Content ID:
Field:


  • About Smithsonian
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
Smithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Air & Space magazine
  • Home
  • History & Archaeology
  • People & Places
  • Science & Nature
  • Arts & Culture
  • Travel
  • Photos & Videos
  • Games & Puzzles
  • Subscribe
  • Africa & the Middle East
  • Asia Pacific
  • Europe
  • The Americas
  • People & Places

The Farewell State

It's time to revisit Rhode Island

  • By Donald Dale Jackson
  • Smithsonian magazine, May 2006

Article Tools

 
  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
     
  • Email
  •  
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
     
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
     
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit
     

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    1. Keepers of the Lost Ark?
    2. Mining the Mountains
    3. Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
    4. Frost, Nixon and Me
    5. Gene Therapy in a New Light
    6. The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis
    7. Snowman Gone Wild
    8. Tattoos
    9. Family Ties
    10. Van Gogh's Night Visions
    1. Gene Therapy in a New Light
    2. Mining the Mountains
    3. The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis
    4. Frost, Nixon and Me
    5. Gobekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?
    6. Lincoln as Commander in Chief
    7. A Monumental Struggle to Preserve Hagia Sophia
    8. Smithsonian Notable Books for Children 2008
    9. Van Gogh's Night Visions
    10. The 'Secret Jews' of San Luis Valley

    When Donald Dale Jackson died at age 70 on February 23, Smithsonian lost a remarkably gifted contributor who had written more than 100 pieces for the magazine since 1980. None of them evoked a greater response than this essay from 2000, which we reprint here in fond tribute to his wit and talent.

    Rhode Island should be eliminated. I know it sounds harsh, but Rhode Island is too small to be a state, and it occupies space nature intended to be part of Connecticut. The millennium is the time for bold initiatives, and so, my friends, I say abolish Rhode Island now.

    People from Rhode Island will no doubt fuss and whine about this, but we must ignore them. If God or George Washington really wanted a Rhode Island, He (or he) would have made it bigger and more important. Even its name is meaningless: Who was Rhode, and where is the island?

    It will be necessary, of course, to clear out all the old Rhode Island artifacts: the state government, laws, buildings, officeholders, license plates, fax machines, stationery and the like. The official flatware, ashtrays and such will probably appeal to antiques dealers. If there is anything we want to save, we can just overprint Connecticut’s name on it. The case for the elimination of Rhode Island is based on geographic integrity. If you have any doubts, you need only look at the map. New England, as you can see, is a top-heavy protrusion squared off at the bottom that juts out from the nation’s northeast corner. Maine of course takes up all the uneven, misshapen space at the top right, which is fine for Maine, because nobody pays attention to Maine anyway.

    New Hampshire and Vermont, by contrast, fit together in a perfectly tidy and orderly Yankee way, one bulging a bit in the north and the other doing the same in the south. They couldn’t be a better match. Beneath them, Massachusetts occupies a sensible, rectangular slab of territory with a somewhat untidy slop-over at Cape Cod. But everything about Cape Cod is so totally endemic to Massachusetts that there is no point quibbling about it. Rhode Island, I’m afraid, is something else. Rhode Island does not compute.

    Look at the way it cringes there, occupying a sliver of land so inconsequential that the names of its cities and towns have to be entered vertically on the map. It is foolish for something so microscopic to go around posing as a state. Anyone who has ever been there knows what I mean. You drive into Rhode Island, nod off for 10 or 20 minutes or embark on an interesting conversation and—zap—you’re in Massachusetts. You’re out of the place before you can settle into it. Flying over Little Rhody is absurdity itself; you can traverse it in the middle of a sentence.

    I bear no rancor toward Rhode Island, you understand, and I want to make it clear that this is my idea and mine alone, and I am attached to no organized political party. The credit or blame should rest with me, not Republicans or Democrats or whatever it is Ross Perot and Donald Trump are this year. The idea came to me as I studied a topographic map of New England one day while looking for excuses to avoid raking the leaves. I know some people will think it’s significant that I come from Connecticut, and they’ll see this as some sort of Nutmeg State power play, but it’s not. I’m not even sure Connecticut wants the extra territory. It’s just common sense.

    I don’t know what the next step should be if this idea is going to go anywhere. We’ll probably need a committee, somebody to handle public relations, maybe a lawyer. I’m for minimizing public input, and doing our work as bloodlessly as possible. Rhode Islanders will just whimper and carry on if we let them in on this. Some will probably take it hard, but I think that in time they’ll adjust. They’ll need strength and maturity. If you want to join me in this campaign, I’ll be launching a mailing that will let you know where to send money. We’re going to need a bundle of cash to remove one star from every American flag in the country. It’s a big job, yes, but not an impossible one. And if anyone from Rhode Island wants to write and discuss this, I’ll be letting you know the address just as soon as I set up an unlisted, untraceable mail drop.

    When Donald Dale Jackson died at age 70 on February 23, Smithsonian lost a remarkably gifted contributor who had written more than 100 pieces for the magazine since 1980. None of them evoked a greater response than this essay from 2000, which we reprint here in fond tribute to his wit and talent.

    Rhode Island should be eliminated. I know it sounds harsh, but Rhode Island is too small to be a state, and it occupies space nature intended to be part of Connecticut. The millennium is the time for bold initiatives, and so, my friends, I say abolish Rhode Island now.

    People from Rhode Island will no doubt fuss and whine about this, but we must ignore them. If God or George Washington really wanted a Rhode Island, He (or he) would have made it bigger and more important. Even its name is meaningless: Who was Rhode, and where is the island?

    It will be necessary, of course, to clear out all the old Rhode Island artifacts: the state government, laws, buildings, officeholders, license plates, fax machines, stationery and the like. The official flatware, ashtrays and such will probably appeal to antiques dealers. If there is anything we want to save, we can just overprint Connecticut’s name on it. The case for the elimination of Rhode Island is based on geographic integrity. If you have any doubts, you need only look at the map. New England, as you can see, is a top-heavy protrusion squared off at the bottom that juts out from the nation’s northeast corner. Maine of course takes up all the uneven, misshapen space at the top right, which is fine for Maine, because nobody pays attention to Maine anyway.

    New Hampshire and Vermont, by contrast, fit together in a perfectly tidy and orderly Yankee way, one bulging a bit in the north and the other doing the same in the south. They couldn’t be a better match. Beneath them, Massachusetts occupies a sensible, rectangular slab of territory with a somewhat untidy slop-over at Cape Cod. But everything about Cape Cod is so totally endemic to Massachusetts that there is no point quibbling about it. Rhode Island, I’m afraid, is something else. Rhode Island does not compute.

    Look at the way it cringes there, occupying a sliver of land so inconsequential that the names of its cities and towns have to be entered vertically on the map. It is foolish for something so microscopic to go around posing as a state. Anyone who has ever been there knows what I mean. You drive into Rhode Island, nod off for 10 or 20 minutes or embark on an interesting conversation and—zap—you’re in Massachusetts. You’re out of the place before you can settle into it. Flying over Little Rhody is absurdity itself; you can traverse it in the middle of a sentence.

    I bear no rancor toward Rhode Island, you understand, and I want to make it clear that this is my idea and mine alone, and I am attached to no organized political party. The credit or blame should rest with me, not Republicans or Democrats or whatever it is Ross Perot and Donald Trump are this year. The idea came to me as I studied a topographic map of New England one day while looking for excuses to avoid raking the leaves. I know some people will think it’s significant that I come from Connecticut, and they’ll see this as some sort of Nutmeg State power play, but it’s not. I’m not even sure Connecticut wants the extra territory. It’s just common sense.

    I don’t know what the next step should be if this idea is going to go anywhere. We’ll probably need a committee, somebody to handle public relations, maybe a lawyer. I’m for minimizing public input, and doing our work as bloodlessly as possible. Rhode Islanders will just whimper and carry on if we let them in on this. Some will probably take it hard, but I think that in time they’ll adjust. They’ll need strength and maturity. If you want to join me in this campaign, I’ll be launching a mailing that will let you know where to send money. We’re going to need a bundle of cash to remove one star from every American flag in the country. It’s a big job, yes, but not an impossible one. And if anyone from Rhode Island wants to write and discuss this, I’ll be letting you know the address just as soon as I set up an unlisted, untraceable mail drop.


     
    Comments

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement

    Smithsonian Videos

    Turco Gil's Accordion Academy

    Turco Gil operates a school to teach local children how to play vallenato music


    Gene Therapy Experts Look Ahead in Treating Blindness

    Two of the preeminent researchers of gene therapy hope to improve their patients' sight in an experimental operation


    Abraham Lincoln: An Extraordinary Life

    Behind the Scenes with Harry Rubenstein At the National Museum of American History


    Inside the Photobooth

    Collector Nakki Goranin leads a tour of her collection


    Star-Spangled Salute

    Re-enactors relive the Battle of Baltimore


    Advertisement

    Culturespotter

    Experience Mexico

    Discover the beauty and splendor of Mexico's natural treasures in our new photo gallery.

    Marketplace

    SmithsonianStore

    Animated Musical Ornaments
    Item no: 97625

    Window Shopping

    Gifts, Gadgets and Great Finds!

    From Our Advertisers: Products, Offers and Free Info

    Travel & Adventure

    Sojourners

    Love to travel? We've collected some of the best offerings from our most valued travel partners, across the country and around the world

    In The Magazine

    Smithsonian Magazine January 2009 Cover

    January 2009

    • Samarra Rises
    • Commander in Chief
    • Winging It
    • Gene Therapy in a New Light
    • The Spotted Owl's New Nemesis

    View Table of Contents



    Wonders of the Deep

    Wonders of the Deep

    The National Museum of Natural History's Ocean Hall illuminates the murky waters of the deep blue sea

    Smithsonian Journeys

    Genghis Khan’s Mongolia
    Genghis Khan’s Mongolia
    A new exciting and active adventure in exotic Mongolia







    View full archiveRecent Issues

    • Smithsonian Magazine January 2009 Cover
      Jan 2009

    • December 2008 Issue Cover
      Dec 2008


    • Nov 2008

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Smithsonian.com expands on Smithsonian magazine's in-depth coverage of history, science, nature, the arts, travel, world culture and technology. Join us regularly as we take a dynamic and interactive approach to exploring modern and historic perspectives on the arts, sciences, nature, world culture and travel, including videos, blogs and a reader forum.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Smithsonian
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability