• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Travel
    With Us
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Air & Space
    magazine

Smithsonian.com

  • Subscribe
  • History & Archaeology
  • Science
  • Ideas & Innovations
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel & Food
  • At the Smithsonian
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Games
  • Shop
  • Human Behavior
  • Mind & Body
  • Our Planet
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Wildlife
  • Art Meets Science
  • Science & Nature

Give Weeds a Chance

How a cultivated dislike of gardening can lead to more time on the porch

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
  • By Ann Hodgman
  • Smithsonian magazine, August 2005, Subscribe
 

"Mom, the sun is not your friend," my daughter once said to me. And being out in the sun is only one of the things I don't like about gardening. I also don't like digging (too dirty), dragging hoses around (too twisty), seeing leaves close up (too veiny) and accidentally cutting worms in half with a trowel (too messy). If I ever get more money than I can bear, I'll hire a gardener. Until then, I'm fine with a tattered lawn and a border of shrubs that my father once euphemistically called "primitive."

Well, not exactly fine. Actually, I'm ashamed of dodging America's favorite pastime. It seems furtive and unpatriotic to lie on the porch sofa reading mysteries while all around me, gardeners are sweating away their weekends lugging mulch and swatting gnats. On the other hand, why should I feel guilty? I'm the one holding the moral high ground. No one hates nature more than a gardener.

Here's a friend of mine, a very nice man, telling me that a woodchuck has invaded his suburban lawn. "I'd bomb his tunnel if I could find the entrance," he says. Another friend has planted a Concord grape arbor in one corner of her yard. To her amazement, the arbor has attracted raccoons. Although my friend has enough grapes to keep her family in jelly for centuries, she can't spare any fruit for the coons. "I asked the Audubon Society if it was OK to shoot them, and they said no!" she moans. "Do you believe it?"

Meanwhile, the main topic at local dinner parties is how to keep deer away from the day lilies, which deer chomp like lollipops. (Bags of lion hair? A flamethrower? A comet crashing into the earth?) Meanwhile, an Arizona relative who says she doesn't like the look of indigenous plants confesses that her traditional English garden uses an awful lot of water. Meanwhile, the droning of leaf blowers destroys tranquil summer days all across the nation. God forbid that a leaf should touch anyone's grass.

I'm not saying beauty is bad. Nor am I suggesting that all gardeners should be as happy to see a woodchuck munching their perennials as I would be. But planting a garden full of proven animal treats and then hating the animals that move in...Hey, why not set a freshly baked cake on the grass and then declare war on the ants swarming over it? The minute you plant a garden, wilderness starts trying to take advantage of it. Getting mad at the process is like getting mad at gravity.

"But flowers are prettier than pests," gardeners will say, without acknowledging that prettiness is entirely a matter of opinion. There's the truism about a weed's being a flower where you don't want it, or whatever. And I'd rather watch any kind of animal, even a snail, than any kind of flower, even a forest full of rare orchids. To me, a cottontail in the backyard provides more entertainment than a bunch of flowers. Plants just stand there with their feet in the dirt. And I can't look at them without seeing the work required to keep them standing there. At least it's less stressful to appreciate the living things that don't need special care—or special poisons—to stay alive. It's also prettier to see deer eating my yews and holly in the winter than to shroud all the bushes in brown burlap. (If deer are hungry enough to eat holly, I say they're welcome to it.)

"But we own this plot of land," gardeners will argue. "We have a right to keep it looking nice!" Why? Did Mother Nature sign a contract with them? We buy land from other humans. Why should we expect nature to respect our borders? Why not abandon the incongruity of taming a little patch of land while savagely battling nature to stay on the other side of the fence?

Gardening feels redemptive, which may account for the odor of sanctity exhaled by so many gardeners. It seems like a selfless act; you're improving your little corner of the world and working out at the same time. But gardening is just another luxury hobby, like getting a manicure or learning to make the perfect cassoulet. There's nothing wrong with fancy pastimes; if we can indulge in them, we're lucky. But we shouldn't make them the excuse for declaring war on the natural world. Summers would be a lot more peaceful if we sat back and smelled the roses—even if all we have is clover.


"Mom, the sun is not your friend," my daughter once said to me. And being out in the sun is only one of the things I don't like about gardening. I also don't like digging (too dirty), dragging hoses around (too twisty), seeing leaves close up (too veiny) and accidentally cutting worms in half with a trowel (too messy). If I ever get more money than I can bear, I'll hire a gardener. Until then, I'm fine with a tattered lawn and a border of shrubs that my father once euphemistically called "primitive."

Well, not exactly fine. Actually, I'm ashamed of dodging America's favorite pastime. It seems furtive and unpatriotic to lie on the porch sofa reading mysteries while all around me, gardeners are sweating away their weekends lugging mulch and swatting gnats. On the other hand, why should I feel guilty? I'm the one holding the moral high ground. No one hates nature more than a gardener.

Here's a friend of mine, a very nice man, telling me that a woodchuck has invaded his suburban lawn. "I'd bomb his tunnel if I could find the entrance," he says. Another friend has planted a Concord grape arbor in one corner of her yard. To her amazement, the arbor has attracted raccoons. Although my friend has enough grapes to keep her family in jelly for centuries, she can't spare any fruit for the coons. "I asked the Audubon Society if it was OK to shoot them, and they said no!" she moans. "Do you believe it?"

Meanwhile, the main topic at local dinner parties is how to keep deer away from the day lilies, which deer chomp like lollipops. (Bags of lion hair? A flamethrower? A comet crashing into the earth?) Meanwhile, an Arizona relative who says she doesn't like the look of indigenous plants confesses that her traditional English garden uses an awful lot of water. Meanwhile, the droning of leaf blowers destroys tranquil summer days all across the nation. God forbid that a leaf should touch anyone's grass.

I'm not saying beauty is bad. Nor am I suggesting that all gardeners should be as happy to see a woodchuck munching their perennials as I would be. But planting a garden full of proven animal treats and then hating the animals that move in...Hey, why not set a freshly baked cake on the grass and then declare war on the ants swarming over it? The minute you plant a garden, wilderness starts trying to take advantage of it. Getting mad at the process is like getting mad at gravity.

"But flowers are prettier than pests," gardeners will say, without acknowledging that prettiness is entirely a matter of opinion. There's the truism about a weed's being a flower where you don't want it, or whatever. And I'd rather watch any kind of animal, even a snail, than any kind of flower, even a forest full of rare orchids. To me, a cottontail in the backyard provides more entertainment than a bunch of flowers. Plants just stand there with their feet in the dirt. And I can't look at them without seeing the work required to keep them standing there. At least it's less stressful to appreciate the living things that don't need special care—or special poisons—to stay alive. It's also prettier to see deer eating my yews and holly in the winter than to shroud all the bushes in brown burlap. (If deer are hungry enough to eat holly, I say they're welcome to it.)

"But we own this plot of land," gardeners will argue. "We have a right to keep it looking nice!" Why? Did Mother Nature sign a contract with them? We buy land from other humans. Why should we expect nature to respect our borders? Why not abandon the incongruity of taming a little patch of land while savagely battling nature to stay on the other side of the fence?

Gardening feels redemptive, which may account for the odor of sanctity exhaled by so many gardeners. It seems like a selfless act; you're improving your little corner of the world and working out at the same time. But gardening is just another luxury hobby, like getting a manicure or learning to make the perfect cassoulet. There's nothing wrong with fancy pastimes; if we can indulge in them, we're lucky. But we shouldn't make them the excuse for declaring war on the natural world. Summers would be a lot more peaceful if we sat back and smelled the roses—even if all we have is clover.

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


Related topics: Gardening


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email |
 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments


Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  1. 16 Photographs That Capture the Best and Worst of 1970s America
  2. The Scariest Monsters of the Deep Sea
  3. Buzz Aldrin on Why We Should Go to Mars
  4. Jack Andraka, the Teen Prodigy of Pancreatic Cancer
  5. Microbes: The Trillions of Creatures Governing Your Health

  6. How Titanoboa, the 40-Foot-Long Snake, Was Found
  7. Ten Inventions Inspired by Science Fiction
  8. Photos of the World’s Oldest Living Things
  9. The Ten Most Disturbing Scientific Discoveries
  10. Top Ten Most-Destructive Computer Viruses
  1. What is Causing Iran’s Spike in MS Cases?

  1. Buzz Aldrin on Why We Should Go to Mars
  2. How Can a Jellyfish This Slow Be So Deadly? It's Invisible
  3. Rethinking Neanderthals

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement

Follow Us

Smithsonian Magazine
@SmithsonianMag
Follow Smithsonian Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

In The Magazine

May 2013

  • Patriot Games
  • The Next Revolution
  • Blowing Up The Art World
  • The Body Eclectic
  • Microbe Hunters

View Table of Contents »






First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store

Stars and Stripes Throw

Our exclusive Stars and Stripes Throw is a three-layer adaption of the 1861 “Stars and Stripes” quilt... $65



View full archiveRecent Issues


  • May 2013


  • Apr 2013


  • Mar 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Smithsonian
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution