Clan-Do Spirit
A genealogical surprise led the author to ask: What does it take to be one of the family?
- By Jake Halpern
- Smithsonian magazine, September 2008, Subscribe
When I was 20 years old, I crammed my most valued possessions into a big purple backpack and moved to Prague. This was in the mid-1990s, when the city was buzzing with American expats—writers, artists, musicians, bohemians—searching for the modern-day equivalent of Hemingway's Paris. The city's gothic, winding, Escher-like streets were bustling with energy, but when it came to Jewish life, the city was a ghost town. Late at night I would walk through the vacant Jewish quarter, with its many moss-covered tombstones shrouded in fog, and I would feel like the last Jew alive.
One evening, I wandered into a dimly lit antiques shop behind Prague Castle and found a tray stacked with gold and silver rings bearing family crests. "What are these?" I asked the storekeeper.
"They are old family rings," she told me.
"Where did they come from?" I asked.
"From Jewish families," she answered curtly.
Eventually, as my loneliness and alienation mounted, I called my great-uncle back in the States and asked if we had any relatives left in Eastern Europe. "No," he said. "They all perished at the hands of the Nazis."
At that moment, and for a number of years afterward, I hated all things German. And so it came as quite a shock when I discovered, several months ago, that I might have relatives in the Old World—blond-haired, blue-eyed, gentile relatives in Germany.
This information came from my mother's cousin, a devoted genealogist, who had learned about a large clan in Germany named Plitt. This was news to me, even though my mother's maiden name is Plitt, and my full name is Jacob Plitt Halpern. Apparently, this clan even had its own Web site, which traced the family's roots back to one Jacob Plitt, who was recorded in 1560 as paying taxes in the mountain town of Biedenkopf in the state of Hesse.
As last names go, Plitt is pretty unusual: according to the U.S. census, it ranks 28,422th in this country—well behind Jagodzinski, Przybylski, Berkebile and Heatwole. I had never known a Plitt outside my immediate family, but on the German Plitts' Web site I discovered that they held a family reunion every couple of years. Typically these gatherings are held in Germany, but the next one, I saw, was to be held in Rockville, Maryland, a suburb of Washington, D.C. A posting on the Web site noted that there would be special events featuring the Jewish side of the Plitt family.
In the coming weeks, I passed this information along to the other Plitts in my family. They took it tepidly. No one seemed excited by the prospect that our family tree might include a few gray-haired former Nazis who had been "rehabilitated" into Mercedes assembly-line managers. Yet, as much as I bristled at the thought of being related to this tribe of Germans, the thought of not attending seemed neurotic and provincial. Ultimately, I shamed myself into going. I even browbeat my mother and younger brother into going with me.
So one morning not long ago, I found myself in a conference room at the Rockville Hilton with two dozen putative relatives, listening to a woman named Irmgard Schwarz talk about the estimable history of the Plitts. Irmgard, one of a half-dozen German Plitts who had traveled to Maryland for the reunion, is the keeper of a massive tome that traces the family's lineage in meticulous detail back to the early days of the Renaissance. That rich a genealogy is highly unusual in Germany, where a number of armed conflicts, such as the Thirty Years' War (1618-48), destroyed many tax records and church archives.
Throughout the morning, Irmgard helped a number of American Plitts figure out how they were related, but there were a handful of attendees who had found no connection to the original Biedenkopf clan. Some of them were Jews who traced their origins to Bessarabia, or modern-day Moldova. Their ranks included an architect named Joel Plitt, an author named Jane Plitt and my mother, brother and me. We jokingly called ourselves the Lost Tribe of Plitt, and as the four-day gathering progressed, the mystery surrounding us seemed only to grow. "I hold on to the belief that there is a connection between the families," one of the gentile Plitts told me over lunch. "But it's just a feeling."
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (11)
I have Plitt Relatives from before 1900 from West Prussia in Germany and can not find any records of their time there. Where can I look? HLW.
Posted by Howard Lee Wanhoff on July 27,2010 | 01:02 PM
My mother is a Plitt and I would like to get some info from anyone regarding the reunion in 2010 in the USA
Thanks
Posted by Ximena walker on May 6,2010 | 11:34 AM
Apropos the symbols in the Plitt armorial bearings. As far as I can see there are no obvious jewish symbols, or at least symbols only used by jews. There is usually a record of the reasoning behind the choices in armorial bearings, but these are probably ong gone by now. The Anchor is the traditional european mark for trade, which before the advent of trains and cars, was the only way in which to move large cargoes quickly. That this anchor is at the bottom of the shield shows that the house for which the arms was drawn (Plitt) was based on trade. The three small stars above the anchor represent in my opinion Biedenkopf, Wetter and Marburg - the area in Germany from which the part of the Plitt family which the person who ordered the drawing of the arms, came from. The large star above the helmet is in my opinion Lubeck, which was the high point of Plitt economic and political power, the place where Senator Plitt and his family were located. Less obvious are the two horns. Very recently contacts between the Danish Plitts and the House in Lubeck indicate that there were connections to a powerful Danish family at that time, so this may be an indication - but blowing horns are not unudual in european bearings so the answer may be quite another. Cheers Gerald
Posted by Dr. Alfred Gerald Davison on November 18,2008 | 04:26 AM
Hello everyone, My name is Josh Plitt. I recently was shown this article by my wife's grandmother who recognized my name. I found the article to be very informative. I have never really gotten a straight answer from anyone in my family as to where my name comes from. If anyone would mind, could someone contact me? I would love to find out more about where "I came from" so to speak. My e-mail address is jplitt22@yahoo.com. Thanks all.
Posted by Josh Plitt on October 20,2008 | 10:02 PM
With all due respect to Irmgard Schwarz, where DID she get all those records when so many were destroyed? (I'm an addicted researcher too and that is a legitimate question.) Both sides of the family need to take into account the fact that many people change their family names for as many reasons as there are families. While we assume, at first glance, that the same family name means we are related to someone, we not be even if the name is a little unusual. I too question the DNA "proof". I loved the article and wish all families well in their search for peace and - maybe connections. At least they are now connected with common binds whether or not there is a blood relationship. Friendship can be thicker than blood.
Posted by Betty Walling on September 23,2008 | 06:15 PM
When I did a family genealogy search recently for Alling, I found Charlemagne,Henry I,the first 5 Kings of Scotland, and over 40 other Kings and Queens of Europe,England, and Finland.I knew that most have at least 1 link to royalty,but was surprised at the range of cultures and beliefs.Perhaps all of this points at the simplest of truths:Ultimately,We all came from one mother in Africa,and are One family, with One home. That should be our only religion. One species...one planet.
Posted by Gordon Clark on September 14,2008 | 02:36 PM
I ran into another Jeff Plitt at a trade show perhaps in 1999 or 2000. He immediately asked if I was Jewish, which seemed to be an odd question based on the knowledge of my German heritage. Jeff (the other) said that a grand parent had told him the family (Jewish Plitt's) came from Russia and changed their name from the obvious Jewish and/or Slavic name to the Americanized “Plitt” upon immigration to the US. Perhaps this opens another door to the common name/different ancestry mystery. I was thrilled at the beginning of the article to think my heritage would reach back to ancient Israel. Which begs the question, why the obvious Jewish symbols in a gentile coat of arms; if indeed the German Plitt’s have no Jewish ancestry? I am now curious about a taking a DNA test. In any case, blood relatives or not, welcome to the family! We do seem to share the same spirit, even if a common heritage is under question. Jeffrey Plitt Plitt International, LLC Brillion, WI
Posted by Jeffrey Plitt on September 12,2008 | 09:54 AM
I attended the Plitt reunion in Rockville last year and was thrilled to meet all of the Plitt's who attended. Meeting Jake, Jane, Irmgard, and our other relatives was a fantastic and heartwarming experience. We had a marvelous time sharing our individual family information. My husband and I are looking forward to the reunion in 2010.
Posted by Dorothy Plitt Becker on September 11,2008 | 07:27 PM
I enjoyed Jake's article and his sense of humor. But, sensing from the whole experience, Jake is a little wiser by ending his article with, "DNA hasn't ruptured the "family." That's what it's all about. I like that. Peace
Posted by history buff on September 10,2008 | 03:30 PM
I really like the article. Meanwhile, we have tested 12 male Plitt's. And - we have five different Haplo-Groups! We do not know already, what this means, because there are Plitt's, whose ancestors definitely came from Biedenkopf, but have another Haplo-Group than others from Biedenkopf. At our next reunion in October in Luebeck/Germany we will try to convince more Plitt's to do the DNA test; maybe this will give us more information. Irmgard Schwarz
Posted by Irmgard Schwarz on September 5,2008 | 03:40 AM
Enjoyed the article but was surprised by the DNA-based conclusion that these 2 families have no common ancestors within the past 15,000-30,000 years. I've read elsewhere that the most recent common ancestor of ALL living Europeans ("European" here meaning anyone of European descent) lived less than 1000 years ago. As I understand it, this can be shown through mathematical modeling based on 3 basic facts: the tiny population of Europe back then as compared to now; the fact that everyone's ancestors double in number with each generation you go back (since everyone has 2 parents); and the migrations and intermixing of European populations over time. Another statement I've seen that expresses basically the same concept: Every living person of European descent is a descendant of Charlemagne. (With Charlemagne being the one singled out only because it's known with certainty that he had children, grandchildren, etc, etc, and he lived long enough ago that everyone today of European descent "has" to be descended from him.) I don't know DNA or genealogy but don't see how the "Clan-Do" article reconciles with this idea. Can anyone help me out here? I liked the idea of being related to Charlemagne.
Posted by j koch on August 27,2008 | 02:15 AM