How Canada Celebrates the War of 1812
The Rodney Dangerfield of wars in the United States, the 19th-century conflict is given great respect by our Northern neighbors
- By John Hanc
- Smithsonian.com, June 18, 2012, Subscribe
(Page 2 of 2)
“We showed the Americans of the time that we weren’t just these quiet, timid people of the North,” says Phillip Charbonneau, a resident of nearby Kitchener who was visiting the Fort with a friend on a sunny Saturday afternoon in mid-May. “I think we should take some pride in that.”
“We’re a small country,” says Torontonian Al Leathem, at Fort York with his wife Neisma and nine-year-old son Liam. “This is a nice victory to have, beating the Americans back then, right? It’s important for our identity.”
Indeed, identity-building and bonding is a big part of all this. Americans often forget that our neighbors to the north are in some senses as much a patchwork as we are, which is one reason the current Conservative government of prime minister Stephen Harper is putting renewed emphasis on the War of 1812.
“This is, in their view, a teachable moment,” says Taylor. “The Harper government is trying to define Canadian patriotism in a way that builds upon this moment in the past.” Part of the re-telling, Taylor says, emphasizes “this perceived unity between French- and English-speaking Canadians in the hopes it will translate into the present.”
With a few notable exceptions, however, French-speaking Canada did not see much fighting during the war. Ontario, then known as Upper Canada, and now the largest province, is where much of the action took place. Other parts of this vast nation—most notably the lands that now encompass the western provinces—were as removed from the hostilities as Australia.
“If you’re from British Columbia, the War of 1812 means almost nothing,” says Fort York’s historian Richard Gerrard.
It’s hoped that the bicentennial may change that; as will some other new initiatives including, as of April, 2011, the inclusion of questions about the War of 1812 in the Canadian citizenship test.
“I knew there was a War of 1812, but that’s about it,” says Laura Riley, with a laugh. Riley, visiting the Fort to learn more about this chapter of her adopted nation’s history, is a native of Great Britain who now lives in Toronto.
David Howe, another Toronto transplant in town for a visit (he has since moved back to Europe), is a native of Belfast in Northern Ireland and hence, takes with a grain of salt the claims of both sides on who won or was in the right in some long-ago war. “The Canadians and the Americans have different perspectives on a lot of things,” he says with a grin.
Still, one of the lessons of the War of 1812 up here is that three years of hostility can be followed by nearly two centuries of harmonious relations. “People ask, ‘didn’t we beat the Americans in that war?’” says interpreter Peter Gibbins, who portrays a Canadian militiaman at Fort York. “I reply, ‘sort of, but they’re still there.’”
Even in this part of the country where the War of 1812 matters, all—or most—is forgiven. It’s doubtful that there are many Canadians who walk out of Fort York Historic Site urging an attack on Buffalo.
“For us it was a defensive war,” says Reeves. “We may have had some victories, but we didn’t take any [American] territory. That part, I think, appeals to the Canadian character. We’re people who have persevered, and from our point of view, this was a war of perseverance.”
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (8)
Hilarious little Canadians, no one "won" the war. It was hardly a war at all and was a military stalemate. Its cute that you want your own little thing to be proud of. It was the British, you as a country did not even exist.
Posted by John on February 5,2013 | 02:21 PM
“We may have had some victories, but we didn’t take any [American] territory." True, if you completely forget about Isaac Brock, Tecumseh, and the capture of Michigan. A small thing.
Posted by Phil O. on November 15,2012 | 11:32 AM
@Steve.. Hold on a second! Quebec is the largest Canadian province in terms of land. However, Ontario is the largest province in terms of population. As a result, I think the author of the article did a poor job explaining the rational used to describe what he meant by Canada's "largest province."
Posted by Gabriel Howell on September 1,2012 | 10:17 PM
Are you for real!? First off, among all the biased comments and hearsay in this "informative paper" I'd like to first point out that Ontario is NOT the largest province in Canada (google it), and the fact that the smithsonian institute didn't get that right says a lot about the "facts" of this article. I am born and raised in Ontario, Canada. Woodstock Ontario to be exact. And I know the facts. The fact is we won. And the only thing I got out of reading this was a very negative view on the writers and smithsonian's part toward Canada. You should really focus on all the garbage going on in your own country instead of pointing out sutch a minuscule topic to do with another country, all this paper dose is make the USA look like a spoiled brat, caught red handed and then bringing up anything bad he/she saw everyone else in the room do just to divert attention. I am shocked and appalled by the smithsonian and I am even more disappointed in the "greatest country in the world" I pray for the actual true good people of your country and for Canada aswell, because of your government and garbage papers like this we are headed down the road to failure.
Posted by Steve on June 23,2012 | 08:38 PM
With all of the international battles, economic and military changes, and folklore from the 'War of 1812' (our navy, our marines, our banking crisis, sailors being kidnapped, burning of our capitol) the best this rag could come up with is a bunch of revisionist pseudo-Canadian claptrap? I seem to recall ol Canada wasn't exactly united behind that British crown - the real "excuse" for a second attempt to destroy the US of A. I don't know if I'm more offended by the revision of US history or Canadian. I guess they have their own troubles, and we're stuck with our money supporting the Smithsonian. If they want an article on Canadian ignorance by all means write one, but I expected something more for the bicentennial.
Posted by minnie mouus on June 21,2012 | 09:49 PM
It's 'Pearson' not 'Preston.'
Posted by Dave on June 19,2012 | 11:51 AM
Very weird how he calls it the "Harper Government". Is Steven Harper personally funding the various programs associated with the War of 1812? No, the CANADIAN government is. Was is the Martin government or Chretien government when the liberals where in power? No, a very peculiar phrase used there.
Posted by Andrew on June 19,2012 | 11:38 AM
It's Pearson Airport, not Preston Airport, in Toronto. It was named after former Canadian Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson.
Posted by Beverly Behan on June 18,2012 | 08:09 PM