(Page 4 of 5)
George Boehlert, a marine scientist and director of the center, looks out of his office at a field of undulating sea grass. "What we know now is what we don't know," says Boehlert, whose dirty blond curls resemble ocean waves. "Ocean energy is a fast-moving field and environmental researchers have a lot of questions."
For instance, the buoys absorb energy from waves, reducing their size and power. Would shrunken swells affect sand movement and currents near shore, perhaps contributing to erosion?
Buoys, as well as the power cables that would connect to the electrical grid on-shore, emit electromagnetic fields. And mooring cables would thrum in the currents, like a guitar string. Might these disturbances confuse whales, sharks, dolphins, salmon, rays, crabs and other marine animals that use electromagnetism and sound for feeding, mating or navigation?
Would birds collide with the buoys or turtles become entangled in the cables?
Would anchors create artificial reefs that attract fish not normally found in that habitat?
Would deploying, maintaining and removing buoys disturb the seafloor or otherwise change the ocean environment?
"I want to know the answers to these questions, too," von Jouanne says. "The last thing I want to do is harm the ocean and its beautiful creatures." To study the environmental risks and allow wave-energy engineers to test their inventions, she and colleagues at Oregon State, including Boehlert, are building a floating test berth nearby. It is scheduled to open next year and at its center will be a buoy full of instruments to collect data on how well wave-energy converters are performing.
The test berth is part of a massive effort to move wave energy out of the lab and onto the electrical power grid. Through a new Energy Department-funded national marine renewable energy center, researchers from all over the country will have the chance to refine their inventions in the WESRF energy lab, test them in the Hinsdale wave flume and perfect them in the ocean. "This is what we need to do to fully explore wave energy as part of a renewable energy portfolio, for the state, the nation and the world," von Jouanne says.
Boehlert and others say that even if wave energy has some local environmental impacts, it would likely be far less harmful than coal- and oil-fired power plants. "The effects of continuing to pump carbon into the atmosphere could be much worse for marine life than buoys bobbing in the waves," he says. "We want ocean energy to work."



Comments
This is a great story, portraying the human side to an emerging technology and industry. We often think technology evolves from big budgets and armies of engineers, but this story reminds us that it can happen from the efforts of a dedicated few who treat it as a labor of love. The work can take place as much in a family bathtub or community swimming pool, as in a high tech laboratory.
John Lavrakas
Newport, OR
Posted by John Lavrakas on June 25,2009 | 09:33AM
"Complex machines like [Pelamis] are riddled with valves, filters, tubes, hoses, couplings, bearings, switches, gauges, meters and sensors. The intermediate stages reduce efficiency, and if one component breaks, the whole device goes kaput."
Rather like aeroplanes, automobiles and wind turbines?
A Penny Farthing is simpler than a derailleur gear road bicycle with all its complicated linkages but it's not more efficient.
Similarly a single engine failure on a 747 doesn't cause it to go kaput and the same applies to a properly engineered Wave Energy Converter.
Posted by Max CC on June 25,2009 | 02:57PM
The Devil is in the details. The voltage generated by the coil is N ∂φ/∂t where N is the number of turns in the coil,φ is the magnetic flux and t is the time it takes to make the magnet move through the coil. ∂φ/∂t is the rate of change of magnetic flux. Thus the magnet must be large to generate an adequate magnetic flux and larger the magnet, the greater its inertia (t becomes greater) and thus the lower the voltage generated.
Posted by Moderate Redoy on June 29,2009 | 10:39AM
The up-down motion could be converted simply to rotating motion of a manetized rotor of an electric generator. With this rotor in a quasi horizontal position perpendicular to the vertical motion of the wave action the gyroscopic condition of the system would help to stabilize the buoy mounting against more aggressive wave action. I was thinking of the "yankee" screwdriver as a means of coverting vertical motion to rotating motion as a simple technic.
Posted by Robert Meek on June 29,2009 | 04:45PM
Meaning no offense to the people in the article but I cannot believe there is no mention of Steven Salter and the "Salter Duck".
We had this technology in 1974 and if it weren't for Parliament mistakenly/foolishly (your choice) killing the project, we could have been refining his work ever since. Also, his device was definitely not one to which "The gadgets all had one problem in common: they were too complicated." applies.
Posted by Ben on July 2,2009 | 06:25PM
I suspect that equally important to developing a wave energy converter would be to develop a wave energy enhancer. In other words, the power developed by Ms. von Jouanne's buoys is limited to the vagaries of the type wave it harnesses.
Both the strength and direction of waves can be manipulated by the depth of the ocean bottom. As ocean waves approach the shallow depth of a beach they are bent and the wave height increases. More than 50-years ago, Doc Walters, demonstrated this with a wave generator. He changed the tank's water depth by placing wide blocks of metal of various thickness (and shape) in the water. When a lens-shaped block was placed in the water as an artificial "ocean" bottom, the waves were bent and came to a focal point the same as light through a lens. The waves can be tightly managed. Where the waves cross, there are nodes and height-on-height super-waves; they are like controlled 'rogue waves'. The energy surges.
Instead of taking a buoy out 1-1/2 miles to an ocean depth of 140' as Ms. von Jouanne did, it may be better to consider shallow depths. By constructing an off-shore reef of specific shape and depth, the restructured cookie-cutter waves will allow a different shape buoy to optimize the harvest of massive power from each predictable wave rather than from a sole point on the wave. Better: harness controlled rogue waves.
Posted by Andy Olsen on July 2,2009 | 07:07PM
I would think that the greater ocean depth is necessary to counter the water depth changes due to tides. The amount of slack in the anchor line with a 10 foot tide is not as noticeable in 140ft of water then say 40ft. (angle of the buoy line at low tide accounting for drift) It would seem important to keep the fixed coil as vertical as possible.
Otherwise, a very simple design, that would be relatively inexpensive to produce, and maintain. Kudos to Von Jouanne
Posted by Larry on July 4,2009 | 09:05AM
Nice story - good practical application of physics as well, but there's already a simple device under patent process which operates on fresh or sea water, and looks to have the capability of pumping (per square meter of pump area) 333,000 gallons of liquid an hour to a 150 foot head for no "manufactured" energy in. Combining both technologies could provide an optimum process. Hydraulics certainly can be an efficient energy source. The devices could be incorporated each to the other and be fully synergistic.
Posted by Bill on July 7,2009 | 01:01PM
It is wonderful to read about Annette von Jouanne and her initiative and drive to perfect her device for generating electricity from the ocean waves ("Catching a Wave" by Elizabeth Rusch). I was the Project Manager for the successful demonstration of generating electricity from the tides using the "Gorlov Helical Turbine" (GHT). The project was supported by the Long Island Power Authority (LIPA), the New York State Energy R&D Authority (NYSERDA), GCK, Inc. (the owner of the patents on the GHT), and myself, and took place in the tidal channel between Shelter Island and North Haven Peninsula (near Sag Harbor) off Long island, New York in 2004. The two GHTs, submerged over the bow of a barge moored in the channel, immediately began generating electricity upon being lowered into place, producing an average power of about two kilowatts during the twenty hours per day of tidal flow. The GHTs are rugged, reliable and commercially available, in contrast to other systems such as the propeller type which recently failed in the East River of New York City. I should warn Ms. von Jouanne that after demonstrating the reliability of her "wave energy converter" in real ocean waves, not a trivial step, obtaining the funding for a commercial installation (millions of dollars to generate multi-megawatts) is the primary problem in making a significant impact. Whether the "American Clean Energy and Security Act" now before the Congress, if enacted, will provide funding for commercial scale "alternative energy systems" such as ocean waves and tidal flows is a real question.
Richard S. Greeley
St. Davids, PA
Posted by Richard S. Greeley on July 8,2009 | 08:29AM
Can the plastic that is out in the ocean be mined and recycled? Can plastic be fashioned into machine parts? I am not an engineer or a scientist, just a curious person.
Posted by Martha Quigley on July 15,2009 | 05:39PM
good idea i have often watched the wave action and wondered vwhy someone don't make use of the obvious energy poteintually available all over the world stay with it i can see a lot of potential with this idea bill hainline ---frustrated erstwhile inventor
Posted by bill hainline on July 15,2009 | 07:44PM
There is a vast amount of energy in the ocean, BUT, HUMANS ALSO RELY ON THE OCEAN BECAUSE IT IS A FOOD SOURCE, PROVIDES RECREATION, AND MOST IMPORTANT IT IS THE SOURCE OF LIFE. IF THE OCEAN DIES, HUMANS WILL FOLLOW. THE OCEAN AS A SOURCE OF POWER IS A GREAT IDEA, BUT HUMANS DON'T SEEM TO SEE THE FAR REACHING RESULTS OF THEIR TECHNOLOGY, THEY CUT OFF THEIR NOSE TO SPITE THEIR FACE. ISSUES LIKE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY RELEASE IN THE WATER FROM THE SURROUNDING CABLES AND BUOYS. THE ELECTROMAGNETIC ENERGY RELEASED INTO THE WATER WARMS THE WATER, WHICH IS A BIG MISTAKE AND ANYONE STUDYING ENERGY SHOULD KNOW THAT MUCH. THE METHANE GAS ESCAPES. METHANE GAS IS A GREEN HOUSE GAS, AND HAS A SYNERGY EFFECT ON THE PROBLEM OF CARBON DIOXIDE. WARMING THE OCEAN ALSO BRINGS DEADLY BACTERIA TO FISH.
I COULD GO ON AND ON, BUT FOLKS INTO A SOURCE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY SHOULD LOOK AT THE LONG TERM EFFECTS OF THEIR IDEAS.
WE ALL KNOW ABOUT WIND AND SOLAR TYPES OF ENERGY. THEY ARE GIVEN TO US TO USE, BUT WE CANNOT EVERY SATISFIED UNLESS WE ARE DESTROYING NATURE TO GET THE ALMIGHTY DOLLAR. PROFIT AND GREED WILL BE HUMANS DOWNFALL. NOT ONLY vON JOUANNE, BUT ALL FOLKS INTO USING THE OCEAN SHOULD BE VERY FAMILIAR WITH THE PROBLEMS OF WAVE ENERGY AND ITS AFFECTS ON THE OCEAN. HUMAN GREED WILL BE THE DOWNFALL OF LIFE ON EARTH.
Posted by Barbara on July 28,2009 | 10:29AM
Its okay to take energy from waves becaus scientists can find a way to harness the gas and other bad particles and chemicals.The ocean is also over
Posted by on September 8,2009 | 06:53PM