Say What?

In an era of global communications, regional dialects are hanging in there, y'all.

  • By Ulrich Boser
  • Smithsonian magazine, October 2006, Subscribe
 

More from Smithsonian.com


Experts have been predicting the imminent demise of American dialects for decades, arguing that universal literacy and mass media would deaden local speech patterns. No more "Hahvahd Yahd" in Boston or "goin' for a raad" in Birmingham. Everyone would sound as distinctly indistinct as a television newscaster.

But The Atlas of North American English, the first work to plot all the major speech patterns in the continental United States and Canada, has found the opposite: regional dialects are actually becoming more pronounced. In the Great Lakes region, "that" sounds more like "theeaht." Around New York City, people continue to drop their "r"s in everyday speech, saying "watta" instead of "water." Canadians are still apt to say "aboot" for "about."

North American English is a language of dialects because so many distinct groups settled the continent. Once an accented vowel is incorporated into a dialect, it typically strengthens over time. "It's a lot like a game of musical chairs—if you are going to the right, you keep on going to your right. If a dialect has a vowel that changes in one direction, it tends to keep on going in that direction," says University of Pennsylvania linguist Bill Labov, who compiled the new atlas with Charles Boberg and Sharon Ash.

Yet social forces may be even more important: people get their accents from friends and family and use them to help express their identity. While Canadians and Americans live within spitting distance of each other along the Michigan border, the word "stock" in Detroit sounds like "stack" in Windsor, Ontario. "Radio and television don't seem to have much impact on how people talk," Labov says. "People want to sound like their friends, their boss."

Labov and his team have amassed mountains of data on how dialects are changing, but a theory on why they change remains a challenge. "We develop these big trees that look like biological evolution, that show how one dialect died and another developed," says Labov. "But it's not really like biological evolution. No linguist believes that language gets better as it changes."


Experts have been predicting the imminent demise of American dialects for decades, arguing that universal literacy and mass media would deaden local speech patterns. No more "Hahvahd Yahd" in Boston or "goin' for a raad" in Birmingham. Everyone would sound as distinctly indistinct as a television newscaster.

But The Atlas of North American English, the first work to plot all the major speech patterns in the continental United States and Canada, has found the opposite: regional dialects are actually becoming more pronounced. In the Great Lakes region, "that" sounds more like "theeaht." Around New York City, people continue to drop their "r"s in everyday speech, saying "watta" instead of "water." Canadians are still apt to say "aboot" for "about."

North American English is a language of dialects because so many distinct groups settled the continent. Once an accented vowel is incorporated into a dialect, it typically strengthens over time. "It's a lot like a game of musical chairs—if you are going to the right, you keep on going to your right. If a dialect has a vowel that changes in one direction, it tends to keep on going in that direction," says University of Pennsylvania linguist Bill Labov, who compiled the new atlas with Charles Boberg and Sharon Ash.

Yet social forces may be even more important: people get their accents from friends and family and use them to help express their identity. While Canadians and Americans live within spitting distance of each other along the Michigan border, the word "stock" in Detroit sounds like "stack" in Windsor, Ontario. "Radio and television don't seem to have much impact on how people talk," Labov says. "People want to sound like their friends, their boss."

Labov and his team have amassed mountains of data on how dialects are changing, but a theory on why they change remains a challenge. "We develop these big trees that look like biological evolution, that show how one dialect died and another developed," says Labov. "But it's not really like biological evolution. No linguist believes that language gets better as it changes."

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.


 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (5)

Can I see hear the regional accents mentioned in the 10/06 article?

Posted by Lucille Cronin on November 11,2009 | 04:45 PM

i am amazed and happy that we still have regional variations. one of my friends told me recently that he noticed my michigan accent and i didnt think i had any accent

Posted by shiva nataraj on October 12,2009 | 01:34 AM

language will continue to change as times passes and generations expand. The young will have their own spin on word and phrases and the older generation will be sitting there saying "I remember when they use to call that...... now it is........." that is where I will be with the older generation saying "What are you saying?"

Posted by thomasene groos on January 21,2009 | 11:32 AM

Can the regional accents be heard online? (October 2006 issue of 'Smithsonian')

Posted by Mary Hulen on November 27,2007 | 04:17 PM

Can the regional accents still be heard online at smithsonian.com?

Posted by G Gia on November 22,2007 | 12:47 PM



Advertisement


Advertisement

Follow Us





First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store