Looking for Neutrinos, Nature's Ghost Particles
To study some of the most elusive particles, physicists have built detectors in abandoned mines, tunnels and Antarctic ice
- By Ann Finkbeiner
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2010, Subscribe
We’re awash in neutrinos. They’re among the lightest of the two dozen or so known subatomic particles and they come from all directions: from the Big Bang that began the universe, from exploding stars and, most of all, from the sun. They come straight through the earth at nearly the speed of light, all the time, day and night, in enormous numbers. About 100 trillion neutrinos pass through our bodies every second.
The problem for physicists is that neutrinos are impossible to see and difficult to detect. Any instrument designed to do so may feel solid to the touch, but to neutrinos, even stainless steel is mostly empty space, as wide open as a solar system is to a comet. What’s more, neutrinos, unlike most subatomic particles, have no electric charge—they’re neutral, hence the name—so scientists can’t use electric or magnetic forces to capture them. Physicists call them “ghost particles.”
To capture these elusive entities, physicists have conducted some extraordinarily ambitious experiments. So that neutrinos aren’t confused with cosmic rays (subatomic particles from outer space that do not penetrate the earth), detectors are installed deep underground. Enormous ones have been placed in gold and nickel mines, in tunnels beneath mountains, in the ocean and in Antarctic ice. These strangely beautiful devices are monuments to humankind’s resolve to learn about the universe.
It’s unclear what practical applications will come from studying neutrinos. “We don’t know where it’s going to lead,” says Boris Kayser, a theoretical physicist at Fermilab in Batavia, Illinois.
Physicists study neutrinos in part because neutrinos are such odd characters: they seem to break the rules that describe nature at its most fundamental. And if physicists are ever going to fulfill their hopes of developing a coherent theory of reality that explains the basics of nature without exception, they are going to have to account for the behavior of neutrinos.
In addition, neutrinos intrigue scientists because the particles are messengers from the outer reaches of the universe, created by violently exploding galaxies and other mysterious phenomena. “Neutrinos may be able to tell us things that the more humdrum particles can’t,” says Kayser.
Physicists imagined neutrinos long before they ever found any. In 1930, they created the concept to balance an equation that was not adding up. When the nucleus of a radioactive atom disintegrates, the energy of the particles it emits must equal the energy it originally contained. But in fact, scientists observed, the nucleus was losing more energy than detectors were picking up. So to account for that extra energy the physicist Wolfgang Pauli conceived an extra, invisible particle emitted by the nucleus. “I have done something very bad today by proposing a particle that cannot be detected,” Pauli wrote in his journal. “It is something no theorist should ever do.”
Experimentalists began looking for it anyway. At a nuclear weapons laboratory in South Carolina in the mid-1950s, they stationed two large water tanks outside a nuclear reactor that, according to their equations, should have been making ten trillion neutrinos a second. The detector was tiny by today’s standards, but it still managed to spot neutrinos—three an hour. The scientists had established that the proposed neutrino was in fact real; study of the elusive particle accelerated.
A decade later, the field scaled up when another group of physicists installed a detector in the Homestake gold mine, in Lead, South Dakota, 4,850 feet underground. In this experiment the scientists set out to observe neutrinos by monitoring what happens on the rare occasion when a neutrino collides with a chlorine atom and creates radioactive argon, which is readily detectable. At the core of the experiment was a tank filled with 600 tons of a chlorine-rich liquid, perchloroethylene, a fluid used in dry-cleaning. Every few months, the scientists would flush the tank and extract about 15 argon atoms, evidence of 15 neutrinos. The monitoring continued for more than 30 years.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (10)
Its funny how exotic 'neutrinos' are, and at the same time they are the dominant 'emitted' particle in Nature. If we ever master the whole detection of these quantum streams... will find a better solution to detecting gravity? Its strange to wonder what is the principle of these exotic particles.... what makes neutrinos have a behavior that reminds me of 'quantum' tunneling? A material particle with energies that are 'truer' than the pseudo-scientific 'ghosts' that draw the popular imagination. But to a 'neutrino' we of the ordinary 'baryons', 'leptons' & 'photons' realm are the non-existent stuff in their symmetrical realm. Does our Universe have an undetectable glow of 'neutrino' twilight? As a teenager I had this imagined daydream that neutrinos were responsible for triggering all radioactive decays... but that didn't square with the 'emissions' and 'half-lives' of all the meta-stable isotopes in the periodic table.Wish these particles were easier to read?
Posted by tom on January 12,2013 | 07:41 PM
to João Calvete, according to the theory- Neutrinos have negligible mass which has been not calculated yet.
Posted by Shubham#Indian on October 19,2012 | 03:55 AM
Higgs Boson / "God Particle" -2012 Science news is actually a 150+ year old discovery by a different name ……............Infinite Intelligence….Steve Meyer / New Thought Movement / HolisticDNA The Sixth Sense Activation Sequence – GROUNDBREAKING New Book in 2012! "New Thought promotes the ideas that "Infinite Intelligence" or "God" is ubiquitous, spirit is the totality of real things, true human selfhood is divine, divine thought is a force for good, sickness originates in the mind, and "right thinking" has a healing effect..." Wikipedia
Posted by steve meyer on September 13,2012 | 02:08 PM
Are Neutrinos massless or not? Can they go faster than the speed of light? The anti particles are composed of positrons, antiproons, and what else? Is it just a neutron, or an anti neutron? If Neutrinos are made of just neutrons, an anti Neutrino must have some form of anti neutron!? thankyou in advance
Posted by João Calvete on September 25,2011 | 02:52 PM
Fascinating.
Posted by David C. Smith on November 19,2010 | 02:54 PM
If neutrinos can be shot underground from point to point, and that stream can be modulated, a new form of wireless communication is possible.
What's not to like about that?
Posted by kP on November 15,2010 | 01:58 PM
I am very curious about wolfgang Pauli's comments regarding his work. Is this a published work? Can you give me the citation?
thank you in advance
Posted by Griffith Morgan on November 10,2010 | 03:45 PM
I am curious to know the mechanics of how the neutrino collision with an atom in water creates an electron? Given that neutrinos are almost massless and can pass through everything without interacting, how does this process take place, what are its concrete steps?
Posted by Sadia Tariq on November 3,2010 | 09:36 AM
We have seen literally billions go into these neutrino experiments, and also into related "hot fusion" reactor experiments, all based upon fallacious assumptions on how the Sun gets its internal energy. But so far over decades, all they do is show a handful of particle-counts, increasingly complexification and contradictions, and not even sufficient energy to illuminate an LED bulb. Space is filled with energy, by all the experimental findings which followed the slight positive result of Michelson-Morley, as proven in the experiments of Miller, Michelson-Pease-Pearson, Michelson-Gale, Sagnac, and in more recent years, by Cahill, Munera and notably Yuri Galaev at the Ukraine Radiophysics Institute. Those research scientists only get the silent treatment, or mud thrown at them, by contrast to these New Emperors of scientism, ensconced in their gold-plated temples, and who have no clue about how their central axioms have already been disproven decades ago. Science "journalism" is even more lost in space, self-righteous and arrogant towards dissent in the sciences, to the point where Federal book-burning and jailing of scientists gets ignored, or treated with arrogant self-righteousness. We may send rockets to the moon and jet around the world (using technology from the dissident Robert Goddard who was spat upon by his academic peers, as were the Wright Brothers) but our attitudes towards dissenting views is absolutely Medieval. These giant neutrino detectors will, along with the "hot fusion" reactors, be viewed by some future age as being the equivalent of the Egyptian pyramids, constructed willingly by tens of thousands, to worship invisible gods or "god-particles" (their words, not mine) which nobody can fathom. But we all must genuflect and make the annual donations anyhow, or be labeled a dangerous social dissenter to revealed truth. "Ghost particles" indeed!
Posted by James DeMeo, PhD on October 26,2010 | 05:34 PM
These experimental neutrino detectors sound massive, expensive, and labor intensive. How are they being funded?
Posted by Steve Robinson on October 26,2010 | 01:17 PM