Pilgrims' Progress
We retrace the travels (and travails) of the ragtag group that founded Plymouth Colony, gave us Thanksgiving and laid the foundation for democracy in the New World
- By Simon Worrall
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 4 of 5)
If Brewster continued his rebellious ways, he faced prison, and possibly torture, as did his fellow Separatists. So in the spring of 1608, they organized a second attempt to flee the country, this time from Killingholme Creek, about 60 miles up the Lincolnshire coast from the site of the first, failed escape bid. The women and children traveled separately by boat from Scrooby down the River Trent to the upper estuary of the River Humber. Brewster and the rest of the male members of the congregation traveled overland.
They were to rendezvous at Killingholme Creek, where a Dutch ship, contracted out of Hull, would be waiting. Things went wrong again. Women and children arrived a day early. The sea had been rough, and when some of them got seasick, they took shelter in a nearby creek. As the tide went out, their boats were seized by the mud. By the time the Dutch ship arrived the next morning, the women and children were stranded high and dry, while the men, who had arrived on foot, walked anxiously up and down the shore waiting for them. The Dutch captain sent one of his boats ashore to collect some of the men, who made it safely back to the main vessel. The boat was dispatched to pick up another load of passengers when, William Bradford recalled, "a great company, both horse and foot, with bills and guns and other weapons," appeared on the shore, intent on arresting the would-be departees. In the confusion that followed, the Dutch captain weighed anchor and set sail with the first batch of Separatists. The trip from England to Amsterdam normally took a couple of days—but more bad luck was in store. The ship, caught in a hurricane-force storm, was blown almost to Norway. After 14 days, the emigrants finally landed in the Netherlands. Back at Killingholme Creek, most of the men who had been left behind had managed to escape. The women and children were arrested for questioning, but no constable wanted to throw them in prison. They had committed no crime beyond wanting to be with their husbands and fathers. Most had already given up their homes. The authorities, fearing a backlash of public opinion, quietly let the families go. Brewster and John Robinson, another leading member of the congregation, who would later become their minister, stayed behind to make sure the families were cared for until they could be reunited in Amsterdam.
Over the next few months, Brewster, Robinson and others escaped across the North Sea in small groups to avoid attracting notice. Settling in Amsterdam, they were befriended by another group of English Separatists called the Ancient Brethren. This 300-member Protestant congregation was led by Francis Johnson, a firebrand minister who had been a contemporary of Brewster's at Cambridge. He and other members of the Ancient Brethren had done time in London's torture cells.
Although Brewster and his congregation of some 100 began to worship with the Ancient Brethren, the pious newcomers were soon embroiled in theological disputes and left, Bradford said, before "flames of contention" engulfed them. After less than a year in Amsterdam, Brewster's discouraged flock picked up and moved again, this time to settle in the city of Leiden, near the magnificent church known as Pieterskerk (St. Peter's). This was during Holland's golden age, a period when painters like Rembrandt and Vermeer would celebrate the physical world in all its sensual beauty. Brewster, meanwhile, had by Bradford's account "suffered much hardship....But yet he ever bore his condition with much cheerfulness and contentation." Brewster's family settled in Stincksteeg, or Stink Alley, a narrow, back alley where slops were taken out. The congregation took whatever jobs they could find, according to William Bradford's later recollection of the period. He worked as a maker of fustian (corduroy). Brewster's 16-year-old son, Jonathan, became a ribbon maker. Others labored as brewer's assistants, tobacco-pipe makers, wool carders, watchmakers or cobblers. Brewster taught English. In Leiden, good-paying jobs were scarce, the language was difficult and the standard of living was low for the English immigrants. Housing was poor, infant mortality high.
After two years the group had pooled together money to buy a house spacious enough to accommodate their meetings and Robinson's family. Known as the Green Close, the house lay in the shadow of Pieterskerk. On a large lot behind the house, a dozen or so Separatist families occupied one-room cottages. On Sundays, the congregation gathered in a meeting room and worshiped together for two four-hour services, the men sitting on one side of the church, the women on the other. Attendance was compulsory, as were services in the Church of England.
Not far from the Pieterskerk, I find William Brewstersteeg, or William Brewster Alley, where the rebel reformer oversaw a printing company later generations would call the Pilgrim Press. Its main reason for being was to generate income, largely by printing religious treatises, but the Pilgrim Press also printed subversive pamphlets setting out Separatist beliefs. These were carried to England in the false bottoms of french wine barrels or, as the English ambassador to the Netherlands reported, "vented underhand in His Majesty's kingdoms." Assisting with the printing was Edward Winslow, described by a contemporary as a genius who went on to play a crucial role in Plymouth Colony. He was already an experienced printer in England when, at age 22, he joined Brewster to churn out inflammatory materials.
The Pilgrim Press attracted the wrath of authorities in 1618, when an unauthorized pamphlet called the Perth Assembly surfaced in England, attacking King James I and his bishops for interfering with the Presbyterian Church of Scotland. The monarch ordered his ambassador in Holland to bring Brewster to justice for his "atrocious and seditious libel," but Dutch authorities refused to arrest him. For the Separatists, it was time to move again—not only to avoid arrest. They were also worried about war brewing between Holland and Spain, which might bring them under Catholic rule if Spain prevailed. And they recoiled at permissive values in the Netherlands, which, Bradford would later recall, encouraged a "great licentiousness of youth in that country." The "manifold temptations of the place," he feared, were drawing youths of the congregation "into extravagant and dangerous courses, getting the reins off their necks and departing from their parents."
About this time, 1619, Brewster disappears briefly from the historical record. He was about 53. Some accounts suggest that he may have returned to England, of all places, there to live underground and to organize his last grand escape, on a ship called the Mayflower. There is speculation that he lived under an assumed name in the London district of Aldgate, by then a center for religious nonconformists. When the Mayflower finally set sail for the New World in 1620, Brewster was aboard, having escaped the notice of authorities.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
I have done a little research about dialects, due to my frequent viewing of BBC news, some sports, and entertainment programming on Both BBC for America and PBS shows from BBC. I also watch a considerable amount of Australian and Irish movies. It is amazing the vast array of dialects and accents in the English language. I may be wrong but it seems that the General American English is more refined than Australian English. Is this due to the common understanding that the English (Puritans, etc) were leaving for America in search for religious freedom, which meant they were generally literate, whereas those who headed to Australia were most often prisoners sentenced to leave Enland to work the land in Australia or a good number of Indentured servants? Or, am I wrong on all accounts, including my perception that the standard English of each country shows a difference in language esthetics? By the way, I find most variations charming, though it does grate on my nerves when I hear certain Britons pronouncing "th" as either "f" or "v." (brover for brother and "I fought so" for "I thought so"). I know I must apologize for any spelling or grammatical errors, considering my questions!! Thank you from Upstate NY, US.
Posted by Jane La Lone on February 27,2011 | 03:46 PM
James ruled Scotland as well as England as a united kingdom. It would have served no good to have fled England to another part of his kingdom! Scotland became Presbyterian without the help of James who was only a child at the time.And there is good reason to believe that he had no love for the Scottish Church if you look at his comments before, after and during the Hampton Court conference of 1604.
In fact James said that Presbytery ' Agreeth with monarchy as well as God with the devil...' he was also much agrieved when before coming to the English crown he had suffered great humiliation at the hands of the Scottish Church and Andrew Melville- the greatest Presbyterian preacher since Knox.
Melville had publicly grabbed the King by the sleeve and said 'God's silly vassal.There are two kings,'he told him,'and two kingdoms in Scotland. There is Christ Jesus the King and His Knigdom the Kirk, whose subject James VI is, and of whose kingdom not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member.'
In any event James was most likely a closet Catholic- as was also likely his son Charles.
If you would like more help then contact me through my author website and I am happy to help.
Sue Allan mayflowermaid.com
Posted by Sue Allan on February 8,2011 | 02:24 PM
Hello,
I was just wanting to ask are you sure Elizabeth Tudor and James (VI and I) Stewart were cousins? You mention Mary Stewart (of Scotland) as a cousin too although she was James's mother.
Regarding religious views do you know why the pilgrim fathers did not move to Scotland originally? By this time Scotland was established as a strongly (Calvinist) presbyterian country, indeed James ruled Scotland (partly under a regency) for almost 36 years. Had James converted to Anglicism? I know he eventually tried to force the English church on Scotland to no avail.
Maybe 'Student' was onto something...
Regards,
DL
Posted by David Little on February 2,2011 | 10:48 AM
thank you so much for all the information that your website provides! this is a great site and i would definitely recommend to anyone!
Posted by student on January 8,2010 | 06:14 PM
Excellent site and history.
I'm researching the Davenport side of my family, and conclude they may have been among those escaping to Holland.
Might anyone know if there is a list of those familes in Holland during this time? Specifically, one Humphrey Davenport.
Thanks,
Jack Woods
Posted by Jack Woods on December 3,2009 | 12:54 PM
I am interested in information regarding the Freeman society, what it stood for, requirements if joining was required, and if it is still a viable society. If so, would this society have information on the history of its founding and members.
Posted by Martie Brown on August 8,2009 | 12:01 PM
i have a book published the pligram'publishing co an introductory notice of the author rev. william landels,d.d.
Posted by helen bariteau on March 17,2009 | 12:33 AM
Hello;
I'd like to inteview a Smithsonian Scholar and ask the question my professor as asked me and fellow peers. The question is, "why did the pilgrims come to america?" Many seem to suggest that religion is not the only reason. Please if you have a moment, could you answer this intriging question.
Thanks,
Student
Posted by L Steward on February 27,2009 | 07:18 PM
Hello Julie Dunstan Very good news. I visited the area while researching for a novel set in the times prior to the 'Mayflower'. Though fictional I wish to produce a story as accurate in its setting, both historical and geographical, as possible, to reflect the times and the struggles of the separatists. Scrooby Manor House is of course an important part of that story. Through subsequent they became synonymous with the emergence and growth of what is now the USA, they also played a large part in our own historical development. I applaud your endeavour and wish you well with the project.
Posted by Michael G Kimber on October 3,2008 | 11:49 AM
See if you can restore it by summer of 2009! I will be visiting Scrooby and the area then on sabbatical.
Posted by Len on May 9,2008 | 06:56 PM
Hello from Scrooby, England My husband and I have recently moved back from New Zealand and agree with the comments made about the dire state of the Scrooby Manor House. However the good news is that we plan to restore the house and grounds to reflect its historical significance. Any comments welcome. Julie Dunstan
Posted by Julie Dunstan on April 23,2008 | 04:53 PM
how come it does not give me the answer to my question when i asked what church the pilgrams went to before they were at England?
Posted by nyla on November 19,2007 | 12:22 PM