Breeding the Perfect Bull
A Texas cattleman used genetic science to breed his masterpiece – a near-perfect Red Angus bull. Then nature took its course
- By Jeanne Marie Laskas
- Photographs by Karen Kasmauski
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2010, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 8)
All three of Donnell’s siblings, and their spouses, share ownership of the ranch with him and Kelli. She serves as marketing maven and quiet, sturdy voice of wisdom—and as president of the Red Angus Association of America. Ranch headquarters is the small red house where Donnell grew up and now lives with Kelli and their two teenage boys, Tucker and Lanham.
In the end, Donnell decided no, he would not give up on Revelation. He would try to save his masterpiece. So he hauled the bull away in a trailer and drove five hours to a veterinary hospital near Austin, where he learned that Revelation had torn two ligaments, the anterior cruciate and medial collateral, in its right rear knee. “Nothing we can do for him here,” the vet said, pointing Donnell to specialists at Kansas State University, 11 hours away. So Donnell got in the truck and drove. Revelation was like Barbaro, the racehorse. If ever there was an animal worth going the extra mile for, it was Revelation.
“We can try to construct a new knee,” the Kansas vet said, with only vague encouragement in his voice. “Sure, we can try.”
Donnell’s parents, Rob and Peggy, used to live in the red ranch house, but in 1998 they retired to the fancy house in town with the big columns out front, just as Rob’s parents had done before them. Before she married Rob, Peggy’s name was Peggy Donnell, and that’s how Donnell got his name.
Rob, now 74, is himself legendary in the beef world; he played a vital role in determining the kind of steak America now eats. He came of age when the Hereford was the cattle of choice for the U.S. beef industry—a reliable, thrifty breed with far more muscle than the Texas Longhorn, its predecessor as America’s main beef cow.
At Texas Tech, Rob had learned of a brave new world. “Continental breeds!” he said to his father, R. A., after he came home with his degree in agriculture in 1958. Breed a Hereford with, say, a Brown Swiss and get a larger carcass with, perhaps, the same quality meat—or better! Rob had other ideas, other breeds, other dreams. R.A., a man of tradition, would have none of it. Not until 1965 did he give Rob his reluctant blessing to crossbreed; within days, he died of a heart attack. If he hadn’t given his assent, the ranch never would have enjoyed its explosive success in creating better and better meat.
Rob crossed a Hereford with a Brown Swiss and sure enough, he got cattle fully 100 pounds heavier at weaning, with the same hardiness as a Hereford. “Brilliant!” he thought. But the market did not quite agree. The cattle were not uniform in color, like the good old-fashioned amber Herefords. Some were brindle and some were gray. Coat color has nothing whatsoever to do with carcass quality, but even so, Rob’s cattle were discounted at auction because they looked funny.
So Rob got back to work. He mixed his Herefords with Simmental, a different Swiss breed, and that solved the color problem. To that hybrid he added Simbrah, a Simmental-Brahman mix, to create cattle with heat tolerance. He added Red Angus for marbling. He got a planeload of Senepol from the Virgin Islands to add a gentle demeanor. And by 1989 he had a hybrid called the Hotlander, which is still popular among some breeding connoisseurs.
By then Rob’s son, Donnell, was at Texas Tech, studying genetics. It’s the Throckmorton way, after you grow up cowboying and playing football for the Throckmorton High Greyhounds (2005 state six-man champions!).
When he came home with his degree in 1993, Donnell said, “Dad, it’s better to be on the leading edge than the bleeding edge.” His father may have been ahead of his time, Donnell thought. He was creating superior beef, absolutely, but not necessarily beef the marketplace understood. Donnell brought science back from Texas Tech, but he also brought marketing.
Never a place for subtleties, the market understood one thing: Angus. Over the past quarter-century, brilliant marketing by the American Angus Association has made the word “Angus” synonymous with “best steak in the world.” Specifically Black Angus, even though Red and Black Angus carcasses are indistinguishable without the hide. But the American Angus Association promoted black, and so in today’s market, solid black cattle, for reasons almost entirely psychological, bring top dollar.
“We have to create the meat that people want to buy!” was, and remains, Donnell’s main point. Rob agrees, of course, but on the other hand he has the soul of an inventor and can’t stop thinking of awesome new things to try. The father is the boy in this relationship. Donnell: buttoned-up, doing the right thing, selling it with a smile. Rob: trial and error and joy.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (32)
+ View All Comments
I think I forgot to include my name and email when I submitted my comment earlier today. Sorry!
Posted by Ann Bell on January 22,2013 | 12:27 PM
"...a $76 billion industry, and yet more than 97 percent of U.S. cattle ranches are family-owned and operated." This wording is a bit misleading. It does not say that 97% of this $76 billion industry is comprised of family-owned ranches. What it actually says is that 97% of the total number of all ranches in teh industry are family-owned. Two very different statistics and and not so unexpected if you think about it. The family-owned ranch is a much smaller operation than a corporate owned one, hence it would not be unexpected that they would be far more numerous. All I'm saying is that you must look at statistics carefully and that they are often not as meaningful as they may appear. I did enjoy the article, but I found myself wondering if better marbling in my steak was really worth the ethical quandry of cloning. If we have this ability, wouldn't a more ethical use of the technology be to apply it to more serious problems.
Posted by on January 22,2013 | 11:51 AM
I had a hard time reading this article because it reminds me that a person eat meat for a reason. GOD would not let us kill animals to eat if he wanted. He could have made it where they(cattle) had a taste that could have made us sick.
It is like some things are plants that can kill you. So be careful of what you eat.
Posted by Buie on August 16,2010 | 01:43 AM
Having grown up on a farm is Mississippi, I knew a lot ofthings about the cattle on our place. Dad knew everyone was named and he could tell you about each one. He hated to carry one to be sold or to the packing house. I went with him one time,that was the first & last time. I raised show cows in 4H. My brothers showed as well. I will never forget the steer that my brother showed. We were not told that "BIG-BOY" would be sold after the show. We all were expecting to carry him home. He was more like a big puppy to us.
I already knew about the meat line and now it was coming home hard. I know how Donnell felt how he was hoping for his prayer to be answered.
Posted by Elizabeth on August 16,2010 | 01:31 AM
Carol LeKashman - Laskas leaves us hanging regarding the fate of the embryos because it is still unknown. The cows were inseminated this spring and should calve this coming winter. Then the calves (hopefully they get some bull calves) have to grow and mature before the Browns will know if they have anything like Revelation again. Agriculture--it's one big waiting game. :)
Sara--married into a farming and small-time Angus-producing family.
Posted by Sara on June 8,2010 | 04:57 PM
I also agree with those critical of the article. The good thing about it, I suppose, is that it may help expose the greed and insensitivity involved in modern industrial meat production.
Posted by Terry Thorkildson on May 25,2010 | 11:11 AM
Although this article carefully avoids describing where the cows ultimately end up (feed lots were only very briefly mentioned), it's a great and informative piece. Another article that follows a cow through out its life, including the feed lot process, can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/31/magazine/power-steer.html?pagewanted=all
For anyone who consumes store-bought beef in America, both this article and the one linked above are worth reading. It's important to know what you're putting in your mouth and where it came from.
Posted by Ashley on May 14,2010 | 02:49 PM
I found the article a wonderful expose. However, I was astonished that the prize bull that was given such exquisite care was so quickly turned to hamburger. All this love and attention from Donnell was only based on $$s. Couldn't Revelation at least be allowed to graze freely for the rest of his life?
Posted by stan adams on May 14,2010 | 12:53 PM
I also agree with Elena Brodskaya. I was quite shocked to see the beef industry so shamelessly romanticized in this day and age. Most cows and bulls in the United States are not raised on bucolic family farms, as Ms. Laskas' article suggests. According to Farm Sanctuary, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of farm animals, just four large corporations control over eighty percent of the cattle slaughtered in our country, and these animals are treated in the most cruel, inhumane, and disgusting ways one could possibly imagine. The beef industry also harms humans as well as animals, by degrading the environment and putting scarce water and land resources to inefficient use.
In respectful response to Pat Jones, I would like to add that I am a strict ethical vegan who is also pro-choice regarding abortion. The reason for this is that I take a compassionate view of all life, and that includes adult women as well as fetuses. What I find interesting as another, similar example of cognitive dissonance, is that many people who are "pro-life" regarding fetuses are also in favor of the death penalty for adult criminals.
Posted by Maureen Friel on April 28,2010 | 04:18 AM
It is a true testament to the brilliance of a writer that a 30 year vegetarian (me!) could be riveted by an article about beef! And, Jeanne Marie Laskas' writing drew me in and held me tight....wouldn't let go until I finished every last word. Will I eat beef? No. But, the article was fascinating and insightful. Thanks Smithsonian and Ms. Laskas! Keep up the good work.
peace.
Posted by Robin on April 23,2010 | 02:23 PM
This method of food production is anachronistic, and it ultimately can't be sustained. It is as anachronistic as those comments invoking "god". Modern society must be run on reason, not ancient superstitions. Levitican law sanctions human slavery, yet that has been rejected.
Posted by Boregence on April 16,2010 | 02:47 PM
A fantastic article, very interesting: but HOW COULD YOU LEAVE US HANGING AS TO THE FATE OF THE EMBRYOS?
Posted by Carol LeKashman on April 15,2010 | 08:07 PM
Beautifully written article which shows respect for the people and animals involved. I had already heard from my son and daughter-in-law what a well-respected operation the RA Ranch is. Interesting views from Elena and Moira and I recognize their right to express them. However, I just have to wonder how they feel about abortion, since very often those who are so radical about the food chain products don't blink an eye at killing human infants. Just wondering.
Thanks for an accurate, insightful article with integrity.
Posted by Pat Jones on April 14,2010 | 05:38 PM
Jeanne Marie Laskas wrote an excellent story about a family who love their work and contribute greatly to the beef industry. I am so sorry that Elena Brodskaya wrote such a hateful criticism of Jeanne Laskas work. God says man is to take dominion over the animals. Not for us to take dominion over other people by scathing remarks. Elena calm down so we can love you. Sincerely, paul price
Posted by paul price on April 12,2010 | 07:53 PM
+ View All Comments