Brilliant Space Photos From Chandra and Spitzer

Two unsung space telescopes create eye-opening images of the universe from light we can't see

  • By Abigail Tucker
  • Smithsonian magazine, February 2011, Subscribe
View More Photos »
Milky Way The center of our Milky Way galaxy is even more breathtaking when seen as a composite made of data from three space-based instruments sensitive to different wavelengths.

NASA / CXC / UMass / D. Wand et al.

 

Article Tools

 
  • Comments (12)
  • Font
    		•
  • Email
    		•
  • RSS
    		•
  • Print
    		•
  • Single Page
    		•

    Photo Gallery

    Heated black hole gas

    Brilliant Space Photos From Chandra and Spitzer

    Explore more photos from the story

    More from Smithsonian.com

    To human eyes, the night sky is a confetti of stars. Powerful telescopes show us the remote planets and faraway galaxies that our puny retinas cannot see. But even the Hubble Space Telescope can’t reveal everything that’s out there. Many objects—the fizzled stars known as brown dwarfs, for instance—are too cool to give off visible light, which represents only a tiny sliver of the electromagnetic spectrum. They do, however, emit energy in an invisible form: longer wavelengths known as infrared radiation. Incredibly hot objects, like massive exploding stars called supernovas, give off much of their energy in shorter wavelengths that also are invisible: gamma rays and X-rays.

    Fortunately, other telescopes trans- late these spectacles into images we can understand. In the 1990s and early 2000s, NASA launched space-based telescopes known as the Great Observatories. The first and most famous, Hubble, specializes in visible light. Lesser-known but equally vital instruments focus on different wavelengths.

    “The object was to have a major telescope in each part of the electromagnetic spectrum,” says Giovanni Fazio, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “When you look at the universe in different wavelengths, you get a completely different picture. They are all pieces of a puzzle.”

    Hubble’s 1990 launch was followed by that of Compton (1991), which observed gamma rays, Chandra (1999), which studies X-rays, and Spitzer (2003), the infrared telescope. Compton fell to Earth in 2000, disintegrating in the atmosphere and splashing down as planned in the Pacific Ocean. (Another space telescope, Fermi, replaced it in 2008.) But Spitzer and Chandra are still up—way up—and running, unlocking secrets of the universe and surpassing the hopes of the people who helped create them.

    The telescopes’ pictures of winking newborn stars and gluttonous black holes are composed of false colors that scientists assign to the different wavelengths the telescopes detect. In addition to being data-laden, though, these images are simply wonderful to behold. Pulsing with flamingo pink, indigo and saffron, some are almost psychedelic—a florid galaxy appears to breathe fire—while others recall delicate natural forms: spider webs, windowpane frost, wisps of smoke. A few have an almost spectral quality, particularly “The Hand of God,” Chandra’s portrait of a young pulsar in which ghostly blue fingers seem to caress the heavens.

    Most satellite telescopes, including Hubble, circle Earth, but Spitzer revolves around the Sun, trailing behind Earth in its orbit. Thus Spitzer not only avoids Earth’s atmosphere, which would obscure the telescope’s view, it also avoids heat from Earth and the Moon. A supply of liquid helium initially cooled the instrument almost to absolute zero—or minus 459 degrees Fahrenheit, the lowest possible temperature—so the telescope’s own radiation wouldn’t muddle its readings.

    Spitzer looks at cooler parts of the universe. Infrared is associated with temperatures from minus 450 to plus 6,000 degrees, and while 6,000 degrees may not sound cold, astronomers are accustomed to recording bodies in the millions of degrees.

    The telescope has detected radiation from Jupiter-like exoplanets in tight orbits around other stars, and it has located brown dwarfs, which—if they host their own mini solar systems, as some scientists suspect—could be ideal staging grounds for life. Spitzer can also peer through the choking dust in the spiral arms of distant galaxies to see where stars are being born. These observations can yield insights into how our own solar system formed.


    To human eyes, the night sky is a confetti of stars. Powerful telescopes show us the remote planets and faraway galaxies that our puny retinas cannot see. But even the Hubble Space Telescope can’t reveal everything that’s out there. Many objects—the fizzled stars known as brown dwarfs, for instance—are too cool to give off visible light, which represents only a tiny sliver of the electromagnetic spectrum. They do, however, emit energy in an invisible form: longer wavelengths known as infrared radiation. Incredibly hot objects, like massive exploding stars called supernovas, give off much of their energy in shorter wavelengths that also are invisible: gamma rays and X-rays.

    Fortunately, other telescopes trans- late these spectacles into images we can understand. In the 1990s and early 2000s, NASA launched space-based telescopes known as the Great Observatories. The first and most famous, Hubble, specializes in visible light. Lesser-known but equally vital instruments focus on different wavelengths.

    “The object was to have a major telescope in each part of the electromagnetic spectrum,” says Giovanni Fazio, an astrophysicist at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “When you look at the universe in different wavelengths, you get a completely different picture. They are all pieces of a puzzle.”

    Hubble’s 1990 launch was followed by that of Compton (1991), which observed gamma rays, Chandra (1999), which studies X-rays, and Spitzer (2003), the infrared telescope. Compton fell to Earth in 2000, disintegrating in the atmosphere and splashing down as planned in the Pacific Ocean. (Another space telescope, Fermi, replaced it in 2008.) But Spitzer and Chandra are still up—way up—and running, unlocking secrets of the universe and surpassing the hopes of the people who helped create them.

    The telescopes’ pictures of winking newborn stars and gluttonous black holes are composed of false colors that scientists assign to the different wavelengths the telescopes detect. In addition to being data-laden, though, these images are simply wonderful to behold. Pulsing with flamingo pink, indigo and saffron, some are almost psychedelic—a florid galaxy appears to breathe fire—while others recall delicate natural forms: spider webs, windowpane frost, wisps of smoke. A few have an almost spectral quality, particularly “The Hand of God,” Chandra’s portrait of a young pulsar in which ghostly blue fingers seem to caress the heavens.

    Most satellite telescopes, including Hubble, circle Earth, but Spitzer revolves around the Sun, trailing behind Earth in its orbit. Thus Spitzer not only avoids Earth’s atmosphere, which would obscure the telescope’s view, it also avoids heat from Earth and the Moon. A supply of liquid helium initially cooled the instrument almost to absolute zero—or minus 459 degrees Fahrenheit, the lowest possible temperature—so the telescope’s own radiation wouldn’t muddle its readings.

    Spitzer looks at cooler parts of the universe. Infrared is associated with temperatures from minus 450 to plus 6,000 degrees, and while 6,000 degrees may not sound cold, astronomers are accustomed to recording bodies in the millions of degrees.

    The telescope has detected radiation from Jupiter-like exoplanets in tight orbits around other stars, and it has located brown dwarfs, which—if they host their own mini solar systems, as some scientists suspect—could be ideal staging grounds for life. Spitzer can also peer through the choking dust in the spiral arms of distant galaxies to see where stars are being born. These observations can yield insights into how our own solar system formed.

    The telescope’s most amazing power may be its ability to view the universe in its infancy. Looking deep in space is the same as looking back in time, explains Fazio, who designed part of Spitzer. As the 13.7-billion-year-old universe expands, visible light is stretched into infrared wavelengths, a phenomenon known as redshift. Focusing on infrared light, Spitzer scientists initially hoped to see the universe when it was just two billion years old—but they’ve gone much farther back in time than that. “Now we’ve been able to look back to 700 million years old,” Fazio said, or about 13 billion years ago. Spitzer’s observations suggest that galaxies had already begun to form when the universe was only 400 million to 500 million years old, much earlier than previously theorized.

    Chandra, the X-ray telescope, follows an elliptical orbit around Earth, flying 200 times higher than Hubble. Chandra specializes in violent phenomena, such as flares shooting from young stars and the explosions of supernovas. “What we like to know is what was going on inside the star just before it blew up, what are the details of the explosion itself, and what happens following the explosion,” says Harvey Tananbaum, director of the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory’s Chandra X-ray Center.

    Chandra also probes objects with extreme gravitational or magnetic fields, like neutron stars and black holes. Some scientists expect Chandra to be crucial in the study of little-understood dark matter and dark energy, mysterious forces that account for most of the material in the universe. But the telescope has also revealed new things about more familiar sights: Saturn’s rings, it turns out, glitter with X-rays.

    Sometimes astronomers produce images using data from all three telescopes. In 2009, the trio generated a stunning composite view of the Milky Way’s core. Hubble showed countless stars, Spitzer captured radiant dust clouds and Chandra tracked X-ray emissions from material near a black hole.

    Telescopes can’t last forever. Spitzer ran out of coolant last year, though some parts are still cold enough to function, and the telescope has begun to drift away from Earth. “It’s going to be sad to see it go,” says Fazio. “It’s been a major part of my life for the past 25 years. But we’re still mining the data and finding new stuff.” In 2015, the Webb, a new infrared telescope with the capacity to collect more than 58 times as much light as Spitzer, is scheduled to pick up where Spitzer leaves off.

    Chandra is still functioning well, and scientists expect the instrument to soldier on for at least another decade. Eventually, perhaps a century from now, the worn-out telescope will likely slip too close to Earth and burn up in the atmosphere. But we have many more illuminating images to look forward to before then.

    Abigail Tucker is Smithsonian’s staff writer.


    1 2 Next »

        Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.



    Digg


     
    Comments (12)

    I love how it looks up in space ad takes pics of exploding stars and black holes

    Posted by taylor on February 11,2012 | 03:11 PM

    Now how can anybody say that there is no existence of aliens(another living planet),after seeing this i m quit confident aliens are there. Its a fabulous achievement.

    Posted by Vishwanandan on February 23,2011 | 12:23 AM

    Re: Seeing the Invisible Universe – by Abigail Tucker Feb 2011 Smithsonian The beautiful pictures from Chandra brought back many memories for me. I was the second and third shift Senior Test Conductor at TRW responsible for the Assembly, Integration and Environmental testing of AXAF – later renamed Chandra. Our dedicated test crew worked tirelessly 24/7 for over two years to make Chandra launch ready. The challenges were enormous and it took imagination and innovative problem solving skills to keep the project on time and on track. It was like losing a member of our TRW family when we shipped Chandra to Florida for the Columbia Space Shuttle Launch.

    Posted by Robert Smith on February 16,2011 | 04:18 PM

    The article was good but on the web, it's criminal to offer such tiny photo's of a subject like the universe!

    Here's a better example of how photo's of the universe should be shown: http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap110212.html

    Posted by Joseph on February 12,2011 | 02:54 AM

    Help! Thinking I was blocking the ad images, I blocked instead the beautiful galactic images and can't seem to undo my mistake. How can I reverse my decision? I'd love to use these in my classroom.

    Posted by Julie O on January 26,2011 | 02:47 PM

    Spectacular images shown by powerful telescopes are really awesome...I wish God has created a planet somewhere in the galaxy habitable to another set of living things that do not abuse God's creation.

    Posted by Oscar S. Ferrer on January 25,2011 | 03:45 AM

    Hi BobE,

    good question. When matter falls into a black hole it gets accelerated due to the strong gravitational force but if the black hole is close to a good supply of gas, it can't all get in at once and a traffic jam occurs. As all the gas pushes to get to the centre and as the gas particles rub together against each other, the gas gets very hot and turns into a plasma. Things become chaotic and the rapid rotation of the black hole swirls space-time around like water going down a plug hole, creating magnetic fields in the plasma. These magnetic fields result in some of the plasma being ejected from the traffic jam region close to the black hole. SO some of the stuff witing to get in gets thrown out. Once its inside, its gone and you can't see it (unless black holes evaporate but thats a different story.). You are seeing violent events in the stuff that is falling in.

    Posted by Malc on January 24,2011 | 07:29 PM

    Gotta LOVE intelligent design!

    Posted by Sandy on January 24,2011 | 06:41 PM

    And Some Say There Is No God !!!, I am apt to believe completely otherwise! This massive and beauty filled mysterious objects, could not of just happened without divine intervention. Thats like saying a new BMW could create itself from the scraps at the local junk yard, without any help what so ever ! Highly unlikely !!!

    Posted by Mark King on January 23,2011 | 09:55 PM

    One of the Chandra pictures depicts matter being ejected from a black hole. I have always read that nothing escapes a black hole. Have I been mislead?

    Posted by BobE on January 23,2011 | 07:45 PM

    Great job! I love the clarity in the filaments of color. Cas A is especially spectacular as you can see the remnant white dwarf star in the center of the supernova explosion. The Crab Nebula is also spectacular, for similar reasons.

    It is important to see images like these: they help us to situate ourselves in the universe. We have been able to see these kinds of photos only in the last 20 years. I, for one, am utterly grateful to/for the astronomers and telescopes that have made these images possible. Let's see more of these knockout images!

    Posted by Q R Quasar on January 23,2011 | 05:35 AM

    Great Pictures, Love the Color

    Posted by Lorraine on January 20,2011 | 11:07 AM

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.



    Advertisement


    Advertisement

    Follow Us






    First Name
    Last Name
    Address 1
    Address 2
    City
    State   Zip
    Email



    Smithsonian Store

    Smithsonian Journeys