Pilgrims' Progress
We retrace the travels (and travails) of the ragtag group that founded Plymouth Colony, gave us Thanksgiving and laid the foundation for democracy in the New World
- By Simon Worrall
- Smithsonian magazine, November 2006, Subscribe
On an autumn night in 1607, a furtive group of men, women and children set off in a relay of small boats from the English village of Scrooby, in pursuit of the immigrant's oldest dream, a fresh start in another country. These refugees, who would number no more than 50 or 60, we know today as Pilgrims. In their day, they were called Separatists. Whatever the label, they must have felt a mixture of fear and hope as they approached the dimly lit creek, near the Lincolnshire port of Boston, where they would steal aboard a ship, turn their backs on a tumultuous period of the Reformation in England and head across the North Sea to the Netherlands.
There, at least, they would have a chance to build new lives, to worship as they chose and to avoid the fate of fellow Separatists like John Penry, Henry Barrow and John Greenwood, who had been hanged for their religious beliefs in 1593. Like the band of travelers fleeing that night, religious nonconformists were seen as a threat to the Church of England and its supreme ruler, King James I. James' cousin, Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603), had made concerted efforts to reform the church after Henry VIII's break with the Roman Catholic faith in the 1530s. But as the 17th century got under way at the end of her long reign, many still believed that the new church had done too little to distinguish itself from the old one in Rome.
In the view of these reformers, the Church of England needed to simplify its rituals, which still closely resembled Catholic practices, reduce the influence of the clerical hierarchy and bring the church's doctrines into closer alignment with New Testament principles. There was also a problem, some of them felt, with having the king as the head of both church and state, an unhealthy concentration of temporal and ecclesiastical power.
These Church of England reformers came to be known as Puritans, for their insistence on further purification of established doctrine and ceremony. More radical were the Separatists, those who split off from the mother church to form independent congregations, from whose ranks would come the Baptists, Presbyterians, Congregationalists and other Protestant denominations. The first wave of Separatist pioneers—that little band of believers sneaking away from England in 1607—would eventually be known as Pilgrims. The label, which came into use in the late 18th century, appears in William Bradford's Of Plymouth Plantation.
They were led by a group of radical pastors who, challenging the authority of the Church of England, established a network of secret religious congregations in the countryside around Scrooby. Two of their members, William Brewster and William Bradford, would go on to exert a profound influence on American history as leaders of the colony at Plymouth, Massachusetts, the first permanent European settlement in New England and the first to embrace rule by majority vote.
For the moment, though, they were fugitives, inner exiles in a country that did not want their brand of Protestantism. If caught, they faced harassment, heavy fines and imprisonment.
Beyond a few tantalizing details about the leaders Brewster and Bradford, we know very little about these English men and women who formed the vanguard of the Pilgrim's arrival in the New World—not even what they looked like. Only one, Edward Winslow, who became the third governor of Plymouth Colony in 1633, ever sat for his portrait, in 1651. We do know that they did not dress in black and white and wear stovepipe hats as the Puritans did. They dressed in earth tones—the green, brown and russet corduroy typical of the English countryside. And, while they were certainly religious, they could also be spiteful, vindictive and petty—as well as honest, upright and courageous, all part of the DNA they would bequeath to their adopted homeland.
To find out more about these pioneering Englishmen, I set off from my home in Herefordshire and headed north to Scrooby, now a nondescript hamlet set in a bucolic landscape of red brick farmhouses and gently sloping fields. The roadsides were choked with daffodils. Tractors chugged through rich fields with their wagons full of seed potatoes. Unlike later waves of immigrants to the United States, the Pilgrims came from a prosperous country, not as refugees escaping rural poverty.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (12)
I have done a little research about dialects, due to my frequent viewing of BBC news, some sports, and entertainment programming on Both BBC for America and PBS shows from BBC. I also watch a considerable amount of Australian and Irish movies. It is amazing the vast array of dialects and accents in the English language. I may be wrong but it seems that the General American English is more refined than Australian English. Is this due to the common understanding that the English (Puritans, etc) were leaving for America in search for religious freedom, which meant they were generally literate, whereas those who headed to Australia were most often prisoners sentenced to leave Enland to work the land in Australia or a good number of Indentured servants? Or, am I wrong on all accounts, including my perception that the standard English of each country shows a difference in language esthetics? By the way, I find most variations charming, though it does grate on my nerves when I hear certain Britons pronouncing "th" as either "f" or "v." (brover for brother and "I fought so" for "I thought so"). I know I must apologize for any spelling or grammatical errors, considering my questions!! Thank you from Upstate NY, US.
Posted by Jane La Lone on February 27,2011 | 03:46 PM
James ruled Scotland as well as England as a united kingdom. It would have served no good to have fled England to another part of his kingdom! Scotland became Presbyterian without the help of James who was only a child at the time.And there is good reason to believe that he had no love for the Scottish Church if you look at his comments before, after and during the Hampton Court conference of 1604.
In fact James said that Presbytery ' Agreeth with monarchy as well as God with the devil...' he was also much agrieved when before coming to the English crown he had suffered great humiliation at the hands of the Scottish Church and Andrew Melville- the greatest Presbyterian preacher since Knox.
Melville had publicly grabbed the King by the sleeve and said 'God's silly vassal.There are two kings,'he told him,'and two kingdoms in Scotland. There is Christ Jesus the King and His Knigdom the Kirk, whose subject James VI is, and of whose kingdom not a king, nor a lord, nor a head, but a member.'
In any event James was most likely a closet Catholic- as was also likely his son Charles.
If you would like more help then contact me through my author website and I am happy to help.
Sue Allan mayflowermaid.com
Posted by Sue Allan on February 8,2011 | 02:24 PM
Hello,
I was just wanting to ask are you sure Elizabeth Tudor and James (VI and I) Stewart were cousins? You mention Mary Stewart (of Scotland) as a cousin too although she was James's mother.
Regarding religious views do you know why the pilgrim fathers did not move to Scotland originally? By this time Scotland was established as a strongly (Calvinist) presbyterian country, indeed James ruled Scotland (partly under a regency) for almost 36 years. Had James converted to Anglicism? I know he eventually tried to force the English church on Scotland to no avail.
Maybe 'Student' was onto something...
Regards,
DL
Posted by David Little on February 2,2011 | 10:48 AM
thank you so much for all the information that your website provides! this is a great site and i would definitely recommend to anyone!
Posted by student on January 8,2010 | 06:14 PM
Excellent site and history.
I'm researching the Davenport side of my family, and conclude they may have been among those escaping to Holland.
Might anyone know if there is a list of those familes in Holland during this time? Specifically, one Humphrey Davenport.
Thanks,
Jack Woods
Posted by Jack Woods on December 3,2009 | 12:54 PM
I am interested in information regarding the Freeman society, what it stood for, requirements if joining was required, and if it is still a viable society. If so, would this society have information on the history of its founding and members.
Posted by Martie Brown on August 8,2009 | 12:01 PM
i have a book published the pligram'publishing co an introductory notice of the author rev. william landels,d.d.
Posted by helen bariteau on March 17,2009 | 12:33 AM
Hello;
I'd like to inteview a Smithsonian Scholar and ask the question my professor as asked me and fellow peers. The question is, "why did the pilgrims come to america?" Many seem to suggest that religion is not the only reason. Please if you have a moment, could you answer this intriging question.
Thanks,
Student
Posted by L Steward on February 27,2009 | 07:18 PM
Hello Julie Dunstan Very good news. I visited the area while researching for a novel set in the times prior to the 'Mayflower'. Though fictional I wish to produce a story as accurate in its setting, both historical and geographical, as possible, to reflect the times and the struggles of the separatists. Scrooby Manor House is of course an important part of that story. Through subsequent they became synonymous with the emergence and growth of what is now the USA, they also played a large part in our own historical development. I applaud your endeavour and wish you well with the project.
Posted by Michael G Kimber on October 3,2008 | 11:49 AM
See if you can restore it by summer of 2009! I will be visiting Scrooby and the area then on sabbatical.
Posted by Len on May 9,2008 | 06:56 PM
Hello from Scrooby, England My husband and I have recently moved back from New Zealand and agree with the comments made about the dire state of the Scrooby Manor House. However the good news is that we plan to restore the house and grounds to reflect its historical significance. Any comments welcome. Julie Dunstan
Posted by Julie Dunstan on April 23,2008 | 04:53 PM
how come it does not give me the answer to my question when i asked what church the pilgrams went to before they were at England?
Posted by nyla on November 19,2007 | 12:22 PM