Sacred and Profaned
Misguided restorations of the exquisite Buddhist shrines of Pagan in Burma may do more harm than good
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2002, Subscribe
(Page 6 of 8)
Unlike the damage caused by recent restorations, the mural-cleaning and conservation projects conducted by U.N. and Burmese teams in the ’80s and ’90s have proved remarkably durable. Early one morning, I arrange for a horse-cart ride to the 12th-century GubyaukgyiTemple, an imposing pyramid of redbrick with elaborate carvings topped by a tapering, corncob-shaped tower called a sikhara. Gorgon masks with garlands of pearls pouring out of grinning mouths form a frieze that rings the temple’s exterior. Inside, on the walls, tigers and fantastic beasts square off with snout-nosed, yellow-faced demons. In the niche of one window, I can just make out a pair of lithe dancers twirling arms and legs seductively in shadow. These are among the oldest and, after careful and proper restoration, the most vivid paintings in Pagan.
In marked contrast, at Leimyethna, a 13th-century temple about a mile away, I am appalled to see that a donor has inscribed his name in red paint over 800-year-old wall paintings. Equally jarring, a new gilt statue of a seated Buddha is surrounded by incongruously jazzy paintings of flowers, vines and lotus blossoms in bright Mediterranean pastels that look like poor copies of works by Henri Matisse or Raoul Dufy.
When the Burmese archaeologist Kyaing and I arrive at Nandamanya, a 13th-century terraced brick temple topped by a bell-shaped dome, we slip off our sandals at an intricately carved doorway and step barefoot into the cool interior. Weak sunlight filters through a pair of stone windows perforated in diamond-shaped patterns. When Kyaing turns on his flashlight, the dimly lit walls erupt in extravagant color, illuminating one of the best murals in Pagan: exquisitely detailed scenes of Buddha’s life painted in the mid-13th century.
One Nandamanya panel depicts Buddha preaching his first sermon in a deer forest embellished with intricate yellow flowers and green foliage. Painted fish with individual scales are so well-preserved that they gleam in the artificial light. An illustrated series of half-naked women, daughters of the evil demon Mara sent to tempt Buddha, remain mildly shocking, though hardly “so vulgarly erotic and revolting that they can neither be reproduced or described,” as Charles Duroiselle, a French expert in Burmese inscriptions, huffed in his 1916 description of the temple. Some of the paintings are riven with cracks. “Earthquake damage,” says Kyaing, referring to the 1975 tremor. “This temple was spared, but the murals were damaged. We are trying to leave them untouched except for cleaning and filling cracks with harmless epoxy resin.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (2)
RENAMING AN ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENT It might be all of a surprise,one of the Bagan temples very important archaeologically, culturally not only for Myanmar people but also for the people of the world who love and admire the ancient cultural heritage of the world. It is THABEIKHMOUK (BOYCOTT) TEMPLE UNESCO NUMBERING 744 Tha-peik-hmouk-gu-hpaya (363a) construction period 12th century AD,is renamed as Panthuku Mahahtay gu-hpaya with new stone inscription after renovation in 1998 Dec 11 by Singapore Golden Monastery Abbot. Originally there is no signboard since it was donated by the ancient Bagan people and Named by themselves as Thabeikhmouk hpaya in honor of king's Abbot Panthuku who stand for the suffering Bagan people for the earth filling work to construct Sulamani temple by King the 2nd Narapati Sithu in 1188AD.The term Thabeikhmouk is literally equal Boycott in English expressing disagreement. Thapeikhmouk guhpaya is the one and the only temple bearing very strange name and donated by the people themselves to honor the monk Panthuku ( a brilliant and well known in Bagan history). Since that time and before 1998 there is no inscription of any kind but its stand for centuries as Thapeikhmouk hpay and old people live in Bagnan and NyaungU know the name of hpaya. So I am terribly disappointed and with renaming. UNESCO recorded and printed seven volume Bagan Inventory and it can be seen in page 286 in vol: Three.
Posted by Hla Tun on January 30,2012 | 12:48 AM
thank you...
Posted by ali on June 17,2008 | 12:52 AM