Scaling the Washington Monument
Mountaineering park ranger Brandon Latham talks about how engineers investigated the monument from hundreds of feet above the ground
- By Megan Gambino
- Smithsonian.com, October 03, 2011, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
What damage has been found so far?
They are finding some loose spalls, or pieces of stone. Of course, they are finding cracks that we have actually seen from photographs taken from a helicopter already. From a structural standpoint, they still feel very confident that the monument is sound. That is the main take away. There is going to be some work to be done on it, but there is nothing too serious.
What would you say, in your climbing experience, best prepared you for this type of assignment?
My main responsibility as a mountaineering ranger is to perform search and rescue activities up on Denali. Sometimes that involves using rope systems similar to the rope systems that the engineers are using on the monument, just in a little bit different fashion. It is still a two-rope system. Of course, the anchors are different. We are using snow and ice anchors versus rock and steel anchors that the engineers are using.
I have been climbing for 20 years, and I have been working in the search and rescue and rope access worlds for 10 to 12 of those years. I also worked as an instructor for a company that teaches the physics behind these types of rope systems. The company is called Rigging for Rescue out of Colorado. It is a research- and testing- based company for these types of systems. My background in climbing and rope access is important. But I think understanding the physics and math behind it all is what I bring most to the table, being able to explain to people, most of all the Park Service, that it is going to be a sound system.
When you first started climbing as a teenager, you were climbing on overpasses in Louisiana, right?
Yeah. That is where I first started to learn how to climb. There are no cliffs or crags in Louisiana. Some friends of mine actually climbed in Oklahoma before, on some cliffs and crags. They started epoxying little chips of rock onto the overpass, and that was our cliff so to speak.
Have you rappelled off any buildings?
I have rappelled on buildings around the country—nothing bigger than maybe 30 or 40 stories, which is 300 or 400 feet. It is basically all construction work. Have you seen huge banners on buildings, like out in Las Vegas? I have done some of that work. The rope access systems are used a lot on oil rigs. Rope access is also used to inspect dams for cracks and other things.
What is the closest natural equivalent to rappelling down the Washington Monument?
Imagine you had a big granite cliff that was 555 feet tall just outside of the city, and you went out there and you clipped a sling around a big tree at the top and you put a rope down and clipped yourself in and you started rappelling. The environment, of course, is a little different. It’s a natural setting, versus a manmade structure. The main difference between the two, rappelling on a cliff and rappelling on a manmade structure, is going to be the equipment that is involved. When people go out and rappel on a cliff, most of the time they just have one rope, because there is a different level of acceptable risk. But you still have exposure. From an exposure standpoint, the feeling of being in that vertical world is going to be very similar.
The Washington Monument is currently closed. The Wiss, Janney, Elstner team plans to provide a report on it findings by mid-October, and the National Park Service will decide what repairs are needed before the monument reopens.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (8)
maybe they used a helipoter to secure it and then dropped the guys off at the top
Posted by micheal on October 14,2011 | 05:29 PM
In response to the questions about how they got the slings on the top, here is what I saw on msnbc, which had a better angle of camera coverage than CNN the first day that someone went out the top of the monument to do the rigging. There is at least one small hatch, mentioned in the article above, that is up on a sloping pyramid side. The climber slipped through that small opening and sat there on the sill for some time, with his legs still inside the monument. Then he stood up on the sill of the hatch and could actually reach the top of the pyramid, where he placed the slings around the top. I didn't see him put the sling around the top, so I don't know if there was any lassoing involved or required. By the time I saw the climber standing on the sill at the top, he was rigging other ropes to the ones encircling the very top, which he could reach with his hands.
Posted by Lynn Ferguson on October 12,2011 | 11:38 PM
Good luck to you brave Guys that are trying to repair the Monument. I would like to go in it again after 62 years.
Posted by Bobby Crain on October 11,2011 | 10:26 PM
That is my question also. Have not seen anything in any of the news articles that explains just how they got that rigging up on the very top to start with.
Posted by O.D. Smith on October 8,2011 | 09:09 PM
Helicopter would be guess one. Bronco Billy would be next:)
That was my first thought too.
Posted by Mike M. on October 6,2011 | 08:05 PM
Same comment. Ever since I saw the first photos in the paper and thought about it, I've been wondering how they got the slings in place at the very top of the monument. The interviewer got Brandon Latham to say figuring this out was the hardest technical challenge they had, but then never went on to asked him how they did it.
Posted by Ron Bogolin on October 6,2011 | 03:58 PM
Sal, you took the words right out of my mouth. Maybe they lassoed it, like a calf?
Posted by Kate Diehl on October 6,2011 | 02:52 PM
Yeah yeah yeah, but how did they get those ropes up on the tippytop.
Posted by Sal Monella on October 5,2011 | 09:53 AM