Scandinavians’ Strange Holiday Lutefisk Tradition
People in the Old Country won’t touch the stuff, but immigrants to the American Midwest have celebrated it for generations
- By Erica Janik
- Smithsonian.com, December 08, 2011, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 3)
The plaintive question frequently asked of lutefisk lovers: “If it’s so good, why don’t you eat it more than once a year?”
“Lutefisk is the substance you love to hate,” writes Roy. “It’s a rich substance for jokes, and for these reasons, it holds an interesting spectrum of appeal that varies from the cherished to reviled.”
That notorious smell has improved in recent years, however. Modern processing methods, including enclosed commercial kiln dryers and the refinement of lye, make for better smelling—or at least less smelly—fish. The lye does leave a distinct ashy taste that butter helps mask. Still, few people make lutefisk from scratch at home anymore, preferring instead to purchase it vacuum-packed from the store. Those searching for the smelly scent memory of old, however, can still find it at Ingrebretson’s Scandinavian Foods, a Minneapolis institution that hosts an annual lutefisk tasting, where shoppers can buy dried fish to soak themselves. There aren’t too many takers.
No one is quite sure where and when lutefisk originated. Both Swedes and Norwegians claim it was invented in their country. A common legend has it that Viking fishermen hung their cod to dry on tall birch racks. When some neighboring Vikings attacked, they burned the racks of fish, but a rainstorm blew in from the North Sea, dousing the fire. The remaining fish soaked in a puddle of rainwater and birch ash for months before some hungry Vikings discovered the cod, reconstituted it and had a feast. Another story tells of St. Patrick’s attempt to poison Viking raiders in Ireland with the lye-soaked fish. But rather than kill them, the Vikings relished the fish and declared it a delicacy. It makes for a great story if you don’t mind the fact that Patrick lived centuries before the Vikings attacked Ireland.
Whatever its origins, Scandinavians have eaten lutefisk for centuries. Preserved cod provided protein during the long winter months for generations of families in a part of the world with a strong tradition of fishing. Lye was used for making soap and preserving food. It was easily prepared in the kitchen by boiling wood ash from beech or birch in water and straining the result. Lutefisk first appeared in Norwegian literature in 1555 in the writings of Olaus Magnus, who describes its preparation and proper serving method: lots of butter.
Despite its long history in Scandinavia, though, lutefisk has fallen out of favor now that few people need to preserve food to last all winter. In fact, the Norwegian national dish isn’t lutefisk or even fishbased; it’s farikal, a lamb and cabbage casserole.
“You see some lutefisk in Norway but you’ll find many people who’ve never had it. There’s just not the lutefisk culture in Scandinavia that exists here,” says Eric Dregni, a Minnesotan who spent a year in Norway and wrote the book In Cod We Trust: Living the Norwegian Dream about his experiences. “It’s the immigrants that have kept this going and turned it into a community event.”
Andrine Wefring at the Culinary Academy of Norway in Oslo agrees. “People still eat it, usually at Christmas, and you can find it in some restaurants in the winter. But church dinners? No, that doesn’t happen here,” she says.
Poverty and the collapse of traditional farming practices led more than 950,000 Norwegians to leave their homes for America in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Only Ireland experienced a greater exodus relative to the size of its population. Lutefisk, the food of poor Scandinavians, came to the United States with its immigrants. Today, there are nearly as many Americans with primarily Norwegian heritage as there are citizens of Norway, about 4.5 million people. And many of the immigrant descendants crave some connection to their Nordic past, even one that jiggles and seems to repel more than it appeals.
“It’s a symbol of solidarity,” says Hasia Diner, a professor of immigration history at New York University. “Foods like lutefisk could have been markers of poverty in the past, but by eating them in the more prosperous present, they serve to remind consumers where they came from and how far they have come.”
Professor Diner notes that it’s common for subsequent American-born generations to find these immigrant foods offensive. “Some individuals may find them disgusting, but they still offer markers of past authenticity,” she says.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (8)
I went to my first (and only) lutefisk and lefske dinner in the small town of Scandinavia, Wisconsin. I passed on eating the Lutefisk, but did gingerly try the lefske (a sort of flat bread). Another newcomer to the delicacies at my table ate a piece of his lefske and exclaimed "Am I eating lefske - or the tablecloth?"
Posted by Mary E.Brownell on October 4,2012 | 02:13 AM
My Grandmother was pretty strict about making me eat whatever was served for dinner. However, she made an exception whenever she and my Grandfather had lutefisk. I think that Grandma did this to protect herself. She didn't want to risk getting charged with child abuse.
Posted by Gail Anderson on August 2,2012 | 03:48 PM
I first tried it when I was a college student in Bellingham. I went to a Sons of Norway Dinner and it did smell like stinky socks as I entered the building. I had three helpings of scalloped potatoes with butter sauce. The old Norwegian guy next to me patted me on the shoulder, gave me a thumbs-up, and named me an honorary Norweigan. I didn't know I was eating Lutefisk. I thought it was scalloped potatoes with butter sauce and it was very good. The whole table of folks laughed when I told them about the "good potatoes".
Posted by JL on April 10,2012 | 06:54 PM
Acctualy lutefisk is is making a comback as a Norwegian christmas dinner here in Norway =). Both sorts Nakka and the more gelatine version
Posted by nordmann on January 23,2012 | 11:14 AM
I can remember my maternal grandparents (Nanny from Norway and Grampy from Sweden) and my mother making Lutefisk in the cellar, daily stirring the fish (pieces of petrified wood) soaking in crocks of lye for about a week. They would cook it and serve it with lots of melted butter and boiled potatoes. It had a slight fish taste and a slimy texture that with the butter went down easily (thankfully). I am not a fan.
Posted by Anita Coubert on January 22,2012 | 02:37 PM
thought about trying it,but after my dog and cat refused to eat it i changed my mind.
Posted by mike ginther on December 28,2011 | 06:49 AM
They neglect to mention that Lutefisk makes a first class brass polish as well! (Just kidding, but that's what we Norwegian Americans do about the stuff)
Posted by Wes Anderson on December 20,2011 | 03:25 PM
This photo explains my feelings about lutefisk: http://class-factotum.blogspot.com/2009/06/monday-photo.html
Posted by class factotum on December 15,2011 | 02:49 PM