Next Stop, Squalor
Is poverty tourism "poorism," they call it exploration or exploitation?
- By John Lancaster
- Smithsonian magazine, March 2007, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 4)
The welcoming reception probably had something to do with the tour operators, who have cultivated good relations with the slum workers as well as local police. There are, moreover, certain rules. From the door of a one-room garment factory, I spotted a boy who looked to be no more than 8 sitting with other workers at a long table, where he was embroidering fabric with fine gold thread. I nudged my guide: "Ask him how old he is." Poojari shook his head no. Pointed questions were not part of his compact with the slum dwellers.
As it happens, Ellingson and I did not see many child laborers in Dharavi, perhaps because of laws limiting employment of children under 14 or, more likely—as Way suggested later—because they were sequestered out of view. We did see several schools, however, and plenty of kids in uniforms. "By plane you are coming?" one boy asked in English, before declaring, with evident pride, "I'm studying in 8th standard."
Blighted though it was, Dharavi had the feeling of an established community. Signs in Hindi advertised the services of doctors and dentists. An outdoor barber administered a shave with a folding razor. A laundryman stood against an alley wall, pressing clothes with an ancient-looking iron. At a small factory where recycled plastic was melted down and turned into tiny pellets for use by toymakers, the owner, who was in his late 20s, told us that his father had started the business three decades ago. Like many of the slum dwellers, the factory owner was a Muslim, although Dharavi is nothing if not diverse. Its residents come from all over India, and many have lived there for a generation or more. Poojari said that one of the slum neighborhoods is dominated by the descendants of potters from Gujarat state who settled in Dharavi in 1933. When we visited the potters' district in the early afternoon, we were puzzled to find few signs of life, other than smoking kilns and an old man napping on a rope cot. It turned out that most of the potters and their families had taken the afternoon off to attend a wedding.
Ellingson drew a comparison with Palestinian communities he had toured in the West Bank. They were "a lot wealthier, but it's like society has broken down," he said, adding that in Dharavi, "it feels like something is functioning." I had to agree.
For one thing, almost no one asked for money, or even tried to sell me anything. Only once was I approached for a handout, by an elderly woman. That was a big change from Colaba, the main tourist district, where it is difficult to walk more than a few steps without being accosted by a beggar—usually a young woman with an infant on her hip—or a peddler hawking laminated maps. Perhaps people in Dharavi were simply too busy. And some of them clearly had rupees in their pockets. Besides the food stalls and handcarts piled high with okra and squash, there were video parlors showing Bollywood hits, several bars and, on one thoroughfare, a spiffy-looking electronics store plastered with Sony decals.
"They're happy to be here," Poojari said as we paused outside a small factory where women were stitching bluejeans. "They don't want to move out of Dharavi." I don't know about "happy," but on the latter point, Poojari was probably correct.
Because of its prime location—on rail lines near the heart of one of the world's most crowded cities—Dharavi sits on valuable real estate, and its residents are not about to give up their stake. The slum is the focus of a looming showdown with municipal authorities and developers who want to turn it into office towers, luxury apartments and shopping centers. Families that can prove they have lived in Dharavi since 1995 would be entitled to a free apartment in the same area, but the new dwellings would be so small—just 225 square feet—that many prefer to stay where they are. Nor is it clear what would happen to the thousands of businesses that provide Dharavi residents with jobs.
We finished the tour on the side of a busy four-lane road, where the festive sounds of a Hindu wedding ceremony—apparently the one the potters had gone to—spilled from a gaudy tent. We paused to peek inside, and I spotted the groom sitting awkwardly beneath an enormous gold turban. No one gave us a second glance, and I had to wonder about the motives of those in the Indian media and elsewhere who claimed on behalf of the Dharavi residents to be offended by the tours. Surely their ire could have been better targeted at the municipal authorities who had failed to provide the community with basic sanitation. I wondered whether the critics weren't simply embarrassed by the slum's glaring poverty—an image at odds with the country's efforts to rebrand itself as a big software park. In any case, it seemed to me that the purpose of the tour was not to generate pity, but understanding. That's not to say that it made me an expert—I was only there a few hours, after all. Were the people I saw in Dharavi the victims of globalization, or its beneficiaries? I still don't know. But at least the question had been raised in my mind.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (9)
Last year, I completed a junior mid-term project at my school. The assignment was to pick out a Smithsonian magazine at the library, choose an article, and write a research paper about it. Luckily, I found this article. John, your writing is absolutely captivating. Thank you for doing what you do!
Posted by Alissa on February 1,2013 | 12:32 PM
Fascinating article John. Thank you very much. Your journalistic skills are something I hope to achieve one day. I spent three months in India and spotted the Dharavi slum tour in the Lonely Planet. Needless to say, I didn't go, it seemed to make a theme park out of a serious situation. If Westerners want to experience the slums, then it should only be if they are willing to volunteer and get their hands dirty. Certainly not sitting from an air conditioned vehicle or peering through doorways in an invasive museum-like fashion.
Posted by Kiri Bowers on October 16,2012 | 04:22 PM
People in the states are terrified of losing their jobs, their way of life. There are terrified of becoming poor. But if you go visit the poor, and see poverty for what it is, maybe you won't be so terrified. The US is becoming poorer and poorer each year. If you go visit a "poor" country, maybe you can envision what the future is for the US. Maybe you can learn how to make it as a poor person. How do you live without running water, without electricity, without washer/dryers/frigerator/lights. Maybe you can plan for your future with the knowledge that you may make less money in the future. i spoke with an ethopian once, i asked him what was the biggest difference between the states and Ethopia. He said women say home and cook, its thanksgiving every day. there is someone always home, there is no mcdonalds/wendy/taco bell, and fewer shops/malls/outlets. and you don't need the shops either. He prefers ethiopia. women can stay home and watch their children and not have to rely on child care services. Much like what it was like in the US in the 1950's when women stayed home to raise families. so, in the end, you should not be afraid of becoming poorer. Mexico is a poorer country than the US. But they have everything the US has. Airports, Trains, Cars,Highway, electricity, houses, farms, universities, ect.... So, just because the US is in decline, doesn't mean you have to be afraid.
Posted by alma vasquez on April 11,2012 | 10:53 AM
I had exactly the experience described in your article. When my wife and I were working in Nairobi we were invited by a volunteer with the Missionaries of Charity to spend the day assisting the residents of Kibera, one of the largest and poorest slums in Africa--a day described in my blog post "Father George, Poverty Tourism, and the Slums of Kibera." (otherguysdime.wordpress.com) It was a difficult and emotional experience but an informative one, especially for a traveler like myself who had never before been outside the developed world, and I am glad I went. I think we were the only visitors there.
However today, tourists by the thousands are snapping photos of shanty towns from tour buses, and purchasing "slum souvenirs" to show to the folks back home. This form of "poorism" as you call it is a controversial topic angering many government officials--so much so wealthy tourists who are flocking to poor neighborhoods.
I am not saying that you should not go, but you really need to balance the learning experience that you and your family will have with the possibility of exploitation of some of the neediest members of society.
Posted by G. Michael Schneider on July 1,2010 | 11:48 AM
You might do your research with a charity evaluation site like http://www.charitynavigator.org. I was satisfied with their tools to evaluate where to donate funds in a manner consistent with my desired philanthropy.
Posted by Ken on February 11,2010 | 12:48 PM
Unlike Amanda, I feel that this type of tour is beneficial. If you want to know what a town, or state or country is really like you do not look to it's afluent...you look at it's backbone...which unfortunatly is usually it's poor. We have become so immune to televised visuals, it would do us all good to have reality smack us in the face...so that we can all contribute to the welfare of our own communities and to the wellbeing of our world with a heart thats dedicated to the cause, not just because it's a "nobel" undertaking that improves our social image.
Posted by Kathy on February 15,2009 | 09:28 AM
In response to Michael, and to Jodi Pavlovich: Reality Tours has started a small education centre for people in Dharavi. http://realitytoursandtravel.com/communitycentre.html , so you could donate to that. According to the article in the Hindustan Times (halfway down the site linked above), the education centre costs 42,000 INR/month to run. (They use -and are looking for- volunteer teachers, but also rent the space, and pay their local teacher and watchman, both of whom live in Dhavari.) If you're interested, Reality Tours also publishes its accounts online. See the NGOs link http://realitytoursandtravel.com/ngos.html from their main website. (They've been running at a loss. One of the owners has not drawn any salary yet, and the other did likewise for the first year.) The education centre's run in conjunction with a Non-Governmental Organization called MESCO, but I'm not certain how/if you could target your donation specifically for Dharavi-related work. Link to MESCO from the NGO link above. -Hope this helps. I haven't been on their tour yet, but hope to when I'm in Mumbai in December.
Posted by Bookchen on November 2,2008 | 09:06 AM
Its businesses manufacture a variety of products—plastics, pottery, bluejeans, leather goods—and generate an estimated $665 million in annual revenue. In other words, Dharavi is not just a slum, it is also a node on the global economy. My question would be, how is the $665 million in annual revenue being spent?
Posted by Katherine on April 14,2008 | 02:17 PM
Will someone answer Michael?? I also would like to know.
Posted by Jodi Pavlovich on February 3,2008 | 08:58 PM
poorism is stupid. people arent animals and the poor places arent zoos. the only thing keeping you from poverty is a very thin line. you're rejoicing in someone else's troubles.
Posted by amanda on January 5,2008 | 09:58 AM
Is there a reliable organization who will accept donations to help people in Dharavi. $10.00 a month seems small compared to what we get. Can you guide us in the right direction. Thank you.
Posted by Michael on November 25,2007 | 01:18 AM