The Pirate Hunters
As buccanneering is back with a vengeance, stepped-up law enforcement and high-tech tools work to help protect shipping on the high seas
- By Paul Raffaele
- Smithsonian magazine, August 2007, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
Several grim-faced Iraqi marines clad in camouflage fatigues climbed aboard and forced us up to the front of the Aquidneck. Some pointed their guns at us even though their trainers had ordered them not to, and others searched us and checked our ID. I grimaced when a marine yanked my arms above my head and I tensed as he roughly searched my body for hidden weapons.
They made us sit on the uncovered deck in brutal heat for more than an hour, refusing our requests for water and keeping their guns trained on us. But for all that, our captors failed to detect a knife one of the Aquidneck crew had secreted, and they never searched my camera bag. Had we been actual bad guys, who knows what might have happened.
Last October I drove an hour north of Mombasa, past a string of Kenyan luxury seaside resorts, to talk to any of the ten accused Somali pirates who would speak with me in the maximum-security jail where they were being held. As I waited outside the stone walls, grim-faced prisoners in striped pajamas with short pants came and went, under guard.
By then, the Somalis' trial was under way; the defendants were due in court the following day. Inside the jail, armed guards escorted two of them as they shuffled toward me, handcuffed to each other.
We moved to a bare room with a barred window. The guards followed us, while others crowded the window outside to stare and listen.
Moktar Mohammed Hussein and Abdi Fadar, clad in sarongs and T-shirts, squatted in front of me but did not make eye contact. They were 17 and 18, respectively. "We're fishermen, and our boats broke down on the ocean," Hussein said. "We sought help from the Indian dhow."
Then why were they carrying assault rifles and rocket-propelled grenades, I asked them. "Every man in Somalia carries such weapons for protection," Hussein said, turning his dark eyes on me. That much was corroborated later by the BBC's Mombasa-based correspondent, Peter Greste, who often visits Somalia.
But why did they try to escape when they spotted the American warship? "We thought they suspected us of being Al Qaeda. We were frightened, and so we tried to get away," Fadar said.
"We just want to go home," Hussein added softly.
I reminded them that Indian crewmembers had testified that the Somalis had hijacked their ship and beaten them? Hussein shook his head. "They're lying," he said.
Did they even know any Somali pirates? Both shook their heads no, but stared silently at the floor.
At 3 o'clock the next afternoon, all ten defendants crowded into the dock in a small courtroom to face a senior magistrate, Beatrice Jaden, seated high above us on a pedestal in the British manner. The prosecutor, Margaret Mwangi, read out the charge, accusing them of committing "acts of piracy on the high seas," and ran through the evidence, based on statements from the Indian crew aboard the dhow and the U.S. sailors who had rescued them.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
what this doent help what weapons do they use.
Posted by niyah on March 3,2011 | 09:42 AM
Avast ye scurvy dogs!
The days of Pirates have returned. It is time to have an international treaty to train and allow mariners to go armed with deadly force on the high seas. We are talking belt-fed machine guns, shotguns, and modern military automatic rifles here. Upon entering a foreign port the comercial or private vessel could surrender the weapon onboard, or secure them onboard the vessel with customs tamper proof seals. This international treaty could and should be radified by all freedom loving states. Chance of happening? slim and nil! Better yet, let the would be totalitarians incorperate a second amendment like that of the U.S. Bill of Rights into the UN charter, instead of trying to disarm the law abiding citizen of the world. I propose that the U.S. defund the U.N. until they pass a treaty to garrantee the rights of all peoples to keep and bear arms as a INDIVIDUAL RIGHT!
Posted by Padraig's Ghost on January 10,2010 | 01:25 PM
If there were aircraft carriers deployed in the region that could launch aircraft in seconds of receiving report of pirate attacks, they could and should attack and sink the mother ship stranding the pirates in their speedboat. One should always attack the root of the problem. If enough such mother ships were sunk leaving the speedboat attackers helpless and the pirates become food for the sharks, the piracy would be quickly stopped. Unfortunately United States and many other western countries show far more mercy than these pirates deserve. I am certain that Russia would not show such mercy after some of their ships were attacked. There should also be well armed ships with air support enticing the pirates into a trap and then unleashing all the firepower at their disposal. Again if enough pirates were killed and others released to spread the message in the home base of the most savage retributions to the pirates, the piracy would stop. Mercy, trials, etc. against pirates are counter-productive.
Posted by Ali Nur on May 4,2009 | 03:13 AM
pirates operating from a lawless home country,pose a unique problem for shipping companys.Any government in this part of the world must continuosly curry favor with the public sympathy for the pirates cause,however perverted,any shipper employing aggresive methods,run the risk of alienating the governments of the ports they depend on for business. No poirt no shipping
Posted by rd johnson on April 16,2009 | 09:58 PM
As a former Australian serviceman,with over seas servic,i am ready to help with/in this problem, and i say,Their is only one way to deal with this problem,(of piracy on the high seas)and it is to take no prisioners,elimate the problem,as it will cut the number of boardings of forren ships, and will save the companys a lot of money,and our sea ways once again will be free, from this problem.
Posted by william hinds on December 26,2008 | 03:06 AM
A quick recommendation regarding prevention of Somali pirate threats to ships, from someone who has been there and done this type of insurgency eradication. Why decide to steer way around the immediate standard sailing routes and add unnecessary costs to the consumers? The less costly, most easiest and effective means to counter any pirate threat is to simply contract and have onboard professional armed security teams. I am not talking about “simple security guards.” I am talking about professional ex-military operators. This “proper” type of ship security team can counter any of the armed pirate threats available. There are plenty of these people around for contract work. They will need to be screened with proper scrutiny before hired to ensure their abilities and skill-sets. They then need to be assigned into teams. Take the tough stand against these cowardly minions and make a strong statement that says, “You mess with us, we will exterminate you!” You say it sounds too simple and controversial. It is that simple and NOT controversial, but provocatively smart to continue the rite of passage on peaceful seas! You cannot depend on maritime patrol ships to counter pirate incursions because those patrol boats can only be brought to bear AFTER pirates have already control of the vessels. It is ex-post facto at work! Just as any law enforcement agency is activated ONLY AFTER the criminal act has already taken place, it is only reactionary! It takes experienced critical mass teams armed with the proper means of weaponry to not only “discourage” pirate raids, but will effectively in the immediate term overcome any pirate attack on a vessel with precision. Stop making it harder on yourself and your customers and do the smart thing. It is simple and cost-effective, and gets your product to market.
Posted by PETER R DUYSINGS on November 28,2008 | 01:38 PM
I agree with Peter. They don't do it just to do it. They have their reasons. We in America have it pretty well we don't know what it's like over there. So i guess until we do we should try to be more open minded.
Posted by DaughterofaPirate on October 24,2008 | 01:20 PM
There should be cargo ships, turned into pirate hunting vessels. Gut out the inside turn all the cargo space into rooms so you can hold 50 or 60 guys. Reinforce the top sides of the ship to give better cover. Kill all the pirates, siphon out all the gas and oil, sell that, and sink their ship. If this is already being done where do I sign up?
Posted by on July 17,2008 | 04:39 PM
I can not understand people who think that the USA is responsible for everything that is wrong in the world and gets credit for nothing. We give food to the hungry, their leaders keep it for themselves. We give money to their country, their leaders keep it and spend it on themselves. We have been sending support for many years what country has used to resources that we provide (along with countless other country's) to lift themselves out of the conditions these bleeding hearts cannot bear.
Posted by John Morrison on July 6,2008 | 11:41 AM
Caught and put in prison? Noooo. Give them maritime justice as it was in the yonder days of piracy. Hanging at best, burn at the stake at worst. I say if you are going to be dumb enough to run those hostile, foreign shipping routes in a pleasure yacht, or sailboat, you had best invest in arming yourself with machine guns off the black market. I think about 5 or so US made M-60s would do the trick. Easily portable and hidden for when you are port bound...and viciously deadly on the open water. Heck, even simpler may be to just hire a well trained mercenary sniper. You drop a few water bound sand monkeys at 1000 yards and the rest will run...fast.
Posted by M. Sixty SAW on May 7,2008 | 02:44 PM
Has it not occurred to you,that maybe,(just maybe), those buggers in the boat tried to sell the swag for their own profit; and then, came up with some ghost story to tell the boss?If any of them died; it could just as easilly have been caused by over greedyness, or non cooperance in the caper, dued to the dead bloke's stupidity, which was, obviously, blamed on the poor dark faced native sailors.I tell you, insurance companies should seriously look into that;just some food for thaught.
Posted by realist fellar on March 10,2008 | 11:00 AM
it's not a matter of simple-mindedness. Like it's been said before, there's a need to do these things, they may not be justified in our eyes, but in the eyes of the people carrying out these actions they are. That's the simple truth of it. Without evil, pain, or carelessness, there would be no light, comfort or caring in the world. These things hold a balance to one another and it will always be so. We just need to be able to deal with it correctly. (that's what our brave militaries and law enforcement agencies are for, thank you to all people who serve).
Posted by Ness on February 27,2008 | 05:59 PM
What's with the pointless comments above? Right lets kill everyone that commit robbery. For godsake enforcement is of little point if you don't tackle the causes of crime. What compels what is the essentially citzens of the third-world to take to rusty, decreipt vessels, to attempt extremely risky robberies? Spend a day in a third-world country and the answer will smash your narrow minded bigoted views. Yes these people don't rob just to feed themselves. They're stealing in order to lift their station in life. To move to a level that we in the western world expect, nay demand. I say the pirates of the sea are a symbol of what is wrong with this world, of what we've done to the world.
Posted by Peter on December 6,2007 | 06:42 PM
What about the notion of not negotiating with terrorist? Why is The U.N of all people paying for the release of hostages? Has anyone ever heard of Lo-Jack? How about talking to GM and getting these ships the ONSTAR system and locate these guys red handed.
Posted by Kevin on December 1,2007 | 09:41 PM