The Pros to Being a Psychopath
In a new book, Oxford research psychologist Kevin Dutton argues that psychopaths are poised to perform well under pressure
- By Amy Crawford
- Smithsonian.com, October 29, 2012, Subscribe
When most of us hear the word “psychopath,” we imagine Hannibal Lecter. Kevin Dutton would prefer that we think of brain surgeons, CEOs and Buddhist monks. In his new book, The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success, the Oxford research psychologist argues that psychopathic personality traits—charm, confidence, ruthlessness, coolness under pressure—can, in the right doses, be a good thing. Not all psychopaths are violent, he says, and some of them are just the sort of people society can count on in a crisis.
To further his psychopathic studies, Dutton is seeking participants for his Great American Psychopath Survey, which he says will reveal the most psychopathic states, cities and professions in the United States. Try it for yourself at wisdomofpsychopaths.com.
“Psychopath” is a term that gets thrown about a lot in our culture. Are psychopaths misunderstood?
It’s true, no sooner is the word “psychopath” out than images of your classic psychopathic killers like Ted Bundy and Jeffrey Dahmer and a whole kind of discreditable raft of senior politicians come kind of creeping across our minds. But actually, being a psychopath doesn’t mean that you’re a criminal. Not by default, anyway. It doesn’t mean that you’re a serial killer, either.
One of the reasons why I wrote the book in the first place was to debunk two deep-seated myths that the general public have about psychopaths. Firstly, that they’re either all “mad or bad.” And secondly, that psychopathy is an all-or-nothing thing, that you’re either a psychopath or you’re not.
What is a psychopath, anyway?
When psychologists talk about psychopaths, what we’re referring to are people who have a distinct set of personality characteristics, which include things like ruthlessness, fearlessness, mental toughness, charm, persuasiveness and a lack of conscience and empathy. Imagine that you tick the box for all of those characteristics. You also happen to be violent and stupid. It’s not going to be long before you smack a bottle over someone’s head in a bar and get locked up for a long time in prison. But if you tick the box for all of those characteristics, and you happen to be intelligent and not naturally violent, then it’s a different story altogether. Then you’re more likely to make a killing in the market rather than anywhere else.
How are these psychopathic traits particularly useful in modern society?
Psychopaths are assertive. Psychopaths don’t procrastinate. Psychopaths tend to focus on the positive. Psychopaths don’t take things personally; they don’t beat themselves up if things go wrong, even if they’re to blame. And they’re pretty cool under pressure. Those kinds of characteristics aren’t just important in the business arena, but also in everyday life.
The key here is keeping it in context. Let’s think of psychopathic traits—ruthlessness, toughness, charm, focus—as the dials on a [recording] studio deck. If you were to turn all of those dials up to max, then you’re going to overload the circuit. You’re going to wind up getting 30 years inside or the electric chair or something like that. But if you have some of them up high and some of them down low, depending on the context, in certain endeavors, certain professions, you are going to be predisposed to great success. The key is to be able to turn them back down again.
You’ve found that some professions rate higher than others when it comes to psychopathic traits. Which jobs attract psychopaths?
I ran a survey in 2011, “The Great British Psychopath Survey,” in which I got people to fill out a questionnaire online to find out how psychopathic they were. I also got people to enter their occupations, what they did for a living, and how much money they earned over the course of a year. We found a whole range of professions cropping up—no serial killers among them, although no one would admit to it. The results made very interesting reading, especially if you’re partial to a sermon or two on a Sunday, because the clergy cropped up there at number eight. You had the usual suspects at the top; you had your CEOs, lawyers, media—TV and radio. Journalists were a bit down the list. We also had civil servants. There were several police officers, actually, so as opposed to being criminals, some psychopaths are actually out there locking other people up. Any situation where you’ve a got a power structure, a hierarchy, the ability to manipulate or wield control over people, you get psychopaths doing very well.
What would be a bad career choice for a psychopath? Which professions scored low?
No real surprises, actually. There were craftsmen, care workers. Nurses were in there. Accountants were pretty low on psychopathy. One of the interesting ones: doctors. Doctors were low on psychopathy, but surgeons were actually in the top ten, so there’s kind of a dividing line between surgeons and doctors.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (15)
vyctorynotes.blogspot.com says: This article was an interesting one about something incredibly absurd! Men in patriarchal societies commit most crime, which is most of the world. Patriarchy has spent thousands of years attempting to defend itself and traditional notions of masculinity. Some of that tradition is pathological. In fact, whole societies, like the USA, are based on some of that pathology (i.e., that it is ok in any form and in any arena to be "ruthless"). I would never support anyone in any way mirroring themselves to a psychopath, which is itself pathological and another attempt by patriarchy to defend its pathological ways. A humin being can exhibit positive and beneficial traits without such an inane comparison. In addition, the ability to feel empathy is, in my opinion, crucial to a stable and healthy psychological and spiritual self. It is crucial to healthy social interactions. Empathy should be part of the definition of intelligence.
Posted by Vyctorya on January 25,2013 | 06:06 PM
although it does not change the fact that a anonymous sort filled out an actual survey and consistently.... certain psychopathic characteristics were or were not present in people who do certain things..... the fact is... the world is ran by sociopaths and psychopaths...unfortunately very many people keep complaining about the author's findings-- which is.... that all of these psychopaths had a choice...use this personality characteristic to "kill" or "heal".... i guess
Posted by james on January 10,2013 | 03:06 PM
Maslow's hierarchy of needs is a pyramid. basic needs must be met before higher needs can be addressed- in a 'normal human being'. What if psychopathy is an adaptation (sort of a positive feedback between behavior and cognition) to get around this hierarchy to improve performance and success when a need like basic security has no chance of being met. There might be a basic temperment that is necessary for the development of a psychopathic personality. If true psychopathy might result from the frustration of basic needs due to environmental factors- in individuals who are tempermentally predisposed to fight/assert instead of accept/adapt. I think this is where Dutton's coming from, but he does not provide an explanation for psychopathic development- only examples of how psychopaths seem to function at a higher level than most in short term stress situations. Empathy can probably be felt by psychopaths but early in development they usually discount the feelings of others as irrelevant to their immediate goals (unless they're not irrelevant)- hence the paradox of emotional manipulation in people who supposedly lack empathy. Interesting PD
Posted by sjorges on January 7,2013 | 10:34 AM
Dutton is probably a psychopath himself. Just as long as he sells his book right? I wonder how he'd feel interviewing the victims of psychopaths.
Posted by AM on December 28,2012 | 12:50 AM
This is a far cry from the truth! If anyone has read Dr.Hare's book "Without Conscience", they will know that psychopaths are almost the opposite of what is explained in this article. And Dr.Hare is the doctor that actually wrote the psychopath checklist used uniformity throughout the world to diagnose and understand psychopaths. Get real! It seems a little bit obvious that the man who wrote this is a little out to lunch ...
Posted by Amber on November 30,2012 | 01:35 AM
Psychopaths are liars, uncreative, selfish, dangerous to society, full of themselves etc. So NO I can't see them having a positive impact on society. Frankly im pretty blown away (and not in a positive way) by this article. By the way psychopaths are not good soldiers since they are the ultimate cowards who would do anything to save their own skin.
Posted by yours truly on November 19,2012 | 03:30 PM
Fascinating, I'll have to read the book. "There were several police officers, actually, so as opposed to being criminals, some psychopaths are actually out there locking other people up." When I was in college, I decided to pick up some Criminal Justice classes. The professor of Intro, who had been in the Police-I want to say Chief, but don't recall for sure, in New Orleans, said there is a fine line between a cop and a criminal. Both have common psychological characteristics [of a sociopath], but one chooses to express them one direction, and the other in another. Of course, human behavior isn't quite that simplistic, but it is interesting, isn't it?
Posted by Kelly on November 15,2012 | 03:58 PM
I have to agree with the other commenters that this is pretty idiotic and unhelpful. Yeah, a handful of traits that are diagnostic of psychopathy proper can, in a person who doesn't have psychopathy, be useful in certain pursuits. So, obviously, fearlessness/boldness/preternatural calm under stress would be great traits for Navy Seal. Uh, yeah, and? How does this extended analogy with psychopathy - which is a highly dysfunctional personality disorder - add to our previous understanding of the traits valuable to Navy Seals? Well, it doesn't really. It's just a way to get a book out of "gee, isn't it neato how psychopaths have this trait too?" So? Any psychopath also had a host of other traits that cause profound misery to those who come into the psychopath's orbit, and that frequently lead the psychopath into legal trouble. The Buddhist monk bit is too stupid for words. Anyway, whatever. This guy got a book and some attention out of it. Have no idea why the Smithsonian considers this work worth writing about. I was hoping this would be interesting, and was very disappointed by how shallow and useless it turned out to be.
Posted by MoZeu on November 13,2012 | 11:00 AM
I'm sorry, but this is about the most ridiculous article I've read, certainly not befitting the Smithsonian, and on top of that the book sounds silly and sensationalistic at best. I'm no expert, but the traits you're describing sound like sociopathic, not psychopathic, ones (I think this is more than a matter of degree). Also, it bears emphasizing that ON A SCALE, you can rate someone on CERTAIN TRAITS, but to qualify as a sociopath much less a psychopath you have to hit several of the traits, beyond a certain level, and in several contexts and over time. Futhemore, true psychopathy is an illness and not a desirable state of being! You're not doing anyone but yourself any favors with writing pap like this.
Posted by c.gutierrez on November 4,2012 | 10:37 AM
Sadly, I have to throw in with the comments which precede my own. The feedback posts from Steph Rae/ Don Druid/ Tarara Boumdier take exception to the validity and 'positive spin' suggested by Amy Crawford's 'Pros of being a psychopath'. The source document reviewed (Kevin Duttons' 'The Pros to Being a Psychopath'), makes use of selective data, and flanks several postulates with conclusions facilitated by some relatively stark generalizations (while not misrepresentation per se, the conjecture valence is pretty darn high). Some of the misses reflect the absence of the basic adherence to scientific method. Causation/ Correlation. e.g. --> being decisive to say that a decisive person has a psychopathic trait/ feature/ etc., is not too far from saying that a the owner of a XXXL t-shirt is overweight because of the wardrobe they own (kind of). This is, to my way of thinking, the problem with 'lay-literature' documents which tread the boundries of a scientific discipline. Titles, phrases, photographs and language that get peoples attention are frequently infused with charisma and sexy. Loose interpretation, selective data use, a tendency toward generalizations in the service of a particular point of view, or economy, when reviewed by a 'non-specialist', well ... it gets train-wrecky (sort of like a 'non-writer' trying to write a cogent comment without getting so lost in the middle of a run-on sentence that he does his best, but is wrong - so wrong that he resorts to odd punctuation or abrupt endings, such as, well ....
Posted by max batista on November 1,2012 | 05:13 PM
"The Wisdom of Psychopaths: What Saints, Spies and Serial Killers Can Teach Us About Success, the Oxford research psychologist argues that psychopathic personality traits—charm, confidence, ruthlessness, coolness under pressure—can, in the right doses, be a good thing".....Not if you have been forced to work for one it's not. Take it from someone who knows!
Posted by Odyssey8 on November 1,2012 | 02:05 PM
Smithsonian is giving this inches?! I know a psychopath and although wealthy he and his family have had so much unhappiness in their lives because of his condition. Those psychopathic personality traits that the researcher claims are healthy in the right doses are so clearly not the traits that are unique to a psychopath. It is the lack of empathy and conscience that makes a psychopath. The suggestion that people should seek to emulate the traits of a psychopath is irresponsible.
Posted by Steph Rae on October 31,2012 | 07:30 PM
I think this psychopath-boosting is pretty ridiculous. Psychopaths don't consider long-term consequences. They cause extreme problems when placed into positions of power where they are expected to plan for the future.
Posted by Don Druid on October 31,2012 | 10:40 AM
The author should spend some time working in correctional facilities and forensic psychiatric units, if he has the cojones, then come back and enlighten us some more about psycopaths.
Posted by Tarara Boumdier on October 30,2012 | 02:45 PM