Barrow, Alaska: Ground Zero for Climate Change
Scientists converge on the northernmost city in the United States to study global warming's dramatic consequences
- By Bob Reiss
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2010, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 5)
Commercial shipping operations—which abide by different regulations, require more long-term planning and cannot risk having to retreat to the longer route through the Panama Canal—are likely to follow the tourist ships once the passage is more dependably navigable. A single container ship using the route to reach New York City from China could save up to $2 million on fuel and Panama Canal tolls. The passage is expected to open to regular commercial shipping, in summers, sometime between 2013 and 2050. (Icebreakers have enabled the Soviet Union and Russia to use the Northeast Passage, also known as the Northern Sea Route, since the 1930s. When two German commercial cargo vessels made it through last summer, the first non-Russian ships to do so, they made headlines around the world.)
“The [entire North] Alaskan Coast may come to look like the coast of Louisiana today, filled with the lights of ships and oil rigs,” says Scott Borgerson, a visiting fellow for ocean governance at the Council on Foreign Relations.
But the opening of North Alaskan waters to ship traffic poses a host of new challenges for the Coast Guard, which is responsible for security and safety from the Bering Strait to Canada, some 1,000 miles. Security threats along Alaska’s long, unguarded coastline are likely to increase. There may be shipwrecks and fuel spills. “The Bering Strait will be the new choke point for world shipping,” Coast Guard Adm. Gene Brooks told me. “We’re going to have problems.” In recent summers, the Coast Guard has racheted up its visits to Arctic-area villages to learn about the people and operating conditions in the north. It has helicoptered in teams of doctors and veterinarians and held small-boat and helicopter exercises to practice rescue missions. But, Brooks added, “We don’t have the infrastructure: radio towers, communication, all the things that states in the lower 48 have.”
For their part, Alaskan Eskimos worry that the problems associated with increased traffic will affect their food supply. Much of their diet comes from seals, walrus and whales, which may be killed or displaced by human activity. (Packaged food is available but costly. In one town I saw a 16-ounce jar of mayonnaise for $7. A gallon of milk cost $11.) “It is alarming to contemplate the explosion of ship traffic on subsistence hunting and animal migration,” said Vera Metcalf, director of the Eskimo Walrus Commission.
But less ice also spells opportunity. Under a 1982 international treaty called the Convention on the Law of the Sea, Arctic nations can claim sea floor as national territory if they can prove, by mapping the ocean floor, that the areas are extensions of their continental shelves. The implications are staggering because an estimated 22 percent of the world’s undiscovered oil and gas reserves lies beneath Arctic seas, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Energy and ocean policy consultant Paul Kelly calls the potential expansion “the greatest division of lands on earth possibly ever to occur, if you add up claims around the world.”
The United States, which stands to gain territory the size of California, is woefully behind in the race to develop its territorial claims, critics say. Russia and Norway have already submitted claim applications to a United Nations-based commission that will help determine ownership. Russia and Canada have beefed up their Arctic military forces, and Canada has installed sensors on Devon Island in the high arctic to detect rogue ships.
In 2007, Russia dropped a titanium flag on the ocean floor at the North Pole—an act that some have likened in its wake-up effect to the 1957 launch of Sputnik. Artur Chilingarov, the Russian legislator and explorer who dropped the flag, boasted that “the Arctic is ours.” Russia has 18 icebreakers and plans to build floating nuclear power plants for use in the Arctic. In contrast, the United States has two polar-class icebreakers.
In fact, the United States will have little say in the decision to award land claims because some members of the U.S. Senate, citing national security, have blocked ratification of the 1982 treaty for more than two decades. “If this was a baseball game,” Admiral Brooks has said, “the United States wouldn’t be on the field, the stands, even the parking lot.”
“Until now the Arctic was in a frozen state, both literally and figuratively,” Borgerson said. “As it thaws, these new issues emerge.”
“Hold the shotgun and watch out for polar bears.”
John Lenters pushed a metal boat into a freshwater lake three miles south of Barrow and motioned for me to climb aboard. The wind was stiff, the sun bright, the vista dotted with Arctic flowers—marsh marigold and Arctic cotton. Lenters, a hydroclimatologist at the University of Nebraska, studies how tundra lakes are responding to climate change. Now he was steering toward a yellow speck in the middle of the lake, a climate-monitoring buoy due for scheduled maintenance.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Global Warming Alaska Arctic Glaciers
Additional Sources
Watching Ice and Weather Our Way by Conrad Oozeva, Chester Noongwook, George Noongwook, Christina Alowa, and Igor Krupnik, Smithsonian Institution, 2004









Comments (34)
+ View All Comments
It is terrible how the artic is melting. That is all due to global warming.
Posted by Joe on February 17,2012 | 07:13 PM
I am a 76 yr old world traveler who has $1650.00 total dollars coming in each month. I have been on six of the continents, traveled to Antarctica and six of the countries in S America earlier in this decade, went four weeks thruout the US West covering every one of the Big League baseball parks, spent 3 weeks in N Europe visiting all the Baltic states to St Petersburg. I have lived in Europe for 7 years 40 years ago and traveled around the world several times on ship or by air. I suffer from Charteau-Marie- Tooth disease, a crippling disease affecting little kids mostly, but I got into the USArmy with it and so I have a 60% disability pension, a good wife who helps me and a desire to see the world. I WANT TO SAIL THRU THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE, can get to Barrow myself, need help for the rest of the trip.
Posted by Curtis DeShong on October 31,2010 | 12:10 PM
I would like to thank all you ignorant people out there who enjoy trotting out the same old stupid stories claiming climate change is a hoax.
Climategate; thousands of emails trawled to find a couple of examples of questionable SEMANTICS! Greenleand; sorry, interior was never GREEN.
Volcanoes; tiny CO2 emissions compared to the plague which now covers the Earth burning everything it can find = HUMANS!
Egypt; good grief you are stupid! Irrigation from the Nile provides water for the crops.
Natural cycles; means the World should be cooling right now, not WARMING.
Thank you for confirming my cynical opinions that the small percentage of wealthy people on this planet (by that I mean everyone who has clothes to wear, food in their belly and a roof over their head) are only interested in their own greedy, self appeasement. With such an attitude, the future of the human race doesn't look good - good riddance!
Posted by Peter on June 16,2010 | 05:06 AM
Disappointing. The denier nuts are here too...
I thought smithsonianmag.com would have better informed posters, but apparently not.
Posted by Rod on June 4,2010 | 09:28 AM
It is amusing and sad at the same time to see these hysterical alarmists insist every scientist in the world is in on the conspiracy to... to.... well, they don't say what the scientists' goals are, but the scientists are are lying about global warming. FUNNY! Note that "climategate" never happened, and that no scientist did anything wrong: not even the America Treason Network, FOX, was able to show any scientist did anything wrong. Meanwhile, humans have caused, and are still causing, Earth to warm; I see that a recent paper by MIT climatologists, using Goddard data, have shown that even sequestering CO2 will not help much--- it is too late to mitigate the damage.
Posted by Desertphile on June 3,2010 | 10:28 PM
The very beginning of this article dictates the one-sided direction..."Scientists converge on the northernmost city in the United States to study global warming's dramatic consequences". This Global Warming" onslaught is the 2nd biggest scam in human history. This is fully political and has nothing to do with concern for the planet or the people.
It is about money (what isn't in politics) that politicians can obtain via another "tax" so they can spend even more.
I've finally figured out why the "lefties" are still pushing this down our throats from every possible political angle in spite of the enormous corruption uncovered - if you keep on repeating something, eventually the mindless masses (yes, that is what we are to politicians) will believe it.
The earth has experienced "climate Change" for billions or hundreds of millions of years, and these changes occur over hundreds and/or thousands and/or tens of thousands of years. The Middle Ages Warming period (800 A.D. - 1300 A.D.) and every other prior Warming Period must have an anthropogenic cause, right!!! Must have been all the fossil fuels to heat the caves and mud huts, along with the gas powered oxen. Lastly, the "little Ice Age" (1400 A.D. - 1850 A.D.) must also have been due to global warming, as any weather related event is now being shoved down our throats as global warming. There is no end to the insults being fed to us individuals.
Follow the Money ...
Posted by Ray Aronson on April 12,2010 | 05:41 PM
Dr. Johnson, the point is that the Climategate people were at the apex of their scientific field, supposedly the best and brightest (and most honest?) in meteorology, telling us we need sweeping carbon emissions reduction legislation.
And since global warming has not occurred over the last decade (not what the Climategate people who agree with you said), your statement that it's a big problem rings hollow. Besides, with any global warming (by solar flux), the surface of the ocean is heated for the formation of more cooling clouds.
Posted by James I. Nienhuis on March 26,2010 | 07:05 PM
Were there 6 polar bear hides on the rack in the picture? I know that the natives are allowed to shoot polar bears, but that seems like an excessive number
Posted by Janet McCormick on March 18,2010 | 08:19 PM
It is indeed unfortunate and scandalous that several scientists "manipulated" data on maybe 19 documents of various importance. What many readers don't fully realize however, is that there are over 100 peer-reviewed articles published in the US and internationally each month documenting compelling evidence of global warming and its impact. The journals I am referring to include, Science, Nature, American Naturalist, American Scientist, Ecology and Ecology Letters to name a few in addition to Smithsonian. In fact Nature publishing has even begun a new journal to act as a venue for increasing numbers of high-quality global change research manuscripts; it is called Nature Global Change. As a scientist, my assessment of all the work I have seen over the course of 20 years is that global climate change is happening at an increasingly rapid rate and that anthropomorphic causes are highly probable.
Posted by Robert H Johnson PhD on March 18,2010 | 05:42 PM
CAS, the whole point is why did they feel compelled to fudge the data, to fool themselves, is that it? The only reason is that the data didn't, and doesn't, say what they want it to say for their nefarious agenda, very simple.
Posted by James I. Nienhuis on March 16,2010 | 09:48 AM
hay... these guys should go to the east coast of the us and check out how hot it is here!!!
Posted by john on March 15,2010 | 06:44 PM
To infer that climate change is a hoax seems ridiculous to me. The majority of the scientists of the world from all disciplines of science are coming to the same conclusion that the climate is changing. The impact of humanity on our planet is undeniably tremendous. I think a reasonable person could see that trying to organize a hoax of such magnitude and involving so many people is a little farfetched. The hoax is so big that nearly 100 leaders from around the world are fooled and meet to discuss it each year at the climate change summit? To point out some inconsistencies in an evolving set of knowledge is not exactly what one would call hard evidence against the reality of the situation when the pool of evidence is so vast and diffused. It seems to me that the people who have something to loose, such as money from a policy change would be the ones to vehemently deny it. They would be the ones to invest the big money into a propaganda campaign to convince less educated people that it was a hoax. The Smithsonian is a reputable magazine and I thought the article was excellent. It gave a different perspective to an important issue our generation needs to deal with. The reality of the situation is that the legacy of humanity from this and last century may be that we chemically altered the climate. I think it is a shame that I saw so many negative comments related to this article.
Posted by CAS on March 15,2010 | 04:16 PM
Interesting about any global atmospheric warming (actually from temporary solar output increases), the warming causes more evaporation of the ocean which increases the global cloudcover generally, a buffer system, the greater cloudcover which cools the atmosphere back down. The Ice Age was caused by greater cloudcover from a geothermally heated ocean.
Posted by James I. Nienhuis on March 13,2010 | 10:13 PM
While in the Air Force and stationed in St. Louis Mo. from 1957 thru 1958, I was a supporter/contributor to a local AM radio station's promation to purchase a snow mobile for one Chester Noongwook, an Alaskan Eskimo mail-carrier who delivered mail by dog sled. Throught the years I've told that story whenever a relative conversation arose. The March 2010 issue totally floored me and reconfirmed my 50 plus years memory. Its an additional pleasure knowing Mr. Noongwook is still with us as well as seeing his smiling face.
Posted by Anthony Korch on March 13,2010 | 09:25 AM
+ View All Comments