Pilgrims' Progress
We retrace the travels (and travails) of the ragtag group that founded Plymouth Colony, gave us Thanksgiving and laid the foundation for democracy in the New World
- By Simon Worrall
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 5)
The English do not make much of their Pilgrim heritage. "It's not our story," a former museum curator, Malcolm Dolby, told me. "These aren't our heroes." Nonetheless, Scrooby has made at least one concession to its departed predecessors: the Pilgrim Fathers pub, a low, whitewashed building, right by the main road. The bar used to be called the Saracen's Head but got a face-lift and a change of name in 1969 to accommodate American tourists searching their roots. A few yards from the pub, I found St. Wilfrid's church, where William Brewster, who would become the spiritual leader of Plymouth Colony, once worshiped. The church's current vicar, the Rev. Richard Spray, showed me around. Like many medieval country churches, St. Wilfrid's had a makeover in the Victorian era, but the structure of the building Brewster knew remained largely intact. "The church is famous for what's not in it," Spray said. "Namely, the Brewsters and the other Pilgrims. But it's interesting to think that the Thanksgiving meal they had when they got to America apparently resembled a Nottinghamshire Harvest Supper—minus the turkey!"
A few hundred yards from St. Wilfrid's, I found the remains of Scrooby Manor, where William Brewster was born in 1566 or 1567. This esteemed Pilgrim father gets little recognition in his homeland—all that greets a visitor is a rusting "No Trespassing" sign and a jumble of half-derelict barns, quite the contrast to his presence in Washington, D.C. There, in the Capitol, Brewster is commemorated with a fresco that shows him—or, rather, an artist's impression of him—seated, with shoulder-length hair and a voluminous beard, his eyes raised piously toward two chubby cherubs sporting above his head.
Today, this rural part of eastern England in the county of Nottinghamshire is a world away from the commerce and bustle of London. But in William Brewster's day, it was rich in agriculture and maintained maritime links to northern Europe. Through the region ran the Great North Road from London to Scotland. The Brewster family was well respected here until William Brewster became embroiled in the biggest political controversy of their day, when Queen Elizabeth decided to have her cousin, Mary, Queen of Scots, executed in 1587. Mary, a Catholic whose first husband had been the King of France, was implicated in conspiracies against Elizabeth's continued Protestant rule.
Brewster's mentor, the secretary of state, became a scapegoat in the aftermath of Mary's beheading. Brewster himself survived the crisis, but he was driven from the glittering court in London, his dreams of worldly success dashed. His disillusionment with the politics of court and church may have led him in a radical direction—he fatefully joined the congregation of All Saints Church in Babworth, a few miles down the road from Scrooby.
There the small band of worshipers likely heard the minister, Richard Clyfton, extolling St. Paul's advice, from Second Corinthians, 6:17, to cast off the wicked ways of the world: "Therefore come out from them, and be separate from them, says the Lord, and touch nothing unclean." (This bit of scripture probably gave the Separatists their name.) Separatists wanted a better way, a more direct religious experience, with no intermediaries between them and God as revealed in the Bible. They disdained bishops and archbishops for their worldliness and corruption and wanted to replace them with a democratic structure led by lay and clerical elders and teachers of their own choosing. They opposed any vestige of Catholic ritual, from the sign of the cross to priests decked out in vestments. They even regarded the exchanging of wedding rings as a profane practice.
A young orphan, William Bradford, was also drawn into the Separatist orbit during the country's religious turmoil. Bradford, who in later life would become the second governor of Plymouth Colony, met William Brewster around 1602-3, when Brewster was about 37 and Bradford 12 or 13. The older man became the orphan's mentor, tutoring him in Latin, Greek and religion. Together they would travel the seven miles from Scrooby to Babworth to hear Richard Clyfton preach his seditious ideas—how everyone, not just priests, had a right to discuss and interpret the Bible; how parishioners should take an active part in services; how anyone could depart from the official Book of Common Prayer and speak directly to God.
In calmer times, these assaults on convention might have passed with little notice. But these were edgy days in England. James I (James VI as King of Scotland) had ascended to the throne in 1603. Two years later, decades of Catholic maneuvering and subversion had culminated in the Gunpowder Plot, when mercenary Guy Fawkes and a group of Catholic conspirators came very close to blowing up Parliament and with them the Protestant king.
Against this turmoil, the Separatists were eyed with suspicion and more. Anything smacking of subversion, whether Catholic or Protestant, provoked the ire of the state. "No bishop, no king!" thundered the newly crowned king, making it clear that any challenge to church hierarchy was also a challenge to the Crown and, by implication, the entire social order. "I shall make them conform," James proclaimed against the dissidents, "or I will hurry them out of the land or do worse."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
I have done a little research about dialects, due to my frequent viewing of BBC news, some sports, and entertainment programming on Both BBC for America and PBS shows from BBC. I also watch a considerable amount of Australian and Irish movies. It is amazing the vast array of dialects and accents in the English language. I may be wrong but it seems that the General American English is more refined than Australian English. Is this due to the common understanding that the English (Puritans, etc) were leaving for America in search for religious freedom, which meant they were generally literate, whereas those who headed to Australia were most often prisoners sentenced to leave Enland to work the land in Australia or a good number of Indentured servants? Or, am I wrong on all accounts, including my perception that the standard English of each country shows a difference in language esthetics? By the way, I find most variations charming, though it does grate on my nerves when I hear certain Britons pronouncing "th" as either "f" or "v." (brover for brother and "I fought so" for "I thought so"). I know I must apologize for any spelling or grammatical errors, considering my questions!! Thank you from Upstate NY, US.
Posted by Jane La Lone on February 27,2011 | 03:46 PM
James ruled Scotland as well as England as a united kingdom. It would have served no good to have fled England to another part of his kingdom! Scotland became Presbyterian without the help of James who was only a child at the time.And there is good reason to believe that he had no love for the Scottish Church if you look at his comments before, after and during the Hampton Court conference of 1604.
In fact James said that Presbytery ' Agreeth with monarchy as well as God with the devil...' he was also much agrieved when before coming to the English crown he had suffered great humiliation at the hands of the Scottish Church and Andrew Melville- the greatest Presbyterian preacher since Knox.
Melville had publicly grabbed the King by the sleeve and said 'God's silly vassal.There are two kings,'he told him,'and two kingdoms in Scotland. There is Christ Jesus the King and His Knigdom the Kirk, whose subject James VI is, and of whose kingdom not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member.'
In any event James was most likely a closet Catholic- as was also likely his son Charles.
If you would like more help then contact me through my author website and I am happy to help.
Sue Allan mayflowermaid.com
Posted by Sue Allan on February 8,2011 | 02:24 PM
Hello,
I was just wanting to ask are you sure Elizabeth Tudor and James (VI and I) Stewart were cousins? You mention Mary Stewart (of Scotland) as a cousin too although she was James's mother.
Regarding religious views do you know why the pilgrim fathers did not move to Scotland originally? By this time Scotland was established as a strongly (Calvinist) presbyterian country, indeed James ruled Scotland (partly under a regency) for almost 36 years. Had James converted to Anglicism? I know he eventually tried to force the English church on Scotland to no avail.
Maybe 'Student' was onto something...
Regards,
DL
Posted by David Little on February 2,2011 | 10:48 AM
thank you so much for all the information that your website provides! this is a great site and i would definitely recommend to anyone!
Posted by student on January 8,2010 | 06:14 PM
Excellent site and history.
I'm researching the Davenport side of my family, and conclude they may have been among those escaping to Holland.
Might anyone know if there is a list of those familes in Holland during this time? Specifically, one Humphrey Davenport.
Thanks,
Jack Woods
Posted by Jack Woods on December 3,2009 | 12:54 PM
I am interested in information regarding the Freeman society, what it stood for, requirements if joining was required, and if it is still a viable society. If so, would this society have information on the history of its founding and members.
Posted by Martie Brown on August 8,2009 | 12:01 PM
i have a book published the pligram'publishing co an introductory notice of the author rev. william landels,d.d.
Posted by helen bariteau on March 17,2009 | 12:33 AM
Hello;
I'd like to inteview a Smithsonian Scholar and ask the question my professor as asked me and fellow peers. The question is, "why did the pilgrims come to america?" Many seem to suggest that religion is not the only reason. Please if you have a moment, could you answer this intriging question.
Thanks,
Student
Posted by L Steward on February 27,2009 | 07:18 PM
Hello Julie Dunstan Very good news. I visited the area while researching for a novel set in the times prior to the 'Mayflower'. Though fictional I wish to produce a story as accurate in its setting, both historical and geographical, as possible, to reflect the times and the struggles of the separatists. Scrooby Manor House is of course an important part of that story. Through subsequent they became synonymous with the emergence and growth of what is now the USA, they also played a large part in our own historical development. I applaud your endeavour and wish you well with the project.
Posted by Michael G Kimber on October 3,2008 | 11:49 AM
See if you can restore it by summer of 2009! I will be visiting Scrooby and the area then on sabbatical.
Posted by Len on May 9,2008 | 06:56 PM
Hello from Scrooby, England My husband and I have recently moved back from New Zealand and agree with the comments made about the dire state of the Scrooby Manor House. However the good news is that we plan to restore the house and grounds to reflect its historical significance. Any comments welcome. Julie Dunstan
Posted by Julie Dunstan on April 23,2008 | 04:53 PM
how come it does not give me the answer to my question when i asked what church the pilgrams went to before they were at England?
Posted by nyla on November 19,2007 | 12:22 PM