Dinosaurs' Living Descendants
China's spectacular feathered fossils have finally answered the century-old question about the ancestors of today's birds
- By Richard Stone
- Photographs by Stefen Chow
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2010, Subscribe
In a pine forest in rural northeastern China, a rugged shale slope is packed with the remains of extinct creatures from 125 million years ago, when this part of Liaoning province was covered with freshwater lakes. Volcanic eruptions regularly convulsed the area at the time, entombing untold millions of reptiles, fish, snails and insects in ash. I step gingerly among the myriad fossils, pick up a shale slab not much larger than my hand and smack its edge with a rock hammer. A seam splits a russet-colored fish in half, producing mirror impressions of delicate fins and bones as thin as human hairs.
One of China's star paleontologists, Zhou Zhonghe, smiles. "Amazing place, isn't it?" he says.
It was in 1995 that Zhou and colleagues announced the discovery of a fossil from this prehistoric disaster zone that heralded a new age of paleontology. The fossil was a primitive bird the size of a crow that may have been asphyxiated by volcanic fumes as it wheeled above the lakes all those millions of years ago. They named the new species Confuciusornis, after the Chinese philosopher.
Until then, only a handful of prehistoric bird fossils had been unearthed anywhere in the world. That's partly because birds, then as now, were far less common than fish and invertebrates, and partly because birds more readily evaded mudslides, tar pits, volcanic eruptions and other geological phenomena that captured animals and preserved traces of them for the ages. Scientists have located only ten intact fossilized skeletons of the earliest known bird, Archaeopteryx, which lived at the end of the Jurassic period, about 145 million years ago.
Zhou, who works at the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (IVPP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Beijing, believed that the extraordinary bone beds in Liaoning might fill in some of the many blanks in the fossil record of the earliest birds. He couldn't have been more prophetic. In the past 15 years, thousands of exquisitely preserved fossil birds have emerged from the ancient lakebed, called the Yixian Formation. The region has also yielded stunning dinosaur specimens, the likes of which had never been seen before. As a result, China has been the key to solving one of the biggest questions in dinosaur science in the past 150 years: the real relationship between birds and dinosaurs.
The idea that birds—the most diverse group of land vertebrates, with nearly 10,000 living species—descended directly from dinosaurs isn't new. It was raised by the English biologist Thomas Henry Huxley in his 1870 treatise, Further Evidence of the Affinity between the Dinosaurian Reptiles and Birds. Huxley, a renowned anatomist perhaps best remembered for his ardent defense of Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, saw little difference between the bone structure of Compsognathus, a dinosaur no bigger than a turkey, and Archaeopteryx, which was discovered in Germany and described in 1861. When Huxley looked at ostriches and other modern birds, he saw smallish dinosaurs. If a baby chicken's leg bones were enlarged and fossilized, he noted, "there would be nothing in their characters to prevent us from referring them to the Dinosauria."
Still, over the decades researchers who doubted the dinosaur-bird link also made good anatomical arguments. They said dinosaurs lack a number of features that are distinctly avian, including wishbones, or fused clavicles; bones riddled with air pockets; flexible wrist joints; and three-toed feet. Moreover, the posited link seemed contrary to what everyone thought they knew: that birds are small, intelligent, speedy, warmblooded sprites, whereas dinosaurs—from the Greek for "fearfully great lizard"—were coldblooded, dull, plodding, reptile-like creatures.
In the late 1960s, a fossilized dinosaur skeleton from Montana began to undermine that assumption. Deinonychus, or "terrible claw" after the sickle-shaped talon on each hind foot, stood about 11 feet from head to tail and was a lithe predator. Moreover, its bone structure was similar to that of Archaeopteryx. Soon scientists were gathering other intriguing physical evidence, finding that fused clavicles were common in dinosaurs after all. Deinonychus and Velociraptor bones had air pockets and flexible wrist joints. Dinosaur traits were looking more birdlike all the time. "All those things were yanked out of the definition of being a bird," says paleontologist Matthew Carrano of the Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Birds Dinosaurs Fossils China
Additional Sources
"Four-Winged Fossil Bridges Bird-Dinosaur Gap," by Sid Perkins, Science News, in Wired, September 25, 2009.
"Dinosaur Fossil Reveals True Feather Colors" by Sid Perkins, Science News, in Wired, February 4, 2010









Comments (9)
is it a four legged bird?cool i've never seen anything like that, or a cat with feathers, or anything other than the basic stuff you find on the internet.but' i thought man was biblical, being the greatest sreation and predator in history. makes you wonder what something that much older was realyy like.really
Posted by steven on July 3,2011 | 12:08 AM
Very informative. I liked this article very much.
Posted by Prasun Bhattacharyya on February 16,2011 | 01:16 AM
DINOSAURS LIVING DESCENDANTS Dec 2010
I get annoyed at paleoscience' constant efforts to take land "lizards" (dinos, amphibios, reptos, etc.) up into the trees without realistic visual forethought. Its a great leap for a ground pounder to perch. So, what makes more sense in between.....lizards could run but not yet fly (various degrees of flapping, guidance, etc.)!
Lizards had almost zero reasons to climb or perch in trees! Fruit/flowers/honey....not! Eat birds eggs...not even around yet! Escape predators....maybe? Which predator outlasted the other--tree v. ground?
Water draws plants and animals! It makes most sense for lizards to hang around water...hence most, if not all, pre-perch lizards remains are found at, in, near water sediments. Hence, ca-zillions of near water cliff dwelling/breeding birds still exist today. Where are the modern perch features on penguins, ducks, sea gulls, etc.?
Lizards learned to leap, jump, run off cliffs near water 1st...to escape danger; find &/or pounce on prey in/by water; scoop fish, protect offlings in cliffs, etc! Pre-fly lizards began to glide first--perching is a modern physical capability as pointed out in the article. Pre-fly lizards had strong run/leap/climb cliff capability/features coupled with weak (compared with today) fly feathers/stems for gliding/steerage....they didn't need to cavort and fly from tree to tree yet!
SO, LET'S NOT DO THE GROUND TO TREE LEAPING LIZARDS SPIN TOO SOON!
George Stevenson
Portland, Oregon
Posted by George Stevenson on December 9,2010 | 02:00 AM
What a great article!
Posted by Tom on December 1,2010 | 03:43 PM
Was the comment about Taiwan being on the map really necessary? You just had to voice your political opinions while talking about these amazing feathered dinosaurs from millions of years ago?
Posted by Adou on November 28,2010 | 10:34 PM
The illustration of the archaepteryx clearly has the leg joints wrong compared to the fossil image.
Posted by walt laramie on November 27,2010 | 07:47 PM
Some classic imitations or pritendings that they are strange. Can Irian-Papua island be one biggest dinosaur; can Turkey Salt and Eğridir lakes be biggest birds at history before deluvions? Some mauntains were full of buffalos due to some ignorante abrodal villagers. Can the biggest elephants or swans be bigger two times more and can they live two times more? Best sea can be similer to fish shape relatively that kind of hyphothese. The creatures were at craters. The origen of shape of the animals were the pharalel star groups relatively to same hyphothese. The important is being rational, realist and thruer guesses, imaginations. Valor Alexander
Posted by Valor Alexander on November 21,2010 | 09:31 PM
Extraordinaire...
Posted by Lucien Alexandre Marion on November 20,2010 | 09:22 PM
The article is very well written and covers much information that wasn't known when I was a zoology student. Thanks for making it available online.
Posted by Raymond Holderman on November 19,2010 | 10:51 AM