The Sodfather
Major-league teams are turning to third-generation groundskeeper Roger Bossard to give them a winning edge
- By Mike Thomas
- Photographs by Tim Klein
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2008, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
Bringing the living carpet at the Cell to its striped and verdant apotheosis in 1990 led, Bossard says, to two anxiety attacks that felt like coronaries. Accordingly, he coddles the field like a nervous father. "We were playing the Yankees and Roger Clemens was warming up in right field and he wasn't pitching," former White Sox pitcher and current sports announcer Ed Farmer remembers. "And Roger went out there and said to [Clemens], ‘I'd like you to stop throwing here because you're digging up my outfield.'" Clemens left.
Such fierce turf territoriality notwithstanding, Bossard is actually more partial to his dirt than his grass. After all, he says, it's where 70 percent of the action takes place. So fond was he of old Comiskey's infield clay dirt that, before the crumbling stadium was razed, he filled trucks with 550 tons of it (which included the scattered ashes of several die-hard Sox fans) to build his field of dreams at the Cell.
There, assisted by a small crew, Bossard does much of the mowing, fertilizing, watering, sodding, rolling, raking and edging himself. During an hours-long process that precedes every home game, each position on the infield is repeatedly wet to suit each player's preferences (hard, soft or in between). Wielding an inch-and-a-quarter hose like an artist, Bossard adds brush strokes of water to a diamond-shaped canvas. For the third and final application, he screws on a misshapen brass nozzle that once belonged to his father. Hammer-pounded at the opening to produce a fine mist, its functionality is surpassed only by its sentimental value.
Among baseball insiders and fans, it's commonly believed that Bossard (like other groundskeepers) puts his talents to devious uses. "If the visitor's bullpen mound is not the same as the main mound, say it's just an inch off as far as the drop, it literally might take the opposing pitcher three batters, four batters, maybe an inning to adjust to the drop," he told Chicago Public Radio last year. "Now, once again, I would never do anything like this. These are things that I've heard of."
Perhaps at the dinner table. Grandfather Emil, who became known as the "evil genius of groundskeepers," was a whiz at what is euphemistically called maximizing the home field advantage. Over time he honed several techniques, including tilting base lines in or out so balls rolled fair or foul, digging up or tamping down base paths to prevent or abet stealing, leaving grass long or clipping it short to slow or speed grounders. He also moved the outfield fences back 12 to 15 feet to stymie the home-run-slugging Yankees. By and large, his tricks were employed selectively to bolster home team strengths and take advantage of opponent teams' weaknesses. And just about everyone, even superstars, fell victim. Years after his 56-game hitting streak ended in 1941, Joe DiMaggio remarked that Emil and his sons had helped ruin the run. "The Yankees hated to come [to Cleveland]," DiMaggio said, "because our every defensive flaw was exploited by the Bossards the way they prepared the playing field."
Emil's contributions were so critical that Indians manager Lou Boudreau called him "the tenth man in our lineup." The stellar condition of Emil's field, combined with his surreptitious diamond doctoring, facilitated more than a few Tribe victories. "I wouldn't be surprised if [Emil] helped us win as many as ten games a year," Boudreau told Baseball Digest in 1955. During Emil's tenure, the team won the World Series in 1948 and a pennant in 1954.
By the time Emil died, in 1980, Gene had presided over Comiskey Park for 40 years without witnessing a World Series trophy in White Sox hands—the result, some said, of a curse the team suffered following the "Black Sox" gambling scandal of 1919. But it wasn't for lack of trying. More than a few players were grateful for Gene's efforts. All-star Sox second baseman Nellie Fox was a better bunter thanks to raised base lines. Those who needed speed, such as Sox sprinters Luis Aparicio and Minnie Miñoso, found a bit more pep in their steps on Gene's extra-firm base paths.
And, like his father, Gene was a master at tweaking the terrain. Opponents lost their footing on tractionless mud, grounders fizzled on shaggy grass and bunts went foul when they should have gone fair. Among Gene's most cunning inventions was an infamous bog near home plate that came to be known as "Bossard's Swamp." The quicksand-like patch of dirt slowed ground balls that were hit off the Sox's low-slung, sinkerball pitches.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Baseball
Additional Sources
"They Doctor the Diamond," by Hal Lebovitz, Baseball Digest, July 1955









Comments (7)
Awesome story,good to see a man who loves his work, I have been to the Cell many times with my nephew and there's nothing like a good baseball game on a beautiful field. Especially if the Sox Win!!!
Posted by mike twomey on April 15,2011 | 11:57 PM
Thanks to Roger, children in a rough part of the city will have dirt for their little league field. My child is on a mission trip trying to serve, they had a problem and they were put in touch with Roger... who came through in a big way. SO WAY TO GO ROGER! Granger community church/parents thank you! AMBER
Posted by Amber on July 22,2008 | 09:31 AM
like to meet him!
Posted by erin Scott on July 14,2008 | 05:28 PM
Hey Julie, Take yourself to a ballgame someday. Relax. Its almost summertime. I loved the ole Cominskey, my mom and grandmother would go to the games during the Depression. My significant other is a Chicago transplant, and our first date was to Wrigley Field where I had never been. Its a pretty park, but has none of the soul of old Comiskey in its sad shape. Bless the Bossards, noble work for America's pass time.
Posted by Liz Strause on June 2,2008 | 01:30 AM
I suspect that some of Ms. Craves' other observations on the ecology of baseball would make interesting reading, as well. Two words: puh-leeze.
Posted by Brian Gallagher on April 13,2008 | 01:31 PM
A well manicured lawn is quite an art. I look forward to every spring when it's time to wake up the grass with water and turf builder. I'll bet Ms. Craves lawn makes a landfill look like a field of daisies. Thanks for the excellent article.
Posted by Denny Southern on April 7,2008 | 02:08 AM
Nice article! There is a lot of science and experience involved in being a good sports turf manager or golf course superintendent today. One has to know: agronomic practices for various turf, irrigation systems and watering practices, proper fetilization, effective and safe pest control measures, specialized equipment use, maintenance, and repair especially reel mowers, shop management, personnel management, budget management,environmental regulations, and much more. There are colleges that specialize in this type of training like Lake City Community College in Florida where I have been for 34 years. Our primary mission is to educate golf course superintendents, but we have students who do very well in sports turf management also. We have 41 years of experience with turf education. It is a very interesting and rewarding career.
Posted by John Piersol on April 6,2008 | 10:57 AM
I'm appalled that you would offer tips to encourage a high-maintenance lawn, including frequent watering, mowing, and pesticide application. Lawns are virtually bereft of ecological benefits, waste water and non-renewable resources, displace native species, and send tons of chemical run-off into our waterways and clippings to landfills. Smithsonian should be advocating the reduction of lawns -- or at least organic and environmentally-friendly lawn-care methods -- rather than perpetuating the creation of these sterile landscapes.
Posted by Julie Craves on March 29,2008 | 09:01 AM
Big Sox fan. I love it.
Posted by Walt Bollinger on March 28,2008 | 12:01 PM