Breeding the Perfect Bull
A Texas cattleman used genetic science to breed his masterpiece – a near-perfect Red Angus bull. Then nature took its course
- By Jeanne Marie Laskas
- Photographs by Karen Kasmauski
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2010, Subscribe
(Page 5 of 8)
He parks. He notices a splotch of dried mud on his starched jeans. He takes out a knife he keeps clipped to his belt, unfolds it and scrapes that mud right off.
The artificial insemination (AI) center is a modest white tin barn surrounded by a catacomb of pens and clanking red gates. It’s at the far end of the ranch, flanked by shady hills providing cool comfort to hundreds of cattle. Atop the hill, a lone oil derrick bounces its lunatic head up and down.
Inside the AI center, the main event is the mighty gray metal chute, a monstrous contraption that can, with the benefit of hydraulics, hold a cow or a bull in place. Then a cowboy can do what he needs to do: inseminate, castrate, brand, palpate.
Today, a freelance cowboy who specializes in ultrasound technology is here with his machine, which is connected to a computer, which is connected to a thumb drive, which contains information that will eventually be uploaded to a lab in Iowa. Technicians there will run a program to translate the images into numbers.
“Howdy, sir!” Donnell says, all smiles.
“How’s your boy?” the cowboy says. “He’s playing ball next year?”
“You spying for another team?” Donnell says with a laugh. “Yes sir, Tucker’s looking to play quarterback. We’re proud of him, mighty proud of him.”
“I’m about through with these bulls,” the cowboy says, holding on to a humming electric shaver. “About a half-dozen left. Seeing some good scores.” He’s shaving some hair from the back of a 926-pound young bull. He squirts a shot of lubricant on the hide, then gently places his ultrasound wand over a spot between the 12th and 13th ribs. The image that emerges on his computer screen is unmistakably and perhaps unsettlingly a rib-eye steak. Clear as on a plate.
“Nice marbling,” Donnell says. “OK, real nice.”
The cowboy then gets a shot of the bull’s back fat. All carcasses are trimmed to the industry standard of a quarter-inch of body fat, so you’re hoping to see that score low, and marbling high. The complete examination takes less than five minutes, and when the ultrasound cowboy is through he pulls a lever, releasing the bull. The bull roars out while another thunders into the chute with a great clank and clatter.
Once processed into numbers, the data will go to the Red Angus Association of America, where a cowboy like Donnell can pull them up on his Blackberry: the Expected Progeny Differences (EPDs) of one bull versus another and one cow versus another. A herd’s full set of EPDs reads like endless pages of Nasdaq offerings, a chart of numbers expressing the relative values of carcass weight, marbling, rib-eye area, fat thickness, maternal milk, cow energy value, calving ease, birth weight, weaning weight, yearling weight—14 traits in all—that each animal’s progeny has been statistically predicted to achieve.
EPDs can be difficult for the weekend rancher to master, but for a modern seed-stock provider like Donnell the information is gold. Get a dam with the best EPDs for calving ease and cow energy value, and breed it with a bull with the best EPDs for marbling and rib-eye area and maybe weaning weight times yearling weight (an online EPD Mating Calculator can help with this task), and see if you can’t just produce perfection. Tweak with the next generation, and try again, and again.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (32)
+ View All Comments
I think I forgot to include my name and email when I submitted my comment earlier today. Sorry!
Posted by Ann Bell on January 22,2013 | 12:27 PM
"...a $76 billion industry, and yet more than 97 percent of U.S. cattle ranches are family-owned and operated." This wording is a bit misleading. It does not say that 97% of this $76 billion industry is comprised of family-owned ranches. What it actually says is that 97% of the total number of all ranches in teh industry are family-owned. Two very different statistics and and not so unexpected if you think about it. The family-owned ranch is a much smaller operation than a corporate owned one, hence it would not be unexpected that they would be far more numerous. All I'm saying is that you must look at statistics carefully and that they are often not as meaningful as they may appear. I did enjoy the article, but I found myself wondering if better marbling in my steak was really worth the ethical quandry of cloning. If we have this ability, wouldn't a more ethical use of the technology be to apply it to more serious problems.
Posted by on January 22,2013 | 11:51 AM
I had a hard time reading this article because it reminds me that a person eat meat for a reason. GOD would not let us kill animals to eat if he wanted. He could have made it where they(cattle) had a taste that could have made us sick.
It is like some things are plants that can kill you. So be careful of what you eat.
Posted by Buie on August 16,2010 | 01:43 AM
Having grown up on a farm is Mississippi, I knew a lot ofthings about the cattle on our place. Dad knew everyone was named and he could tell you about each one. He hated to carry one to be sold or to the packing house. I went with him one time,that was the first & last time. I raised show cows in 4H. My brothers showed as well. I will never forget the steer that my brother showed. We were not told that "BIG-BOY" would be sold after the show. We all were expecting to carry him home. He was more like a big puppy to us.
I already knew about the meat line and now it was coming home hard. I know how Donnell felt how he was hoping for his prayer to be answered.
Posted by Elizabeth on August 16,2010 | 01:31 AM
Carol LeKashman - Laskas leaves us hanging regarding the fate of the embryos because it is still unknown. The cows were inseminated this spring and should calve this coming winter. Then the calves (hopefully they get some bull calves) have to grow and mature before the Browns will know if they have anything like Revelation again. Agriculture--it's one big waiting game. :)
Sara--married into a farming and small-time Angus-producing family.
Posted by Sara on June 8,2010 | 04:57 PM
I also agree with those critical of the article. The good thing about it, I suppose, is that it may help expose the greed and insensitivity involved in modern industrial meat production.
Posted by Terry Thorkildson on May 25,2010 | 11:11 AM
Although this article carefully avoids describing where the cows ultimately end up (feed lots were only very briefly mentioned), it's a great and informative piece. Another article that follows a cow through out its life, including the feed lot process, can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/31/magazine/power-steer.html?pagewanted=all
For anyone who consumes store-bought beef in America, both this article and the one linked above are worth reading. It's important to know what you're putting in your mouth and where it came from.
Posted by Ashley on May 14,2010 | 02:49 PM
I found the article a wonderful expose. However, I was astonished that the prize bull that was given such exquisite care was so quickly turned to hamburger. All this love and attention from Donnell was only based on $$s. Couldn't Revelation at least be allowed to graze freely for the rest of his life?
Posted by stan adams on May 14,2010 | 12:53 PM
I also agree with Elena Brodskaya. I was quite shocked to see the beef industry so shamelessly romanticized in this day and age. Most cows and bulls in the United States are not raised on bucolic family farms, as Ms. Laskas' article suggests. According to Farm Sanctuary, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of farm animals, just four large corporations control over eighty percent of the cattle slaughtered in our country, and these animals are treated in the most cruel, inhumane, and disgusting ways one could possibly imagine. The beef industry also harms humans as well as animals, by degrading the environment and putting scarce water and land resources to inefficient use.
In respectful response to Pat Jones, I would like to add that I am a strict ethical vegan who is also pro-choice regarding abortion. The reason for this is that I take a compassionate view of all life, and that includes adult women as well as fetuses. What I find interesting as another, similar example of cognitive dissonance, is that many people who are "pro-life" regarding fetuses are also in favor of the death penalty for adult criminals.
Posted by Maureen Friel on April 28,2010 | 04:18 AM
It is a true testament to the brilliance of a writer that a 30 year vegetarian (me!) could be riveted by an article about beef! And, Jeanne Marie Laskas' writing drew me in and held me tight....wouldn't let go until I finished every last word. Will I eat beef? No. But, the article was fascinating and insightful. Thanks Smithsonian and Ms. Laskas! Keep up the good work.
peace.
Posted by Robin on April 23,2010 | 02:23 PM
This method of food production is anachronistic, and it ultimately can't be sustained. It is as anachronistic as those comments invoking "god". Modern society must be run on reason, not ancient superstitions. Levitican law sanctions human slavery, yet that has been rejected.
Posted by Boregence on April 16,2010 | 02:47 PM
A fantastic article, very interesting: but HOW COULD YOU LEAVE US HANGING AS TO THE FATE OF THE EMBRYOS?
Posted by Carol LeKashman on April 15,2010 | 08:07 PM
Beautifully written article which shows respect for the people and animals involved. I had already heard from my son and daughter-in-law what a well-respected operation the RA Ranch is. Interesting views from Elena and Moira and I recognize their right to express them. However, I just have to wonder how they feel about abortion, since very often those who are so radical about the food chain products don't blink an eye at killing human infants. Just wondering.
Thanks for an accurate, insightful article with integrity.
Posted by Pat Jones on April 14,2010 | 05:38 PM
Jeanne Marie Laskas wrote an excellent story about a family who love their work and contribute greatly to the beef industry. I am so sorry that Elena Brodskaya wrote such a hateful criticism of Jeanne Laskas work. God says man is to take dominion over the animals. Not for us to take dominion over other people by scathing remarks. Elena calm down so we can love you. Sincerely, paul price
Posted by paul price on April 12,2010 | 07:53 PM
+ View All Comments