Breeding the Perfect Bull
A Texas cattleman used genetic science to breed his masterpiece – a near-perfect Red Angus bull. Then nature took its course
- By Jeanne Marie Laskas
- Photographs by Karen Kasmauski
- Smithsonian magazine, April 2010, Subscribe
There once was a bull, an astonishing bull with a handsome, wide muzzle, stunning scrotal circumference and a square frame solid as a sycamore. He was the son of Cherokee Canyon, the grandson of Make My Day—a noble pedigree. The cowboy who designed him, who chose the semen, selected the dam, prepared and inseminated the uterus, named him Revelation. “We don’t intend to present this bull as divine,” the cowboy, Donnell Brown, would write in his 2005 sale catalog, “but we do count it a blessing to have raised him.” Brown was a salesman by nature, but not given to hyperbole. He believed in his heart that Revelation, at just a year-and-a-half old, could become the most storied bull in the history of the Red Angus breed. Finally, after decades of tinkering: might this be the masterpiece?
Every October, cattle buyers from all over the United States gather near Throckmorton, in north-central Texas, where the R.A. Brown Ranch has been selling breeding cattle for more than a century, and where as many as 800 head will go at auction in a single day. Fathers, sons, grandsons—the ranch has passed through five generations. Donnell Brown, 41, is the current cowboy in charge, and at the 2005 R. A. Brown Ranch Bull & Female Sale he sold Revelation to a Houston businessman with a weekend ranch for $12,000.
In time, the bull could turn out to be worth much more. Top breeding bulls—once they’re proven to produce prime calves—can sell for more than $100,000. In the breeding business, the buyer gets the animal, but the seller typically retains an interest in the genetics. Donnell kept the rights to half of Revelation’s semen. It would be two years before anyone would know the quality of the bull’s progeny.
Donnell wears creased Wranglers, a starched plaid shirt with long sleeves and a white hat with the brim cupped obediently up—not in some floppy, haphazard shape like East Texas cowboys wear. The spurs on his boots bear his initials, but he does not wear jingle bobs on them, those dangling silver baubles you see on flashy Arizona cowboys. No, cowboys in Throckmorton consider themselves West Texas cowboys: starched and ironed, just the way cowboys are supposed to be. Donnell is tall, slim, with a quarterback’s build and the deep blue determined eyes of a man who is hanging on with all his might for the ride. No giving up on the four life goals he set for himself at age 23: get to heaven; be the best possible husband and father; be healthy and happy; produce the most efficient beef cattle in the entire world by converting God’s forage into safe, nutritious, delicious food for His people. He wears a clean, straight mustache above an intelligent smile.
Two years after he sold Revelation, Donnell’s dream came true: the bull’s babies were at the top of the class. The weekend rancher from Houston didn’t quite know what he had, so Donnell called him to explain.
“A superstar,” Donnell told him, pointing out, as he often has to do, that a bull in today’s marketplace is like a player in the NFL draft, except with a longer roster of stats. He told him that Revelation’s progeny were showing beef marbling scores that were off the charts, along with breathtaking rib-eye areas. Producing a bull whose offspring have even one of these super stats is like hitting the lottery. But two? A near miracle.
“You should syndicate Revelation,” Donnell advised, offering to bring the bull back to the R. A. Brown Ranch, where it would enjoy higher visibility, the conditioning of an athlete and Donnell’s help in selling shares to investors. Word spread fast. Donnell and the rancher sold seven shares of Revelation for $1,650 apiece and had 14 more ranchers ready to pony up.
So of course Donnell felt blessed. Of course he was feeling something resembling pride when he went out on a routine cattle call one warm October morning in 2007 and looked around the east holding pasture.
“Come on, bulls!” Donnell cried. He sprinkled sweet grain on the brittle prairie grass, and the bulls gathered like children after the big piñata spill. All of them but one. “Come on, bull! Come on, buddy!” Donnell called to the slacker lying some 20 yards distant. It was Revelation. “Hey!” He went closer, and closer still. “Come on, buddy!”
Revelation lifted its head but otherwise remained as inert as a lump of clay. The bull could not get up. Donnell bent over to find that its right rear leg had been mangled, most likely in a fight with another bull, a battle for turf or just a boyish tussle for fun. Revelation was crippled, and a crippled bull is worthless. A crippled bull produces less and weaker sperm. A crippled bull is sent straight to the packinghouse.
“No,” Donnell said. “Please God, no.”
The average American at the backyard grill who cares to think about the steak sizzling before him may imagine little beyond the packinghouse, where meat is cut and shrink-wrapped, or perhaps the feedlot, where beef cattle fatten up on corn on their way to market. But those are only two stops—relatively short and highly industrialized stops—in a long process. Before they get to the feedlot, cattle live the lives their bodies were built for: grazing beside their mothers on endless pastures at ranches called “cow-calf operations.” These are independent ranches, about 750,000 of them in the United States, most of them with fewer than 50 head. The R. A. Brown Ranch, which has 2,000-odd head, belongs to a subset of these ranches that specialize in breeding: the “seed-stock providers.” They begin the beef production chain. The cowboys who run them are the inventors, the tinkerers who choose the genetics that determine the qualities of America’s tenderloin, rib eye, sirloin, filet mignon and burgers.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (32)
+ View All Comments
I think I forgot to include my name and email when I submitted my comment earlier today. Sorry!
Posted by Ann Bell on January 22,2013 | 12:27 PM
"...a $76 billion industry, and yet more than 97 percent of U.S. cattle ranches are family-owned and operated." This wording is a bit misleading. It does not say that 97% of this $76 billion industry is comprised of family-owned ranches. What it actually says is that 97% of the total number of all ranches in teh industry are family-owned. Two very different statistics and and not so unexpected if you think about it. The family-owned ranch is a much smaller operation than a corporate owned one, hence it would not be unexpected that they would be far more numerous. All I'm saying is that you must look at statistics carefully and that they are often not as meaningful as they may appear. I did enjoy the article, but I found myself wondering if better marbling in my steak was really worth the ethical quandry of cloning. If we have this ability, wouldn't a more ethical use of the technology be to apply it to more serious problems.
Posted by on January 22,2013 | 11:51 AM
I had a hard time reading this article because it reminds me that a person eat meat for a reason. GOD would not let us kill animals to eat if he wanted. He could have made it where they(cattle) had a taste that could have made us sick.
It is like some things are plants that can kill you. So be careful of what you eat.
Posted by Buie on August 16,2010 | 01:43 AM
Having grown up on a farm is Mississippi, I knew a lot ofthings about the cattle on our place. Dad knew everyone was named and he could tell you about each one. He hated to carry one to be sold or to the packing house. I went with him one time,that was the first & last time. I raised show cows in 4H. My brothers showed as well. I will never forget the steer that my brother showed. We were not told that "BIG-BOY" would be sold after the show. We all were expecting to carry him home. He was more like a big puppy to us.
I already knew about the meat line and now it was coming home hard. I know how Donnell felt how he was hoping for his prayer to be answered.
Posted by Elizabeth on August 16,2010 | 01:31 AM
Carol LeKashman - Laskas leaves us hanging regarding the fate of the embryos because it is still unknown. The cows were inseminated this spring and should calve this coming winter. Then the calves (hopefully they get some bull calves) have to grow and mature before the Browns will know if they have anything like Revelation again. Agriculture--it's one big waiting game. :)
Sara--married into a farming and small-time Angus-producing family.
Posted by Sara on June 8,2010 | 04:57 PM
I also agree with those critical of the article. The good thing about it, I suppose, is that it may help expose the greed and insensitivity involved in modern industrial meat production.
Posted by Terry Thorkildson on May 25,2010 | 11:11 AM
Although this article carefully avoids describing where the cows ultimately end up (feed lots were only very briefly mentioned), it's a great and informative piece. Another article that follows a cow through out its life, including the feed lot process, can be found at http://www.nytimes.com/2002/03/31/magazine/power-steer.html?pagewanted=all
For anyone who consumes store-bought beef in America, both this article and the one linked above are worth reading. It's important to know what you're putting in your mouth and where it came from.
Posted by Ashley on May 14,2010 | 02:49 PM
I found the article a wonderful expose. However, I was astonished that the prize bull that was given such exquisite care was so quickly turned to hamburger. All this love and attention from Donnell was only based on $$s. Couldn't Revelation at least be allowed to graze freely for the rest of his life?
Posted by stan adams on May 14,2010 | 12:53 PM
I also agree with Elena Brodskaya. I was quite shocked to see the beef industry so shamelessly romanticized in this day and age. Most cows and bulls in the United States are not raised on bucolic family farms, as Ms. Laskas' article suggests. According to Farm Sanctuary, a nonprofit organization dedicated to improving the lives of farm animals, just four large corporations control over eighty percent of the cattle slaughtered in our country, and these animals are treated in the most cruel, inhumane, and disgusting ways one could possibly imagine. The beef industry also harms humans as well as animals, by degrading the environment and putting scarce water and land resources to inefficient use.
In respectful response to Pat Jones, I would like to add that I am a strict ethical vegan who is also pro-choice regarding abortion. The reason for this is that I take a compassionate view of all life, and that includes adult women as well as fetuses. What I find interesting as another, similar example of cognitive dissonance, is that many people who are "pro-life" regarding fetuses are also in favor of the death penalty for adult criminals.
Posted by Maureen Friel on April 28,2010 | 04:18 AM
It is a true testament to the brilliance of a writer that a 30 year vegetarian (me!) could be riveted by an article about beef! And, Jeanne Marie Laskas' writing drew me in and held me tight....wouldn't let go until I finished every last word. Will I eat beef? No. But, the article was fascinating and insightful. Thanks Smithsonian and Ms. Laskas! Keep up the good work.
peace.
Posted by Robin on April 23,2010 | 02:23 PM
This method of food production is anachronistic, and it ultimately can't be sustained. It is as anachronistic as those comments invoking "god". Modern society must be run on reason, not ancient superstitions. Levitican law sanctions human slavery, yet that has been rejected.
Posted by Boregence on April 16,2010 | 02:47 PM
A fantastic article, very interesting: but HOW COULD YOU LEAVE US HANGING AS TO THE FATE OF THE EMBRYOS?
Posted by Carol LeKashman on April 15,2010 | 08:07 PM
Beautifully written article which shows respect for the people and animals involved. I had already heard from my son and daughter-in-law what a well-respected operation the RA Ranch is. Interesting views from Elena and Moira and I recognize their right to express them. However, I just have to wonder how they feel about abortion, since very often those who are so radical about the food chain products don't blink an eye at killing human infants. Just wondering.
Thanks for an accurate, insightful article with integrity.
Posted by Pat Jones on April 14,2010 | 05:38 PM
Jeanne Marie Laskas wrote an excellent story about a family who love their work and contribute greatly to the beef industry. I am so sorry that Elena Brodskaya wrote such a hateful criticism of Jeanne Laskas work. God says man is to take dominion over the animals. Not for us to take dominion over other people by scathing remarks. Elena calm down so we can love you. Sincerely, paul price
Posted by paul price on April 12,2010 | 07:53 PM
+ View All Comments