Sacred and Profaned
Misguided restorations of the exquisite Buddhist shrines of Pagan in Burma may do more harm than good
- By Richard Covington
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2002, Subscribe
As we rattle along rutted dirt tracks in a battered jeep, Aung Kyaing, chief archaeologist of Pagan’s breathtaking 1,000-year-old Buddhist temples, points out an enormous pentagonal pyramid sparkling in the morning sunlight, dominating this arid central Burma plain.
“Dhammayazika,” he informs me as we bounce past a golden, bell-shaped dome with red banners and a flashy marble walkway. “Secretary Number One paid for the restoration himself.” Secretary Number One is Gen. Khin Nyunt, one of the two strongmen leading Burma’s repressive military junta. Kyaing, an affable scholar dressed in an immaculate white shirt and green longyi, the traditional wraparound skirt favored by both Burmese men and women, is showing me an archaeological disaster—the best and the worst of the government’s recent efforts to restore the ancient temples.
In 1996, the junta invited sponsors across Asia to donate money to help the Burmese rebuild the crumbling temples, but they spurned any professional assistance from international conservators. The resulting hurried and often sloppy restorations have risked destroying the very treasures that make Pagan unique. “The restoration campaign is catastrophic,” says Pierre Pichard, a French archaeologist long familiar with Pagan.
Like many of Afghanistan’s archaeological treasures, Pagan’s temples may fall victim to politics. But there are signs of hope. Pagan attracts nearly 200,000 foreign visitors a year, 12,000 of them American, despite the U.S. government’s imposition of economic sanctions in April 1997 and the country’s repressive regime. With the May release of Burmese dissident and 1991 Nobel Peace Prize laureate Aung San Suu Kyi, 57, from house arrest, the government has signaled, if not a willingness to back away from its harshly antidemocratic stance, at least a recognition of the importance of tourism and foreign exchange. If the change in attitude continues, many temples could be saved—at least that’s the hope of archaeologists like Pichard.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (2)
RENAMING AN ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGICAL MONUMENT It might be all of a surprise,one of the Bagan temples very important archaeologically, culturally not only for Myanmar people but also for the people of the world who love and admire the ancient cultural heritage of the world. It is THABEIKHMOUK (BOYCOTT) TEMPLE UNESCO NUMBERING 744 Tha-peik-hmouk-gu-hpaya (363a) construction period 12th century AD,is renamed as Panthuku Mahahtay gu-hpaya with new stone inscription after renovation in 1998 Dec 11 by Singapore Golden Monastery Abbot. Originally there is no signboard since it was donated by the ancient Bagan people and Named by themselves as Thabeikhmouk hpaya in honor of king's Abbot Panthuku who stand for the suffering Bagan people for the earth filling work to construct Sulamani temple by King the 2nd Narapati Sithu in 1188AD.The term Thabeikhmouk is literally equal Boycott in English expressing disagreement. Thapeikhmouk guhpaya is the one and the only temple bearing very strange name and donated by the people themselves to honor the monk Panthuku ( a brilliant and well known in Bagan history). Since that time and before 1998 there is no inscription of any kind but its stand for centuries as Thapeikhmouk hpay and old people live in Bagnan and NyaungU know the name of hpaya. So I am terribly disappointed and with renaming. UNESCO recorded and printed seven volume Bagan Inventory and it can be seen in page 286 in vol: Three.
Posted by Hla Tun on January 30,2012 | 12:48 AM
thank you...
Posted by ali on June 17,2008 | 12:52 AM