shoot rubber bullets and explode firecrackers to drive away sea lions fattening up on endangered salmon. Downriver, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been relocating a colony of Caspian terns, which feast on endangered salmon and steelhead. In 2005, government contractors shot Arctic foxes outside Barrow, Alaska, to protect ground-nesting shorebirds. Not long ago, government-sponsored hunters in central Washington killed coyotes that preyed on the world's last remaining pygmy rabbits.
A scientist in California collecting museum specimens recently shot a few barred owls near abandoned spotted owl nests. Two weeks later, a spotted owl returned to the area. "He flew up, sat in the branch and was sitting there, like, ‘Where's my mouse?'" says Kent Livezey, a wildlife biologist with the Fish and Wildlife Service and a member of the scientific work group trying to design barred owl control experiments. "He'd been hanging around."
Joe Buchanan, a biologist at Washington's Department of Fish and Wildlife, advocates targeted hunts if the evidence indicates that culling barred owls creates havens for spotted owls. But he acknowledges there are limits: "We can't push barred owls back to the Mississippi River."
Forsman supports shooting barred owls only to determine a cause-effect relationship between the two birds. Anything beyond that strikes him as impractical. "You could shoot barred owls until you're blue in the face," he said. "But unless you're willing to do it forever, it's just not going to work."
It would be several weeks before Forsman could tell for certain, to his delight, that the pair of spotted owls near Greasy Creek had again defied the odds and reared two young hatchlings. Yet Forsman isn't sanguine about the spotted owl's chances, particularly in northern areas like the Olympic Peninsula, where the barred owl concentration is high. "Whether barred owls will completely replace spotted owls...it's not clear," he says. "I would say the most optimistic view is that at some point we'll end up with a population that's largely barred owls, with a few scattered pairs of spotted owls."
Yet after nearly four decades of tracking these birds, Forsman won't discount nature's capacity to surprise again. "No one really knows how this will play out in the long run," he says. Some elements of life in these ancient moss-draped forests remain shrouded in mystery.
Craig Welch lives in Seattle and is writing a book about wildlife thieves.
Gary Braasch's most recent book is Earth Under Fire: How Global Warming is Changing the World.
Related topics: Owls Hunting Environmental Preservation Oregon Forests
Additional Sources
A Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl: Report of the Interagency Scientific Committee To Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl, published by the USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, 1990


Comments
Interesting how nature can throw us a curve ball. Great pictures too.
Posted by thelma w gannon on December 25,2008 | 03:26AM
The barred owls slowly and steadily came west along the southern edge of the boreal forest in Canada...just look up the observation records there over a series of decades. They have then progress south here on the West Coast. Why does this article again repeat the meme that they may have skipped across the Great Plains?
Posted by west on December 30,2008 | 01:07PM
As a forester I call for NSOs and love to find them even when it makes my timber harvests more complex. It saddens me to see barred owls displacing NSOs in forests where loggers and NSOs have coexisted for many decades. To elaborate on the connection between logging and the NSO, I would like to make the following points. NSOs may prefer old growth type forests and trees but this is unclear since the majority of NSO studies have been conducted in parks with old growth. Certainly, many spotted owls are thriving in second growth forests. Barred owls are much more dependent on old growth. Responsible, sustainable logging can and does happen in tandum with protection of spotted owls. With fire suppression, required foraging areas for NSOs, are less abundant. NSOs frequently move adjacent to openings created by logging for foraging oportunities. The timber industry has come a long way since the report you cited from 1990. It would be nice to see more balanced reporting in this prestigious publication.
Posted by Harlan Tranmer on December 31,2008 | 01:42PM
"bully" "invader" "murderous" "feathery missile" Poetic license notwithstanding, Smithsonian really should keep an eye on its writers' absurb anthropomorphisms. It diminishes science in general and confuses our understanding of natural processes.
Posted by Sydney Brillo Duodenum on January 7,2009 | 05:38PM
As humans, we have a duty to protect the enivironment from ourselves as we do our best to co-exist with it; however, when cases like this where a stronger, more "fit" animal comes along and causes the extinction of another animal it is simply natural for this to happen. To me, targeted hunts are ethically similar to the destruction of habits for timber. We need to protect habitats but also not interfere with the natural order of things even if that the extinction of some animals.
Posted by Zach Blake on January 9,2009 | 06:20PM
Of course they don't want to kill barred owls. The newcomer has provided more leverage in this "managed crisis" The plan is to keep the spotted owl at extinction levels (guess who's counting the owls?)to maintain control over federal forests. I've seen several spotted owls, and they were all in 2nd+ growth forests. These are wild animals with a built in ability to adapt. When are we going to realize that we can't freeze time in the moment when we thought it was best?
Posted by Nikole Jacoby on January 9,2009 | 09:10PM
As a retired BLM wildlife biologist, it was my pleasure to work with Dr. Eric Fosrman for over thirty years. From 1975 through about 1995, I worked primarily on Spotted owls but had opportunity to work with other noted individuals on everything from small mammals and birds to fungi and vascular plants. What this has shown is that the importance of the remaining old growth, virgin forests of the northwest cannot be overstated. This importance has been eclipsed by a single species focus on the spotted owl. These forests gave us taxol, a anti-cancer drug found in the bark of the Yew tree, very few of which existed outside of the natural, native forests, or second growth. At present, work on several species of fungi show promise as anti-inflamatory drugs and one species in particular has been effective in controlling several strains of tuberculosis bacteria. To date, very little of the biological resources found in the native forests have been screened. To lose the remnants of remaining native forest would be a travisty to mankind, not just the timber industry.
Posted by Gerald Mires on February 1,2009 | 03:39PM
thank this help me alot on my history project obout the spotted owls
Posted by patty on April 15,2009 | 03:10PM