Breeding the Perfect Bull
A Texas cattleman used genetic science to breed his masterpiece – a near-perfect Red Angus bull. Then nature took its course
- By Jeanne Marie Laskas
- Photographs by Karen Kasmauski
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2010, Subscribe
There once was a bull, an astonishing bull with a handsome, wide muzzle, stunning scrotal circumference and a square frame solid as a sycamore. He was the son of Cherokee Canyon, the grandson of Make My Day—a noble pedigree. The cowboy who designed him, who chose the semen, selected the dam, prepared and inseminated the uterus, named him Revelation. “We don’t intend to present this bull as divine,” the cowboy, Donnell Brown, would write in his 2005 sale catalog, “but we do count it a blessing to have raised him.” Brown was a salesman by nature, but not given to hyperbole. He believed in his heart that Revelation, at just a year-and-a-half old, could become the most storied bull in the history of the Red Angus breed. Finally, after decades of tinkering: might this be the masterpiece?
Every October, cattle buyers from all over the United States gather near Throckmorton, in north-central Texas, where the R.A. Brown Ranch has been selling breeding cattle for more than a century, and where as many as 800 head will go at auction in a single day. Fathers, sons, grandsons—the ranch has passed through five generations. Donnell Brown, 41, is the current cowboy in charge, and at the 2005 R. A. Brown Ranch Bull & Female Sale he sold Revelation to a Houston businessman with a weekend ranch for $12,000.
In time, the bull could turn out to be worth much more. Top breeding bulls—once they’re proven to produce prime calves—can sell for more than $100,000. In the breeding business, the buyer gets the animal, but the seller typically retains an interest in the genetics. Donnell kept the rights to half of Revelation’s semen. It would be two years before anyone would know the quality of the bull’s progeny.
Donnell wears creased Wranglers, a starched plaid shirt with long sleeves and a white hat with the brim cupped obediently up—not in some floppy, haphazard shape like East Texas cowboys wear. The spurs on his boots bear his initials, but he does not wear jingle bobs on them, those dangling silver baubles you see on flashy Arizona cowboys. No, cowboys in Throckmorton consider themselves West Texas cowboys: starched and ironed, just the way cowboys are supposed to be. Donnell is tall, slim, with a quarterback’s build and the deep blue determined eyes of a man who is hanging on with all his might for the ride. No giving up on the four life goals he set for himself at age 23: get to heaven; be the best possible husband and father; be healthy and happy; produce the most efficient beef cattle in the entire world by converting God’s forage into safe, nutritious, delicious food for His people. He wears a clean, straight mustache above an intelligent smile.
Two years after he sold Revelation, Donnell’s dream came true: the bull’s babies were at the top of the class. The weekend rancher from Houston didn’t quite know what he had, so Donnell called him to explain.
“A superstar,” Donnell told him, pointing out, as he often has to do, that a bull in today’s marketplace is like a player in the NFL draft, except with a longer roster of stats. He told him that Revelation’s progeny were showing beef marbling scores that were off the charts, along with breathtaking rib-eye areas. Producing a bull whose offspring have even one of these super stats is like hitting the lottery. But two? A near miracle.
“You should syndicate Revelation,” Donnell advised, offering to bring the bull back to the R. A. Brown Ranch, where it would enjoy higher visibility, the conditioning of an athlete and Donnell’s help in selling shares to investors. Word spread fast. Donnell and the rancher sold seven shares of Revelation for $1,650 apiece and had 14 more ranchers ready to pony up.
So of course Donnell felt blessed. Of course he was feeling something resembling pride when he went out on a routine cattle call one warm October morning in 2007 and looked around the east holding pasture.
“Come on, bulls!” Donnell cried. He sprinkled sweet grain on the brittle prairie grass, and the bulls gathered like children after the big piñata spill. All of them but one. “Come on, bull! Come on, buddy!” Donnell called to the slacker lying some 20 yards distant. It was Revelation. “Hey!” He went closer, and closer still. “Come on, buddy!”
Revelation lifted its head but otherwise remained as inert as a lump of clay. The bull could not get up. Donnell bent over to find that its right rear leg had been mangled, most likely in a fight with another bull, a battle for turf or just a boyish tussle for fun. Revelation was crippled, and a crippled bull is worthless. A crippled bull produces less and weaker sperm. A crippled bull is sent straight to the packinghouse.
“No,” Donnell said. “Please God, no.”
The average American at the backyard grill who cares to think about the steak sizzling before him may imagine little beyond the packinghouse, where meat is cut and shrink-wrapped, or perhaps the feedlot, where beef cattle fatten up on corn on their way to market. But those are only two stops—relatively short and highly industrialized stops—in a long process. Before they get to the feedlot, cattle live the lives their bodies were built for: grazing beside their mothers on endless pastures at ranches called “cow-calf operations.” These are independent ranches, about 750,000 of them in the United States, most of them with fewer than 50 head. The R. A. Brown Ranch, which has 2,000-odd head, belongs to a subset of these ranches that specialize in breeding: the “seed-stock providers.” They begin the beef production chain. The cowboys who run them are the inventors, the tinkerers who choose the genetics that determine the qualities of America’s tenderloin, rib eye, sirloin, filet mignon and burgers.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (32)
I think I forgot to include my name and email when I submitted my comment earlier today. Sorry!
Posted by Ann Bell on January 22,2013 | 12:27 PM
"...a $76 billion industry, and yet more than 97 percent of U.S. cattle ranches are family-owned and operated." This wording is a bit misleading. It does not say that 97% of this $76 billion industry is comprised of family-owned ranches. What it actually says is that 97% of the total number of all ranches in teh industry are family-owned. Two very different statistics and and not so unexpected if you think about it. The family-owned ranch is a much smaller operation than a corporate owned one, hence it would not be unexpected that they would be far more numerous. All I'm saying is that you must look at statistics carefully and that they are often not as meaningful as they may appear. I did enjoy the article, but I found myself wondering if better marbling in my steak was really worth the ethical quandry of cloning. If we have this ability, wouldn't a more ethical use of the technology be to apply it to more serious problems.
Posted by on January 22,2013 | 11:51 AM
I had a hard time reading this article because it reminds me that a person eat meat for a reason. GOD would not let us kill animals to eat if he wanted. He could have made it where they(cattle) had a taste that could have made us sick.
It is like some things are plants that can kill you. So be careful of what you eat.
Posted by Buie on August 16,2010 | 01:43 AM
Having grown up on a farm is Mississippi, I knew a lot ofthings about the cattle on our place. Dad knew everyone was named and he could tell you about each one. He hated to carry one to be sold or to the packing house. I went with him one time,that was the first & last time. I raised show cows in 4H. My brothers showed as well. I will never forget the steer that my brother showed. We were not told that "BIG-BOY" would be sold after the show. We all were expecting to carry him home. He was more like a big puppy to us.
I already knew about the meat line and now it was coming home hard. I know how Donnell felt how he was hoping for his prayer to be answered.
Posted by Elizabeth on August 16,2010 | 01:31 AM
Carol LeKashman - Laskas leaves us hanging regarding the fate of the embryos because it is still unknown. The cows were inseminated this spring and should calve this coming winter. Then the calves (hopefully they get some bull calves) have to grow and mature before the Browns will know if they have anything like Revelation again. Agriculture--it's one big waiting game. :)
Sara--married into a farming and small-time Angus-producing family.
Posted by Sara on June 8,2010 | 04:57 PM
I also agree with those critical of the article. The good thing about it, I suppose, is that it may help expose the greed and insensitivity involved in modern industrial meat production.
Posted by Terry Thorkildson on May 25,2010 | 11:11 AM
Although this article carefully avoids describing where the cows ultimately end up (feed lots were only very briefly mentioned), it's a great and informative piece. Another article that follows a cow through out its life, including the feed lot process, can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/31/magazine/power-steer.html?pagewanted=all
For anyone who consumes store-bought beef in America, both this article and the one linked above are worth reading. It's important to know what you're putting in your mouth and where it came from.
Posted by Ashley on May 14,2010 | 02:49 PM
I found the article a wonderful expose. However, I was astonished that the prize bull that was given such exquisite care was so quickly turned to hamburger. All this love and attention from Donnell was only based on $$s. Couldn't Revelation at least be allowed to graze freely for the rest of his life?
Posted by stan adams on May 14,2010 | 12:53 PM
I also agree with Elena Brodskaya. I was quite shocked to see the beef industry so shamelessly romanticized in this day and age. Most cows and bulls in the United States are not raised on bucolic family farms, as Ms. Laskas' article suggests. According to Farm Sanctuary, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of farm animals, just four large corporations control over eighty percent of the cattle slaughtered in our country, and these animals are treated in the most cruel, inhumane, and disgusting ways one could possibly imagine. The beef industry also harms humans as well as animals, by degrading the environment and putting scarce water and land resources to inefficient use.
In respectful response to Pat Jones, I would like to add that I am a strict ethical vegan who is also pro-choice regarding abortion. The reason for this is that I take a compassionate view of all life, and that includes adult women as well as fetuses. What I find interesting as another, similar example of cognitive dissonance, is that many people who are "pro-life" regarding fetuses are also in favor of the death penalty for adult criminals.
Posted by Maureen Friel on April 28,2010 | 04:18 AM
It is a true testament to the brilliance of a writer that a 30 year vegetarian (me!) could be riveted by an article about beef! And, Jeanne Marie Laskas' writing drew me in and held me tight....wouldn't let go until I finished every last word. Will I eat beef? No. But, the article was fascinating and insightful. Thanks Smithsonian and Ms. Laskas! Keep up the good work.
peace.
Posted by Robin on April 23,2010 | 02:23 PM
This method of food production is anachronistic, and it ultimately can't be sustained. It is as anachronistic as those comments invoking "god". Modern society must be run on reason, not ancient superstitions. Levitican law sanctions human slavery, yet that has been rejected.
Posted by Boregence on April 16,2010 | 02:47 PM
A fantastic article, very interesting: but HOW COULD YOU LEAVE US HANGING AS TO THE FATE OF THE EMBRYOS?
Posted by Carol LeKashman on April 15,2010 | 08:07 PM
Beautifully written article which shows respect for the people and animals involved. I had already heard from my son and daughter-in-law what a well-respected operation the RA Ranch is. Interesting views from Elena and Moira and I recognize their right to express them. However, I just have to wonder how they feel about abortion, since very often those who are so radical about the food chain products don't blink an eye at killing human infants. Just wondering.
Thanks for an accurate, insightful article with integrity.
Posted by Pat Jones on April 14,2010 | 05:38 PM
Jeanne Marie Laskas wrote an excellent story about a family who love their work and contribute greatly to the beef industry. I am so sorry that Elena Brodskaya wrote such a hateful criticism of Jeanne Laskas work. God says man is to take dominion over the animals. Not for us to take dominion over other people by scathing remarks. Elena calm down so we can love you. Sincerely, paul price
Posted by paul price on April 12,2010 | 07:53 PM
I sent your magazine with this article in to to my "cow" friends. They both said if anyone had a bull of this magnitude there would be no way he would be put out to pasture with other bulls. They said it didn't make sence for Mr. Brown to do that. What happened?
Posted by Roberta Wallace on April 10,2010 | 10:14 PM
Like Elena Brodskaya I found the article disgusting.
I could not read it to the end however. I just can't bear to look at the meat counters displaying parts of somegentle creature.
Not an article I expected to find in the Smithsonian.
Posted by Moira Eicholtz on April 8,2010 | 12:13 AM
Sometimes Texans take their college rivalries too far. Hauling a bull to Kansas for surgery instead of Texas A&M's world class Vet School could only be chalked up to anti-Aggie bias.
Posted by LM Yager on April 8,2010 | 07:38 PM
Forgive me if I don't gush in over-salivated terms about this disgusting article. In fact I had to make myself read it all the way to the end in order to be able to write this. I started counting the ways in which not only this article but the subject matter itself is wrong. The answer? Way too many. There is nothing poetic about the slavery and misery of the animals who are only bred for profit and ultimately steak (the horrible line where the "prized" bull became 1200 lbs of hamburger gave me nightmares), playing God in some ghastly Dr. Moreau fashion trying to control the genetic makeup of the animals (somehow human cloning hasn't caught on yet), and the number of calves they produce and many many more. Cows and bulls are gentle creatures (as the author pointed out, right before she said what great steak they make), who interact in socially complex ways including friendships that develop over time. But the author chose to overlook this fact blinded by the profits they make the ranchers. There is no love, or respect that shown the animals in this article, and of course, on the ranch - they are merely objects, like furniture that are being tampered with and experimented on. As if their lives are not just as precious as human lives. When we read about slavery and human trafficking and lack of human rights in the world it is considered morally wrong. Why is it that reading about the same situations and conditions in animal lives makes it okay??? God did not give humans dominion over animals, He made us keepers of the realm, to live in harmony and peace with all species. I only hope that your readers will skip the steak after reading this article and eat a plate full of beans instead.
Posted by Elena Brodskaya on April 8,2010 | 08:25 AM
My dad went to all the Brown's bull sales from the first one til he died (in 2000). Just before the sale started, he often had a small boy with him telling him all about each bull...in great and glowing detail. That small boy was Donnell Brown. Even then it was apparent what a natural salesman he was.
If there is in Texas( or anywhere in America, for that matter) a representative of what a ranch family should be, it is the R.A.Brown family.
Posted by Tom Blakeney,Jr. on April 7,2010 | 02:13 PM
This was a great article! Certainly, for me it was a celebration of the American family farm. The following statistic from your article was a welcome surprise: "Beef production is the largest single segment of American agriculture, a $76 billion industry, and yet more than 97 percent of U.S. cattle ranches are family-owned and operated." I am one of those cow-calf operations that is an independant ranches with fewer than 50 head (Buhler, KS).
Posted by Willmar T. Harder on April 6,2010 | 12:18 PM
Thank you very much for the beautiful, poetic portrait of today's rancher and his balance of heritage and technology to produce quality food. The video is lovely and complementary. I hope your readers will be more confident and understanding about beef's nutrition and food safety. explorebeef.org. You'll also like these personal portraits about rural life near Lake Tahoe, CA. http://artofregionalchange.ucdavis.edu/
Posted by Karen Sweet on April 5,2010 | 11:48 PM
THANK YOU, Jeanne Marie Laskas and Smithsonian magazine, for this insightful journey to where beef comes from and the people who bring it to us...hard working family farmers and ranchers like the Browns. Combining American ingenuity with the tradition and legacy of the cowboy, today's beef farmers and ranchers produce a year-round supply of safe, wholesome and nutritious beef at a price that makes it possible to enjoy beef every day. And knowing that lean beef provides 10 essential nutrients and vitamins, including 51% of our daily protein needs, in one 3 oz serving and only 180 calories, we can feel good about enjoying beef every day (and not just for diiner!).
Posted by Daren WIlliams on April 1,2010 | 12:44 PM
Well, I'm a Minnesotan always have been and always will be. I raise angus and am commonly called a cowboy. Up here its not common for someone to walk in with a cowboy hat to a Wal-Mart. This article though makes me step back and take another look at my profession. I'd like to thank all other cattle breeders and owners around the nation, farmers and cowboys. I'm 18 and looking forward to owning my own operation in the future after college.
Posted by Darren DeRaad on March 30,2010 | 10:24 PM
Awesome article, great read! Thoroughly enjoyed reading this story.
While the pronounciation sounds like "seeder," it is actually an acronymn, CIDR, which stands for controlled internal drug release.
Posted by tl on March 30,2010 | 11:40 AM
I so enjoyed and appreciated this article - and I was, admittedly, astonished to find it in Smithsonian. I recently married into an Angus cow/calf operation, and my learning curve has been precipitously steep. I'm a city girl by birth and a photographer by occupation. But, believe me, I've been seen more often in the past 3 yrs running the headgate, holding the AI glove, or trying to help a clueless calf find the teats. Quite the romantic dating experience! From the very first, I was smitten, much to the shock of my friends & family. You have captured the flavor, the feel of the whole ranching experience. It was as though you were in that man's pocket for years in the writing of this. Thank you so much for painting such perfectly poetic and accurate imagery.
Posted by Angela Gambill Neese on March 30,2010 | 10:27 AM
Two words: Great story! Being from a midwest city, I have no clue what it is like living on a ranch, nor the interseting issues that you have before you: such as engineering the perfect bull. I learned alot from it, and wish to thank you for taking the time to write it and share it with us.
Posted by Andrew on March 29,2010 | 03:27 PM
I hope to use this story in my four 12th grade Film Analysis classes. We are currently studying the western genre and have been using the book, Cowboy Ethics as supplimental reading.
After reading this excellent piece about modern day ranching, I am asking my 120 urban,southern California students to develop arguments about why Donnell Brown should or should not clone Revelation. I hope there is a story to follow to let all of us know how calving went this Spring and whether Donnell still feels the same way about cloning his perfect bull.
Devon Day, LBUSD
Posted by Devon Day on March 28,2010 | 04:24 PM
I live on a seed stock cattle ranch, and I can really relate to this article. I am only 16, but the ranching lifestyle has been a huge part of my life. This article did an excellent job of depicting the ranch lifestyle and the people that are a part of it. Cattle ranchers are some of the most caring and sincere people that I've ever been around. The cows become like part of the family. As a whole, cattle ranchers are very often misrepresented, and subject to the abuse that PETA and other radical animal rights organizations. This article was a very good representation of ranchers, and should be required reading at any steakhouse before the meal is served!!
Posted by Troy Rowan on March 27,2010 | 05:15 PM
A most interesting and informative great article about beef cattle development and the families behind it all.For a wanabe rancher its a great read. As a sideline I have had a small herd for many years. Progressive Farmer has been my main farm magazine. Smithsonian really surprized me.Thank you so very much.
Posted by paul price on March 26,2010 | 12:00 PM
I was so pleased with your article "Breeding The Perfect Bull". I have lived in Texas for 17 years now. Although I have never been a part of the ranching lifestyle, I admire and respect these hard working families. The American culture has lost it's respect for the "cowboy". The agricultural community is so often the subject of stereotypes and jokes. From Hollywood to New York publishers, this vital portion of our country and our economy recieves frequent disrespect and misrepresentation. Thank you for an article that gave these deserving men and women such respect.
Posted by Kristi Boyd on March 25,2010 | 06:30 PM
An excellently well-written article! It combines the scientific, experienced and difficult-to-understand aspects of Beef Cattle breeding into easily understood common, everyday language.
DOC HARRIS
Posted by DOC HARRIS on March 24,2010 | 08:32 PM
This article is a revelation in its own right! Thank you!
Posted by Shir-El on March 21,2010 | 02:51 PM