Dinosaurs' Living Descendants
China's spectacular feathered fossils have finally answered the century-old question about the ancestors of today's birds
- By Richard Stone
- Photographs by Stefen Chow
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 5)
But there was one important feature that had not been found in dinosaurs, and few experts would feel entirely comfortable asserting that chickadees and triceratops were kin until they had evidence for this missing anatomical link: feathers.
A poor Chinese farmer, Li Yingfang, made one of the greatest fossil finds of all time, in August 1996 in Sihetun village, an hour's drive from the site where I'd prospected for fossil fish. "I was digging holes for planting trees," recalls Li, who now has a full-time job at a dinosaur museum built at that very site. From a hole he unearthed a two-foot-long shale slab. An experienced fossil hunter, Li split the slab and beheld a creature unlike any he had seen. The skeleton had a birdlike skull, a long tail and impressions of what appeared to be feather-like structures.
Because of the feathers, Ji Qiang, then the director of the National Geological Museum, which bought one of Li's slabs, assumed it was a new species of primitive bird. But other Chinese paleontologists were convinced it was a dinosaur.
On a visit to Beijing that October, Philip Currie, a paleontologist now at the University of Alberta, saw the specimen and realized it would turn paleontology on its head. The next month, Currie, a longtime China hand, showed a photograph of it to colleagues at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. The picture stole the show. "It was such an amazing fossil," recalls paleontologist Hans-Dieter Sues of the National Museum of Natural History. "Sensational." Western paleontologists soon made a pilgrimage to Beijing to see the fossil. "They came back dazed," Sues says.
Despite the feathers, the skeleton left no doubt that the new species, named Sinosauropteryx, meaning "Chinese lizard wing," was a dinosaur. It lived around 125 million years ago, based on the dating of radioactive elements in the sediments that encased the fossil. Its integumentary filaments—long, thin structures protruding from its scaly skin—convinced most paleontologists that the animal was the first feathered dinosaur ever unearthed. A dozen dinosaurs with filaments or feathers have since been discovered at that site.
By analyzing specimens from China, paleontologists have filled in gaps in the fossil record and traced the evolutionary relationships among various dinosaurs. The fossils finally have confirmed, to all but a few skeptics, that birds descended from dinosaurs and are the living representatives of a dinosaur lineage called the Maniraptorans.
Most dinosaurs were not part of the lineage that gave rise to birds; they occupied other branches of the dinosaur family tree. Sinosauropteryx, in fact, was what paleontologists call a non-avian dinosaur, even though it had feathers. This insight has prompted paleontologists to revise their view of other non-avian dinosaurs, such as the notorious meat eater Velociraptor and even some members of the tyrannosaur group. They, too, were probably adorned with feathers.
The abundance of feathered fossils has allowed paleontologists to examine a fundamental question: Why did feathers evolve? Today, it's clear that feathers perform many functions: they help birds retain body heat, repel water and attract a mate. And of course they aid flight—but not always, as ostriches and penguins, which have feathers but do not fly, demonstrate. Many feathered dinosaurs did not have wings or were too heavy, relative to the length of their feathered limbs, to fly.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Birds Dinosaurs Fossils China
Additional Sources
"Four-Winged Fossil Bridges Bird-Dinosaur Gap," by Sid Perkins, Science News, in Wired, September 25, 2009.
"Dinosaur Fossil Reveals True Feather Colors" by Sid Perkins, Science News, in Wired, February 4, 2010









Comments (9)
is it a four legged bird?cool i've never seen anything like that, or a cat with feathers, or anything other than the basic stuff you find on the internet.but' i thought man was biblical, being the greatest sreation and predator in history. makes you wonder what something that much older was realyy like.really
Posted by steven on July 3,2011 | 12:08 AM
Very informative. I liked this article very much.
Posted by Prasun Bhattacharyya on February 16,2011 | 01:16 AM
DINOSAURS LIVING DESCENDANTS Dec 2010
I get annoyed at paleoscience' constant efforts to take land "lizards" (dinos, amphibios, reptos, etc.) up into the trees without realistic visual forethought. Its a great leap for a ground pounder to perch. So, what makes more sense in between.....lizards could run but not yet fly (various degrees of flapping, guidance, etc.)!
Lizards had almost zero reasons to climb or perch in trees! Fruit/flowers/honey....not! Eat birds eggs...not even around yet! Escape predators....maybe? Which predator outlasted the other--tree v. ground?
Water draws plants and animals! It makes most sense for lizards to hang around water...hence most, if not all, pre-perch lizards remains are found at, in, near water sediments. Hence, ca-zillions of near water cliff dwelling/breeding birds still exist today. Where are the modern perch features on penguins, ducks, sea gulls, etc.?
Lizards learned to leap, jump, run off cliffs near water 1st...to escape danger; find &/or pounce on prey in/by water; scoop fish, protect offlings in cliffs, etc! Pre-fly lizards began to glide first--perching is a modern physical capability as pointed out in the article. Pre-fly lizards had strong run/leap/climb cliff capability/features coupled with weak (compared with today) fly feathers/stems for gliding/steerage....they didn't need to cavort and fly from tree to tree yet!
SO, LET'S NOT DO THE GROUND TO TREE LEAPING LIZARDS SPIN TOO SOON!
George Stevenson
Portland, Oregon
Posted by George Stevenson on December 9,2010 | 02:00 AM
What a great article!
Posted by Tom on December 1,2010 | 03:43 PM
Was the comment about Taiwan being on the map really necessary? You just had to voice your political opinions while talking about these amazing feathered dinosaurs from millions of years ago?
Posted by Adou on November 28,2010 | 10:34 PM
The illustration of the archaepteryx clearly has the leg joints wrong compared to the fossil image.
Posted by walt laramie on November 27,2010 | 07:47 PM
Some classic imitations or pritendings that they are strange. Can Irian-Papua island be one biggest dinosaur; can Turkey Salt and Eğridir lakes be biggest birds at history before deluvions? Some mauntains were full of buffalos due to some ignorante abrodal villagers. Can the biggest elephants or swans be bigger two times more and can they live two times more? Best sea can be similer to fish shape relatively that kind of hyphothese. The creatures were at craters. The origen of shape of the animals were the pharalel star groups relatively to same hyphothese. The important is being rational, realist and thruer guesses, imaginations. Valor Alexander
Posted by Valor Alexander on November 21,2010 | 09:31 PM
Extraordinaire...
Posted by Lucien Alexandre Marion on November 20,2010 | 09:22 PM
The article is very well written and covers much information that wasn't known when I was a zoology student. Thanks for making it available online.
Posted by Raymond Holderman on November 19,2010 | 10:51 AM