An Astronomer’s Solution to Global Warming
The technology developed for telescopes, it turns out, can harness solar power
- By Alaina G. Levine
- Smithsonian.com, February 03, 2012, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
They may be cheaper, but you wouldn’t want to stand at the focal point of one of his mirrors. Angel recently tested a three-meter-wide mirror that focused sunlight on a piece of steel six millimeters thick. In 15 seconds, the beam burned a hole into the steel the size of a quarter.
In addition to the mirrors, the other critical elements of his system are the PV cells in the PCU. Rather than using the typical silicon solar cells, he takes his cue from above: “The thing that caught my eye is that recently the kind of PV cells used in space [to power the space station, for example] have been adapted for use on the ground,” he says. “Of the light that comes into them, you convert twice as much energy into electricity.” This saves money and space in the system. “Many people have noted the wonderful properties” of the newer cells, called triple-junction PV cells, “but the challenge is getting the concentrated light onto them without blowing the budget.”
With the help of the silica ball, sunlight that falls on the mirror can be focused onto an area of cells one one-thousandth the size of the mirror, and the cost of the cells becomes one-tenth as much per watt generated compared with solar panels that do not employ Angel’s technology.
Angel’s goal is to create “utility-scale” solar electricity at a price that competes with fossil fuels, something that doesn't exist today. “I think what we’re doing has a good chance. The architecture we have developed over the last few years is a new approach and is aimed specifically at getting to the low cost.”
Part of its cost–effectiveness stems from Angel’s ability to draw on manufacturing processes that are already in place. His patented and patent-pending system (covering the assembly, optics, and use of the PV cells) is simple enough that it can be manufactured in high volume, and he and a team of scientists and graduate students at the University of Arizona are researching ways to make the mass production methods even more streamlined.
Even the setting for his research and development helps cut costs. The prototype for Angel’s jungle-gym-like assembly was constructed in a deserted swimming pool behind a gym on the UA campus, a spot that once housed a satellite dish for a Tucson TV station. “This particular space has a perfect view of southern sky from dawn to dusk and is a two-minute walk from my office,” he says, and the region gets about 350 days of sunshine per year. Another benefit of being in Arizona is that “we are two to three hours behind the East Coast, which means the sun is still shining in Arizona at the time of peak demand in the East,” he says.
Angel was partly driven to develop solar power because of something he observed on Earth. His home is near a river, and he has watched the waterway decline over time. “The water table has gone down by three feet since I have been in the house,” he says. “The degradation of the river is something I see real time in front of my eyes due to overpopulation. I’ve reconciled that my beautiful river will dry up, but I don’t want to be reconciled to a planet that is doomed a miserable fate like that.”
Alaina G. Levine is a science writer based in Tucson, Arizona.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (9)
My solution to climate change is simple and probably less costly than many other methods. I am not a doctor, lawyer, or scientist. I have thought about this solution many times and, obviously, this is just one piece to the solution and needs to be coupled with everything under the sun (no pun intended) Hybrids and solar vehicles,carbon sequestration, wind energy, hydro and other renewable non-carbon producing forms of energy must be expanded. My solution involves improved methods of capturing rainwater and purifying salt water. Water is the most abundant natural resource on the planet. My solution involves recreating the ecosystem that we have destroyed over the past 200 years. We do this by creating huge pipelines of oceanic saltwater that extend many miles onto the land. As the water passes thru the pipelines it is desalinated and treated enough to be consumed by plants. Areas that are too far from saltwater or freshwater sources would have huge reservoirs designed to capture rainwater to be used to water trees. With this system we can recreate rainforests, making states like Arizona huge rainforests will certainly cool the earth. Most of North Africa and many other extremely dry, arid locations on the earth would be recreated and transformed into rainforests. Over a span of a decade we would see the carbon PPM in the atmosphere and slowly decrease thus cooling the earth. This method is costly, however it can also be used to export fresh water to other countries to be further treated by localities. This method coupled with renewables and everything else we are doing would surely cool the earth. There should be no price too large to save planet earth.
Posted by Houman on November 27,2012 | 11:28 PM
The next time you feel the need to call CO2 a pollutant and cry in dismay about global warming that will help feed the billions, please feel free to cancel my subscription and return any unused funds.
Posted by JimWilemon on February 29,2012 | 08:34 PM
I love this story... and we need more inventors... but for the most part, the world stopped "warming" in 1998... check the data, not the bumper-stickers...
Posted by Connor Vernon on February 25,2012 | 10:33 AM
I, myself, thinks this idea has huge potential. Unfortunately, it would probably be opposed by the GOTP because it would take future profits away from Big Oil.
Posted by trekie70 on February 17,2012 | 02:08 PM
How much of the energy generated is lost to the cooling system?
Posted by Greg Keif on February 12,2012 | 11:47 AM
What cools the coolant? Looks like I see a fan on this contraption. So, the article doesn't state the ROI on this either. I'm not sure this is going to go anywhere, just like so many other ideas. It looks good, sounds good, but in reality it won't fit the in and complete the puzzle. This looks like more of an apparatus for space. You don't need cooling fans in space.
Posted by Paul Streicher on February 12,2012 | 03:48 AM
Please let me test this model in the Sandhills of N.C, using reinforced aluminum frames instead of steel & iron.
Posted by Kevin G. Lee on February 8,2012 | 03:21 PM
The degradation of the river by the lowering of the water table mentioned in the article is driven almost entirely via environmental pressure from increased population.
The effort of his solar design is noble and commendable, but the USA grew by 100 million in the last 40 years and we are on track to reach a half a billion in a few decades. The elephant in the room is nearly all of Americas recent population growth has come from massive immigration that is politically incorrect to question.
In fact, the Sierra Club, which once warned of population growth via immigration, was bribed with 100 million donation to never bring up the subject of environmental damage from immigration again.
Google it if you don't believe me.
It would be a lot easier to reduce immigration and thereby reduce our energy needs and environmental damage then to constantly try to come up with more energy production.
That would however require a fierce battle with democrat leaders that want more immigration for a future electoral advantage and republicans that want an endless supply of cheap compliant labor.
Posted by Delmar Jackson on February 7,2012 | 09:11 PM
Has anyone developed an efficient way to transmit electricity from Arizona to the east coast ?
Posted by Robert Dalrymple on February 6,2012 | 03:33 PM