The Pirate Hunters
As buccanneering is back with a vengeance, stepped-up law enforcement and high-tech tools work to help protect shipping on the high seas
- By Paul Raffaele
- Smithsonian magazine, August 2007, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
"We repeatedly radioed and asked [the dhow] to halt," Nilsson said. When the pirates refused, the U.S. sailors called to them over an amplified megaphone, without effect. The chase went on all morning and into the afternoon. With Somali waters only four hours away, the Churchill closed to within 500 yards of the dhow and fired across its bow with its 25-millimeter chain guns. "That got the pirates' attention, and they stopped," Nilsson said.
Some of the Churchill's crew boarded the dhow and took everyone on it into custody. Aboard the destroyer, a Hindi-speaking member of the Churchill crew questioned the dhow's captain. "She found that the pirates had captured the dhow six days earlier and had beaten and imprisoned the crew," Nilsson said. "They'd given the Indians no food during that time and had threatened to kill them if they resisted."
Nilsson said that he had seen the Somalis throw unidentified "objects" over the side during the night. Many pirates try to ditch their weapons in the belief that it would provide less evidence for prosecution, but if that were the case aboard the dhow, it didn't work: the boarding party found an AK-47 stashed in the wheelhouse.
Later that afternoon, the USS Nassau, a 40,000-ton amphibious assault ship and the flagship of the expeditionary strike group to which the Churchill was attached, caught up with the destroyer. Ten Somali pirates were taken to the brig of the larger ship. After consulting with the U.S. Central Command, the Nassau took the Somalis to Mombasa, where Kenyan authorities arrested them and charged them with piracy.
Keeping the world's sea lanes safe for commerce is one goal of what the Navy calls Maritime Security Operations, or MSO. Another is to prevent sea-based terrorism. Choong had told me that piracy was prevalent even in the hazardous waters off Iraq in the northern Persian Gulf.
To get there, I flew to the desert kingdom of Bahrain, headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet, which operates in the Arabian Sea, Red Sea, Gulf of Oman and parts of the Indian Ocean. From there I caught a Navy Desert Hawk helicopter for a two-hour flight to the guided-missile cruiser USS Philippine Sea, my base for a three-day visit. Along the way, the chopper flew fast and low over a sparkling green sea dotted with coral islands, fishing dhows and oil rigs. With the cruiser steaming along, the pilot put us smoothly down on the aft deck.
On board, Australian Navy lieutenant commander Tish Van Stralen, a maritime lawyer, said that the cruiser was the flagship of an eight-ship coalition task force guarding Iraq's nearby Al Basrah and Khawr Al Amaya oil terminals, which were pumping up to 1.6 million barrels a day into the holds of supertankers. "They provide up to 90 percent of Iraq's GDP, and so the coalition forces have set up a pair of adjacent two-mile-wide exclusion zones around the oil terminals," Van Stralen said. "We challenge and check every vessel wanting to enter them, primarily on the watch for terrorists intent on blowing up the oil terminals, but also for pirates and smugglers."
The pirate hunters patrolling the zones were a Coast Guard crew aboard the cutter Aquidneck. The next morning I rode a half hour across a flat sea in a rigid inflatable speedboat to meet them.
Lt. Jonathan Carter and his 22-man crew had spent six months on these volatile waters. Assault rifles were nestled in a rack, and on the small bridge, four sailors hunched over radar and sonar equipment, looking for any vessel trying to enter the exclusion zones.
As the Aquidneck edged up the Shatt Al Arab waterway toward Basra, Carter pointed to an empty stretch of desert about 200 yards on our left. "That's Kuwait," he said. About 200 yards to the right was Iraq—more desert with no sign of life. The cutter passed several rusting hulks resting half out of the water, casualties of Gulf warfare.
"Pirates have been active in these waterways for centuries. There're still plenty of them here, and we call them Ali Baba," Carter went on. "They mostly prey on the fishing dhows, especially during the prawning season when the dhow captains carry plenty of money on board after selling their catch to traders....We'll hear a plea over the radio, 'Ali Baba! Ali Baba!' But by the time we reach the dhow, the pirates have usually escaped. If we surprise them, they throw their weapons overboard."
Coalition naval forces are trying to train Iraqi marines to board, search and, if necessary, seize suspicious vessels. From the north, I saw two patrol boats roaring along the waterway toward us. On board were Iraqi marines under the guidance of a pair of Royal Australian Navy officers. The marines were taking part in a training exercise, and five Coast Guardsmen and I volunteered to play potential terrorists or pirates.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
what this doent help what weapons do they use.
Posted by niyah on March 3,2011 | 09:42 AM
Avast ye scurvy dogs!
The days of Pirates have returned. It is time to have an international treaty to train and allow mariners to go armed with deadly force on the high seas. We are talking belt-fed machine guns, shotguns, and modern military automatic rifles here. Upon entering a foreign port the comercial or private vessel could surrender the weapon onboard, or secure them onboard the vessel with customs tamper proof seals. This international treaty could and should be radified by all freedom loving states. Chance of happening? slim and nil! Better yet, let the would be totalitarians incorperate a second amendment like that of the U.S. Bill of Rights into the UN charter, instead of trying to disarm the law abiding citizen of the world. I propose that the U.S. defund the U.N. until they pass a treaty to garrantee the rights of all peoples to keep and bear arms as a INDIVIDUAL RIGHT!
Posted by Padraig's Ghost on January 10,2010 | 01:25 PM
If there were aircraft carriers deployed in the region that could launch aircraft in seconds of receiving report of pirate attacks, they could and should attack and sink the mother ship stranding the pirates in their speedboat. One should always attack the root of the problem. If enough such mother ships were sunk leaving the speedboat attackers helpless and the pirates become food for the sharks, the piracy would be quickly stopped. Unfortunately United States and many other western countries show far more mercy than these pirates deserve. I am certain that Russia would not show such mercy after some of their ships were attacked. There should also be well armed ships with air support enticing the pirates into a trap and then unleashing all the firepower at their disposal. Again if enough pirates were killed and others released to spread the message in the home base of the most savage retributions to the pirates, the piracy would stop. Mercy, trials, etc. against pirates are counter-productive.
Posted by Ali Nur on May 4,2009 | 03:13 AM
pirates operating from a lawless home country,pose a unique problem for shipping companys.Any government in this part of the world must continuosly curry favor with the public sympathy for the pirates cause,however perverted,any shipper employing aggresive methods,run the risk of alienating the governments of the ports they depend on for business. No poirt no shipping
Posted by rd johnson on April 16,2009 | 09:58 PM
As a former Australian serviceman,with over seas servic,i am ready to help with/in this problem, and i say,Their is only one way to deal with this problem,(of piracy on the high seas)and it is to take no prisioners,elimate the problem,as it will cut the number of boardings of forren ships, and will save the companys a lot of money,and our sea ways once again will be free, from this problem.
Posted by william hinds on December 26,2008 | 03:06 AM
A quick recommendation regarding prevention of Somali pirate threats to ships, from someone who has been there and done this type of insurgency eradication. Why decide to steer way around the immediate standard sailing routes and add unnecessary costs to the consumers? The less costly, most easiest and effective means to counter any pirate threat is to simply contract and have onboard professional armed security teams. I am not talking about “simple security guards.” I am talking about professional ex-military operators. This “proper” type of ship security team can counter any of the armed pirate threats available. There are plenty of these people around for contract work. They will need to be screened with proper scrutiny before hired to ensure their abilities and skill-sets. They then need to be assigned into teams. Take the tough stand against these cowardly minions and make a strong statement that says, “You mess with us, we will exterminate you!” You say it sounds too simple and controversial. It is that simple and NOT controversial, but provocatively smart to continue the rite of passage on peaceful seas! You cannot depend on maritime patrol ships to counter pirate incursions because those patrol boats can only be brought to bear AFTER pirates have already control of the vessels. It is ex-post facto at work! Just as any law enforcement agency is activated ONLY AFTER the criminal act has already taken place, it is only reactionary! It takes experienced critical mass teams armed with the proper means of weaponry to not only “discourage” pirate raids, but will effectively in the immediate term overcome any pirate attack on a vessel with precision. Stop making it harder on yourself and your customers and do the smart thing. It is simple and cost-effective, and gets your product to market.
Posted by PETER R DUYSINGS on November 28,2008 | 01:38 PM
I agree with Peter. They don't do it just to do it. They have their reasons. We in America have it pretty well we don't know what it's like over there. So i guess until we do we should try to be more open minded.
Posted by DaughterofaPirate on October 24,2008 | 01:20 PM
There should be cargo ships, turned into pirate hunting vessels. Gut out the inside turn all the cargo space into rooms so you can hold 50 or 60 guys. Reinforce the top sides of the ship to give better cover. Kill all the pirates, siphon out all the gas and oil, sell that, and sink their ship. If this is already being done where do I sign up?
Posted by on July 17,2008 | 04:39 PM
I can not understand people who think that the USA is responsible for everything that is wrong in the world and gets credit for nothing. We give food to the hungry, their leaders keep it for themselves. We give money to their country, their leaders keep it and spend it on themselves. We have been sending support for many years what country has used to resources that we provide (along with countless other country's) to lift themselves out of the conditions these bleeding hearts cannot bear.
Posted by John Morrison on July 6,2008 | 11:41 AM
Caught and put in prison? Noooo. Give them maritime justice as it was in the yonder days of piracy. Hanging at best, burn at the stake at worst. I say if you are going to be dumb enough to run those hostile, foreign shipping routes in a pleasure yacht, or sailboat, you had best invest in arming yourself with machine guns off the black market. I think about 5 or so US made M-60s would do the trick. Easily portable and hidden for when you are port bound...and viciously deadly on the open water. Heck, even simpler may be to just hire a well trained mercenary sniper. You drop a few water bound sand monkeys at 1000 yards and the rest will run...fast.
Posted by M. Sixty SAW on May 7,2008 | 02:44 PM
Has it not occurred to you,that maybe,(just maybe), those buggers in the boat tried to sell the swag for their own profit; and then, came up with some ghost story to tell the boss?If any of them died; it could just as easilly have been caused by over greedyness, or non cooperance in the caper, dued to the dead bloke's stupidity, which was, obviously, blamed on the poor dark faced native sailors.I tell you, insurance companies should seriously look into that;just some food for thaught.
Posted by realist fellar on March 10,2008 | 11:00 AM
it's not a matter of simple-mindedness. Like it's been said before, there's a need to do these things, they may not be justified in our eyes, but in the eyes of the people carrying out these actions they are. That's the simple truth of it. Without evil, pain, or carelessness, there would be no light, comfort or caring in the world. These things hold a balance to one another and it will always be so. We just need to be able to deal with it correctly. (that's what our brave militaries and law enforcement agencies are for, thank you to all people who serve).
Posted by Ness on February 27,2008 | 05:59 PM
What's with the pointless comments above? Right lets kill everyone that commit robbery. For godsake enforcement is of little point if you don't tackle the causes of crime. What compels what is the essentially citzens of the third-world to take to rusty, decreipt vessels, to attempt extremely risky robberies? Spend a day in a third-world country and the answer will smash your narrow minded bigoted views. Yes these people don't rob just to feed themselves. They're stealing in order to lift their station in life. To move to a level that we in the western world expect, nay demand. I say the pirates of the sea are a symbol of what is wrong with this world, of what we've done to the world.
Posted by Peter on December 6,2007 | 06:42 PM
What about the notion of not negotiating with terrorist? Why is The U.N of all people paying for the release of hostages? Has anyone ever heard of Lo-Jack? How about talking to GM and getting these ships the ONSTAR system and locate these guys red handed.
Posted by Kevin on December 1,2007 | 09:41 PM