Looking for Neutrinos, Nature's Ghost Particles
To study some of the most elusive particles, physicists have built detectors in abandoned mines, tunnels and Antarctic ice
- By Ann Finkbeiner
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
Hoping to detect neutrinos in larger numbers, scientists in Japan led an experiment 3,300 feet underground in a zinc mine. Super-Kamiokande, or Super-K as it is known, began operating in 1996. The detector consists of 50,000 tons of water in a domed tank whose walls are covered with 13,000 light sensors. The sensors detect the occasional blue flash (too faint for our eyes to see) made when a neutrino collides with an atom in the water and creates an electron. And by tracing the exact path the electron traveled in the water, physicists could infer the source, in space, of the colliding neutrino. Most, they found, came from the sun. The measurements were sufficiently sensitive that Super-K could track the sun’s path across the sky and, from nearly a mile below the surface of the earth, watch day turn into night. “It’s really an exciting thing,” says Janet Conrad, a physicist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The particle tracks can be compiled to create “a beautiful image, the picture of the sun in neutrinos.”
But the Homestake and Super-K experiments didn’t detect as many neutrinos as physicists expected. Research at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory (SNO, pronounced “snow”) determined why. Installed in a 6,800-foot-deep nickel mine in Ontario, SNO contains 1,100 tons of “heavy water,” which has an unusual form of hydrogen that reacts relatively easily with neutrinos. The fluid is in a tank suspended inside a huge acrylic ball that is itself held inside a geodesic superstructure, which absorbs vibrations and on which are hung 9,456 light sensors—the whole thing looking like a 30-foot-tall Christmas tree ornament.
Scientists working at SNO discovered in 2001 that a neutrino can spontaneously switch among three different identities—or as physicists say, it oscillates among three flavors. The discovery had startling implications. For one thing, it showed that previous experiments had detected far fewer neutrinos than predicted because the instruments were tuned to just one neutrino flavor—the kind that creates an electron—and were missing the ones that switched. For another, the finding toppled physicists’ belief that a neutrino, like a photon, has no mass. (Oscillating among flavors is something that only particles with mass are able to do.)
How much mass do neutrinos have? To find out, physicists are building KATRIN—the Karlsruhe Tritium Neutrino Experiment. KATRIN’s business end boasts a 200-ton device called a spectrometer that will measure the mass of atoms before and after they decay radioactively—thereby revealing how much mass the neutrino carries off. Technicians built the spectrometer about 250 miles from Karlsruhe, Germany, where the experiment will operate; the device was too large for the region’s narrow roads, so it was put on a boat on the Danube River and floated past Vienna, Budapest and Belgrade, into the Black Sea, through the Aegean and the Mediterranean, around Spain, through the English Channel, to Rotterdam and into the Rhine, then south to the river port of Leopoldshafen, Germany. There it was offloaded onto a truck and squeaked through town to its destination, two months and 5,600 miles later. It is scheduled to start collecting data in 2012.
Physicists and astronomers interested in the information that neutrinos from outer space might carry about supernovas or colliding galaxies have set up neutrino “telescopes.” One, called IceCube, is inside an ice field in Antarctica. When completed, in 2011, it will consist of more than 5,000 blue-light sensors (see diagram above). The sensors are aimed not at the sky, as you might expect, but toward the ground, to detect neutrinos from the sun and outer space that are coming through the planet from the north. The earth blocks cosmic rays, but most neutrinos zip through the 8,000-mile-wide planet as if it weren’t there.
A long-distance neutrino experiment is taking place under several Midwestern states. A high-energy accelerator, which generates subatomic particles, shoots beams of neutrinos and related particles as much as six miles deep, beneath northern Illinois, across Wisconsin and into Minnesota. The particles start at Fermilab, as part of an experiment called the Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS). In less than three-thousandths of a second, they hit a detector in the Soudan iron mine, 450 miles away. The data the scientists have gathered complicates their picture of this infinitesimal world: it now appears that exotic forms of neutrinos, so-called anti-neutrinos, may not follow the same rules of oscillation as other neutrinos.
“What’s cool,” says Conrad, “is that it’s not what we expected.”
When it comes to neutrinos, very little is.
Ann Finkbeiner’s latest book, A Grand and Bold Thing, is about the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, an effort to map the universe.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (10)
Its funny how exotic 'neutrinos' are, and at the same time they are the dominant 'emitted' particle in Nature. If we ever master the whole detection of these quantum streams... will find a better solution to detecting gravity? Its strange to wonder what is the principle of these exotic particles.... what makes neutrinos have a behavior that reminds me of 'quantum' tunneling? A material particle with energies that are 'truer' than the pseudo-scientific 'ghosts' that draw the popular imagination. But to a 'neutrino' we of the ordinary 'baryons', 'leptons' & 'photons' realm are the non-existent stuff in their symmetrical realm. Does our Universe have an undetectable glow of 'neutrino' twilight? As a teenager I had this imagined daydream that neutrinos were responsible for triggering all radioactive decays... but that didn't square with the 'emissions' and 'half-lives' of all the meta-stable isotopes in the periodic table.Wish these particles were easier to read?
Posted by tom on January 12,2013 | 07:41 PM
to João Calvete, according to the theory- Neutrinos have negligible mass which has been not calculated yet.
Posted by Shubham#Indian on October 19,2012 | 03:55 AM
Higgs Boson / "God Particle" -2012 Science news is actually a 150+ year old discovery by a different name ……............Infinite Intelligence….Steve Meyer / New Thought Movement / HolisticDNA The Sixth Sense Activation Sequence – GROUNDBREAKING New Book in 2012! "New Thought promotes the ideas that "Infinite Intelligence" or "God" is ubiquitous, spirit is the totality of real things, true human selfhood is divine, divine thought is a force for good, sickness originates in the mind, and "right thinking" has a healing effect..." Wikipedia
Posted by steve meyer on September 13,2012 | 02:08 PM
Are Neutrinos massless or not? Can they go faster than the speed of light? The anti particles are composed of positrons, antiproons, and what else? Is it just a neutron, or an anti neutron? If Neutrinos are made of just neutrons, an anti Neutrino must have some form of anti neutron!? thankyou in advance
Posted by João Calvete on September 25,2011 | 02:52 PM
Fascinating.
Posted by David C. Smith on November 19,2010 | 02:54 PM
If neutrinos can be shot underground from point to point, and that stream can be modulated, a new form of wireless communication is possible.
What's not to like about that?
Posted by kP on November 15,2010 | 01:58 PM
I am very curious about wolfgang Pauli's comments regarding his work. Is this a published work? Can you give me the citation?
thank you in advance
Posted by Griffith Morgan on November 10,2010 | 03:45 PM
I am curious to know the mechanics of how the neutrino collision with an atom in water creates an electron? Given that neutrinos are almost massless and can pass through everything without interacting, how does this process take place, what are its concrete steps?
Posted by Sadia Tariq on November 3,2010 | 09:36 AM
We have seen literally billions go into these neutrino experiments, and also into related "hot fusion" reactor experiments, all based upon fallacious assumptions on how the Sun gets its internal energy. But so far over decades, all they do is show a handful of particle-counts, increasingly complexification and contradictions, and not even sufficient energy to illuminate an LED bulb. Space is filled with energy, by all the experimental findings which followed the slight positive result of Michelson-Morley, as proven in the experiments of Miller, Michelson-Pease-Pearson, Michelson-Gale, Sagnac, and in more recent years, by Cahill, Munera and notably Yuri Galaev at the Ukraine Radiophysics Institute. Those research scientists only get the silent treatment, or mud thrown at them, by contrast to these New Emperors of scientism, ensconced in their gold-plated temples, and who have no clue about how their central axioms have already been disproven decades ago. Science "journalism" is even more lost in space, self-righteous and arrogant towards dissent in the sciences, to the point where Federal book-burning and jailing of scientists gets ignored, or treated with arrogant self-righteousness. We may send rockets to the moon and jet around the world (using technology from the dissident Robert Goddard who was spat upon by his academic peers, as were the Wright Brothers) but our attitudes towards dissenting views is absolutely Medieval. These giant neutrino detectors will, along with the "hot fusion" reactors, be viewed by some future age as being the equivalent of the Egyptian pyramids, constructed willingly by tens of thousands, to worship invisible gods or "god-particles" (their words, not mine) which nobody can fathom. But we all must genuflect and make the annual donations anyhow, or be labeled a dangerous social dissenter to revealed truth. "Ghost particles" indeed!
Posted by James DeMeo, PhD on October 26,2010 | 05:34 PM
These experimental neutrino detectors sound massive, expensive, and labor intensive. How are they being funded?
Posted by Steve Robinson on October 26,2010 | 01:17 PM