Sacred and Profaned
Misguided restorations of the exquisite Buddhist shrines of Pagan in Burma may do more harm than good
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2002, Subscribe
(Page 7 of 8)
After Kyaing drops me off at my riverside hotel set among several temples, I rent a bicycle and pedal out to the 11th-century temple known as Shwesandaw, a milesouth of the city gate, a prime vantage point for catching the sunset and, for locals, netting Western dollars. At the entrance, eager vendors sell postcards, miniature Buddha statues and jewelry. I climb five flights of steep exterior steps to join other camera-toting pilgrims crowding the narrow upper terrace for a sweeping view of the milewide IrrawaddyRiver, where fishing pirogues scurry out of the path of a steamer ferry belching thick, black smoke. The fading light burnishes the hundreds of temples dotting the plain in shades of deep umber.
Pedaling lazily back to the hotel, I pass lantern-lit stalls where vendors are busy setting out silk, woven baskets and lacquer boxes in preparation for a religious celebration that will last three weeks. Fortune-tellers, astrologers and numerologists set up tables in anticipation of brisk busi ness from their many deeply superstitious countrymen. Squatting in front of a restaurant, a pair of old women puff on fat cheroots, crinkling their eyes in amusement as a young girl runs alongside my bike. “Want to buy a painting?” she asks. “My brother paint from temple. Very cheap.”
The next day, I sit on a bench encircling a gargantuan banyan tree in a courtyard outside the beautifully restored AnandaTemple, the largest and most revered in Pagan. I watch several young women sweep the courtyard industriously, a task that earns them 100 kyat (about 17¢) a day plus a ration of rice.
“No one is forced to work on the temples,” Kyaing says later when I ask if the women are forced laborers. “We Burmese enjoy doing meritorious deeds as a way to escape suffering,” Kyaing continues. “That’s why we clean temples and restore pagodas—so we can have a good life in the future. Even our Buddha had to go through many lives. Sometimes he was a king, sometimes an important minister of state, sometimes no one at all.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (2)
RENAMING AN ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENT It might be all of a surprise,one of the Bagan temples very important archaeologically, culturally not only for Myanmar people but also for the people of the world who love and admire the ancient cultural heritage of the world. It is THABEIKHMOUK (BOYCOTT) TEMPLE UNESCO NUMBERING 744 Tha-peik-hmouk-gu-hpaya (363a) construction period 12th century AD,is renamed as Panthuku Mahahtay gu-hpaya with new stone inscription after renovation in 1998 Dec 11 by Singapore Golden Monastery Abbot. Originally there is no signboard since it was donated by the ancient Bagan people and Named by themselves as Thabeikhmouk hpaya in honor of king's Abbot Panthuku who stand for the suffering Bagan people for the earth filling work to construct Sulamani temple by King the 2nd Narapati Sithu in 1188AD.The term Thabeikhmouk is literally equal Boycott in English expressing disagreement. Thapeikhmouk guhpaya is the one and the only temple bearing very strange name and donated by the people themselves to honor the monk Panthuku ( a brilliant and well known in Bagan history). Since that time and before 1998 there is no inscription of any kind but its stand for centuries as Thapeikhmouk hpay and old people live in Bagnan and NyaungU know the name of hpaya. So I am terribly disappointed and with renaming. UNESCO recorded and printed seven volume Bagan Inventory and it can be seen in page 286 in vol: Three.
Posted by Hla Tun on January 30,2012 | 12:48 AM
thank you...
Posted by ali on June 17,2008 | 12:52 AM