The Pros to Being a Psychopath
In a new book, Oxford research psychologist Kevin Dutton argues that psychopaths are poised to perform well under pressure
- By Amy Crawford
- Smithsonian.com, October 29, 2012, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
Can psychopaths have a positive impact on society, as opposed to just using their advantages to get ahead?
I’ve interviewed a lot of special forces troops, especially the British Special Air Service. They’re like Navy Seals. That’s a very good example of people who are pretty high on those psychopathic traits who are actually in a perfect occupation. Also, I interview in the book a top neurosurgeon—this was a surgeon who takes on operations that are especially risky—who said to me, “The most important thing when you’re conducting a dangerous operation, a risky operation, is you’ve got to be very cool under pressure, you’ve got to be focused. You can’t have too much empathy for the person that you’re operating on, because you wouldn’t be able to conduct that operation.” Surgeons do very nasty things to people when they’re on the operating table. If things do go wrong, the most important facet in a surgeon’s arsenal is decisiveness. You cannot freeze.
You noted in the book that you’re not a psychopath yourself. Despite my profession, I scored pretty low on your survey as well. Can “normals” like you and me learn to develop these psychopathic traits, even if we don’t have them naturally?
Absolutely. Normal people can work out their psychopath muscles. It’s kind of like going to the gym in a way, to develop these attributes. It’s just like training.
Psychopaths don’t think, should I do this or shouldn’t I do this? They just go ahead and do stuff. So next time you find yourself putting off that chore or filing that report or something, unchain your inner psychopath and ask yourself this: “Since when did I need to feel like something in order to do it?”
Another way you can take a leaf out of a psychopath’s book: Psychopaths are very reward-driven. If they see a benefit in something, they zone in on it and they go for it 100 percent. Let’s take an example of someone who is kind of scared of putting in for a raise at work. You might be scared about what the boss might think of you. You might think if you’d don’t get it you’re going to get fired. Forget it. Cut all that stuff off. “Psychopath up,” and overwhelm your negative feelings by concentrating on the benefits of getting it. The bottom line here is, a bit of localized psychopathy is good for all of us.
You just came back to England this week from the Himalayas. Did that trip have anything to do with your research into psychopaths?
I was running a rather odd study over there. Psychopaths and Buddhists, in terms of their performance in the lab, have certain characteristics in common. They’re good at living in the present. They’re mindful. Both are calm under pressure. They focus on the positive. But also, both are good at mind reading. They’re very good at picking up on micro-expressions, basically lightning-fast changes in facial scenery; our brain downloads onto the muscles of our face before it decides on the real picture that it wants to project to the world. These micro-expressions are invisible to most of our naked eyes. But it seems that expert Buddhist meditators are able to pick them up, probably because they are able to slow down their perception. There’s a recent study that seems to show that psychopaths are also good at picking up on micro-expressions. We don’t really know the reason for that, but it could be that psychopaths might spend more time just studying us.
What I did was I hot-footed it over the mountains of Northern India on the Tibet border with a laptop. On the laptop were 20 “pleader videos”—clips of press conferences organized by the police where you’ve got folks pleading with the general public for information as to loved ones who’ve gone missing. We know that 10 of these guys have actually done the deed themselves, and 10 people are genuine pleaders. I put them on a laptop, basically took them to the mountains, caves and remote cabins of these expert Buddhist meditator monks in the high Himalayas, and got them to tell me which of the 20 were false and which were true. I’ll be testing psychopaths very shortly, and I am going to see who gets more out of 20. Is it the Buddhist monks, or is it the psychopaths?
It was an epic journey. If you don’t like heights and you have a nervous disposition—we’re talking about foot-width edges, thousand-meter drops. Pretty dicey. I mean, you have to be a bit of a psychopath to get to these guys.
This interview series focuses on big thinkers. Without knowing whom we will interview next, only that he or she will be a big thinker in their field, what question do you have for our next interview subject?
Ask them to take my test and tell me what they score. How psychopathic do they think they are?
Our last interviewee, Alison Dagnes, a political scientist whose book, A Conservative Walks Into a Bar, looks at the liberal bias in political satire, asks: What is your work going to mean for the future?
There was a story in the news not too long ago in which there was a U.S. computer company that deliberately advertised for people who have Asperger’s-like traits, because they know these people are very, very good at focusing on data and seeing patterns. So perhaps one of the things that could happen in the future is that certain kinds of industries might actually deliberately screen for people whose psychopath dials are turned up more than normal.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (26)
+ View All Comments
There seems to be a lot of negativity in the comments because the author is not listing the bad psychopathic traits? I thought the whole point of the article and book was to find to good things in a psychopath. I personally find this quite interesting and useful. While we all know what psychopaths are capable of -criminally, thanks to their apathy-, it is hardly ever discussed what good traits they hold. Please put aside your subjective points (i.e. personal experience) and read. It's told from an open-minded view point. I wholeheartedly enjoyed reading this short find. I hope the rest of the readers think so too.
Posted by Ann on May 5,2013 | 11:03 PM
Another article hyping a book but short on substance (cf. the article about Texas in this issue). For example, in the survey of psychopaths mentioned, was allowance made for the bias of those who chose to answer the survey? Otherwise, the results cannot be deemed significant, since psychopaths, lacking in empathy, might be less likely to respond to a survey unless they saw some personal benefit in doing so.
Posted by Lois W Matelan on May 5,2013 | 08:55 PM
The description of a psychopath sounds like the requiremnts for running for US political office. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Posted by George Bushman on May 3,2013 | 03:56 AM
Look at all you cry babies in the comments. You all want to blame others when you made mistakes. Stop looking for sympathy and learn from your experiences. I bet half of you will go around believing every person who doesn't immediately like you is a psychopath. Truth is, you're jealous because you aren't one. Psychos are the true alpha males of our species. If Armageddon strikes, you'll be begging a psycho to lead your group to safety. They're the ones who get things done. Psychos aren't dead inside. They just know how to control their feelings better than the rest of you sissies.
Posted by Justin Credible on April 28,2013 | 10:25 PM
The article has almost nothing to say about the lack of conscience in psychopaths, which I believe is a defining characteristic. Lack of conscience means a true pschopath can torture and kill with no qualms at all. This, to me, overwhelms all the other traits in the article.
Posted by Robert Benson on April 21,2013 | 03:58 PM
My experience of psychopaths has generally been a very negative one. To my mind they seem utterly evil and very nasty pieces of work and they don't have to be serial killers to be labelled as such. I can certainly say that some of the traits they display, ruthlessness, toughness, charm, focus, may be necessary traits in some areas, like the armed forces, or working in the City etc, and I would call these traits, 'positive' traits. But other traits, such as lack or empathy and lack of conscience we could certainly do without. Being without empathy or conscience is highly dangerous and divisive and does no one any good at all. If anything it is detrimental so society as a whole. Now if we had someone who did have conscience and empathy, and displayed all the other traits mentioned above, that would be an ideal person. And they wouldn't likely be anti-social either or spread lies about innocent people. So no, I don't think psychopaths without conscience are good for society. We need tough human beings, not tough zombies.
Posted by Fidel on April 9,2013 | 07:29 PM
I'm very grateful that I'm not a psychopath. Psychopaths are empty black holes full of infinite rage, jealousy and greed. They have to work so hard to keep up their façade of normality. But they can only keep it up for so long. Thank goodness I don't have to do that. I can just be myself. Psychopaths have no concept of 'self'. There's nothing there. They copy their personalities off their current target/s or people they admire. This gives them their chameleon-like quality. I almost feel sorry for them, but I'll reserve my empathy for people that deserve it.
Posted by Michelle on April 8,2013 | 09:15 PM
I am already suspecting that the author is a psychopath. Psychopaths have done damage to my relationships and my career with their lies, their manipulations, their utter lack of empathy, their rumor spreading and trashing me as a person. I do not even especially consider them human beings. They have no capacity to love, and only mimic the emotions of others, look upon normal feeling human beings with contempt, and do not care about you or me, expect for what they can get and take from you. Their views of reality are seriously distorted. Can you, seriously, imagine this group truthfully filling out a survey?
Posted by Grace on April 7,2013 | 11:17 PM
I am a victim of a psychopath. He lives next door. He has terrorized other neighbors and now it is my turn. He has claimed several different reasons for being mad at me -- none of which make any sense. He has assaulted me on my own property, threatened to kill my dog, left dead animals on my steps, cut my brake line and violated a no contact order. In response to the arrests, all he does is up the ante. He watches me constantly and has surveillance cameras aimed at me. I do not even live in my own home anymore. He has been indicted on a half dozen new felonies, including stalking. In response to the indictment he cut down all the shrubs between the properties and stands there videotaping me. These people are ruthless. THey turn trivial matters into WWIII. They have no conscience. They care about NO ONE but themselves. If this author really thinks this is so wonderful, I have a house i would like to sell him.
Posted by vic on April 1,2013 | 06:31 PM
Maybe modern life and all it's down sides are created by psycho's, as they like that kind of society, whereas 'normal' people slowly drown in todays world. Psycho's are more or less the Ultimate Capitalists.
Posted by Pen on March 28,2013 | 01:34 PM
After actually reading the book his interpretation of psychopathy actually makes perfect sense. During the novel he speaks with Dr. Hare and Hare actually agrees with him in most of his observations and states that his interpretation makes sense. People should not just accept the cliché that all psychopaths are bad and at least be open-minded enough to sincerely learn about the other side in what is a grossly one-sided argument.
Posted by Jack on March 1,2013 | 08:09 AM
vyctorynotes.blogspot.com says: This article was an interesting one about something incredibly absurd! Men in patriarchal societies commit most crime, which is most of the world. Patriarchy has spent thousands of years attempting to defend itself and traditional notions of masculinity. Some of that tradition is pathological. In fact, whole societies, like the USA, are based on some of that pathology (i.e., that it is ok in any form and in any arena to be "ruthless"). I would never support anyone in any way mirroring themselves to a psychopath, which is itself pathological and another attempt by patriarchy to defend its pathological ways. A humin being can exhibit positive and beneficial traits without such an inane comparison. In addition, the ability to feel empathy is, in my opinion, crucial to a stable and healthy psychological and spiritual self. It is crucial to healthy social interactions. Empathy should be part of the definition of intelligence.
Posted by Vyctorya on January 25,2013 | 06:06 PM
although it does not change the fact that a anonymous sort filled out an actual survey and consistently.... certain psychopathic characteristics were or were not present in people who do certain things..... the fact is... the world is ran by sociopaths and psychopaths...unfortunately very many people keep complaining about the author's findings-- which is.... that all of these psychopaths had a choice...use this personality characteristic to "kill" or "heal".... i guess
Posted by james on January 10,2013 | 03:06 PM
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a pyramid. basic needs must be met before higher needs can be addressed- in a 'normal human being'. What if psychopathy is an adaptation (sort of a positive feedback between behavior and cognition) to get around this hierarchy to improve performance and success when a need like basic security has no chance of being met. There might be a basic temperment that is necessary for the development of a psychopathic personality. If true psychopathy might result from the frustration of basic needs due to environmental factors- in individuals who are tempermentally predisposed to fight/assert instead of accept/adapt. I think this is where Dutton's coming from, but he does not provide an explanation for psychopathic development- only examples of how psychopaths seem to function at a higher level than most in short term stress situations. Empathy can probably be felt by psychopaths but early in development they usually discount the feelings of others as irrelevant to their immediate goals (unless they're not irrelevant)- hence the paradox of emotional manipulation in people who supposedly lack empathy. Interesting PD
Posted by sjorges on January 7,2013 | 10:34 AM
+ View All Comments