How to Save a Dying Language

Geoffrey Khan is racing to document Aramaic, the language of Jesus, before its native speakers vanish

  • By Ariel Sabar
  • Smithsonian magazine, February 2013, Subscribe
View More Photos »
St. Andrew’s church in Glenview Illinois.
St. Andrew’s church in Glenview, Illinois. (Greg Ruffing)

Photo Gallery (1/4)

Aramaic is still spoken by immigrants in Chicago suburbs such as Skokie (home of Nemo Toma, pictured).

Explore more photos from the story

More from Smithsonian.com


It was a sunny morning in May, and I was in a car with a linguist and a tax preparer trolling the suburbs of Chicago for native speakers of Aramaic, the 3,000-year-old language of Jesus.

The linguist, Geoffrey Khan of the University of Cambridge, was nominally in town to give a speech at Northwestern University, in Evanston. But he had another agenda: Chicago’s northern suburbs are home to tens of thousands of Assyrians, Aramaic-speaking Christians driven from their Middle Eastern homelands by persecution and war. The Windy City is a heady place for one of the world’s foremost scholars of modern Aramaic, a man bent on documenting all of its dialects before the language—once the tongue of empires—follows its last speakers to the grave.

The tax preparer, Elias Bet-shmuel, a thickset man with a shiny pate, was a local Assyrian who had offered to be our sherpa. When he burst into the lobby of Khan’s hotel that morning, he announced the stops on our two-day trek in the confidential tone of a smuggler inventorying the contents of a shipment.

“I got Shaqlanaye, I have Bebednaye.” He was listing immigrant families by the names of the northern Iraqi villages whose dialects they spoke. Several of the families, it turned out, were Bet-shmuel’s clients.

As Bet-shmuel threaded his Infiniti sedan toward the nearby town of Niles, Illinois, Khan, a rangy 55-year-old, said he was on safari for speakers of “pure” dialects: Aramaic as preserved in villages, before speakers left for big, polyglot cities or, worse, new countries. This usually meant elderly folk who had lived the better part of their lives in mountain enclaves in Iraq, Syria, Iran or Turkey. “The less education the better,” Khan said. “When people come together in towns, even in Chicago, the dialects get mixed. When people get married, the husband’s and wife’s dialects converge.”

We turned onto a grid of neighborhood streets, and Bet-shmuel announced the day’s first stop: a 70-year-old widow from Bebede who had come to Chicago just a decade earlier. “She is a housewife with an elementary education. No English.”

Khan beamed. “I fall in love with these old ladies,” he said.

***

Aramaic, a Semitic language related to Hebrew and Arabic, was the common tongue of the entire Middle East when the Middle East was the crossroads of the world. People used it for commerce and government across territory stretching from Egypt and the Holy Land to India and China. Parts of the Bible and the Jewish Talmud were written in it; the original “writing on the wall,” presaging the fall of the Babylonians, was composed in it. As Jesus died on the cross, he cried in Aramaic, “Elahi, Elahi, lema shabaqtani?” (“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”)

But Aramaic is down now to its last generation or two of speakers, most of them scattered over the past century from homelands where their language once flourished. In their new lands, few children and even fewer grandchildren learn it. (My father, a Jew born in Kurdish Iraq, is a native speaker and scholar of Aramaic; I grew up in Los Angeles and know just a few words.) This generational rupture marks a language’s last days. For field linguists like Khan, recording native speakers—“informants,” in the lingo—is both an act of cultural preservation and an investigation into how ancient languages shift and splinter over time.

In a highly connected global age, languages are in die-off. Fifty to 90 percent of the roughly 7,000 languages spoken today are expected to go silent by century’s end. We live under an oligarchy of English and Mandarin and Spanish, in which 94 percent of the world’s population speaks 6 percent of its languages. Yet among threatened languages, Aramaic stands out. Arguably no other still-spoken language has fallen farther.

Its first speakers, the Arameans, were desert nomads. (The Bible describes the mythic forebear of the Hebrews as “a wandering Aramean.”) Spreading out from ancient Syria, they so blanketed Mesopotamia that when the Assyrians conquered the Middle East in the eighth century B.C., they adopted Aramaic—not their own tongue, Akkadian—as a language of empire. So did the Babylonians when they vanquished the Assyrians, and the Persians when they toppled the Babylonians. The language crossed the lips of Christians, Jews, Mandeans, Manicheans, Muslims, Samaritans, Zoroastrians and pagans.

The writing on the wall (the proverbial sort) came for Aramaic in the seventh century A.D., when Muslim armies from Arabia conquered the Middle East, and Arabic routed Aramaic as the region’s lingua franca. Aramaic survived only in the Kurdish mountains of Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria, places so remote they never got the memo. Jews and Christians there (though not Muslims, who spoke Kurdish) kept up Aramaic as an everyday tongue for another 1,300 years.


It was a sunny morning in May, and I was in a car with a linguist and a tax preparer trolling the suburbs of Chicago for native speakers of Aramaic, the 3,000-year-old language of Jesus.

The linguist, Geoffrey Khan of the University of Cambridge, was nominally in town to give a speech at Northwestern University, in Evanston. But he had another agenda: Chicago’s northern suburbs are home to tens of thousands of Assyrians, Aramaic-speaking Christians driven from their Middle Eastern homelands by persecution and war. The Windy City is a heady place for one of the world’s foremost scholars of modern Aramaic, a man bent on documenting all of its dialects before the language—once the tongue of empires—follows its last speakers to the grave.

The tax preparer, Elias Bet-shmuel, a thickset man with a shiny pate, was a local Assyrian who had offered to be our sherpa. When he burst into the lobby of Khan’s hotel that morning, he announced the stops on our two-day trek in the confidential tone of a smuggler inventorying the contents of a shipment.

“I got Shaqlanaye, I have Bebednaye.” He was listing immigrant families by the names of the northern Iraqi villages whose dialects they spoke. Several of the families, it turned out, were Bet-shmuel’s clients.

As Bet-shmuel threaded his Infiniti sedan toward the nearby town of Niles, Illinois, Khan, a rangy 55-year-old, said he was on safari for speakers of “pure” dialects: Aramaic as preserved in villages, before speakers left for big, polyglot cities or, worse, new countries. This usually meant elderly folk who had lived the better part of their lives in mountain enclaves in Iraq, Syria, Iran or Turkey. “The less education the better,” Khan said. “When people come together in towns, even in Chicago, the dialects get mixed. When people get married, the husband’s and wife’s dialects converge.”

We turned onto a grid of neighborhood streets, and Bet-shmuel announced the day’s first stop: a 70-year-old widow from Bebede who had come to Chicago just a decade earlier. “She is a housewife with an elementary education. No English.”

Khan beamed. “I fall in love with these old ladies,” he said.

***

Aramaic, a Semitic language related to Hebrew and Arabic, was the common tongue of the entire Middle East when the Middle East was the crossroads of the world. People used it for commerce and government across territory stretching from Egypt and the Holy Land to India and China. Parts of the Bible and the Jewish Talmud were written in it; the original “writing on the wall,” presaging the fall of the Babylonians, was composed in it. As Jesus died on the cross, he cried in Aramaic, “Elahi, Elahi, lema shabaqtani?” (“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”)

But Aramaic is down now to its last generation or two of speakers, most of them scattered over the past century from homelands where their language once flourished. In their new lands, few children and even fewer grandchildren learn it. (My father, a Jew born in Kurdish Iraq, is a native speaker and scholar of Aramaic; I grew up in Los Angeles and know just a few words.) This generational rupture marks a language’s last days. For field linguists like Khan, recording native speakers—“informants,” in the lingo—is both an act of cultural preservation and an investigation into how ancient languages shift and splinter over time.

In a highly connected global age, languages are in die-off. Fifty to 90 percent of the roughly 7,000 languages spoken today are expected to go silent by century’s end. We live under an oligarchy of English and Mandarin and Spanish, in which 94 percent of the world’s population speaks 6 percent of its languages. Yet among threatened languages, Aramaic stands out. Arguably no other still-spoken language has fallen farther.

Its first speakers, the Arameans, were desert nomads. (The Bible describes the mythic forebear of the Hebrews as “a wandering Aramean.”) Spreading out from ancient Syria, they so blanketed Mesopotamia that when the Assyrians conquered the Middle East in the eighth century B.C., they adopted Aramaic—not their own tongue, Akkadian—as a language of empire. So did the Babylonians when they vanquished the Assyrians, and the Persians when they toppled the Babylonians. The language crossed the lips of Christians, Jews, Mandeans, Manicheans, Muslims, Samaritans, Zoroastrians and pagans.

The writing on the wall (the proverbial sort) came for Aramaic in the seventh century A.D., when Muslim armies from Arabia conquered the Middle East, and Arabic routed Aramaic as the region’s lingua franca. Aramaic survived only in the Kurdish mountains of Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria, places so remote they never got the memo. Jews and Christians there (though not Muslims, who spoke Kurdish) kept up Aramaic as an everyday tongue for another 1,300 years.

The number of Aramaic speakers alive today is difficult to calculate. Though some estimates set the figure as high as a half-million, that number is misleading. Because of its ancient lineage, lack of standardization and the isolation of speakers from one another, the modern tongue, known as Neo-Aramaic, has more than 100 dialects, most with no written analogue. Many dialects are already extinct, and others are down to their last one or two speakers.

As an everyday language, linguists told me, Aramaic is safe now in only one place: the Christian village of Maaloula, in the hills outside Damascus, where, with Syrian state support, elders still teach it to children.

***

Like many Neo-Aramaic experts, Khan, whose accent bears traces of his working-class childhood in northeast England, stumbled on the field almost by accident. In his early years at Cambridge, he worked on a trove of ancient Jewish manuscripts—in Hebrew, Arabic and Aramaic—known as the Cairo Geniza. But the long hours squinting at microfilm were a downer. Eager for change after a dispiriting day in a Jerusalem microfiche lab in the early 1990s, he asked a local organization of Kurdish Jews for referrals to actual native speakers of Aramaic.

No sooner had Khan sat down with a Jew from Erbil, a northern Iraqi city whose Aramaic dialect was undescribed, than he felt he had found his calling. “It completely blew my mind,” he told me. “To discover a living language through the lips of a living person, it was just incredibly exhilarating.”

The traditional aim of fieldwork is to produce for undocumented languages what linguists sometimes call “the holy trinity”: a grammar, which is a road map to sounds, syntax and structure; texts, which are chunks of unedited speech that reveal a language’s texture; and a dictionary. Over the past two decades, Khan has published highly regarded grammars on the previously undocumented dialects of Barwar, Qaraqosh, Erbil, Sulemaniyya and Halabja, all areas in Iraq, and Urmi and Sanandaj, in Iran. He is also at work on a web-based database of text and audio recordings that allows word-by-word comparisons across dozens of Aramaic dialects.

Aramaic speakers tend to greet microphone-toting linguists with traditional Middle Eastern hospitality. The widow we visited in Niles, Agnes Nissan Esho, would not let us leave before serving an elaborate lunch of kubba hamuth (sour dumplings), masta (yogurt), chicken with rice, and kadeh (spiced-walnut pastry).

“I’m getting very excited about some vowels here,” Khan said as Esho carried in the steaming plates of food.

“And I’m getting excited about the kadeh,” Bet-shmuel deadpanned.

The half-dozen Neo-Aramaic lin­guists I spoke with said informants often served feasts, confided family gossip and plied them with take-home boxes of fruit. But some are puzzled by the outside interest in their language, and others suspicious that their interlocutors are spies.

And bum steers abound. On our drive to one informant’s house, Khan told a story about his multiyear search for a Chicago man from Iraq’s Barwar region who had been described to him as a font of Assyrian folklore. “When we finally met, I said, ‘I heard you know lots of stories.’”

The man’s response: “I’ve forgotten them all.”

When we arrived at homes around Chicago, Khan, in dress shirt and blazer, explained his research, then drew from his backpack a digital voice recorder, a microphone and a sprawling loose-leaf questionnaire. Each session lasted two or three hours, as Khan worked, like an archaeologist with a soil sifter, to tease out nuances, among dialects, in pronunciation, vocabulary and grammar.

How would you say, “There they are”? he asked. How about, “Here I am”? How about, “He wants to come”? And on it went: “You want to come. I want to come. Come!”

To make sure he heard words correctly, Khan repeated them slowly. He held his mouth open an extra second to verify a vowel or ran a finger over his Adam’s apple to confirm a guttural.

At a public housing tower, we spent more than an hour with a 97-year-old Assyrian from Turkey and his 90-year-old wife. When we stopped for coffee afterward, I asked Khan whether he’d found the meeting productive. “Some pronunciations of one of the consonants in the word for ‘hen’ are not according to what I predicted,” he said.

Advances in field linguistics, I saw, come in dribs and drabs, not eurekas.

The work has its exhilarating days, though, and few moved Khan more than his 2008 trip to the former Soviet republic of Georgia. He was in the capital of Tbilisi in search of Aramaic speakers from Salamas, a city in northwestern Iran. One wave of Assyrians fled Salamas after a Kurdish chieftain murdered a Church of the East patriarch there in 1918; another, after an earthquake a dozen years later.

In Tbilisi, people told Khan that all but three of the dialect’s “pure” speakers had died. At the first house, the man’s daughter apologized: Her father had recently suffered a stroke and was mute. At the second, an older woman lived with a quartet of energetic Rottweilers. “I took out my microphone and they just started howling and barking,” Khan recalled. “It was impossible.”

Finally, a local Assyrian escorted Khan one night into an imposing Soviet-era apartment block. At the top of a dark flight of stairs was a one-room apartment. A frail woman in her mid-90s answered the door.

Khan looked at her brittle physique and wondered how much she could handle. He told himself he would stay for just a few minutes. But when he got up to leave, the woman stretched a bony hand across the table and clasped his wrist.

“Biqir, Biqir,” she pleaded, in a small voice. (“Ask, ask.”)

“She literally grabbed onto me,” he said. “It was as if this was her last breath and she wanted to tell me everything.”

For two hours she hung on his wrist as his recorder filled with the sounds of a language in twilight.


Single Page 1 2 3 Next »

    Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.



 

Add New Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.

Comments (37)

If anyone on this board could clarify one thing for me it would be greatly appreciated! Why do Assyrians use Aramaic in their mass and not their own Assyrian language? Aramaic and Assyrian are two separate and distinct languages, no?

Posted by Sarah on February 11,2013 | 02:01 PM

e-li e-li lamah zabachtani is Hebrew not aramaic

Posted by joseph on February 10,2013 | 01:16 PM

35 year ago, I sat in a public library in Worcester MA, and read the newsletter of the local Assyrian community. Because of the similarity to the language of the Talmud, I understood about half of it. An Assyrian priest walked up to me, astounded that I could get it. My neighborhood in Jerusalem is about 1/4 immigrants from Iraqi Kurdistan. Until recently, the elderly women were recognizable by their double head scarves, and henna colored braids. Ironically, people called their Judeo-Aramaic dialect "Kurdish". It has pretty much died out. The similarity to Hebrew, made it easy for even the most illiterate home-bound housewives, to quickly learn Hebrew. BTW the Aramaic letters used in schools in Maaloula Syria, are identical to the square "Aramaic" calligraphy, that has been the standard Hebrew lettering for the past 2000 years.

Posted by Nanushka on February 10,2013 | 05:30 AM

The village of Maaloula is Syria is also one of the last places where Aramaic is still spoken. It is the site of the Greek Orthodox Monastery of St. Thecla.

Posted by Fr. John Morris on February 7,2013 | 07:33 PM

Wonderful article. Powerful and moving closing sentennce. Good job.

Posted by DF on February 7,2013 | 09:46 AM

Aramaic has been alive and living thoughout the world. It is the language of the Talmud which is and has been studied by millions of Jews for more than 2,000 years.

Posted by Thom McCan. on February 7,2013 | 07:35 AM

I am neither Christian nor religioius, but was moved almost to tears by the last few words of the above article - a language in twilight. I love languages and have learned a number of them - mostly in the Romance family. They are neither difficult to learn (well, Portuguese has been a challenge!) nor threatened, but I feel I'm doing my bit to not come across as a bull in a china shop when I visit any of the countries.

Posted by Steven on February 6,2013 | 10:19 PM

This was really a great read! As a Chaldean, I have seen first-hand the decline of the Aramaic language. While my parents and grandparents can speak it perfectly, I myself do not know it very well, as I was taught Arabic more when I was younger, and it saddens me that myself and many young adults in my generation will not be able to pass it on as successfully. Therefore, I truly hope that great people like this are able to document and save our language fully, so that it can never be lost.

Posted by Mehe on February 5,2013 | 12:05 AM

well, many jewish religious texts are in old Aramaic. Any Talmudic scholar reads it. the bible has abram as the founder of the jewish religion. his grandfather described as priest and idol maker in the city of ur. Abram was raised in that city. he left the city but was culturally no wandering aramaic nomad. of course, anyway, there is no evidence he existed.

Posted by susan on February 5,2013 | 07:51 PM

It is always interesting to see a regular linguistic tracking. The linguistic archeologists do not get the coverage they deserve. They preserve the culture before it disappears. Thank you for including this article. I will always stop for articles like this.

Posted by Dan Feske on February 5,2013 | 03:15 PM

There is an effort in Lebanon to revitalize Aramaic. It is now confined as a language of liturgy to the Maronite Christian Church. But in order to revitalize it into a vernacular, it must be used in commerce. Aramaic lost ground to Arabic, when that become the language of trade and commerce. A language goes extinct, when it loses its currency in the marketplace.

Posted by Tim Upham on February 5,2013 | 01:40 PM

Ramsen: The author is the son of Yona Sabar, a distinguished scholar of Semitic languages who is, himself, a Kurdish native of northern Iraq, and a native speaker of Aramaic.

Posted by JamesInCA on February 3,2013 | 03:06 PM

The people who calling themeselves Assyrian are not the old Assyrians before Christ. These so called modern Assyrians of this article are east-Arameans. The term Assyrian is new since 1850 after work of the English missionaires of England. Here more info: http://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Assyria_Syria_John_Joseph_5_7_2008.htm

Posted by Abgar on February 3,2013 | 01:55 PM

Hi, thanks for the article. I thought they still speak Aramaic (Western Aramaic?) in Syria in a place not far from Damascus, near the Lebanese border?

Posted by Pirkko on February 3,2013 | 10:07 AM

I enjoyed the article very much. It was very informative. Southeastern Michigan is home to hundred thousand Chaldeans, whose primary language is Aramic, the language there ancentors spoke. A large number of them were born in Mosul and lived in a Village called Telkaif. There are over 6 local Chaldean church's that are located in the Michgian Suburbs that Chaldeans often frequent with there families.

Posted by Lauren Kassab on February 2,2013 | 09:25 PM

I'm an Assyrian. I'm alive. My language is alive, but don't know how long it will remain alive now that we have no home because of the volatile situation in the Middle East and the Kurdish takeover of our lands. (Kurds are NOT foreign to Northern Iraq, they were brought by the Ottomans from South Eastern Asia to fight our people in the late 1800s-early 1900s and eventually replace us) Please help my people save our language, the language of Christ, before it completely disappears. Many thanks to scholars such as Geoffrey Khan who care!

Posted by Leena on February 2,2013 | 01:10 PM

the comments of the Mr Ariel sabar miss many historical facts: the Assyrians arent semetic groups since infact the word semetic is historically inaccurate and was created by schlautser to designate a specific group of people. Aramaic wasnt the tongue of the middle east at lest during the 8th B.C.. the dialogue mentioned in kings II between Rabshaqeh and The israeli mister (Elyakim bin hazakia) proves that the Aramaic was unknown to jews and wasn't a lingua franka. i quote a famous phrase from the dialogue to prove that: "mallel am awdik aramaiit mottol d shamiinan w la tmallil ihudaiit kdam amma d al shura" meaning : speak to your slaves in Aramaic which the common DO NOT UNDERSTAND; and do not speak the jewish language. of course there are tenths of references to prove that Aramaic was a second language of choice used as diplomatic language of choice as professor linderburger in his book "Aramaic and hebrew letters" specifies. assyrians didnt vanish as you claim that is a big historical error claimed by you. you can refer to professor Simo Parpola and many manuscritpts for Mikhael the great and the archive of rome to see that they had kingdoms even after christianity. of course i am able to expand much more in proves and referencees but the space is not enough im sorry to say that, but the prophecies of jewish prophets lied regarding the "vanishing of Assyrians". and us the Assyrians of today are a living proof

Posted by Sargon Giwargis on February 1,2013 | 03:40 PM

As a half Assyrian and half Polish born in Chicago I feel terrible that I can only barely speak both languages. I wish I could start to relearn without giving up.

Posted by AssyrianPolish on January 31,2013 | 12:11 PM

Great article in short. However as an Assyrian born and raised in Chicago it does have its drawbacks. Want to hear actual Aramaic? Go to any Assyrian church (like also mentioned in these comments) and the Raza (mysteries/mass) is given in the original Aramaic language. I also question some of the references to Kurds in this article. As stated also in the comments, the Kurds really have no real claim to the area if you are talking about aboriginal/original. Also, I still have family in my village in Barwar North Iraq who speak the un-touched Aramaic that is the context of the authors work. Why search in the USA or other diaspora? Sounds like the author should have gone where the language still exists today and in fact there are schools in North Iraq that even teach in the Assyrian language (all subjects: math, science, arts, etc.)

Posted by Ramsen on January 30,2013 | 03:34 PM

I speak Aramaic and so does over 100,000 Assyrians/Syriacs living in Sweden. Germany, the U.S., and other nations have very large Aramaic speakers too.

Posted by Matt on January 30,2013 | 09:58 AM

The Syrian Christian community in Kerala, India still uses Aramaic as its language of worship in their churches. I learned it as a child from my father who was a priest in the Orthodox Syrian Church in Piravom, Kerala. The immigrants from this community to the United States still use this language in their churches in America and Europe.Perhaps Kerala, India is the only place where this language is actively used and taught. The Theological Seminary in Kottayam, Kerala is one of the best places I know of to learn this language today.

Posted by DR. JOSEPH E THOMAS on January 29,2013 | 01:02 PM

WOW! Speechless. Being an assyrian myself and reading this article, it just makes you speechless. It amazing to see that our language has survived (not suprising) for thousands of years and will do so for until the end of time! Mr Geoffrey Khan, There are many Assyrians in Sydney that still speak the pure Assyrian language. If you ever wish to further your research perhaps thing about coming to Sydney, Australia. Here you will find people speaking the dialects of Barwar, Nochy and Darnayee. At the Assyrian Church Of The East, there are A LOT of prayers that are still read out loud in Aramic. God Bless! and again, an absolutely terrific and amazing article.

Posted by Eddy on January 28,2013 | 04:02 PM

The people who calling themeselves Assyrian are not the old Assyrians before Christ. These are east-Arameans. They use the word Assyrian since 1850 after work of the English missionaires of England. Here more info: http://www.aramnahrin.org/English/Assyria_Syria_John_Joseph_5_7_2008.htm

Posted by Ephrem Lahdo on January 26,2013 | 02:50 PM

Beautiful! Thank you :)

Posted by on January 25,2013 | 08:40 PM

Wow, what a great story and an excellent piece of writing! The content is fascinating to me as a student of languages (on my own time) but this article was very well written, Ariel. I'll be looking forward to more content from you.

Posted by Rod on January 25,2013 | 08:07 PM

I hope he posts that online library of words soon, that will be a great resource for the future!

Posted by Jason Malki on January 25,2013 | 03:45 PM

Many thanks for your comments on my work. They are much appreciated. If you would like to be in touch with me directly, my email address is: gk101@cam.ac.uk Geoffrey Khan

Posted by Geoffrey Khan on January 25,2013 | 03:42 PM

Great article, the work that people like George do is important and inspirational really.

Posted by Alex on January 25,2013 | 10:16 AM

Is there anyway I can get in touch with Professor Khan?

Posted by Matthew Boudwin on January 25,2013 | 09:28 AM

I was really thrilled to read this article which I found on Digg, it certainly has piqued my. A few churches in India in the region I come from, still use Syriac which I understand has evolved from Aramaic, and I have always wondered if the original form managed to survive the test of time. It would be a great loss to humanity if we lose another historically significant language while we take great pains to decipher other ancient languages. We may never know of the archeological finds of future and what implication the current knowledge of these ancient languages can have. Sharing more of the language and its elements over mediums like the internet may help it survive among non-native speakers. I hope the diversity of expression that languages like Aramaic brings, is there for generations to come..

Posted by Vivek on January 25,2013 | 06:35 AM

Although I believe Jesus spoke Aramaic, “Elahi, Elahi, lema shabaqtani?” (“My God, my God, why have you forsaken me?”) In Hebrew is "Eli Eli Lama shechachtani" which is very close.

Posted by max roth on January 24,2013 | 09:23 PM

Excellent article,Everything you said was well defended and completely truthful.This beautiful language is the gift of my birth and heritage. It carries a power and beauty I have found in no other tongue. Thank you Ariel Sabar,for your great service and sacrifice for our culture and language to keep it a live.

Posted by Hamurabi on January 24,2013 | 08:49 PM

Dear Mr. Khan, Thank you for your interest and efforts. I, as an Assyrian appreciate your work. However, I would like to clarify the followings: 1. The Assyrian Empire adopted Aramaic as the official language of the State. That is a fact; however, Assyrian Akkadian continued to be used. There are evidence discovered that prove clearly that the Assyrian Akkadian script was used in the 3rd Century of the Christian Era. 2. You stated, quote: "Aramaic survived only in the Kurdish mountains of Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria, places so remote they never got the memo." End quote. The mountains that you refer to are historically Assyrian mountains, not Kurdish. Kurdish history in the region in question is recent and short. Kurds are new arrival to the region. Assyrians presence in that region is rooted deep in history. Again, thank you for this beautiful article. Fred P.S. Please read my book "Assyrians: The Continuous Saga" and visit my web site www.fredaprim.com for more info.

Posted by Fred Aprim on January 24,2013 | 06:17 PM

Thank you for all your research! I myself am and Assyrian and I get very excited when people outside of our culture are intrigued and inquire about it. I'm not sure if you have looked into it already, but the Baz dialect (what I speak) has many difference from the other dialects.

Posted by Ashor Sworesho on January 24,2013 | 04:54 PM

I find this very interesting. I read a UN report on dying languages a few years ago that found this very same thing about Aramaic. My heritage is Chaldean and we speak Aramaic. My parents were both born and raised in Tel Kaif, in northern Iraq but moved to America in the 70s. They speak both Arabic and Aramaic fluently. I have found that 1st generation Chaldean-Americans speak more Arabic than Aramaic because more people speak Arabic and they will get more use out of it. I unfortunately speak neither. The professor should come to the suburbs of Detroit, MI where 100,000 of us live and speak Aramaic

Posted by Mason on January 24,2013 | 04:34 PM

dear professor Geoffrey Khan, you're one of the greatest that I've ever seen in my life, the way that you speak it and explain it so eloquently century after century time after time and so on, may God bless you for your family, for Assyrians and for all civilizations. Regards, Eskhiria Z. Gilyana (Zak)Chicago IL.

Posted by Eskhiria Z. Gilyana on January 24,2013 | 04:23 PM

Thank you Professor Geoffrey Khan, you are a Legend, Keep up the good work.

Posted by Moon on January 24,2013 | 07:55 AM



Advertisement


Advertisement

Follow Us





First Name
Last Name
Address 1
Address 2
City
State   Zip
Email


Travel with Smithsonian




Smithsonian Store