Pilgrims' Progress
We retrace the travels (and travails) of the ragtag group that founded Plymouth Colony, gave us Thanksgiving and laid the foundation for democracy in the New World
- By Simon Worrall
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
He meant it. In 1604, the Church introduced 141 canons that enforced a sort of spiritual test aimed at flushing out nonconformists. Among other things, the canons declared that anyone rejecting the practices of the established church excommunicated themselves and that all clergymen had to accept and publicly acknowledge the royal supremacy and the authority of the Prayer Book. It also reaffirmed the use of church vestments and the sign of the cross in baptism. Ninety clergymen who refused to embrace the new canons were expelled from the Church of England. Among them was Richard Clyfton, of All Saints at Babworth.
Brewster and his fellow Separatists now knew how dangerous it had become to worship in public; from then on, they would hold only secret services in private houses, such as Brewster's residence, Scrooby Manor. His connections helped to prevent his immediate arrest. Brewster and other future Pilgrims would also meet quietly with a second congregation of Separatists on Sundays in Old Hall, a timbered black-and-white structure in Gainsborough. Here under hand-hewn rafters, they would listen to a Separatist preacher, John Smyth, who, like Richard Clyfton before him, argued that congregations should be allowed to pick and ordain their own clergy and worship should not be confined only to prescribed forms sanctioned by the Church of England.
"It was a very closed culture," says Sue Allan, author of Mayflower Maid, a novel about a local girl who follows the Pilgrims to America. Allan leads me upstairs to the tower roof, where the entire town lay spread at our feet. "Everyone had to go to the Church of England," she said. "It was noted if you didn't. So what they were doing here was completely illegal. They were holding their own services. They were discussing the Bible, a big no-no. But they had the courage to stand up and be counted."
By 1607, however, it had become clear that these clandestine congregations would have to leave the country if they wanted to survive. The Separatists began planning an escape to the Netherlands, a country that Brewster had known from his younger, more carefree days. For his beliefs, William Brewster was summoned to appear before his local ecclesiastical court at the end of that year for being "disobedient in matters of Religion." He was fined £20, the equivalent of $5,000 today. Brewster did not appear in court or pay the fine.
But immigrating to Amsterdam was not so easy: under a statute passed in the reign of Richard II, no one could leave England without a license, something Brewster, Bradford and many other Separatists knew they would never be granted. So they tried to slip out of the country unnoticed.
They had arranged for a ship to meet them at Scotia Creek, where its muddy brown waters spool toward the North Sea, but the captain betrayed them to the authorities, who clapped them in irons. They were taken back to Boston in small open boats. On the way, the local catchpole officers, as the police were known, "rifled and ransacked them, searching to their shirts for money, yea even the women further than became modesty," William Bradford recalled. According to Bradford, they were bundled into the town center where they were made into "a spectacle and wonder to the multitude which came flocking on all sides to behold them." By this time, they had been relieved of almost all their possessions: books, clothes and money.
After their arrest, the would-be escapees were brought before magistrates. Legend has it that they were held in the cells at Boston's Guildhall, a 14th-century building near the harbor. The cells are still here: claustrophobic, cage-like structures with heavy iron bars. American tourists, I am told, like to sit inside them and imagine their forebears imprisoned as martyrs. But historian Malcolm Dolby doubts the story. "The three cells in the Guildhall were too small—only six feet long and five feet wide. So you are not talking about anything other than one-person cells. If they were held under any sort of arrest, it must have been house arrest against a bond, or something of that nature," he explains. "There's a wonderful illustration of the constables of Boston pushing these people into the cells! But I don't think it happened."
Bradford, however, described that after "a month's imprisonment," most of the congregation were released on bail and allowed to return to their homes. Some families had nowhere to go. In anticipation of their flight to the Netherlands, they had given up their houses and sold their worldly goods and were now dependent on friends or neighbors for charity. Some rejoined village life.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
I have done a little research about dialects, due to my frequent viewing of BBC news, some sports, and entertainment programming on Both BBC for America and PBS shows from BBC. I also watch a considerable amount of Australian and Irish movies. It is amazing the vast array of dialects and accents in the English language. I may be wrong but it seems that the General American English is more refined than Australian English. Is this due to the common understanding that the English (Puritans, etc) were leaving for America in search for religious freedom, which meant they were generally literate, whereas those who headed to Australia were most often prisoners sentenced to leave Enland to work the land in Australia or a good number of Indentured servants? Or, am I wrong on all accounts, including my perception that the standard English of each country shows a difference in language esthetics? By the way, I find most variations charming, though it does grate on my nerves when I hear certain Britons pronouncing "th" as either "f" or "v." (brover for brother and "I fought so" for "I thought so"). I know I must apologize for any spelling or grammatical errors, considering my questions!! Thank you from Upstate NY, US.
Posted by Jane La Lone on February 27,2011 | 03:46 PM
James ruled Scotland as well as England as a united kingdom. It would have served no good to have fled England to another part of his kingdom! Scotland became Presbyterian without the help of James who was only a child at the time.And there is good reason to believe that he had no love for the Scottish Church if you look at his comments before, after and during the Hampton Court conference of 1604.
In fact James said that Presbytery ' Agreeth with monarchy as well as God with the devil...' he was also much agrieved when before coming to the English crown he had suffered great humiliation at the hands of the Scottish Church and Andrew Melville- the greatest Presbyterian preacher since Knox.
Melville had publicly grabbed the King by the sleeve and said 'God's silly vassal.There are two kings,'he told him,'and two kingdoms in Scotland. There is Christ Jesus the King and His Knigdom the Kirk, whose subject James VI is, and of whose kingdom not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member.'
In any event James was most likely a closet Catholic- as was also likely his son Charles.
If you would like more help then contact me through my author website and I am happy to help.
Sue Allan mayflowermaid.com
Posted by Sue Allan on February 8,2011 | 02:24 PM
Hello,
I was just wanting to ask are you sure Elizabeth Tudor and James (VI and I) Stewart were cousins? You mention Mary Stewart (of Scotland) as a cousin too although she was James's mother.
Regarding religious views do you know why the pilgrim fathers did not move to Scotland originally? By this time Scotland was established as a strongly (Calvinist) presbyterian country, indeed James ruled Scotland (partly under a regency) for almost 36 years. Had James converted to Anglicism? I know he eventually tried to force the English church on Scotland to no avail.
Maybe 'Student' was onto something...
Regards,
DL
Posted by David Little on February 2,2011 | 10:48 AM
thank you so much for all the information that your website provides! this is a great site and i would definitely recommend to anyone!
Posted by student on January 8,2010 | 06:14 PM
Excellent site and history.
I'm researching the Davenport side of my family, and conclude they may have been among those escaping to Holland.
Might anyone know if there is a list of those familes in Holland during this time? Specifically, one Humphrey Davenport.
Thanks,
Jack Woods
Posted by Jack Woods on December 3,2009 | 12:54 PM
I am interested in information regarding the Freeman society, what it stood for, requirements if joining was required, and if it is still a viable society. If so, would this society have information on the history of its founding and members.
Posted by Martie Brown on August 8,2009 | 12:01 PM
i have a book published the pligram'publishing co an introductory notice of the author rev. william landels,d.d.
Posted by helen bariteau on March 17,2009 | 12:33 AM
Hello;
I'd like to inteview a Smithsonian Scholar and ask the question my professor as asked me and fellow peers. The question is, "why did the pilgrims come to america?" Many seem to suggest that religion is not the only reason. Please if you have a moment, could you answer this intriging question.
Thanks,
Student
Posted by L Steward on February 27,2009 | 07:18 PM
Hello Julie Dunstan Very good news. I visited the area while researching for a novel set in the times prior to the 'Mayflower'. Though fictional I wish to produce a story as accurate in its setting, both historical and geographical, as possible, to reflect the times and the struggles of the separatists. Scrooby Manor House is of course an important part of that story. Through subsequent they became synonymous with the emergence and growth of what is now the USA, they also played a large part in our own historical development. I applaud your endeavour and wish you well with the project.
Posted by Michael G Kimber on October 3,2008 | 11:49 AM
See if you can restore it by summer of 2009! I will be visiting Scrooby and the area then on sabbatical.
Posted by Len on May 9,2008 | 06:56 PM
Hello from Scrooby, England My husband and I have recently moved back from New Zealand and agree with the comments made about the dire state of the Scrooby Manor House. However the good news is that we plan to restore the house and grounds to reflect its historical significance. Any comments welcome. Julie Dunstan
Posted by Julie Dunstan on April 23,2008 | 04:53 PM
how come it does not give me the answer to my question when i asked what church the pilgrams went to before they were at England?
Posted by nyla on November 19,2007 | 12:22 PM