Something New Under the Sun
Scientists are probing deep beneath the surface of our nearest star to calculate its profound effect on Earth
- By Robert Irion
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2011, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 5)
One of the biggest solar surprises in the past 50 years wasn’t something the Sun did but something it didn’t do: it didn’t produce many sunspots for most of 2008 and 2009. “We’d go 60, 70, 80, 90 days without a single sunspot,” says NASA science editor Tony Phillips, who independently publishes SpaceWeather.com. “In the lifetime of solar physicists, no one had seen this. It surprised the entire community.”
No one knows what caused the eerie quiet. The deep magnetic field apparently did not twist up in its usual way, perhaps because electrical currents inside the Sun grew weaker. Some scientists speculated that the Sun was powering down, at least temporarily. A panel of solar physicists studied these changes and projected that the Sun’s activity might reach just half of its recent levels in its next 11-year sunspot cycle. This could have minor implications for climate change. For the past century, human activity far outweighed the Sun’s modulations in affecting Earth’s climate. If the pattern of reduced solar activity continues through another of the Sun’s cycles and beyond, the subtle decrease in energy from the Sun could slightly offset global warming.
The Sun is projected to reach the peak of its current sunspot cycle in late 2013 or early 2014. But there’s no reason to think a more sedate Sun will stay that way. “The biggest particle event and geomagnetic storm in recorded history”—the 1859 event observed by Carrington—“occurred during a solar cycle of about the same size as the one we’re projecting in the next couple of years,” says Phillips. Moreover, a recent study by Suli Ma and colleagues at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics showed that one-third of the solar storms striking Earth arise without solar flares or other warning signs. These sneak attacks suggest that the Sun can be hazardous even when it appears quiet.
There’s no way to shield the Earth from the Sun’s eruptions; powerful storms will always disrupt our planet’s magnetic field. But advance warning can limit their impact. Precautions include reducing power loads to prevent surges on electrical lines, putting satellites into an electronic safe mode, and—in NASA’s case—telling astronauts to take shelter within the most fortified parts of their spacecraft.
Even with those measures, an event as severe as the solar storms of 1859 or 1921 would wreak havoc, says solar and space physicist Daniel Baker of the University of Colorado, lead author of the 2008 National Research Council report. People grow more dependent on communications technology by the year, Baker says, making us ever more vulnerable to electromagnetic chaos. “Those [severe] events probably occur every decade,” he says. “It’s just a question of time before one of them hits us.”
Baker and his colleagues have urged NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which runs the Space Weather Prediction Center in Boulder, Colorado, to develop a system of space-weather warning satellites. Today the only instrument that can determine the direction of the magnetic field inside an approaching coronal mass ejection—a critical factor for determining how violently it will interact with Earth—is on a 13-year-old satellite that has no near-term replacement.
“The Sun is a highly variable star,” Baker warns. “We live in its outer atmosphere, and the cyber-electric cocoon that surrounds Earth is subject to its whims. We’d better come to terms with that.”
Robert Irion directs the science writing program at the University of California at Santa Cruz.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (4)
Once again, a brilliantly balanced article of creative flair and scientific fact.
Posted by Holly Dunlea on September 24,2011 | 06:10 AM
Helge: I would like to thank you for sharing the video link. It's truly a stunning compilation -- tens of thousands of still images! Breathtaking to view in full-screen resolution, as you advised. I've passed on the link to my colleagues in science writing. Thank you again!
--Robert Irion / article author
Posted by Robert Irion on March 31,2011 | 06:56 PM
Hello,
I read your article and it was great.
One of my photo buddies made this excellent time-lapse of the Aurora Borealis that might interest you all:
http://vimeo.com/21419634
Check it out and play it BIG wide screen
Posted by Helge Mortensen on March 28,2011 | 09:39 AM
I miss seeing those lights. MN and AK. Now I'm in CO, so thanks, and watch them dance for me!
Posted by Leif on March 24,2011 | 11:48 AM