Extreme Polo
There are no holds barred at the annual grudge match in northwest Pakistan's "land of mirth and murder"
- By Paul Raffaele
- Photographs by Paul Nevin
- Smithsonian magazine, January 2007, Subscribe
(Page 6 of 7)
A toss of the ball starts the 60-minute game. I'm standing at a break in the low wall with several police officers, and time after time we have to jump to safety as the players rush straight at us in pursuit of a mis-hit ball. They crash their mounts into their opponents', seeking to unseat them, or lash out with their mallets, indiscriminately whacking horse and human. Up close, the grunting and thwacking are terrifying.
Sikander and a Gilgit player tear after a ball, both so low in the saddle that their heads threaten to hit the ground. The Gilgit horse noses ahead, and the rider takes a mighty swipe, sending the ball hurtling into the goal. Thousands of Gilgits cheer as an equal number of Chitralis groan.
Siraj's son-in-law, Shah Qubilal Alam of Lahore, captain of Pakistan's polo team, watches from the main grandstand. He shakes his head at the violence. "We've so many rules in mainstream polo, you can't do this, you can't do that, strictly controlled by a referee....In our polo, a chukker lasts just seven and a half minutes, and then you change horses. And that's at sea level. I can't see how the horses can go at it for half an hour at a time without a rest."
Sikander charges into melee after melee, sometimes hitting the ball, sometimes lashing an opponent. He scores the first goal for Chitral, and to the roar of his supporters charges straight down the field, holding the ball in the same hand as his mallet. With the many bands playing his special song, he tosses the ball into the air as he reaches midfield and with his mallet thumps it on the fly deep into enemy territory. This maneuver—the thampuk—signals the restart of play after the goal.
At halftime, the score is 3 all. While players and horses try to catch their breath, soldiers take to the playing field to perform traditional sword dances. After a half-hour, the game resumes, and the score seesaws through the second half—which finally ends with the teams tied at 5 goals each.
Siraj, who has been doing commentary over the PA system, announces that the teams may now elect to toss a coin to decide the winner or play on for ten minutes of overtime. "They have pushed themselves beyond their limits, and any more could be dangerous to man and horse," he intones.
But Shandur Pass mountain men don't toss coins. The horses' chests are heaving, and the game has slowed a bit, but the two captains insist that they play on. They get an unplanned breather when a bomb scare empties thousands of seats. But authorities soon determine that the "bomb" was a cigarette lighter detonated by overheating in the sun, and play resumes.
Overtime ends with the score tied at 7 all. Siraj, at the microphone, pleads for the players to toss a coin to end the match. But no one is surprised when both captains insist on playing ten minutes more.
The tension has become almost unbearable. Even with the score still tied, Siraj announces that "this is the greatest game ever" in the grudge match's 73-year history.
Play resumes, and Chitral scores a goal, and then another—Sikander's third of the game—to put the game beyond doubt. At last, it's over: Chitral 9, Gilgit 7.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (2)
I think this is a sad universal phenomenon. The media has further aggravated the siuation.As the indigenous people like Kalash normally don't have the benefit of liberal education they cannot the wheat from the chaff and tend to get impressed by the media projections of a consumerist culture. All this engenders a deep sense of cultural inferiority and they start looking down upon their own culture,traditions and knowledge systems that had given them identity and had also sustained them over millenia. REACH(Rural Entrepreneurship for Arts and Cultural Heritage) - a not for profit organization has been seized with the above concerns.It has worked with the Khosh tribe of the central Himalayas that also insidentally claim descent from the Macedonian stock. It beleives that an effort has to be made to supports such cultural-gene pools. Otherwise very soon the world would lose the Kalash. Their world-view, art, culture,language, food habits, dresses, ornaments, places of worships, legends,songs, stories, music and musical instruments need to be documented and preserved. The Kalash way of life has be respected and they should maintain cultural autonomy that has stood them in good stead for time imemorial. Otherwise our world would be so much poorer. Secondly, they have to be taught in extremely subtle way to respct their own culture. On a materialistic side this can attract tourist and generate income too. However, by suggesting this, I , by no means, try to get at that they should/can be kept in a time wrap. My only concern is that they should have an informed choice and not that they should reject every thing Kalash because the media and the majority population consider they "backward". REACH, apart from other things try to grow respect in indigenous people like Khosh and otheres for their own culture by inviting them to its 15 day long festival - Virasat(virasat.com) that it organizes at Dehradun, India. RK Singh
Posted by RK Singh on February 22,2009 | 08:46 AM
The Kalash have come to Chitral more than 2000 years ago. Their ancestors in Beshgal [now Nooristan] were forcefully converted by Amir Amanullah. But the Kalash who happened to be in three valleys—Bumborate, Rumbor and Birir—were never asked to convert by the rulers of Chitral, that is the reason as to why they still live according their traditional culture and way of life. By the advent of modern era, however, amongst the Kalash people themselves there have been initiatives emanating from economic depration, development-related issues and cultural phenomenon. I may point out the following points to make things more clear. 1) Kalash people are less sensitized towards the importance of their culture and are more easily impressionable. They feel that as compare to other cultures, their culture has not given them benefit. They see their culture from utilitarian point of view. 2) Kalash girls elope with Muslim boys and normally get converted. This is going to reduce Kalash population. 3) There are less entrepreneurship skills amongst the Kalash. Their lands have been occupied by people from outside and many of the tourism-related businesses are owned by non-Kalash people. 4) Life expectancy is low amongst the Kalash people and pre-mature blindness is high. I feel all these things have long-term negative repercussions for the Kalash culture.
Posted by Shamstheguide on May 28,2008 | 04:57 AM