Searching for Buddha in Afghanistan
An archaeologist insists a third giant statue lies near the cliffs where the Bamiyan Buddhas, destroyed in 2001, once stood
- By Joshua Hammer
- Photographs by Alex Masi
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 4)
One morning, I joined Tarzi in a tent beside the excavation site; we walked along a gully where some digging was going on. During his first excavation, in 2003, he told me with a touch of bravado, "The valley was filled with mines, but I wasn't afraid. I said, 'Follow me, and if I explode, you can take a different route.' And I took out a lot of mines myself, before the de-mining teams came here." Tarzi stopped before a second excavation pit and called to one of his diggers, a thin, bearded Hazara man who walked with a slight limp. The man, Tarzi told me, had lost both legs to a mine five years ago. "He was blown up just above where we're standing now, next to the giant Buddha," he added, as I shifted nervously. "We fitted him with prostheses, and he went back to work."
The archaeologist and I climbed into a minibus and drove to a second excavation site, just below the eastern niche where the smaller Buddha stood. He halted before the ruins of a seventh-century stupa, or relic chamber, a heap of clay and conglomerate rock. "This is where we started digging back in 2003, because the stupa was already exposed," Tarzi said. "It corresponded with Xuanzang's description, 'east of the Royal Monastery.' I thought at the beginning that the Buddha would be lying here, underneath the wheat fields. So I dug here, and I found a lot of ceramics, sculptures, but no Buddha."
Tarzi now gazed at the stupa with dismay. The 1,400-year-old ruin was covered with socks, shirts, pants and underwear, laundry laid out to dry by families living in nearby grottoes. "Please take a picture of the laundry drying on top of my stupa," he told one of the five University of Strasbourg graduate students who had joined him for the summer. Tarzi turned toward the cliff face, scanning the rough ground at its base. "If the great Buddha exists," he said, "it's there, at the foot of the great cliffs."
Not everyone is convinced. To be sure, Xuanzang's account is widely accepted. "He was remarkably accurate," says Nancy Dupree, an American expert on Afghan art and culture who has lived in Kabul for five decades. "The fact that he mentioned it means that there must have been something there." Kosaku Maeda, a retired professor of archaeology in Tokyo and one of the world's leading experts on the Bamiyan Valley, agrees that the monk probably did see a Sleeping Buddha. But Maeda believes that the figure, which was likely made of clay, would have crumbled into dust centuries ago. "If you think of a 1,000-foot-long reclining Buddha, then it would require 100 to 130 feet in height," he said. "You should see such a hill. But there is nothing." Kazuya Yamauchi, the Japanese archaeologist, believes Xuanzang's description of the figure's location is ambiguous. He contends it lies in a different part of the valley, Shari-i-Gholghola, or the "City of Screams," where the Mongol conqueror Genghis Khan massacred thousands of inhabitants.
A short while after my outing with Tarzi, I climbed up some rickety metal scaffolding inside the eastern niche with Bert Praxenthaler, a Munich-based art historian and sculptor from the International Council on Monuments and Sites, a nongovernmental organization that receives UNESCO funding to shore up the niche walls, which were badly damaged by the Taliban blasts. In one of his first visits here some years ago, Praxenthaler recalls, he was rappelling inside the niche when he realized it was about to cave in. "It is just mud and pebbles baked together over millions of years," he said. "It lacks a natural cement, so the stone is rather weak. One slight earthquake would have destroyed everything." Praxenthaler and his team pumped 20 tons of mortar into cracks and fissures in the niche, then drilled dozens of long steel rods into the walls to support it."They are now stable," he said. Pointing to some faint smudges on the rough wall, he added: "You can see traces of the fingers of Buddhist workers, from 1,500 years ago." Praxenthaler's work led him to some serendipitous discoveries, including a tiny fabric bag—"closed with rope and sealed with two stamps"—concealed in a crevice behind the giant Buddha at the time it was constructed. "We still haven't opened it yet," he told me. "We think there is a Buddhist relic inside." (Praxenthaler is organizing a research project that will examine the presumably fragile contents.)
Preservation of the niches—work on the western one is scheduled to begin soon—is the first step, Praxenthaler said, in what many hope will be the reconstitution of the destroyed statues. During the past decade, conservationists, artists and others have floated many proposals, ranging from constructing concrete replicas to leaving the niches empty. Hiro Yamagata, a Japanese artist based in California, suggested that laser images of the Buddhas be projected onto the cliff face—an idea later abandoned as too costly and impractical.
For his part, Praxenthaler supports a method known as anastylosis, which involves combining surviving pieces of the Buddhas with modern materials. "It would be a fragmented Buddha, with gaps and holes, and later, they could fill in the gaps in a suitable way," he said. This approach has gathered strong backing from Governor Sarabi, as well as from archaeologists and art conservators, but it may not be feasible: most of the original Buddhas were pulverized, leaving only a few recognizable fragments. In addition, few Afghan officials think it politically wise, given the Islamic fervor and xenophobic sentiment of much of the country, especially among the Pashtun, to embrace a project celebrating the country's Buddhist past. "Conservation is OK, but at the moment they are critical about what smells like rebuilding the Buddha," Praxenthaler said. Others, including Tarzi, believe the niches should remain empty. New Buddhas, says Nancy Dupree, would turn Bamiyan into "an amusement park, and it would be a desecration to the artists who created the originals. The empty niches have a poignancy all their own." Tarzi agrees. "Leave the two Buddha niches as two pages of history," he told me, "so that future generations will know that at a certain moment, folly triumphed over reason in Afghanistan."
The funding that Tarzi currently gets from the French government allows him and his graduate students to fly from Strasbourg to Bamiyan each July, pay the rent on his house and employ guards and a digging team. He says he has been under no pressure to hasten his search, but the longer the work continues, the greater the likelihood his benefactors will run out of patience. "I've discovered sculptures, I've discovered the stupa, I've discovered the monasteries, I've developed a panorama of Bamiyan civilization from the first century to the arrival of Genghis Khan," he says. "The scientific results have been good."
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (6)
The only treasures which can truly be protected from those who would unwrite our collective past are the ones that aren't known. In 2001 the Taliban destroyed two 1,500 year-old statues of Buddha (SOSA)
Posted by Bill on February 27,2013 | 09:49 AM
I was fortunate to have visited Bamiyan area in May 1974 and viewed the lovely valley and Buddha sculptures intact. My collection of slides from this visit tug at a memory of what was a treasure and now gone. Sadness fills my heart of what was lost to other generations.
Posted by Mary on February 17,2011 | 08:11 PM
The only treasures which can truly be protected from those who would unwrite our collective past are the ones that aren't known. In 2001 the Taliban destroyed two 1,500 year-old statues of Buddha; monumental artifacts falling to a momentary act of indignance, embarassment or insecurity. Zemaryalai Tarzi is intent on finding a purported third. If he succeeds, and the Taliban then retakes Bamiyan, that icon will likely suffer the same fate, lost for the very fact that he found it. In that regard, his actions seem no less short-sighted than theirs. Either that, or the quest of a man more interested in claiming a footnote to history than preserving the thing he professes to value.
Posted by Dan Wetmore on January 4,2011 | 12:08 AM
While I like the every word of the article and I enjoyed it as it has to do a lot to my own heritage, I must say that we have gone astray here. Our patron Saint as Aurel Stein called Huen Tsang may have gone erratic while mentioning the third Buddha in the 'vicinity'. This does not mean in real vicinity but it could be farther not very far from the banks of Oxus river. I believe on our ignorance of the Soviet period archaeology that we have still not cared to unravel their expeditions in these regions. I am convinced that the third Buddha which was discovered from Ajina Tepe near Kurgan Tepe south of Dushanbe now sleeping on the second floor of the Museum of Antiquities in Dushanbe is the one mentioned by Huen Tsang. This part of Tajikistan is very important and is rich in archaeology. On both the sides of Oxus river existed sites earlier than 6th BC - the temple of Oxus(Takht-i-Sangin)and across the river Ai Khanum sites and may be more are very rich. Moreover I believe on the way of the Pamir branch of the Great Silk Road, lie many uncovered sites and this could be a probable route of our patron saint who had travelled down through difficult mountains from present day Taxkorgan in the Chinese Pamir. These sites were very much inter-connected since the Kushan times and Huen Tsang in 7th AD came down from here to Bamiyan. He describes Buddhism in decadent state where the monasteries had lost their importance and the monks reduced to mere caretakers. I can send the photos of sleeping Buddha of Ajina Tepe if required. We must pay attention to exhibits of this Museum as it has a lot to do with Indo-Bactrian artifacts down to Kushan periods.
Posted by Zia on December 20,2010 | 07:04 AM
this is an interesting article
Posted by alejandro on December 15,2010 | 02:23 PM
What are the latitude/longitude of the cliff cavities for the former statues?
Posted by Richard Hintz on December 8,2010 | 12:15 PM