• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Human Behavior
  • Mind & Body
  • Our Planet
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Wildlife
  • Art Meets Science
  • Science & Nature

The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis

An epic battle between environmentalists and loggers left much of the spotted owl's habitat protected. Now the celebrity species faces a new threat—a tougher owl

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Craig Welch
  • Photographs by Gary Braasch
  • Smithsonian magazine, January 2009, Subscribe
View More Photos »
Three week old spotted owl hatchlings
Biologist Eric Forsman was delighted that a breeding pair of wild spotted owls he has studied for years did it again (their 3-week-old hatchlings on a hemlock in Oregon this past May). (ⓒ Gary Braasch)

Photo Gallery (1/11)

Female spotted owl

Explore more photos from the story


Video Gallery

Spotted Owls Endangered by the Encroaching Barred Owl

Spotted Owls Endangered by the Encroaching Barred Owl

Related Links

  • U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service's Web site for the 2008 Final Recovery Plan for the Northern Spotted Owl

More from Smithsonian.com

  • The Hawks in Your Backyard
  • The Little Owls That Live Underground
  • North America’s Most Endangered Animals
  • The Disappearing Habitats of the Vaux’s Swifts

Eric Forsman tramped across the spongy ground with one ear tipped to the tangled branches above. We were circling an isolated Douglas fir and cedar stand near Mary's Peak, the highest point in Oregon's Coast Range, scouring the trees for a puff of tobacco-hued feathers. I had come to see one of the planet's most-studied birds—the Northern spotted owl—with the man who brought the animal to the world's attention.

Forsman stopped. "You hear it?" he asked. I didn't. Above the twitter of winter wrens I caught only the plunk of a creek running through hollow logs. Then Forsman nodded at a scraggly hemlock. Twenty feet off the ground, a cantaloupe-size spotted owl stared back at us. "It's the male," he whispered.

Before I could speak, Forsman was gone. The 61-year-old U.S. Forest Service biologist zipped down one fern-slippery hill and up another. For years, he'd explained, this bird and its mate pumped out babies like fertile field mice, producing more offspring than other spotted owls in the range. Forsman wanted to reach their nest to see if this year's eggs had hatched—and survived.

Every chick counts, because spotted owls are vanishing faster than ever. Nearly 20 years after Forsman's research helped the federal government boot loggers off millions of acres to save the threatened owls, nature has thrown the birds a curveball. A bigger, meaner bird—the barred owl—now drives spotted owls from their turf. Some scientists and wildlife managers have called for arming crews with decoys, shotguns and recorded bird songs in an experimental effort to lure barred owls from the trees and kill them.

To Forsman and other biologists, the bizarre turn is not a refutation of past decisions but a sign of the volatility to come for endangered species in an increasingly erratic world. As climate chaos disrupts migration patterns, wind, weather, vegetation and river flows, unexpected conflicts will arise between species, confounding efforts to halt or slow extinctions. If the spotted owl is any guide, such conflicts could come on quickly, upend the way we save rare plants and animals, and create pressure to act before the science is clear. For spotted owls "we kind of put the blinders on and tried to only manage habitat, hoping things wouldn't get worse," Forsman said. "But over time the barred owl's influence became impossible to ignore."

When I finally hauled myself up to Forsman, yanking on roots for balance, I found him squatting on the ground looking at the curious female spotted owl. The bird, perched unblinking on a low branch not ten feet away, hooted a rising scale as if whistling through a slide flute. Her partner fluttered in and landed on a nearby branch.

Both creatures stared intently at Forsman, who absently picked at a clump of fur and rodent bones—an owl pellet regurgitated by one of the birds. Moments later the female launched herself to a tree crevice some 40 feet off the ground. Her head bobbed as she picked at her nest. Over the next hour, we looked through binoculars hoping to spy a chick.

It was here, not half a mile away, above a trickle of runoff called Greasy Creek, that Forsman saw his first spotted owl nest in 1970. He had grown up chasing great horned owls in the woods outside an old strawberry farm near Eugene, and as an undergraduate at Oregon State University he prowled the forests in search of rare breeds. One day he shimmied up a tree and poked his head inside a crack. He escaped with brutal talon marks on his cheek and one of the earliest recorded glimpses of a spotted owl nest. He also scooped up a sick chick—its eyes were crusted shut—planning to nurse it back to health and return it to its nest. When he came back, though, the adult birds had vanished, so Forsman raised the baby bird himself. It lived in a cage outside his home for 31 years.

Drawn by the romance of this obscure creature that hides in dark woods, Forsman became a spotted owl expert. He was the first to note that the birds nest primarily in the cavities of ancient trees or in the broken-limbed canopies of old-growth forests, where they feast on wood rats, red tree voles, flying squirrels and deer mice. Logging of the Pacific Northwest's conifers accelerated during the post-World War II housing boom and continued afterward. Forsman and a colleague, biologist Richard Reynolds, warned Congress and the U.S. Forest Service that shrinking forests threatened the owl's existence. They sent one of their first letters, to then-Senator Bob Packwood of Oregon, in 1973.

The owl population crash finally began in the 1980s, about the time the environmental movement was finding its footing. In an effort to save what remained of the old-growth forests the birds needed to survive, radical environmentalists pounded steel or ceramic spikes into firs, which threatened to destroy chain saws and mill blades. They donned tree costumes to attract attention to their cause and crawled into tree platforms to disrupt logging. Counter-protests erupted. In angry mill towns, café owners provocatively served "spotted owl soup" and shops sold T-shirts and bumper stickers ("Save a Logger, Eat an Owl"). There were lawsuits, and, in 1990, the Northern subspecies of spotted owl came under the Endangered Species Act (two subspecies in other parts of the country were not affected). A sweeping federal court ruling in 1991 closed much of the Northwest woods to logging. By the end of the century, timber harvest on 24 million acres of federal land had dropped 90 percent from its heyday. The spotted owl crystallized the power of the species-protection law. No threatened animal has done more to change how we use land.


Eric Forsman tramped across the spongy ground with one ear tipped to the tangled branches above. We were circling an isolated Douglas fir and cedar stand near Mary's Peak, the highest point in Oregon's Coast Range, scouring the trees for a puff of tobacco-hued feathers. I had come to see one of the planet's most-studied birds—the Northern spotted owl—with the man who brought the animal to the world's attention.

Forsman stopped. "You hear it?" he asked. I didn't. Above the twitter of winter wrens I caught only the plunk of a creek running through hollow logs. Then Forsman nodded at a scraggly hemlock. Twenty feet off the ground, a cantaloupe-size spotted owl stared back at us. "It's the male," he whispered.

Before I could speak, Forsman was gone. The 61-year-old U.S. Forest Service biologist zipped down one fern-slippery hill and up another. For years, he'd explained, this bird and its mate pumped out babies like fertile field mice, producing more offspring than other spotted owls in the range. Forsman wanted to reach their nest to see if this year's eggs had hatched—and survived.

Every chick counts, because spotted owls are vanishing faster than ever. Nearly 20 years after Forsman's research helped the federal government boot loggers off millions of acres to save the threatened owls, nature has thrown the birds a curveball. A bigger, meaner bird—the barred owl—now drives spotted owls from their turf. Some scientists and wildlife managers have called for arming crews with decoys, shotguns and recorded bird songs in an experimental effort to lure barred owls from the trees and kill them.

To Forsman and other biologists, the bizarre turn is not a refutation of past decisions but a sign of the volatility to come for endangered species in an increasingly erratic world. As climate chaos disrupts migration patterns, wind, weather, vegetation and river flows, unexpected conflicts will arise between species, confounding efforts to halt or slow extinctions. If the spotted owl is any guide, such conflicts could come on quickly, upend the way we save rare plants and animals, and create pressure to act before the science is clear. For spotted owls "we kind of put the blinders on and tried to only manage habitat, hoping things wouldn't get worse," Forsman said. "But over time the barred owl's influence became impossible to ignore."

When I finally hauled myself up to Forsman, yanking on roots for balance, I found him squatting on the ground looking at the curious female spotted owl. The bird, perched unblinking on a low branch not ten feet away, hooted a rising scale as if whistling through a slide flute. Her partner fluttered in and landed on a nearby branch.

Both creatures stared intently at Forsman, who absently picked at a clump of fur and rodent bones—an owl pellet regurgitated by one of the birds. Moments later the female launched herself to a tree crevice some 40 feet off the ground. Her head bobbed as she picked at her nest. Over the next hour, we looked through binoculars hoping to spy a chick.

It was here, not half a mile away, above a trickle of runoff called Greasy Creek, that Forsman saw his first spotted owl nest in 1970. He had grown up chasing great horned owls in the woods outside an old strawberry farm near Eugene, and as an undergraduate at Oregon State University he prowled the forests in search of rare breeds. One day he shimmied up a tree and poked his head inside a crack. He escaped with brutal talon marks on his cheek and one of the earliest recorded glimpses of a spotted owl nest. He also scooped up a sick chick—its eyes were crusted shut—planning to nurse it back to health and return it to its nest. When he came back, though, the adult birds had vanished, so Forsman raised the baby bird himself. It lived in a cage outside his home for 31 years.

Drawn by the romance of this obscure creature that hides in dark woods, Forsman became a spotted owl expert. He was the first to note that the birds nest primarily in the cavities of ancient trees or in the broken-limbed canopies of old-growth forests, where they feast on wood rats, red tree voles, flying squirrels and deer mice. Logging of the Pacific Northwest's conifers accelerated during the post-World War II housing boom and continued afterward. Forsman and a colleague, biologist Richard Reynolds, warned Congress and the U.S. Forest Service that shrinking forests threatened the owl's existence. They sent one of their first letters, to then-Senator Bob Packwood of Oregon, in 1973.

The owl population crash finally began in the 1980s, about the time the environmental movement was finding its footing. In an effort to save what remained of the old-growth forests the birds needed to survive, radical environmentalists pounded steel or ceramic spikes into firs, which threatened to destroy chain saws and mill blades. They donned tree costumes to attract attention to their cause and crawled into tree platforms to disrupt logging. Counter-protests erupted. In angry mill towns, café owners provocatively served "spotted owl soup" and shops sold T-shirts and bumper stickers ("Save a Logger, Eat an Owl"). There were lawsuits, and, in 1990, the Northern subspecies of spotted owl came under the Endangered Species Act (two subspecies in other parts of the country were not affected). A sweeping federal court ruling in 1991 closed much of the Northwest woods to logging. By the end of the century, timber harvest on 24 million acres of federal land had dropped 90 percent from its heyday. The spotted owl crystallized the power of the species-protection law. No threatened animal has done more to change how we use land.

Yet the protection would prove insufficient. Throughout their range, from Canada to California, Northern spotted owls are disappearing three times faster than biologists had feared. Populations in parts of Washington are half what they were in the 1980s. So few birds remain in British Columbia that the provincial government plans to cage the last 16 known wild spotted owls and try to breed them in captivity. "In certain parts of its range," says Dominick DellaSala, chief scientist of the National Center for Conservation Science & Policy, "the spotted owl is circling the drain."

Barred Owls, meanwhile, are thriving. Farther south in the Oregon woods, I crunched through dead leaves behind Robert Anthony, a U.S. Geological Survey biologist, and David Wiens, a wildlife science graduate student at Oregon State. Wiens swept an antenna through the forest, weaving it in and out of snarled branches below overcast skies. Within minutes he pulled up short. The source of his signal looked down from upslope—a barred owl. He'd outfitted the bird with a transmitter the year before.

Half a dozen years earlier, Wiens whispered, spotted owls occupied this patch of forest. "Then barred owls were found and they've kind of taken over," he said. Spotted owls have not been seen here since.

Most of the evidence that barred owls are harming spotted owls is circumstantial; that's why Wiens and other researchers traipse the woods daily, studying how the two species fight for space and food. Still, the trend is clear. Rocky Gutiérrez, a University of Minnesota wildlife biologist, wrote in 2006 that "despite the paucity of information, many biologists now feel that the barred owl is the most serious current threat to the spotted owl."

Both barred and spotted owls, along with great gray owls and rufous-legged owls, belong to the genus Strix, medium-sized birds that lack the hornlike tufts of ear feathers common to many other owls. They are so closely related that they sometimes crossbreed, blurring species boundaries and diluting spotted owl genes. More often, though, when barred owls move in, spotted owls just disappear.

Where spotted owls are finicky eaters, barred owls consume almost anything, including spotted owls. Barred owls, typically 20 percent larger than their rivals, may take over spotted owl nests or slam into their breasts like feathery missiles. "The barred owl is the new bully on the block," DellaSala says. A few years ago, a naturalist in Redwood National Park observed the aftermath of a murderous encounter: a barred owl with a tuft of mottled feathers clinging to its talons flapping near a decapitated, partially gnawed spotted owl. When scientists dissected the spotted owl's body, they saw that it had been sliced and perforated, as if by talons.

No one knows precisely why the bigger birds came West. Barred owls originally ranged from Florida to Maine and west to the treeless expanse of the Great Plains. Sometime in the 20th century, the birds skipped west, possibly across Canada. Perhaps they followed settlers who suppressed fire, allowing trees to grow and providing nesting pockets. Some scientists blame the influx of barred owls on climate change; a few suggest it's a natural range expansion. In 1990, barred owls in a forest west of Corvallis, Oregon, occupied less than 2 percent of spotted owl sites; today, barred owls nest in 50 percent of them. Barred owls have yet to saturate Oregon and California, but in a part of Washington's Gifford Pinchot National Forest set aside for the smaller bird, barred owl nests outnumber spotted owl sites by a third. When barred owls invaded the Olympic Peninsula, spotted owls moved to higher, steeper forests with smaller trees and less food—"like moving from the Sheraton to some dive motel," DellaSala says.

To count owls, which are nocturnal and hard to find, researchers do a lot of hooting; when the birds call back, biologists plunge into the forest toward the sound, usually at a sprint, stopping every so often to call out and listen again, the hoots echoing back and forth through the woods until human and bird wind up face to face. For spotted owls, the sound is vaguely like a cross between a muted rooster call and a French horn: "hoot-hootoot-hoo." For barred owls, the tone is similar but the call is longer and patterned differently: "hoot-hoot-wahoot, hoot-hoot wahoo." For a time, some researchers hoped that spotted owls were just clamming up around barred owls and there were actually more than they thought. But that hope has largely faded. "There's evidence that spotted owls decrease vocalizations in response to barred owls," says Forest Service biologist Stan Sovern. "But honestly, I don't think spotted owls can just be silent somewhere and stay there. Part of their natural history is calling back and forth to one another."

Predictably, perhaps, loggers, timber companies and politicians seized on the barred owls as evidence that logging wasn't to blame for the spotted owl's plight. They have called for a return of chain saws to federal woods, so far without success. But years of efforts by the Bush administration to jump-start logging in the Pacific Northwest remain the subject of courtroom skirmishes between the timber industry, conservation groups and several federal agencies.

Yet far from saying that the logging restrictions were a mistake, owl biologists largely insist that more forests must be spared, especially since heavy logging continues on state and private land. As Wiens and I peered across a timbered ridge, craning to see the barred owl's nest, Anthony said, "If you start cutting habitat for either bird, you just increase competitive pressure."

When barred owls started moving into spotted owl habitat, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service initially proposed killing hundreds of the invaders. After an outcry from scientists and the public, wildlife managers instead plan to launch smaller studies to see if culling barred owls prompts the spotted birds to return. Even proponents of the approach acknowledge that the idea raises a thorny question: When is it appropriate to kill one species to help another?

Scientists and wildlife officials have taken extreme measures when species collide. Government marksmen on the Columbia River below Bonneville Dam shoot rubber bullets and explode firecrackers to drive away sea lions fattening up on endangered salmon. Downriver, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has been relocating a colony of Caspian terns, which feast on endangered salmon and steelhead. In 2005, government contractors shot Arctic foxes outside Barrow, Alaska, to protect ground-nesting shorebirds. Not long ago, government-sponsored hunters in central Washington killed coyotes that preyed on the world's last remaining pygmy rabbits.

A scientist in California collecting museum specimens recently shot a few barred owls near abandoned spotted owl nests. Two weeks later, a spotted owl returned to the area. "He flew up, sat in the branch and was sitting there, like, ‘Where's my mouse?'" says Kent Livezey, a wildlife biologist with the Fish and Wildlife Service and a member of the scientific work group trying to design barred owl control experiments. "He'd been hanging around."

Joe Buchanan, a biologist at Washington's Department of Fish and Wildlife, advocates targeted hunts if the evidence indicates that culling barred owls creates havens for spotted owls. But he acknowledges there are limits: "We can't push barred owls back to the Mississippi River."

Forsman supports shooting barred owls only to determine a cause-effect relationship between the two birds. Anything beyond that strikes him as impractical. "You could shoot barred owls until you're blue in the face," he said. "But unless you're willing to do it forever, it's just not going to work."

It would be several weeks before Forsman could tell for certain, to his delight, that the pair of spotted owls near Greasy Creek had again defied the odds and reared two young hatchlings. Yet Forsman isn't sanguine about the spotted owl's chances, particularly in northern areas like the Olympic Peninsula, where the barred owl concentration is high. "Whether barred owls will completely replace spotted owls...it's not clear," he says. "I would say the most optimistic view is that at some point we'll end up with a population that's largely barred owls, with a few scattered pairs of spotted owls."

Yet after nearly four decades of tracking these birds, Forsman won't discount nature's capacity to surprise again. "No one really knows how this will play out in the long run," he says. Some elements of life in these ancient moss-draped forests remain shrouded in mystery.

Craig Welch lives in Seattle and is writing a book about wildlife thieves.
Gary Braasch's most recent book is Earth Under Fire: How Global Warming is Changing the World.


Single Page 1 2 3 Next »

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: Owls Hunting Environmental Preservation Oregon Forests



Additional Sources

A Conservation Strategy for the Northern Spotted Owl: Report of the Interagency Scientific Committee To Address the Conservation of the Northern Spotted Owl, published by the USDA Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service, 1990


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (18)

+ View All Comments

How simple minded is this journalism? Almost entirely ignoring the main issue of habitat loss (federal forests are only one third of the radically altered forest habitat in the PNW), and instead taking the easy path to focus the story on the bad guy (barred owls) and good guys (spotted owls). Historic clearcutting of old growth forests, and now, short term rotation of second growth forests, are the clear culprit. It's the logging management system that's the problem -- extraction/conversion -- not the barred owl. C'mon, use proper science for your articles!!

Posted by Shawn Cardinall on January 29,2013 | 10:04 PM

Spotted Owls and Barred Owls are in fact the same biological species. They are two races of the same species, separated by the continental ice sheet during the last glacial maximum only 15,000 years ago. What has happened since is that the Barred Owl has reclaimed much of its previous territory across southern Canada, and is now merging once again with its relict western race. This kind of thing happens all the time with many different biological species, whereby geographically isolated races form for a while but do not differentiate to the point where interbreeding with other races is no longer possible. Honestly, some of these wildlife management people (who are not necessarily scientists by any means) act like they are 'creationists' who believe that each 'species' is a concise and immutable created entity. This is just nonsense. There is genetic variation in each of the eastern and western gene pools of this species, and as these merge the genetic variation within the entire population will increase. It's evolution in action- live with it. Species are not static clones of one type.

Posted by Dr. David E. Hill on June 12,2012 | 12:24 AM

Oh yes, how "wise" they were in the management of Yellowstone - and they sure made a mess of that, didn't they? (see Michael Crichton's videos for a thorough expose of that foolishness.) No, we do not need to sacrifice one species for another - next will be the golden winged vs. blue winged warblers. The environmentalists need to knock it off - it's time they realized we are not God, and despite all efforts, they cannot save birds from one another without royally screwing up the rest of the ecological balance.

Posted by rusureuwant2know on March 27,2012 | 09:48 PM

If Science "believes" that Darwin is correct, then why are they concerned about the Bard Owl, is the concept of "The survival of the fittest" not appropriate anymore, professing to be wise, they became fools, Romans 1:22 New Testament. This is just too funny!! We puny humans have no ability to control created nature!

Posted by 1stLogVietnam on March 19,2012 | 10:35 PM

Is the barred owl is used as a scapecoat and excuse to lumber the rest of the old forest off?

I agree with the experts who wrote and said that the old growth forest should be preserved for many other reasons not only as habitat for the spotted owl but due to finding new drugs in such old places as was done with Taxol, a cancer drug found in such places.

Maybe people should just live a more sustainable lifestyle that includes growing food locally and trading it with restaurants and making a living and that probably would not lead to a lot of taxes collected as would happen in the lumber business. It could lead to more topsoil being created and people living healthier and even employing others to also help in growing local vegetables like in this case here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/23/garden/living-off-the-land-in-maine-even-in-winter.html?pagewanted=all

government turns around and writes 400 page draft environmental impact statements about the rationale of killing owls to let other owls live --- well that is taxpayer wasted money and we would be better off just living sustainable livelihoods not lumbering. thank you.

Posted by gudrun scott on March 1,2012 | 08:16 PM

What's wrong with Barred Owls making a presence there. They might have not been there for hundreds or even thousands of years but, to have balance in nature there must be change. The strong will survive. There are times when without the help of humans introducing species that other species overtake the home range of other animals. This could be part of the process of evolution.

Leave it alone or maybe stop clear cutting the home range of Barred Owls making them move their home range into a less dominant owls territory.

Derek Fritz

Posted by Derek Fritz on September 29,2011 | 03:01 PM

As a former Humboldt county resident, it's gratifying to know that the decimation of our timber industry, the loss of ten thousand good paying jobs and the economic misery that the entire region has suffered since those fateful prophetic prognostications emanated from those omniscient biologists, wasn't for naught. After all, how can one put a price on delaying for twenty years the inevitable demise of a species on Mother Nature's hit list, even when that price is measured out in human misery?

Posted by Jeff Patterson on July 14,2011 | 02:06 PM

We work at a wildlife center in Everson, WA. We have been getting a lot of barred owls in recently, and we have both witnessed their overall sweet disposition. And then we hear that people are planning to murder these innocent raptors, and for what? What do we gain out of it? (Jenny)

Barred owls have no less right to exist than Spotted owls. Barred Owls are wonderful creatures with their own voices. Now excuse us while we go tube feed a seagull. (Cheri)

Posted by Jenny and Cheri Foster on December 19,2010 | 04:35 PM

I cannot estimate how valid all of the science was that led to the listing of the NSO, but the listing was inevitable, since it served to protect remaining old-growth forest on Federal lands. The public had simply reached the point that cutting of old-growth, especially by clearcutting, was not considered acceptable. Most people equate old-growth with any forest composed of trees greater than 24 inches in diameter, though most of these may be second-growth, the product of either fire or past forest management. We have successfully moved much of our sustainable forest management practices out of the country by imposing severe restrictions upon wise and sustainable management. This, even in those areas of our vast Federal forest system where good, sustainable management can be done without causing significant effects to fish and wildlife resources. As usual, we simply went too far in one direction. Unfortunately, this may have increased the overall level of environmental impact substantially on a world-wide basis, since we import our wood from countries that provide minimal environmental protection. In the southern portion of the coastal range of the spotted owl, including much of northern California, the owl does quite well in managed forests, due to the abundance of prey species that forest management produces. Lets keep both the owl scientists and forest management scientists in communication, so that cooperative science leads the way, not the fear of chainsaws. The use of forest products in construction offsets a substantial amount of carbon dioxide production by providing an alternative to steel and concrete, while also maintaining viable rural industry in a region where it has all but disappeared, leaving destitute people in it's wake.

Posted by Marc Jameson on May 28,2010 | 07:04 PM

"barred and spotted owls ... are so closely related that they sometimes crossbreed, blurring species boundaries and diluting spotted owl genes."

By the very definition of SPECIES, one of these has been misnamed. Since they interbreed, they are the SAME species.

Posted by Frank Weigert on January 10,2010 | 08:22 AM

thank this help me alot on my history project obout the spotted owls

Posted by patty on April 15,2009 | 06:10 PM

As a retired BLM wildlife biologist, it was my pleasure to work with Dr. Eric Fosrman for over thirty years. From 1975 through about 1995, I worked primarily on Spotted owls but had opportunity to work with other noted individuals on everything from small mammals and birds to fungi and vascular plants. What this has shown is that the importance of the remaining old growth, virgin forests of the northwest cannot be overstated. This importance has been eclipsed by a single species focus on the spotted owl. These forests gave us taxol, a anti-cancer drug found in the bark of the Yew tree, very few of which existed outside of the natural, native forests, or second growth. At present, work on several species of fungi show promise as anti-inflamatory drugs and one species in particular has been effective in controlling several strains of tuberculosis bacteria. To date, very little of the biological resources found in the native forests have been screened. To lose the remnants of remaining native forest would be a travisty to mankind, not just the timber industry.

Posted by Gerald Mires on February 1,2009 | 06:39 PM

Of course they don't want to kill barred owls. The newcomer has provided more leverage in this "managed crisis" The plan is to keep the spotted owl at extinction levels (guess who's counting the owls?)to maintain control over federal forests. I've seen several spotted owls, and they were all in 2nd+ growth forests. These are wild animals with a built in ability to adapt. When are we going to realize that we can't freeze time in the moment when we thought it was best?

Posted by Nikole Jacoby on January 9,2009 | 12:10 AM

As humans, we have a duty to protect the enivironment from ourselves as we do our best to co-exist with it; however, when cases like this where a stronger, more "fit" animal comes along and causes the extinction of another animal it is simply natural for this to happen. To me, targeted hunts are ethically similar to the destruction of habits for timber. We need to protect habitats but also not interfere with the natural order of things even if that the extinction of some animals.

Posted by Zach Blake on January 9,2009 | 09:20 PM

+ View All Comments



Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. Jack Andraka, the Teen Prodigy of Pancreatic Cancer
  2. When Did Humans Come to the Americas?
  3. The Scariest Monsters of the Deep Sea
  4. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
  5. Ten Inventions Inspired by Science Fiction
  6. Photos of the World’s Oldest Living Things
  7. How Titanoboa, the 40-Foot-Long Snake, Was Found
  8. How Our Brains Make Memories
  9. Ten Historic Female Scientists You Should Know
  10. Top Ten Most-Destructive Computer Viruses
  1. Jack Andraka, the Teen Prodigy of Pancreatic Cancer
  2. Who's Laughing Now?
  1. The Evolution of Charles Darwin
  2. The Dinosaur Fossil Wars
  3. Top Ten Most-Destructive Computer Viruses
  4. Mad About Seashells
  5. The Fight to Save the Tiger
  6. The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

February 2013

  • The First Americans
  • See for Yourself
  • The Dragon King
  • America’s Dinosaur Playground
  • Darwin In The House

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Framed Lincoln Tribute

This Framed Lincoln Tribute includes his photograph, an excerpt from his Gettysburg Address, two Lincoln postage stamps and four Lincoln pennies... $40



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • Feb 2013


  • Jan 2013


  • Dec 2012

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution