The Dinosaur Fossil Wars
Across the American West, legal battles over dinosaur fossils are on the rise as amateur prospectors make major finds
- By Donovan Webster
- Photographs by Aaron Huey
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2009, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 7)
In June 2006, Judge Richard Battey of the United States District Court voided the agreement between Frithiof and the county and ruled, on the basis of a technicality, that Tinker belonged to Harding County. Frithiof appealed. In September 2007, a United States Court of Appeals panel reversed the decision. The Tinker fossil, they ruled, was Frithiof's property; only the original contract's 10 percent payment was owed to Harding County. The appeals court then sent the case back to Federal District Court for final disposition. Frithiof had no choice but to wait.
In the meantime, the location of Tinker—and the fossil's condition—had become a source of contention. Before the legal wrangling began, Frithiof had delivered sections of the skeleton to private curators Barry and April James, who specialized in preparation of paleontological specimens for display, at their Sunbury, Pennsylvania, firm, Prehistoric Journeys. (The process involves removal of the stone matrix encasing the excavated bones.) Once the litigation proceeded, however, the Jameses, who say they had put $200,000 worth of labor and more than two years into the project, were barred from completing the work or collecting payment from Frithiof. Their company filed for bankruptcy in 2005.
"Now I have the Tinker fossil in my possession," says Larry Frank, a Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, attorney who is trustee of the James bankruptcy. "I've filed an artisans' lien against the value of the specimen. Until the matter is resolved, the skeleton will sit in large plastic containers in my possession. We believe that's a good, safe place for it."
For scientists, commercial excavation of fossils—legal or not—raises troubling questions. "For me," says Mark Norell, chairman and curator of vertebrate paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History in New York City, "the big concern with all this private digging is that it may be robbing science of valuable knowledge."
Norell believes that anyone harvesting fossils "needs to be considerate of scientific data surrounding the specimen." Context is important. "A lot of the guys out there digging commercially are just cowboys; they don't care about the site where the fossil sits, how it's oriented in the earth, what can be found around it to give us clues to what the world was like when that fossil animal died." Some commercial excavators "want only to get the specimen out of the ground and get paid—so we lose the context of the site as well as the fossil itself."
The Smithsonian's Carrano says all scientifically significant fossil specimens, whether from public or private lands, should be placed into museums for study in perpetuity. "Any unique fossil has more value scientifically and educationally than we can ever place a cash value on," he adds. "In a perfect world, there'd be a way to vet every fossil collected: the significant ones would be retained and studied; others could go to commercial use. Not every fossil shark's tooth is significant, but some are. Let's retain those significant ones for study."
For the past several years, the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology, one of the fossil world's preeminent professional organizations, has lobbied in support of Congressional legislation that would protect fossils taken from public lands. Since 2001, a bill introduced by Representative James McGovern, Democrat of Massachusetts—the Paleontological Resources Preservation Act—has languished in both the House and Senate. The delay, some proponents believe, stems from some western lawmakers' reluctance to add any regulations regarding public lands. If passed into law, the act would require that only trained, federally certified professionals be allowed to extract fossils from public lands—and would substantially increase penalties for illegal fossil excavation.
The proposed legislation has galvanized critics, from mining company executives to paleontology prospectors, many of whom argue that improved enforcement of existing laws is all that is needed. "This new bill provides no funding for additional federal agents to police these areas, meaning it has no teeth," says Jack Kallmeyer, a paleontological prospector. "As long as there is demand for the commodity, without sufficient enforcement personnel, nothing will stop illegal collecting."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (34)
+ View All Comments
Some elitist archeologists whom are usually university associated so-called experts believe that no one else should possess fossils, artifacts and dino bones, except for them of course. They seek to make it illegal for anyone but them to collect and possess them, except for them. These selfish self important glory seeking experts lock their finds away in college basements in drawers where only they can see and touch and visit their precious collected artifacts that only they are allowed to have access to. These special chosen ones rob us all of our rights to study and learn. Do not allow these greedy hoarders to cause others of exactly what they are doing. They are like Gollum curled up in the corner with their "PRECIOUS"!!!
Posted by MyPrecious on August 25,2012 | 07:10 AM
In my experience more artifacts are lost due to construction than any other cause. Someone building a building has loader operators working full speed ahead and could care less about what they destroy in the process of excavation. Private bone hunters do a lot more good than they do harm and everyone should realize that. So many of the precious artifacts they have found would have probably been destroyed at some point in time during excavations. With the exception of human remains, all legal digs are fair game. The 'professionals' have no dibs on anything. As a matter of fact, I suspect most of the black market wares were dug by these professionals who were out to make a buck from the beginning. I know of a case in point, personally. I do not, however, believe anyone has the right to dig up, own or disturb any human remains. What if we dug up your grandmother? From Egypt to the Native Americans, no one has the right to disturb these remains. Period. So, professionals who do this for a living are brazen and calloused and should have the heavy hand of the law come down on them for a change.
Posted by Samuel Martin on August 7,2012 | 02:14 PM
as usual more gov. regs. to muck up our lives! God forbid a private citizen might find something lost for millions of years and be allowed to keep it.I myself have found a Mossasaur skull in texas! in the middle of nowhere! I now know the skull is not on the private land i had permission to dig on.It took me two years to dig it up! i now find out i can be jailed for digging it! Well it will stay were i left it. Very doubtful it will ever be found again! Most likely it will be destroyed by Windmill construction. i guess the "gov." knows best. Better we all sit on the couch get fat and watch "reality" tv. to lazy to get out and do anything ourselves! too much gov. think about that when u vote for a Dem.
Posted by yankee on February 5,2012 | 01:44 PM
I have a dinosaur fossil that my uncle had given to me when I was a kid. I am looking for information on what the different options are for me to do with it.
Posted by Jen on February 3,2012 | 03:10 PM
i found a bone a few years ago and really need to no if its a dino bone.i found it near a creek bed.in georgia in the okfanokee swamp.its on about 12 inches long and curved.its looks like rib bone of some type.the bone is really fossilize.so if any body can help me let me no.
Posted by stil_bill on December 27,2011 | 03:23 PM
my husband FOUND AN SKELETON OF DINOSAUR . WE REALLY APPRECIATE IF YOU COULD GUIDE US TO FINE CUSTOMER or give us some advice for selling it. ITS NOT JUST TOOTH OR SKIN ITS A REAL TYREX AROUND 1.5 METER.
thanks
Posted by sogand on August 9,2011 | 03:31 AM
I know a nice solution. Fossil dealers and paleontologists could explore together. If the fossil is not scientifically signifigant, it gets put up for sale. If it is signifigant, it goes to a museum and a cast is made, which is produced and sold.
Posted by Not Telling on March 20,2011 | 06:21 AM
Private Ownership of fossils should not be banned, and if it is, fossils obtained before the ban should not be confiscated.
Posted by Not Telling on March 17,2011 | 03:30 AM
Can anyone help me I wanted to no where I can bring a fossil/tooth to get it check out and maybe sale it in the bay area. I bought a box of quartz from a old time gold miner and found a piece in there that looks like a fossil or mybe a dinosaur tooth thanks
Posted by matt on October 16,2010 | 08:09 AM
I also found some dinosaur skin not far from the previsous bones in a block of sandstone.
check it out at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lmUs4z88ruI
There is no way I will show it to a paleontologist. I'd rather have a amateur come dig it up. The dino skin piece that I have has been touched by many children who are in awe. That doesn't happen in museums. If anybody is going to be famous for this find, it isn't going to be a so called professional.
Posted by SpectateSwamp on December 25,2009 | 10:22 AM
I videoed some dino bones in a block of stone a few years back. I returned the next year to video what new fossils were exposed. The old ones were long gone. I should have exposed the under layers. Rock in areas that erode should be removed if at all possible.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYZBixDl1gc
View the video
Posted by Spectate Swamp on October 10,2009 | 09:52 PM
i need to know how archiologists know how old bones and fossils are.
Posted by anna holcombe on September 3,2009 | 10:52 AM
What's the current status of this case?
Posted by Sue Misner on July 20,2009 | 02:11 PM
I do not have a problem with private citizens finding, claiming, exposing, digging and removing (with land owner's permission, otherwise it's theft) any fossil they find. Even if they sell it, or put it up for auction. Isn't that what a Paleontologist does when he finds a fossil? OK, call it grant money, call it donating it to a museum (who buy and sell fossils routinely) but the Paleontologist (not to mention Archeologists and Primatologists) are not above paying their mortgage on sold artifacts.
Posted by Christopher Wood on June 2,2009 | 12:34 AM
+ View All Comments