The Devastating Costs of the Amazon Gold Rush
Spurred by rising global demand for the metal, miners are destroying invaluable rainforest in Peru's Amazon basin
- By Donovan Webster
- Photographs by Ron Haviv
- Smithsonian magazine, February 2012, Subscribe
(Page 6 of 7)
“Usually,” he says, “about $70 to $120 a day. It depends.”
“And most people in your hometown, how much do they make?”
“In a month, about half of what I make in a day.”
Then he simply lies on his back in the mud, leans his head against the trunk of a felled tree, crosses his boots at the ankles and instantly goes to sleep, hands clasped over his chest.
A few feet away, a thick layer of sludge lies in the bottom of the pool. As workers prepare to separate gold from silt, the overseer of this particular pit, who is named Alipio, arrives. It’s 7:43 a.m. He will monitor the operation, to make sure that none of the gold in the pool is stolen by workers.
Alipio is friendly yet serious. Like all the men here, his face is chiseled by a life of hard labor. As the men collect the sludge inside the pool, using a stainless-steel bowl about 12 inches in diameter, he watches them closely.
Meanwhile, 150 yards away, the chain-saw-wielding crew fells trees with professional ferocity. Every few minutes, another jungle hardwood topples. The earth shakes.
After the workers empty the first loads of sludge into an open 55-gallon drum, they pour in a little water and two ounces or so of liquid mercury, a highly toxic substance known to cause a host of ill effects, notably neurological disorders. Another miner from the pit, who gives his name only as Hernan, steps into the drum. Now exposed directly to the poison, he works the mixture with his bare feet for five minutes, then climbs out. He grabs an empty stainless-steel bowl and dips it into the barrel, panning for gold. A few minutes later, a gleaming, gelatinous alloy, or amalgam, has formed. It is seductively striated, gold and mercury. He places it in a zip-lock bag and goes back for another load of silt.
After another hour, once that day’s sludge has been processed, the amalgam fills half the plastic pouch. Alipio, Haviv, Ortiz and I walk to the makeshift settlement of Lamal. There are bars here and, in one tent, a brothel. An abandoned hamlet we passed during the motorcycle ride also was called Lamal. The word, says Alipio, pointing at the barren soil, is based on the Portuguese for “the mud.”
Near a cantina and a few bunkhouses, we enter a blue-nylon tent containing only a propane-gas canister and a strange metallic contraption resembling a covered wok, set on a propane burner. Alipio removes the lid, dumps in about one-third the contents of the zip-lock bag, screws down the lid, turns on the gas and lights the burner under his gold cooker.
A few minutes later, Alipio turns off the propane and unscrews the lid. Inside sits a rounded chunk of 24-karat gold. It looks like a hard golden puddle. Using tongs, he lifts out the gold, examining it with a practiced air. “That’s about three ounces,” he announces. He sets it on the packed-earth floor in the tent, then begins the process again.
“How much will you earn for the three ounces of gold?” I ask.
“Well, I must pay everyone. Pay for fuel, food for the men, pay for the engine and dredge siphon...upkeep on the engine, the mercury...other things.”
“But how much?”
“We don’t get the same price for gold here as they pay on Wall Street. Or even in cities.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Gold Mining Peru Rain Forests
Additional Sources
“Gold Mining in the Peruvian Amazon: Global Prices, Deforestation, and Mercury Imports,” Jennifer J. Swenson et al., PLoS ONE, April 19, 2011









Comments (15)
Although it does take a toll on the environment, it is helping these people's lives. Take the girl. She wouldn't have had a good life, hungry and in prostitution. The money she's making is helping her future and life so that she can be happier later. All the workers make double PER DAY what their entire family makes in a month. It certainly isn't good for the environment, but it's good for people and the economy. As a 1st world country, we take things like having food and clothing for granted, so it's easy for us to say they're hurting the environment. In truth, they're just doing their best to get by.
Posted by anonymous on October 30,2012 | 11:48 AM
I would love to know how we can help to stop this if there is any way we can. Its frightening and worrying. Please help us find the ways that we can make a difference before its too late.
Posted by David Beeman on July 3,2012 | 02:21 AM
What a shame...talk about completely obliterating the environment....I guess it won't end until there is not a single tree left standing....
Posted by eddie on May 9,2012 | 11:50 PM
There are definitely some threads of environmental and educational hope, the Nature Conservancy, the Smithsonian, however we humans are a marvel at leaving no stone unturned in feverishly obliterating other lifeforms on earth, while at the same time leaving no scientific stone unturned in feverishly trying to detect them elsewhere. Memo to ET: Hide.
Posted by Thomas Michael Andres on April 30,2012 | 11:48 PM
Panning for gold just to keep up with fiat money created out of thin air by central banks. It's commodity extraction attempting to keep up with money printing to delay economic collapse after almost 100 years of central banking.
Posted by LEM on March 3,2012 | 06:58 PM
Excellent article. I kept thinking about the early North American gold rushes and how much damage was done in California, Alaska, and the Klondike. We have so much gold mining going on now in Alaska and the Yukon, but at least we have regulations, safety rules, and some of the most egregious practices have been outlawed. Is it any surprise that people who have nothing will do whatever they can in their gold rush to make a life for themselves?
Posted by Peregrine on February 21,2012 | 05:27 AM
As devastating as it is; realistically, its the norm of our world. The poor must do what they can to survive, and they are so distanced from the rich that we can't see the cost of our actions. The only real way to halt this kind of behaviour is through fundamental changes to the perspective and values of the global society.
Posted by Liam Grimmett on February 12,2012 | 06:38 PM
Dear Sir.
Excellent report prepared by Donovan Webster. As a Peruvian, I see with concern that there is not a short-or medium term, any more than there is for general deforestation in the high jungle of Peru, as well as the degradation of our mountains that are a source of water for cities the coast. In some mining areas, populations oppose THE ACTIVITIES mining and ore prefer to remain underground because way too remove causes damage to the environment. The problem is extremely complex and has several players, not only in Peru, but also abroad (the buyers of precious metal). There is some levity in developed countries when demanding that poor countries get the care that they did not have when in full industrial development. It is hoped that governments take steps gradual, but serious and responsible in order to properly prosecute mining in our country.
Posted by Alonso Sarmiento on February 8,2012 | 01:40 AM
I've always been a bit repelled by the high-priced desserts and liqueurs laced with gold that I have seen featured in some "gourmet" magazines and websites. The gold is (please excuse the indelicate image) literally flushed down the toilet. Having read this article about the irreparable harm done to acquire some of the gold, the thought of wealthy people ostentatiously eating gold becomes even more sickening.
Posted by sierraseven on February 8,2012 | 07:32 AM
Fascinating article. However the author makes only the barest attempt at explaining the sudden gold rush. Hedging and luxury goods? Both have existed since the dawn of history. So why are the rainforests being ripped down only now? I believe it is due to inflation. Governments are printing money, desparately attempting to pay off enormous debts. To protect themselves, savers are buying gold, getting rid of their paper money. Evidence that this is so is buried in the article itself: Alipio notes that the prices of mercury and fuel have risen, so his operation exists at the margin of profitability. All three commodities have increased in cost simultaneously due to inflation - therefore the margin on gold is paper thin. So if we really want to save the rainforests, men with guns to keep out miners are not the answer. Ending legal tender laws and government monopoly money is.
Posted by Make Men Free on February 4,2012 | 06:54 PM
Disgustingly Inhumane and out of touch with the business lessons left for the next generation caught in between povertys opportunistic hand and international investors blind-eye push for prostituting middlemen everywhere with lies, greed and coercive ambitions. It is no wonder that in various religious sources, the concept of man paying for the faults of his past generation now makes clear sense. For all those that read this article, help do something about the demand for gold in your end of the world. Such disgrace, deceit and harm that can be regulated by officials in power or even prevented if one person could truly stand as leader to say, "ah yes although I could add millions to. Y pocket , let me think. Roared to the ramifications of this opportunistic moment." stand up!!
Posted by Vvillalobos on January 29,2012 | 11:23 AM
Increased gold mining due to skyrocketing price of gold. Gold increasing due to concerns about uncontrolled "printing" of money and profligate governments which can never, ever pay off their debts. Ultimately, this is the fault of the "economists" and politicians who brought us to this point with their economic policies.
Posted by Tom Amlie on January 27,2012 | 08:49 PM
It is too sad and ashame for the Amazonians and everybody. But, what is even worse, this catastrophic situation is not a surprise, it was announced 12 years ago by IIAP, a Peruvian research institution, and nobody took any action.
Posted by dennis del Castillo on January 26,2012 | 09:54 PM
Regarding The Devastating Costs of the Amazon Gold Rush, Smithsonian implies that the devastation is due, in part, to satisfying 'our' thirst for the metal. Since your own statistics show Peru as a relatively minor supplier of the world's gold, and since most of Peru's gold production is as co-product from non-ferrous metals production, I suggest that those involved are merely trying to enrich themselves by the only means available to them. With no one to stop them, or provide an alternative means of survival, we can hardly blame them.
Posted by Richard McClincy on January 22,2012 | 02:10 PM