Are Americans Stuck to their Cubicles?
After a debilitating bicycle accident kept her inactive, Mary Collins toured the country studying Americans’ sedentary lifestyle
- By Abigail Tucker
- Smithsonian.com, December 29, 2009, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
You spent some time with an Amish farmer?
What got me started on the book was a little item in the New York Times science section. A study had found that the average Amish farmer moved about 60 hours a week. Sixty hours of movement! Wow. So then I went out to Pennsylvania and visited an Amish farm several days in a row. And sure enough, at four in the morning, they’re up lugging buckets, collecting milk. After one day I was so tired.
Why did you visit an Utz potato chip factory?
I wanted to do a chapter about the social history of how we moved to a life where our work is no longer physical, and where our physical life is leisure, something we choose to do. That’s very recent. More than 40 percent of Americans still lived on farms in 1900. Now it’s something like 2 percent of people live on farms and most of them use big machines. That shift fascinated me. I thought, "How do I capture the essence of (modern) work?" Even the physical jobs that still exist are not healthy, because they are assembly line jobs. I ended up going to the potato chip factory because there was a bit of an irony that I would go talk about a book about movement at a potato chip factory.
How can we help the workers in that factory?
Places like Utz make sure their workers rotate jobs so the same person doesn’t do the same thing all day. To tell you the truth, the assembly line workers [are better off] than the desk workers. The desk workers relentlessly sit at their desk and type all day long. The average desk worker has far less variety of movement. A desk worker has a worst-case scenario. The repetition is even more intense.
Why have our athletes gotten so much more impressive over the years as the average American lags farther behind?
This stems out of the idea that exercise is something you choose to do—it’s somehow remote from our sense of self. [Professional athletes] are performers and entertainers now, separate from us, while the average person is less and less connected to physical life. Back when everyone was a farmer the divide between the farmer and the athlete really wasn’t that great. But now the divide between the overweight guy watching a football game and the star receiver playing the game is so tremendous that you’d think we were two different species.
Seven years after your bike accident, do you now enjoy a regular flow of physical movement?
I can’t play full court basketball anymore, which is probably a good thing, because I’m almost 49 and I probably would have blown out a knee or something. I try now to think about my vitality rather than fitness. I try to be a person who integrates levels of movements into my day that add energy to my life, that don’t wear my body down, that don’t wear me down, and yet they add to my strength. I still have slots for more rigorous activity every week—I’ll go for a pretty rigorous swim twice a week for 40 minutes, or I’ll run about a mile on a soft track and then go shoot some baskets for a total of about an hour—but those three assigned exercise slots are different from my movement agenda. At work I take the stairs—six or seven flights—about four times a day. I live in a very walk-able community. I walk to the library, walk to the movies, walk to the grocery store.
How will future generations approach exercise?
We’re in this real transition generation. My daughter, who is 17, is in that generation. She is the first person in my family to never know [a relative] who ever had a physical life. My grandfather worked in a lumberyard and was a farmer. He was a very physical guy. I had this model within a generation. My daughter lacks that. There is no model.
Some epidemiologists speculate that the next generation may have a shorter average life expectancy?
All the advances in medicine have stopped outdistancing lifestyle problems. But this generation is good at big-picture issues. When they see this as a larger social, cultural problem, not a sports and exercise problem, they’ll take it on and make it part of the agenda of the future.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (2)
We couldn't control obesity in the military (a place where physical fitness is rewarded not punished)in my time l986-2002 we lost a number of soldiers to overweight. Even though we gave our soldiers time to excericise and if they were overweight, excercise and diet counseling. How can we expect American's to adopt healthier lifestyles?
I see in schools that recess and physical excercise are not participated in because they have to work on curriculem and "God Forbid", the students walk or ride bicycles to school.
I lost a job interview because I wanted to take public transportation to work, and looked down on because I choose to ride a bicycle to work. We must change our attitudes or obesity will kill us. Politicians will not do it for us.
Posted by Thomas M. Halvachs SSG USA Ret on January 3,2010 | 12:34 PM
What a great/depressing article! There is no doubt that physical movement is key to not just physical health but mental health. In the book, Play, by Dr. Stuart Brown, he cites a study of a group of chronically depressed women who, after all other treatment failed, were put on an experimental regimen of daily running, and it made a significant positive impact on their mental health. At a time when schools are cutting P.E., food is being manufactured and not cooked, and people have more and more opportunities to sit in front of computers, it amazes me that something as simple as movement could be the key to radically fixing our ailing society. Thank you.
Posted by roy on December 30,2009 | 12:46 PM