(Page 2 of 5)
Choong showed me the center's reports on the 239 major pirate attacks it recorded in 2006. One hundred eighty-eight crewmen were taken hostage and 15 were killed—9 in Asia, 4 in Africa and 1 each in the Middle East and South America. "Modern-day pirates can be just as merciless as the Caribbean buccaneers," Choong told me. He recalled the 13 pirates—12 Chinese and 1 Indonesian—who hijacked the Cheung Son, a Hong Kong-registered cargo ship, off China in 1998. "They blindfolded the 23 crewmembers, beat them to death with clubs and threw their bodies overboard," he said. Then they sold the vessel to an unknown party for $300,000. But they were caught, convicted of piracy and murder in a Chinese court, and sentenced to death.
On their way to the firing squad, Choong said, the 13 sang Ricky Martin's bouncy 1998 World Cup soccer theme, "La Copa de la Vida," jumping up and down in their chains as they bellowed the chorus: "Go, go, go, ale, ale, ale." (Afterward, Choong said, "the Chinese charged their families the cost of each bullet" used in the executions.)
Because much of Choong's work is under cover, and because he's been the target of assassination threats, he's careful to protect his anonymity. He has a wide network of informants—usually members of pirate gangs or corrupt government officials looking for a fat payoff—and when a big ship goes missing, he will jet to distant cities at short notice to launch recovery operations. The pirates' going rate for the return of a hijacked ship, he said, is about $800,000. "If I can get it back by paying an informant a fraction of that, then the owners and underwriters are happy."
Recently, an informant called Choong's cellphone to say he knew where pirates were holding a hijacked ship. The next day Choong flew to Bangkok and, in the bar of an airport hotel, listened to the man's offer: the ship's whereabouts in exchange for $50,000.
Choong forwarded the offer to Chinese authorities, who found the ship at anchor in the South China Sea, sporting fresh paint, a new name and a fake registration. After the ship was in hand—Choong said he never pays without results—he arranged a $50,000 deposit to an account the informant kept under a false name. The entire transaction—from phone call to payoff—took no more than a week.
But Choong doubted that the man got to enjoy his loot. "I heard he was murdered by the gang not long after," he said.
Between rounds of whiskey in a plush Kuala Lumpur bar, a ship broker who asked not to be named because of security concerns told me that besides buying and selling ships for his clients, he sometimes arranges ransoms to get their vessels back from hijackers, for about the same sum that Choong had mentioned. "The owners usually pay up without question," he said. Bringing in the authorities "might tie up the ship for weeks, even months, at a port while they investigate the crime. That could lose them millions of dollars."
Of course, not all negotiations go smoothly. Along the coast of Somalia—which Choong pinpointed as one of the world's likeliest areas for pirate attacks—brigands can, and often do, drag out negotiations for months.
"Somalia is chaotic, with gangs of heavily armed men roaming around the land and its seas," James Mriria, a strapping sailor, told me in the Kenyan port of Mombasa. He said he had spent four months in 2001 as a hostage of Somali pirates as they haggled with the Italian owner of a fishing trawler they had hijacked. The bandits, he said, fed their guests just enough food to keep them alive, and often beat them with rifle butts. "It was hell," Mriria said.
The pirates who tried to take the Delta Ranger would head for Somalia too.
In pursuit of the hijacked dhow, the Churchill had the advantage of surprise. The pirates "couldn't see us over the horizon" during the night, the ship's executive officer, Lt. Cmdr. Erik Nilsson, told me in a telephone interview. But at first light the destroyer deliberately showed itself to the crew of the dhow, and the pirates took off to the west. Somalia's territorial waters—from which the Churchill was barred by international law—were 80 nautical miles away.
Nilsson had no doubt this was the right ship. He had gotten a description of it from the captain of the Delta Ranger. In time he would see through his binoculars the 16 Indian crewmembers, on the fo'c'sle, holding up a piece of plywood on which they had spray-painted: SIR PLEASE HELP US.


Comments
they are so stupid because they like to go round killing people that are innocent and robbing and stealing from innocent people because they have nothing else to do. They should be caught and put to prison for life or longer than 10years no matter what the age. why why why though these thoughtless people have to go raping, theifing, stealing, wounding,killing just for the bloomin hell of it. The police should be doing more about it. Its these kind of people that are destroying our earth and our people. The police need to get out there and arrest them Tyhank-you i hope you will put this on the web people need to take actiona dn do something about it... Zoe, aged 14
Posted by Zoe on November 16,2007 | 06:14AM
What about the notion of not negotiating with terrorist? Why is The U.N of all people paying for the release of hostages? Has anyone ever heard of Lo-Jack? How about talking to GM and getting these ships the ONSTAR system and locate these guys red handed.
Posted by Kevin on December 1,2007 | 06:41PM
What's with the pointless comments above? Right lets kill everyone that commit robbery. For godsake enforcement is of little point if you don't tackle the causes of crime. What compels what is the essentially citzens of the third-world to take to rusty, decreipt vessels, to attempt extremely risky robberies? Spend a day in a third-world country and the answer will smash your narrow minded bigoted views. Yes these people don't rob just to feed themselves. They're stealing in order to lift their station in life. To move to a level that we in the western world expect, nay demand. I say the pirates of the sea are a symbol of what is wrong with this world, of what we've done to the world.
Posted by Peter on December 6,2007 | 03:42PM
it's not a matter of simple-mindedness. Like it's been said before, there's a need to do these things, they may not be justified in our eyes, but in the eyes of the people carrying out these actions they are. That's the simple truth of it. Without evil, pain, or carelessness, there would be no light, comfort or caring in the world. These things hold a balance to one another and it will always be so. We just need to be able to deal with it correctly. (that's what our brave militaries and law enforcement agencies are for, thank you to all people who serve).
Posted by Ness on February 27,2008 | 02:59PM
Has it not occurred to you,that maybe,(just maybe), those buggers in the boat tried to sell the swag for their own profit; and then, came up with some ghost story to tell the boss?If any of them died; it could just as easilly have been caused by over greedyness, or non cooperance in the caper, dued to the dead bloke's stupidity, which was, obviously, blamed on the poor dark faced native sailors.I tell you, insurance companies should seriously look into that;just some food for thaught.
Posted by realist fellar on March 10,2008 | 08:00AM
Caught and put in prison? Noooo. Give them maritime justice as it was in the yonder days of piracy. Hanging at best, burn at the stake at worst. I say if you are going to be dumb enough to run those hostile, foreign shipping routes in a pleasure yacht, or sailboat, you had best invest in arming yourself with machine guns off the black market. I think about 5 or so US made M-60s would do the trick. Easily portable and hidden for when you are port bound...and viciously deadly on the open water. Heck, even simpler may be to just hire a well trained mercenary sniper. You drop a few water bound sand monkeys at 1000 yards and the rest will run...fast.
Posted by M. Sixty SAW on May 7,2008 | 11:44AM
I can not understand people who think that the USA is responsible for everything that is wrong in the world and gets credit for nothing. We give food to the hungry, their leaders keep it for themselves. We give money to their country, their leaders keep it and spend it on themselves. We have been sending support for many years what country has used to resources that we provide (along with countless other country's) to lift themselves out of the conditions these bleeding hearts cannot bear.
Posted by John Morrison on July 6,2008 | 08:41AM
There should be cargo ships, turned into pirate hunting vessels. Gut out the inside turn all the cargo space into rooms so you can hold 50 or 60 guys. Reinforce the top sides of the ship to give better cover. Kill all the pirates, siphon out all the gas and oil, sell that, and sink their ship. If this is already being done where do I sign up?
Posted by on July 17,2008 | 01:39PM
I agree with Peter. They don't do it just to do it. They have their reasons. We in America have it pretty well we don't know what it's like over there. So i guess until we do we should try to be more open minded.
Posted by DaughterofaPirate on October 24,2008 | 10:20AM
A quick recommendation regarding prevention of Somali pirate threats to ships, from someone who has been there and done this type of insurgency eradication. Why decide to steer way around the immediate standard sailing routes and add unnecessary costs to the consumers? The less costly, most easiest and effective means to counter any pirate threat is to simply contract and have onboard professional armed security teams. I am not talking about “simple security guards.” I am talking about professional ex-military operators. This “proper” type of ship security team can counter any of the armed pirate threats available. There are plenty of these people around for contract work. They will need to be screened with proper scrutiny before hired to ensure their abilities and skill-sets. They then need to be assigned into teams. Take the tough stand against these cowardly minions and make a strong statement that says, “You mess with us, we will exterminate you!” You say it sounds too simple and controversial. It is that simple and NOT controversial, but provocatively smart to continue the rite of passage on peaceful seas! You cannot depend on maritime patrol ships to counter pirate incursions because those patrol boats can only be brought to bear AFTER pirates have already control of the vessels. It is ex-post facto at work! Just as any law enforcement agency is activated ONLY AFTER the criminal act has already taken place, it is only reactionary! It takes experienced critical mass teams armed with the proper means of weaponry to not only “discourage” pirate raids, but will effectively in the immediate term overcome any pirate attack on a vessel with precision. Stop making it harder on yourself and your customers and do the smart thing. It is simple and cost-effective, and gets your product to market.
Posted by PETER R DUYSINGS on November 28,2008 | 10:38AM
As a former Australian serviceman,with over seas servic,i am ready to help with/in this problem, and i say,Their is only one way to deal with this problem,(of piracy on the high seas)and it is to take no prisioners,elimate the problem,as it will cut the number of boardings of forren ships, and will save the companys a lot of money,and our sea ways once again will be free, from this problem.
Posted by william hinds on December 26,2008 | 12:06AM
pirates operating from a lawless home country,pose a unique problem for shipping companys.Any government in this part of the world must continuosly curry favor with the public sympathy for the pirates cause,however perverted,any shipper employing aggresive methods,run the risk of alienating the governments of the ports they depend on for business. No poirt no shipping
Posted by rd johnson on April 16,2009 | 06:58PM
If there were aircraft carriers deployed in the region that could launch aircraft in seconds of receiving report of pirate attacks, they could and should attack and sink the mother ship stranding the pirates in their speedboat. One should always attack the root of the problem. If enough such mother ships were sunk leaving the speedboat attackers helpless and the pirates become food for the sharks, the piracy would be quickly stopped. Unfortunately United States and many other western countries show far more mercy than these pirates deserve. I am certain that Russia would not show such mercy after some of their ships were attacked. There should also be well armed ships with air support enticing the pirates into a trap and then unleashing all the firepower at their disposal. Again if enough pirates were killed and others released to spread the message in the home base of the most savage retributions to the pirates, the piracy would stop. Mercy, trials, etc. against pirates are counter-productive.
Posted by Ali Nur on May 4,2009 | 12:13AM