Interview with John Seidensticker and Susan Lumpkin | People & Places | Smithsonian
Current Issue
October 2014 magazine cover
Subscribe

Save 81% off the newsstand price!

Interview with John Seidensticker and Susan Lumpkin

The authors of "Building an Arc" talk about wildlife conservation and what drew them to work with tigers.

smithsonian.com

You both work at the National Zoo, and John is chairman of the Save the Tiger Fund Council. What drew you to wildlife conservation, and to tigers in particular?

John: I grew up on a ranch in Montana, and I always thought that there should be something you did with wildlife besides hunting it. In college I worked as a research assistant with a grizzly bear study, and then I did my doctoral dissertation on mountain lion social organization. My group was the first to put radio transmitters on mountain lions. Around that time, Secretary of the Smithsonian S. Dillon Ripley and his colleagues had made the world aware of the plight of the tiger, and he pledged the resources of the Smithsonian to save the tigers. But there wasn't actually anybody at the Smithsonian who could work on tiger ecology. So my dissertation advisor was invited by the Smithsonian to go to India and see what he could do to assist the Indian government. Then he said he was too busy to work on tigers, so why didn't I do it. I went to India and then to Nepal, and in the process I established what became the Smithsonian Nepal Tiger Ecology Project.

Susan: My background's very different. I grew up in the suburbs of Detroit where there was no wildlife, and I didn't become interested in animals until I was in college and took an animal behavior class. I remember that I read the book Never Cry Wolf by Farley Mowat, and wanted to do something like that. I went on to get my PhD in animal behavior, and then I came to the National Zoo. And then I married John.

You two had to pass through some politically unstable areas to report for this story. Did you have any close calls?

John: Not really, we were very careful to not provoke anyone—we didn't take pictures where we weren't supposed to take pictures and that sort of thing. We were actually informed on a number of occasions of places where it would have been very dangerous to go, but I do not think for any moment that we were actually in any danger.

Do you think that people and wildlife in this area will be able to thrive together?

John: Well, they already have. What I always find amazing about this part of the world is that right next to people in their rice fields are herds of elephants, as well as tigers and deer. It's just an amazing mix, and there's an enormous amount of tolerance. National policies in both countries are very supportive of conservation, even in spite of this recent Maoist insurgency. Conservation efforts remain very much intact because it's a bottom-up approach; it's not top-down. Efforts on behalf of wildlife are actually bringing positive benefits to local people.

Would you say you’re hopeful for the tiger then?

John: In this area. Not in all areas. But I was extraordinarily pleased that everywhere we looked, where there should have been tiger tracks, there were tiger tracks.

Susan: One thing that struck me the first time I went to India is that you can be driving down a road and you see a tiger, and there are people walking down that road right behind the tiger. At one place we walked down to the riverfront, and there were all these little cafes for tourists, and literally steps away there were tiger tracks. It was just amazing.

About Amy Crawford
Amy Crawford

Amy Crawford is a Boston-based freelance journalist writing about government, education and ideas. Her writing has appeared in Smithsonian, Slate, Boston Magazine and the Boston Globe.

Read more from this author |

Comment on this Story

comments powered by Disqus