• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Human Behavior
  • Mind & Body
  • Our Planet
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Wildlife
  • Art Meets Science
  • Science & Nature

The Pros to Being a Psychopath

In a new book, Oxford research psychologist Kevin Dutton argues that psychopaths are poised to perform well under pressure

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Amy Crawford
  • Smithsonian.com, October 29, 2012, Subscribe
View More Photos »
Norman Bates
According to author Kevin Dutton, psychopaths have a distinct set of personality characteristics. Pictured is Anthony Perkins as Norman Bates in Psycho. (Photo by: Mary Evans / UNIVERSAL PICTURES / Ronald Grant / Everett Collection)

Photo Gallery (1/3)

The Wisdom of Psychopaths

Explore more photos from the story

Related Books

The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies, and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success

by Kevin Dutton

More from Smithsonian.com

  • Henry Morton Stanley's Unbreakable Will

When most of us hear the word “psychopath,” we imagine Hannibal Lecter. Kevin Dutton would prefer that we think of brain surgeons, CEOs and Buddhist monks. In his new book, The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success, the Oxford research psychologist argues that psychopathic personality traits—charm, confidence, ruthlessness, coolness under pressure—can, in the right doses, be a good thing. Not all psychopaths are violent, he says, and some of them are just the sort of people society can count on in a crisis.

To further his psychopathic studies, Dutton is seeking participants for his Great American Psychopath Survey, which he says will reveal the most psychopathic states, cities and professions in the United States. Try it for yourself at wisdomofpsychopaths.com.

“Psychopath” is a term that gets thrown about a lot in our culture. Are psychopaths misunderstood?

It’s true, no sooner is the word “psychopath” out than images of your classic psychopathic killers like Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer and a whole kind of discreditable raft of senior politicians come kind of creeping across our minds. But actually, being a psychopath doesn’t mean that you’re a criminal. Not by default, anyway. It doesn’t mean that you’re a serial killer, either.

One of the reasons why I wrote the book in the first place was to debunk two deep-seated myths that the general public have about psychopaths. Firstly, that they’re either all “mad or bad.” And secondly, that psychopathy is an all-or-nothing thing, that you’re either a psychopath or you’re not. 

What is a psychopath, anyway?

When psychologists talk about psychopaths, what we’re referring to are people who have a distinct set of personality characteristics, which include things like ruthlessness, fearlessness, mental toughness, charm, persuasiveness and a lack of conscience and empathy. Imagine that you tick the box for all of those characteristics. You also happen to be violent and stupid. It’s not going to be long before you smack a bottle over someone’s head in a bar and get locked up for a long time in prison. But if you tick the box for all of those characteristics, and you happen to be intelligent and not naturally violent, then it’s a different story altogether. Then you’re more likely to make a killing in the market rather than anywhere else.

How are these psychopathic traits particularly useful in modern society?

Psychopaths are assertive. Psychopaths don’t procrastinate. Psychopaths tend to focus on the positive. Psychopaths don’t take things personally; they don’t beat themselves up if things go wrong, even if they’re to blame. And they’re pretty cool under pressure. Those kinds of characteristics aren’t just important in the business arena, but also in everyday life.

The key here is keeping it in context. Let’s think of psychopathic traits—ruthlessness, toughness, charm, focus—as the dials on a [recording] studio deck. If you were to turn all of those dials up to max, then you’re going to overload the circuit. You’re going to wind up getting 30 years inside or the electric chair or something like that. But if you have some of them up high and some of them down low, depending on the context, in certain endeavors, certain professions, you are going to be predisposed to great success. The key is to be able to turn them back down again.

You’ve found that some professions rate higher than others when it comes to psychopathic traits. Which jobs attract psychopaths?

I ran a survey in 2011, “The Great British Psychopath Survey,” in which I got people to fill out a questionnaire online to find out how psychopathic they were. I also got people to enter their occupations, what they did for a living, and how much money they earned over the course of a year. We found a whole range of professions cropping up—no serial killers among them, although no one would admit to it. The results made very interesting reading, especially if you’re partial to a sermon or two on a Sunday, because the clergy cropped up there at number eight. You had the usual suspects at the top; you had your CEOs, lawyers, media—TV and radio. Journalists were a bit down the list. We also had civil servants. There were several police officers, actually, so as opposed to being criminals, some psychopaths are actually out there locking other people up. Any situation where you’ve a got a power structure, a hierarchy, the ability to manipulate or wield control over people, you get psychopaths doing very well.

What would be a bad career choice for a psychopath? Which professions scored low?

No real surprises, actually. There were craftsmen, care workers. Nurses were in there. Accountants were pretty low on psychopathy. One of the interesting ones: doctors. Doctors were low on psychopathy, but surgeons were actually in the top ten, so there’s kind of a dividing line between surgeons and doctors.


When most of us hear the word “psychopath,” we imagine Hannibal Lecter. Kevin Dutton would prefer that we think of brain surgeons, CEOs and Buddhist monks. In his new book, The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success, the Oxford research psychologist argues that psychopathic personality traits—charm, confidence, ruthlessness, coolness under pressure—can, in the right doses, be a good thing. Not all psychopaths are violent, he says, and some of them are just the sort of people society can count on in a crisis.

To further his psychopathic studies, Dutton is seeking participants for his Great American Psychopath Survey, which he says will reveal the most psychopathic states, cities and professions in the United States. Try it for yourself at wisdomofpsychopaths.com.

“Psychopath” is a term that gets thrown about a lot in our culture. Are psychopaths misunderstood?

It’s true, no sooner is the word “psychopath” out than images of your classic psychopathic killers like Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer and a whole kind of discreditable raft of senior politicians come kind of creeping across our minds. But actually, being a psychopath doesn’t mean that you’re a criminal. Not by default, anyway. It doesn’t mean that you’re a serial killer, either.

One of the reasons why I wrote the book in the first place was to debunk two deep-seated myths that the general public have about psychopaths. Firstly, that they’re either all “mad or bad.” And secondly, that psychopathy is an all-or-nothing thing, that you’re either a psychopath or you’re not. 

What is a psychopath, anyway?

When psychologists talk about psychopaths, what we’re referring to are people who have a distinct set of personality characteristics, which include things like ruthlessness, fearlessness, mental toughness, charm, persuasiveness and a lack of conscience and empathy. Imagine that you tick the box for all of those characteristics. You also happen to be violent and stupid. It’s not going to be long before you smack a bottle over someone’s head in a bar and get locked up for a long time in prison. But if you tick the box for all of those characteristics, and you happen to be intelligent and not naturally violent, then it’s a different story altogether. Then you’re more likely to make a killing in the market rather than anywhere else.

How are these psychopathic traits particularly useful in modern society?

Psychopaths are assertive. Psychopaths don’t procrastinate. Psychopaths tend to focus on the positive. Psychopaths don’t take things personally; they don’t beat themselves up if things go wrong, even if they’re to blame. And they’re pretty cool under pressure. Those kinds of characteristics aren’t just important in the business arena, but also in everyday life.

The key here is keeping it in context. Let’s think of psychopathic traits—ruthlessness, toughness, charm, focus—as the dials on a [recording] studio deck. If you were to turn all of those dials up to max, then you’re going to overload the circuit. You’re going to wind up getting 30 years inside or the electric chair or something like that. But if you have some of them up high and some of them down low, depending on the context, in certain endeavors, certain professions, you are going to be predisposed to great success. The key is to be able to turn them back down again.

You’ve found that some professions rate higher than others when it comes to psychopathic traits. Which jobs attract psychopaths?

I ran a survey in 2011, “The Great British Psychopath Survey,” in which I got people to fill out a questionnaire online to find out how psychopathic they were. I also got people to enter their occupations, what they did for a living, and how much money they earned over the course of a year. We found a whole range of professions cropping up—no serial killers among them, although no one would admit to it. The results made very interesting reading, especially if you’re partial to a sermon or two on a Sunday, because the clergy cropped up there at number eight. You had the usual suspects at the top; you had your CEOs, lawyers, media—TV and radio. Journalists were a bit down the list. We also had civil servants. There were several police officers, actually, so as opposed to being criminals, some psychopaths are actually out there locking other people up. Any situation where you’ve a got a power structure, a hierarchy, the ability to manipulate or wield control over people, you get psychopaths doing very well.

What would be a bad career choice for a psychopath? Which professions scored low?

No real surprises, actually. There were craftsmen, care workers. Nurses were in there. Accountants were pretty low on psychopathy. One of the interesting ones: doctors. Doctors were low on psychopathy, but surgeons were actually in the top ten, so there’s kind of a dividing line between surgeons and doctors.

Can psychopaths have a positive impact on society, as opposed to just using their advantages to get ahead?

I’ve interviewed a lot of special forces troops, especially the British Special Air Service. They’re like Navy Seals. That’s a very good example of people who are pretty high on those psychopathic traits who are actually in a perfect occupation. Also, I interview in the book a top neurosurgeon—this was a surgeon who takes on operations that are especially risky—who said to me, “The most important thing when you’re conducting a dangerous operation, a risky operation, is you’ve got to be very cool under pressure, you’ve got to be focused. You can’t have too much empathy for the person that you’re operating on, because you wouldn’t be able to conduct that operation.” Surgeons do very nasty things to people when they’re on the operating table. If things do go wrong, the most important facet in a surgeon’s arsenal is decisiveness. You cannot freeze.

You noted in the book that you’re not a psychopath yourself. Despite my profession, I scored pretty low on your survey as well. Can “normals” like you and me learn to develop these psychopathic traits, even if we don’t have them naturally?

Absolutely. Normal people can work out their psychopath muscles. It’s kind of like going to the gym in a way, to develop these attributes. It’s just like training.

Psychopaths don’t think, should I do this or shouldn’t I do this? They just go ahead and do stuff. So next time you find yourself putting off that chore or filing that report or something, unchain your inner psychopath and ask yourself this: “Since when did I need to feel like something in order to do it?”

Another way you can take a leaf out of a psychopath’s book: Psychopaths are very reward-driven. If they see a benefit in something, they zone in on it and they go for it 100 percent. Let’s take an example of someone who is kind of scared of putting in for a raise at work. You might be scared about what the boss might think of you. You might think if you’d don’t get it you’re going to get fired. Forget it. Cut all that stuff off. “Psychopath up,” and overwhelm your negative feelings by concentrating on the benefits of getting it. The bottom line here is, a bit of localized psychopathy is good for all of us.

You just came back to England this week from the Himalayas. Did that trip have anything to do with your research into psychopaths?

I was running a rather odd study over there. Psychopaths and Buddhists, in terms of their performance in the lab, have certain characteristics in common. They’re good at living in the present. They’re mindful. Both are calm under pressure. They focus on the positive. But also, both are good at mind reading. They’re very good at picking up on micro-expressions, basically lightning-fast changes in facial scenery; our brain downloads onto the muscles of our face before it decides on the real picture that it wants to project to the world. These micro-expressions are invisible to most of our naked eyes. But it seems that expert Buddhist meditators are able to pick them up, probably because they are able to slow down their perception. There’s a recent study that seems to show that psychopaths are also good at picking up on micro-expressions. We don’t really know the reason for that, but it could be that psychopaths might spend more time just studying us.

What I did was I hot-footed it over the mountains of Northern India on the Tibet border with a laptop. On the laptop were 20 “pleader videos”—clips of press conferences organized by the police where you’ve got folks pleading with the general public for information as to loved ones who’ve gone missing. We know that 10 of these guys have actually done the deed themselves, and 10 people are genuine pleaders. I put them on a laptop, basically took them to the mountains, caves and remote cabins of these expert Buddhist meditator monks in the high Himalayas, and got them to tell me which of the 20 were false and which were true. I’ll be testing psychopaths very shortly, and I am going to see who gets more out of 20. Is it the Buddhist monks, or is it the psychopaths?

It was an epic journey. If you don’t like heights and you have a nervous disposition—we’re talking about foot-width edges, thousand-meter drops. Pretty dicey. I mean, you have to be a bit of a psychopath to get to these guys.

This interview series focuses on big thinkers. Without knowing whom we will interview next, only that he or she will be a big thinker in their field, what question do you have for our next interview subject?

Ask them to take my test and tell me what they score. How psychopathic do they think they are?

Our last interviewee, Alison Dagnes, a political scientist whose book, A Conservative Walks Into a Bar, looks at the liberal bias in political satire, asks: What is your work going to mean for the future?

There was a story in the news not too long ago in which there was a U.S. computer company that deliberately advertised for people who have Asperger’s-like traits, because they know these people are very, very good at focusing on data and seeing patterns. So perhaps one of the things that could happen in the future is that certain kinds of industries might actually deliberately screen for people whose psychopath dials are turned up more than normal.


Single Page 1 2 Next »

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: Psychology


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (26)

+ View All Comments

There seems to be a lot of negativity in the comments because the author is not listing the bad psychopathic traits? I thought the whole point of the article and book was to find to good things in a psychopath. I personally find this quite interesting and useful. While we all know what psychopaths are capable of -criminally, thanks to their apathy-, it is hardly ever discussed what good traits they hold. Please put aside your subjective points (i.e. personal experience) and read. It's told from an open-minded view point. I wholeheartedly enjoyed reading this short find. I hope the rest of the readers think so too.

Posted by Ann on May 5,2013 | 11:03 PM

Another article hyping a book but short on substance (cf. the article about Texas in this issue). For example, in the survey of psychopaths mentioned, was allowance made for the bias of those who chose to answer the survey? Otherwise, the results cannot be deemed significant, since psychopaths, lacking in empathy, might be less likely to respond to a survey unless they saw some personal benefit in doing so.

Posted by Lois W Matelan on May 5,2013 | 08:55 PM

The description of a psychopath sounds like the requiremnts for running for US political office. hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

Posted by George Bushman on May 3,2013 | 03:56 AM

Look at all you cry babies in the comments. You all want to blame others when you made mistakes. Stop looking for sympathy and learn from your experiences. I bet half of you will go around believing every person who doesn't immediately like you is a psychopath. Truth is, you're jealous because you aren't one. Psychos are the true alpha males of our species. If Armageddon strikes, you'll be begging a psycho to lead your group to safety. They're the ones who get things done. Psychos aren't dead inside. They just know how to control their feelings better than the rest of you sissies.

Posted by Justin Credible on April 28,2013 | 10:25 PM

The article has almost nothing to say about the lack of conscience in psychopaths, which I believe is a defining characteristic. Lack of conscience means a true pschopath can torture and kill with no qualms at all. This, to me, overwhelms all the other traits in the article.

Posted by Robert Benson on April 21,2013 | 03:58 PM

My experience of psychopaths has generally been a very negative one. To my mind they seem utterly evil and very nasty pieces of work and they don't have to be serial killers to be labelled as such. I can certainly say that some of the traits they display, ruthlessness, toughness, charm, focus, may be necessary traits in some areas, like the armed forces, or working in the City etc, and I would call these traits, 'positive' traits. But other traits, such as lack or empathy and lack of conscience we could certainly do without. Being without empathy or conscience is highly dangerous and divisive and does no one any good at all. If anything it is detrimental so society as a whole. Now if we had someone who did have conscience and empathy, and displayed all the other traits mentioned above, that would be an ideal person. And they wouldn't likely be anti-social either or spread lies about innocent people. So no, I don't think psychopaths without conscience are good for society. We need tough human beings, not tough zombies.

Posted by Fidel on April 9,2013 | 07:29 PM

I'm very grateful that I'm not a psychopath. Psychopaths are empty black holes full of infinite rage, jealousy and greed. They have to work so hard to keep up their façade of normality. But they can only keep it up for so long. Thank goodness I don't have to do that. I can just be myself. Psychopaths have no concept of 'self'. There's nothing there. They copy their personalities off their current target/s or people they admire. This gives them their chameleon-like quality. I almost feel sorry for them, but I'll reserve my empathy for people that deserve it.

Posted by Michelle on April 8,2013 | 09:15 PM

I am already suspecting that the author is a psychopath. Psychopaths have done damage to my relationships and my career with their lies, their manipulations, their utter lack of empathy, their rumor spreading and trashing me as a person. I do not even especially consider them human beings. They have no capacity to love, and only mimic the emotions of others, look upon normal feeling human beings with contempt, and do not care about you or me, expect for what they can get and take from you. Their views of reality are seriously distorted. Can you, seriously, imagine this group truthfully filling out a survey?

Posted by Grace on April 7,2013 | 11:17 PM

I am a victim of a psychopath. He lives next door. He has terrorized other neighbors and now it is my turn. He has claimed several different reasons for being mad at me -- none of which make any sense. He has assaulted me on my own property, threatened to kill my dog, left dead animals on my steps, cut my brake line and violated a no contact order. In response to the arrests, all he does is up the ante. He watches me constantly and has surveillance cameras aimed at me. I do not even live in my own home anymore. He has been indicted on a half dozen new felonies, including stalking. In response to the indictment he cut down all the shrubs between the properties and stands there videotaping me. These people are ruthless. THey turn trivial matters into WWIII. They have no conscience. They care about NO ONE but themselves. If this author really thinks this is so wonderful, I have a house i would like to sell him.

Posted by vic on April 1,2013 | 06:31 PM

Maybe modern life and all it's down sides are created by psycho's, as they like that kind of society, whereas 'normal' people slowly drown in todays world. Psycho's are more or less the Ultimate Capitalists.

Posted by Pen on March 28,2013 | 01:34 PM

After actually reading the book his interpretation of psychopathy actually makes perfect sense. During the novel he speaks with Dr. Hare and Hare actually agrees with him in most of his observations and states that his interpretation makes sense. People should not just accept the cliché that all psychopaths are bad and at least be open-minded enough to sincerely learn about the other side in what is a grossly one-sided argument.

Posted by Jack on March 1,2013 | 08:09 AM

vyctorynotes.blogspot.com says: This article was an interesting one about something incredibly absurd! Men in patriarchal societies commit most crime, which is most of the world. Patriarchy has spent thousands of years attempting to defend itself and traditional notions of masculinity. Some of that tradition is pathological. In fact, whole societies, like the USA, are based on some of that pathology (i.e., that it is ok in any form and in any arena to be "ruthless"). I would never support anyone in any way mirroring themselves to a psychopath, which is itself pathological and another attempt by patriarchy to defend its pathological ways. A humin being can exhibit positive and beneficial traits without such an inane comparison. In addition, the ability to feel empathy is, in my opinion, crucial to a stable and healthy psychological and spiritual self. It is crucial to healthy social interactions. Empathy should be part of the definition of intelligence.

Posted by Vyctorya on January 25,2013 | 06:06 PM

although it does not change the fact that a anonymous sort filled out an actual survey and consistently.... certain psychopathic characteristics were or were not present in people who do certain things..... the fact is... the world is ran by sociopaths and psychopaths...unfortunately very many people keep complaining about the author's findings-- which is.... that all of these psychopaths had a choice...use this personality characteristic to "kill" or "heal".... i guess

Posted by james on January 10,2013 | 03:06 PM

Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a pyramid. basic needs must be met before higher needs can be addressed- in a 'normal human being'. What if psychopathy is an adaptation (sort of a positive feedback between behavior and cognition) to get around this hierarchy to improve performance and success when a need like basic security has no chance of being met. There might be a basic temperment that is necessary for the development of a psychopathic personality. If true psychopathy might result from the frustration of basic needs due to environmental factors- in individuals who are tempermentally predisposed to fight/assert instead of accept/adapt. I think this is where Dutton's coming from, but he does not provide an explanation for psychopathic development- only examples of how psychopaths seem to function at a higher level than most in short term stress situations. Empathy can probably be felt by psychopaths but early in development they usually discount the feelings of others as irrelevant to their immediate goals (unless they're not irrelevant)- hence the paradox of emotional manipulation in people who supposedly lack empathy. Interesting PD

Posted by sjorges on January 7,2013 | 10:34 AM

+ View All Comments



Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. The Scariest Monsters of the Deep Sea
  2. 16 Photographs That Capture the Best and Worst of 1970s America
  3. Jack Andraka, the Teen Prodigy of Pancreatic Cancer
  4. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
  5. Ten Inventions Inspired by Science Fiction
  6. Microbes: The Trillions of Creatures Governing Your Health

  7. What is Causing Iran’s Spike in MS Cases?

  8. How Titanoboa, the 40-Foot-Long Snake, Was Found
  9. Top Ten Most-Destructive Computer Viruses
  10. The Pros to Being a Psychopath
  1. Why Procrastination is Good for You
  1. Life on Mars?
  2. What the Discovery of Hundreds of New Planets Means for Astronomy—and Philosophy
  3. The Fight to Save the Tiger
  4. Do Humans Have a Biological Stopwatch?
  5. Ten Plants That Put Meat on Their Plates
  6. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
  7. The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

May 2013

  • Patriot Games
  • The Next Revolution
  • Blowing Up The Art World
  • The Body Eclectic
  • Microbe Hunters

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Stars and Stripes Throw

Our exclusive Stars and Stripes Throw is a three-layer adaption of the 1861 “Stars and Stripes” quilt... $65



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • May 2013


  • Apr 2013


  • Mar 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution