Clan-Do Spirit
A genealogical surprise led the author to ask: What does it take to be one of the family?
- By Jake Halpern
- Smithsonian magazine, September 2008, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 3)
That night, as we gathered for one final dinner in the Hilton ballroom, Irmgard stood up and led us in a round of Hebrew songs. She sang quite well, and her Hebrew was so good that she corrected my pronunciation of the final verse of "Shalom Chaverim."
"How do you know these songs so well?" I asked her.
"It's in the genes!" someone yelled out.
As it turns out, that's not likely. Shortly after our Rockville reunion, half a dozen Plitts, both Jewish and gentile, underwent DNA testing. (I did not participate because the test they used examines the Y chromosome and was therefore restricted to male Plitts. I am, of course, a Halpern.) According to Bennett Greenspan, the founder of Family Tree DNA, the testing service that we used, there is a 100 percent certainty that the Jews and gentiles who were tested have no common ancestor within the past 15,000 to 30,000 years.
I was disappointed, of course. But that feeling soon gave way to a vague sense of hope. After all, why should it take a bond of blood for human beings to regard one another as kin? Isn't it a greater feat to set aside old prejudices in the name of humanity? If our connection to one another were founded on choice rather than obligation, wouldn't it be a more meaningful bond?
We'll find out, we Plitts. The next gathering in the United States is scheduled for 2010. Irmgard has already told me she'll be there, and I know I will, too. My mother, who had her misgivings before her first Plitt family reunion, has volunteered her house in the Berkshires for this one.
Meanwhile, as word of the DNA results spread, Jane Plitt sent out an e-mail saying, "The Plitt branches are ancestrally distinct, but the choice to embrace each other as family, regardless of religion or DNA data, remains very real." I find it reassuring, if odd, that even news of ancestrally distinct DNA hasn't ruptured the "family."
Jake Halpern is the author of Fame Junkies: The Hidden Truths Behind America's Favorite Addiction. He lives in Connecticut.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
I have Plitt Relatives from before 1900 from West Prussia in Germany and can not find any records of their time there. Where can I look? HLW.
Posted by Howard Lee Wanhoff on July 27,2010 | 01:02 PM
My mother is a Plitt and I would like to get some info from anyone regarding the reunion in 2010 in the USA
Thanks
Posted by Ximena walker on May 6,2010 | 11:34 AM
Apropos the symbols in the Plitt armorial bearings. As far as I can see there are no obvious jewish symbols, or at least symbols only used by jews. There is usually a record of the reasoning behind the choices in armorial bearings, but these are probably ong gone by now. The Anchor is the traditional european mark for trade, which before the advent of trains and cars, was the only way in which to move large cargoes quickly. That this anchor is at the bottom of the shield shows that the house for which the arms was drawn (Plitt) was based on trade. The three small stars above the anchor represent in my opinion Biedenkopf, Wetter and Marburg - the area in Germany from which the part of the Plitt family which the person who ordered the drawing of the arms, came from. The large star above the helmet is in my opinion Lubeck, which was the high point of Plitt economic and political power, the place where Senator Plitt and his family were located. Less obvious are the two horns. Very recently contacts between the Danish Plitts and the House in Lubeck indicate that there were connections to a powerful Danish family at that time, so this may be an indication - but blowing horns are not unudual in european bearings so the answer may be quite another. Cheers Gerald
Posted by Dr. Alfred Gerald Davison on November 18,2008 | 04:26 AM
Hello everyone, My name is Josh Plitt. I recently was shown this article by my wife's grandmother who recognized my name. I found the article to be very informative. I have never really gotten a straight answer from anyone in my family as to where my name comes from. If anyone would mind, could someone contact me? I would love to find out more about where "I came from" so to speak. My e-mail address is jplitt22@yahoo.com. Thanks all.
Posted by Josh Plitt on October 20,2008 | 10:02 PM
With all due respect to Irmgard Schwarz, where DID she get all those records when so many were destroyed? (I'm an addicted researcher too and that is a legitimate question.) Both sides of the family need to take into account the fact that many people change their family names for as many reasons as there are families. While we assume, at first glance, that the same family name means we are related to someone, we not be even if the name is a little unusual. I too question the DNA "proof". I loved the article and wish all families well in their search for peace and - maybe connections. At least they are now connected with common binds whether or not there is a blood relationship. Friendship can be thicker than blood.
Posted by Betty Walling on September 23,2008 | 06:15 PM
When I did a family genealogy search recently for Alling, I found Charlemagne,Henry I,the first 5 Kings of Scotland, and over 40 other Kings and Queens of Europe,England, and Finland.I knew that most have at least 1 link to royalty,but was surprised at the range of cultures and beliefs.Perhaps all of this points at the simplest of truths:Ultimately,We all came from one mother in Africa,and are One family, with One home. That should be our only religion. One species...one planet.
Posted by Gordon Clark on September 14,2008 | 02:36 PM
I ran into another Jeff Plitt at a trade show perhaps in 1999 or 2000. He immediately asked if I was Jewish, which seemed to be an odd question based on the knowledge of my German heritage. Jeff (the other) said that a grand parent had told him the family (Jewish Plitt's) came from Russia and changed their name from the obvious Jewish and/or Slavic name to the Americanized “Plitt” upon immigration to the US. Perhaps this opens another door to the common name/different ancestry mystery. I was thrilled at the beginning of the article to think my heritage would reach back to ancient Israel. Which begs the question, why the obvious Jewish symbols in a gentile coat of arms; if indeed the German Plitt’s have no Jewish ancestry? I am now curious about a taking a DNA test. In any case, blood relatives or not, welcome to the family! We do seem to share the same spirit, even if a common heritage is under question. Jeffrey Plitt Plitt International, LLC Brillion, WI
Posted by Jeffrey Plitt on September 12,2008 | 09:54 AM
I attended the Plitt reunion in Rockville last year and was thrilled to meet all of the Plitt's who attended. Meeting Jake, Jane, Irmgard, and our other relatives was a fantastic and heartwarming experience. We had a marvelous time sharing our individual family information. My husband and I are looking forward to the reunion in 2010.
Posted by Dorothy Plitt Becker on September 11,2008 | 07:27 PM
I enjoyed Jake's article and his sense of humor. But, sensing from the whole experience, Jake is a little wiser by ending his article with, "DNA hasn't ruptured the "family." That's what it's all about. I like that. Peace
Posted by history buff on September 10,2008 | 03:30 PM
I really like the article. Meanwhile, we have tested 12 male Plitt's. And - we have five different Haplo-Groups! We do not know already, what this means, because there are Plitt's, whose ancestors definitely came from Biedenkopf, but have another Haplo-Group than others from Biedenkopf. At our next reunion in October in Luebeck/Germany we will try to convince more Plitt's to do the DNA test; maybe this will give us more information. Irmgard Schwarz
Posted by Irmgard Schwarz on September 5,2008 | 03:40 AM
Enjoyed the article but was surprised by the DNA-based conclusion that these 2 families have no common ancestors within the past 15,000-30,000 years. I've read elsewhere that the most recent common ancestor of ALL living Europeans ("European" here meaning anyone of European descent) lived less than 1000 years ago. As I understand it, this can be shown through mathematical modeling based on 3 basic facts: the tiny population of Europe back then as compared to now; the fact that everyone's ancestors double in number with each generation you go back (since everyone has 2 parents); and the migrations and intermixing of European populations over time. Another statement I've seen that expresses basically the same concept: Every living person of European descent is a descendant of Charlemagne. (With Charlemagne being the one singled out only because it's known with certainty that he had children, grandchildren, etc, etc, and he lived long enough ago that everyone today of European descent "has" to be descended from him.) I don't know DNA or genealogy but don't see how the "Clan-Do" article reconciles with this idea. Can anyone help me out here? I liked the idea of being related to Charlemagne.
Posted by j koch on August 27,2008 | 02:15 AM