Sacred and Profaned
Misguided restorations of the exquisite Buddhist shrines of Pagan in Burma may do more harm than good
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2002, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 8)
Burma became a British colony in the late 1880s but regained its independence in 1948. Then followed more than a decade of civil turmoil when a weak democracy broke into factions, which fought back and forth for control of the government. The nation has been ruled for the past 40 years by a series of uncompromising military dictators. When Aung San Suu Kyi’s opposition party, the National League for Democracy, won 80 percent of the vote in 1990 in elections ordered by the junta to quell major civil unrest and to gain international legitimacy, the government annulled the result and imprisoned Suu Kyi and hundreds of dissidents. Since her release eight months ago (because of pressure from the U.S. government, the European Union, Burmese dissidents living abroad and international human rights organizations), the junta has freed more that 300 political prisoners, though more than 1,000 opponents of the regime remain in jail. The junta has permitted 50 National League offices to open, and Suu Kyi has been allowed limited travel to rally support for democratic reform. Nonetheless, according to Human Rights Watch, severe political repression, torture, forced labor and the drafting of children into the army remain. In an October report on religious freedom, the State Department excoriated Burma for its ardent persecution of Muslims and other minorities.
Although Suu Kyi continues to insist that U.S. sanctions be maintained, she is encouraging targeted humanitarian assistance. Along these lines, the U.S. Agency for International Development is sponsoring a $1 million program to fight HIV/AIDS in Burma, an epidemic ravaging the population. But tourists, Suu Kyi says, should boycott the country until the military rulers demonstrate tangible progress on democratic reform. However, even some members of her own party disagree, pointing out that the money that goes toward guest houses, restaurants, tour guides, drivers and local artisans generates desperately needed income in a country where many families live on $5 a day. “If the tourists don’t come, women in textile factories will lose their jobs,” Ma Thanegi, a journalist and former aide to Suu Kyi, told the New York Times recently. “They are the ones who suffer, not the generals.”
Others contend that encouraging tourism could reduce Burma’s dependency on the deeply entrenched opium trade and the rampant logging that is rapidly deforesting the once lush woodlands. However misguided, the government’s current race to restore temples is part of a broader campaign to exploit Pagan’s tourism potential. In the meantime, local residents and pilgrims continue to use the temples as they always have, for quiet meditation and worship, and as communal parks.
But the temples themselves have changed. Everywhere, it seems, temples with new bright pink brick and thick concrete mortar stand out in shocking contrast to the ancient redbrick exteriors and carved sandstone facades. Many temples are being newly built or reconstructed from the ground up rather than restored—using concrete and other materials that damage both the structures themselves and the fragile wall paintings inside. According to Minja Yang, deputy director of the World Heritage Site program for UNESCO in Paris, more than a thousand temples were badly restored or rebuilt in 2000 and 2001.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (2)
RENAMING AN ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENT It might be all of a surprise,one of the Bagan temples very important archaeologically, culturally not only for Myanmar people but also for the people of the world who love and admire the ancient cultural heritage of the world. It is THABEIKHMOUK (BOYCOTT) TEMPLE UNESCO NUMBERING 744 Tha-peik-hmouk-gu-hpaya (363a) construction period 12th century AD,is renamed as Panthuku Mahahtay gu-hpaya with new stone inscription after renovation in 1998 Dec 11 by Singapore Golden Monastery Abbot. Originally there is no signboard since it was donated by the ancient Bagan people and Named by themselves as Thabeikhmouk hpaya in honor of king's Abbot Panthuku who stand for the suffering Bagan people for the earth filling work to construct Sulamani temple by King the 2nd Narapati Sithu in 1188AD.The term Thabeikhmouk is literally equal Boycott in English expressing disagreement. Thapeikhmouk guhpaya is the one and the only temple bearing very strange name and donated by the people themselves to honor the monk Panthuku ( a brilliant and well known in Bagan history). Since that time and before 1998 there is no inscription of any kind but its stand for centuries as Thapeikhmouk hpay and old people live in Bagnan and NyaungU know the name of hpaya. So I am terribly disappointed and with renaming. UNESCO recorded and printed seven volume Bagan Inventory and it can be seen in page 286 in vol: Three.
Posted by Hla Tun on January 30,2012 | 12:48 AM
thank you...
Posted by ali on June 17,2008 | 12:52 AM