An Astronomer’s Solution to Global Warming
The technology developed for telescopes, it turns out, can harness solar power
- By Alaina G. Levine
- Smithsonian.com, February 03, 2012, Subscribe
Roger Angel is an astronomer whose innovative designs for telescope mirrors have radically transformed the way we see the stars and galaxies. He developed lightweight, honeycombed mirrors for the world’s largest and most powerful telescopes, including the Large Binocular Telescope on Mount Graham in Arizona and the Giant Magellan Telescope currently under construction in Chile. He is a Regents Professor and head of the Steward Observatory Mirror Lab at the University of Arizona (UA), and a MacArthur “genius grant” Fellow. In 2010 he won the prestigious Kavli Prize for Astrophysics,. But lately he’s been thinking more about life on our own planet.
“I had been worrying about global warming,” Angel says, and he had begun contemplating solutions as audacious (and ultimately cost-prohibitive) as placing giant sun shades in space to cool the planet. But when his wife asked him, “Can’t you do something about global warming?” he got serious and began envisioning how his telescope mirrors could be used to generate clean energy. Now Angel has fashioned a system that utilizes mirrors with tiny solar cells to harness light and generate electricity, a system that has the potential to be more cost-effective than anything else on the market.
Trying to harness the power of the sun is nothing new; many companies and inventors have been analyzing the problem of how to most effectively collect, convert and use solar energy for decades. The technology of photovoltaic (PV) cells that capture the sun’s rays has improved over time, but there are still a few sticky pieces to the puzzle of producing solar electricity. Some of those issues include the amount of heat generated by existing techniques, the space needed for the solar cells and cost.
Angel is tackling a few of these problems with his new system. “It’s a complete self-contained unit that turns the light into energy and rejects the heat,” he says. Scattered around his Tucson lab are tools, scraps of metal, bits of PV cells and other pieces of the contraption. Put together, it will consist of several square mirrors attached to a large, lightweight steel frame that looks like a jungle gym. Each mirror reflects light into its own cube-shaped power conversion unit (PCU) installed above its center. The PCU is a small box with a fused silica ball on the end that faces the mirror. As the light from the sun hits the mirror, the mirror’s parabolic shape focuses the beam directly into the ball, which in turn focuses the light onto a curved matrix of 36 tiny PV cells. The cells are what convert the light into electricity.
“The cells turn about 40 percent of the light into electricity,” says Angel, noting this is highly efficient for a solar power system. His innovation also contains a cooling system using technology similar to that used for computer chips and automobile engines. “This allows the chips to stay remarkably cool: 20 degrees C above the ambient air temperature,” he says. The cooling system has the added benefit of not using any water, a resource especially precious in the deserts where many solar systems operate; recirculated coolant is used instead.
“No one has ever built a system that uses such an efficient, lightweight space frame structure to minimize the amount of steel and to hold the mirrors. Nobody’s made deeply dished glass mirrors that are practical and inexpensive like this, and nobody’s made a PCU like this,” says Angel.
Alex Cronin, a physicist at the University of Arizona who conducts research independent of Angel on PV solar cells, agrees. Angel “has optimized [this solar system] like a telescope,” Cronin says. “This is an example of stretching the envelope in a new direction. He designed it with the least amount of steel and iron. In the future we will see more of this. He’s leading the industry.”
Angel says his design has a “heritage from astronomy.” But telescopes in astronomy are used for concentrating very faint, distant light, while the mirrors here play a different role. “We’ve gone from the one extreme of making the most perfect mirrors you can think of, to the lowest-cost mirrors that are ‘good enough.’ ”
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (9)
My solution to climate change is simple and probably less costly than many other methods. I am not a doctor, lawyer, or scientist. I have thought about this solution many times and, obviously, this is just one piece to the solution and needs to be coupled with everything under the sun (no pun intended) Hybrids and solar vehicles,carbon sequestration, wind energy, hydro and other renewable non-carbon producing forms of energy must be expanded. My solution involves improved methods of capturing rainwater and purifying salt water. Water is the most abundant natural resource on the planet. My solution involves recreating the ecosystem that we have destroyed over the past 200 years. We do this by creating huge pipelines of oceanic saltwater that extend many miles onto the land. As the water passes thru the pipelines it is desalinated and treated enough to be consumed by plants. Areas that are too far from saltwater or freshwater sources would have huge reservoirs designed to capture rainwater to be used to water trees. With this system we can recreate rainforests, making states like Arizona huge rainforests will certainly cool the earth. Most of North Africa and many other extremely dry, arid locations on the earth would be recreated and transformed into rainforests. Over a span of a decade we would see the carbon PPM in the atmosphere and slowly decrease thus cooling the earth. This method is costly, however it can also be used to export fresh water to other countries to be further treated by localities. This method coupled with renewables and everything else we are doing would surely cool the earth. There should be no price too large to save planet earth.
Posted by Houman on November 27,2012 | 11:28 PM
The next time you feel the need to call CO2 a pollutant and cry in dismay about global warming that will help feed the billions, please feel free to cancel my subscription and return any unused funds.
Posted by JimWilemon on February 29,2012 | 08:34 PM
I love this story... and we need more inventors... but for the most part, the world stopped "warming" in 1998... check the data, not the bumper-stickers...
Posted by Connor Vernon on February 25,2012 | 10:33 AM
I, myself, thinks this idea has huge potential. Unfortunately, it would probably be opposed by the GOTP because it would take future profits away from Big Oil.
Posted by trekie70 on February 17,2012 | 02:08 PM
How much of the energy generated is lost to the cooling system?
Posted by Greg Keif on February 12,2012 | 11:47 AM
What cools the coolant? Looks like I see a fan on this contraption. So, the article doesn't state the ROI on this either. I'm not sure this is going to go anywhere, just like so many other ideas. It looks good, sounds good, but in reality it won't fit the in and complete the puzzle. This looks like more of an apparatus for space. You don't need cooling fans in space.
Posted by Paul Streicher on February 12,2012 | 03:48 AM
Please let me test this model in the Sandhills of N.C, using reinforced aluminum frames instead of steel & iron.
Posted by Kevin G. Lee on February 8,2012 | 03:21 PM
The degradation of the river by the lowering of the water table mentioned in the article is driven almost entirely via environmental pressure from increased population.
The effort of his solar design is noble and commendable, but the USA grew by 100 million in the last 40 years and we are on track to reach a half a billion in a few decades. The elephant in the room is nearly all of Americas recent population growth has come from massive immigration that is politically incorrect to question.
In fact, the Sierra Club, which once warned of population growth via immigration, was bribed with 100 million donation to never bring up the subject of environmental damage from immigration again.
Google it if you don't believe me.
It would be a lot easier to reduce immigration and thereby reduce our energy needs and environmental damage then to constantly try to come up with more energy production.
That would however require a fierce battle with democrat leaders that want more immigration for a future electoral advantage and republicans that want an endless supply of cheap compliant labor.
Posted by Delmar Jackson on February 7,2012 | 09:11 PM
Has anyone developed an efficient way to transmit electricity from Arizona to the east coast ?
Posted by Robert Dalrymple on February 6,2012 | 03:33 PM