The Vikings: A Memorable Visit to America
Exploring the New World a thousand years ago, a Viking woman gave birth to what is likely the first European-American baby. The discovery of the house the family built upon their return to Iceland has scholars rethinking the Norse sagas
- By Eugene Linden
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2004, Subscribe
(Page 3 of 5)
According to the sagas, Erik eventually set up a farmstead on the west coast of Greenland. The incongruous name for this barren, frigid island dominated by a vast ice cap comes from the outcast’s attempt to lure other settlers, demonstrating “a genius for advertising that made him prophetically American,” Stefansson wrote. Erik heard tales of strange lands to the west from a Norse sailor blown off course en route to Greenland, and it was his son Leif who led the first expedition to the New World. Another was led by Erik’s son Thorvald (who died in Vinland from an arrow wound). Thorfinn Karlsefni led a third.
Thorfinn’s assumed lineage is distinguished: one ancestor was Aud the Deepminded, a queen from the British Isles, and another was Ugarval, a king of Ireland. Thorfinn had grown up in Iceland on a farm not far from Glaumbaer. A wealthy merchant notorious for his cleverness, Thorfinn was also a good leader. On a trading voyage to Greenland, he met and married Gudrid Thorbjarnardottir, the beautiful and charismatic widow of Erik’s son Thorvald. (A history of Iceland written around 1120, as well as scattered church records, back up the genealogies and dates in the sagas.) During the winter of 1005 at Brattahlid, Erik’s manor in Greenland’s eastern colony, Thorfinn played board games and planned his trip to Vinland. Erik the Red’s saga makes the planning sound boisterous and somewhat haphazard, noting that various other Norse chiefs decided to join the expedition seemingly on the spur of the moment.
While Leif Eriksson is the Viking name most familiar to Americans, the sagas devote as much space to Thorfinn and his voyage. Steinberg’s discovery supports a long-held theory that Thorfinn was the principal teller of the sagas. (That would explain why he plays such a major role in them.) Steinberg notes that knowing the source of a text helps historians weigh the assertions.
Whoever their author was, the stories have challenged scholars to match the place names mentioned in them to real topography. For example, Thorfinn called two crucial places where he and his group camped in the New World Straumfjord (stream fiord) and Hop (lagoon) and described the first as having strong currents. Scholars have variously located Straumfjord, where Snorri was born, in Buzzards Bay, Massachusetts; Long Island Sound; the Bay of Fundy; and L’Anse auxMeadows (the Norse site discovered by Helge and Anne Ingstad on the northern tip of Newfoundland). Different advocates have placed Hop near New York City, Boston and points north.
If in fact Thorfinn and company traveled as far south as Gowanus Bay in New York Harbor, as asserted by the British scholar Geoffrey Gathorne-Hardy in 1921, they would have sailed past some of the greatest stands of primeval hardwoods on the planet, not to mention grapes—treasured by Norse chiefs who cemented their status with feasts accompanied by copious amounts of wine—and unlimited fish and game.
Why would the Norse have abandoned them or similar inducements farther north? Perhaps the Vikings’ Vinland was like Alexander the Great’s India: a land of fabulous wealth so far from home that it was beyond the limits of his ability to impose his will. Both Norse sagas have Thorfinn beating a retreat north after some humbling battles with Native warriors. (See “Why Didn’t They Stay?”)
Thorfinn never went back to Vinland, but other Norse subsequently did. Evidence continues to accumulate that Norse traded with both Inuit and more southern tribes for skins, and that they regularly brought back wood and other items from the New World. Over the years, various accounts have placed Norse colonies in Maine, Rhode Island and elsewhere on the AtlanticCoast, but the only unambiguous Norse settlement in North America remains L’Anse aux Meadows.
Icelanders, for their part, need no persuading of the Viking’s preeminence among Europeans in the New World. Asked who discovered America, 8-year-old Kristin Bjarnadottir, a third grader in Holar, Iceland, answers with complete confidence: “Leifur,” naming the celebrated Viking explorer. She and other Icelandic kids often play a game called Great Adventurer, in which they take on the roles of the saga heroes. Steinberg’s ongoing investigation of the turf house in Glaumbaer and other structures could well give Kristin and her friends rich new exploits of their Viking ancestors to act out.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (21)
I think that the Norse probably took a few inuit women from Greenland back to iceland and Norway. Thats how some "East Asian" genes are showing up in iceland.
Posted by Tim on January 11,2013 | 09:03 AM
I'm gonna agree with everyone here and say Demetrius is terribly misinformed and should take a look into a history book next time he decides to make a post. And however I understand that he would like to defend his culture (if you can call it that) in the same way I am currently doing (Vikings are the s#@t) Now not only did the vikings who were apparently "savages" Spread their Culture from as far as Iceland to The Middle East whereas the Spanish got to the South America and had their hearts set that it was india,and to top it all off these "highly civilized" spaniards butchered Countless Native Americans and ruined Several Civilizations which thanks to the spaniards we'll never get to know enough about to piece together how their society worked so yeah Demetrius Spanish are just sooooooo great. >:-(
Posted by ErikYeahlikeaviking on December 3,2012 | 07:59 PM
The abandonment of the settlements on Greenland in the 14th century has intrigued me for some years. That pioneers of this kind should disappear without fighting back somehow seems to be unnatural. Assuming that they were still pioneers leaves us with a few alternatives.
They could go back east to Iceland and Scandinavia, where the Plague had made room for that. Other destinations in Europe not to be forgotten. But why not imagine that these pioneers went further west? They knew the riches they craved were there so I feel convinced that some of them went. Others have suggested the same but have not been able to come up with enough evidence to support their claims.
Just how far did they penetrate into the continent? Modern DNA-testing may be able to help. My idea is not scientific, basically. I am a wooden shipwright and have for some time been wondering if the shape of the indian canoe, which in some areas resemble the norse ships,could help us decide approximately how far they got, assuming that the native boatbuilder would have thought it worthwhile to copy the foreign vessels. How far into the woods am I?
Posted by ole klemme on April 13,2012 | 04:39 AM
Does anyone ever stop to think why northeastern tribes such as the Iraquois Algonquin mohecan and probably most all of the tribes of that region look more european and not mongoloid as western tribes do?
They seem to have prominent straight noses of scandinavians.
HUM JUST THINKING.
Posted by Greg on February 9,2012 | 02:18 PM
Why does it seem that scandinavians are not given credit for being the first modern europeans. The fact they discovered america is one of the most important things to have ever been done by peoples of there time! What would modern history have been with out the viking's explorations trading and interbreeding with most of the world. Just wondering
Posted by on February 9,2012 | 02:01 PM
They didn't find "beach nuts" at LAM. They were butternuts ( also called white walnuts). And BTW they are Beech Trees, not Beach Trees!
Posted by Dick Jorgensen on January 3,2012 | 05:49 PM
"Tom McGovern, an archaeologist at HunterCollege in New York City, has spent more than 20 years reconstructing the demise of a Norse settlement on Greenland. In the middle of the 14th century, the colony suffered eight harsh winters in a row, culminating, in 1355, in what may have been the worst in a century. McGovern says the Norse ate their livestock and dogs before turning to whatever else they could find in their final winter there. The settlers might have survived if they had mimicked the Inuit, who hunted ringed seal in the winter and prospered during the Little Ice Age"
Looks like twenty years of modelling were wasted. Midden heaps from fifteenth century Greenland show the Norse diet was 80% fish in the final years in the final years of their settlement there.
The climate affected the Inuit just as much as the Norse. The Dorset Eskimo were forced into the northernmost reaches of Greenland and Ellesmere Island during the medieval warm period. The Thule migrated there as well and drove the Dorset to extinction with the dog, bow, and toggling harpoon. The Thule themselves were forced out of the northernmost latitudes and below the Arctic circle once the Little Ice Age hit, placing them in competition with the Norse. Perhaps the Norse were doomed from the start, we can't be certain. What is known is that the settlements in Greenland were obsolete once Europe obtained easy access to elephant ivory, endangering the market for walrus ivory, Greenland's only valuable export.
Posted by Ken on October 2,2011 | 06:59 PM
Great helped me on my project
Posted by pizza on January 13,2011 | 05:39 AM
Leaving later (and irrelevant) Europeans aside...
Linden seems to have cloaked the core of this article, the uncovering of a large Viking Age building in Iceland, with a fairly free ranging overview of the problem of matching the three Vinlander's Sagas to possible historic events.
There has long been (massive) debate about just how the tales of the Sagas might match any actual facts. Any modern reader of what are in truth long repeated *stories* needs to be aware that although there may be accurate elements, much is also intended as mere entertainment. On the other hand there is the proven archaeology uncovered in Canada, primarily at L'Anse aux Meadows, but also through the Arctic. That the house remains and small collection of artifacts at L'Anse aux Meadows Newfoundland are Norse in origin is certain.
One obvious flaw in Linden's thesis is that he seems to conclude the building complex at LAM needs to belong to only one of either of Leif or Thorfin. He appears to discard the more obvious interpretation - that the Saga tales actually describe entirely different locations.
That the Norse at LAM did in fact travel down at least to modern day New Brunswick is proven by artifacts. Both beach nuts and beach wood was found at LAM, trees which never grew further north than New Brunswick. People tend to always want to settle in desirable locations - so perhaps Thorfin's houses are sitting, unknown, under the buildings of some modern Canadian town.
Readers should remember that to Leif and the other Norse, *Vinland* was a vast territory, not merely a small exploration camp set on it's doorstep.
Frankly, given the extensive work we all undertook on the fine details on the exhibit 'Vikings - North Atlantic Saga' ( http://www.mnh.si.edu/vikings/start.html ), I do find this offering by Eugene Linden 'a bit shallow'.
Posted by Darrell Markewitz on October 5,2010 | 08:15 AM
i totally agree
Posted by rythm drummer on September 30,2010 | 10:59 AM
Red Feather has it.
Posted by Skáld on September 9,2010 | 11:32 PM
Haha, very good point, Red Feather!
Posted by Aratan "Fire Spirit" on March 26,2010 | 01:49 PM
well..i`m afraid america was already populated thousands of years before both Leiv Eriksson and colombus "discovered" it..so I belive someone dicovered it before any of them really. and they colonized it too :-)
Posted by Red Feather on February 10,2010 | 05:04 PM
Hatred of mankind is an obominous thing. We all need to be more tolerant of each other so that our own cultures do not disappear. Vikings, like native Americans were not savages; they were human beings just like you and I. In fact the Vikings are our ancestors, though their culture has been destroyed their blood still runs through our veins.
Posted by M Binkley on September 20,2009 | 10:55 AM
This is viking history that is proven: The vikings of norway who invented the viking boat ( today known as the most solid boat built and as fast as modern sailboats today). These vikings went over to Iceland from norway. From Iceland to greenland (some of them). As they were exploring they came to north america 400-500 years before columbus discovered central america. Thats right: columbus discovered central america and leif Eriksson discovered north america. This is not a theory - it's a fact that is accepted in Europa and north america. I read about spanish ppl in here and north america hehe, sorry but nomatter how many spanish speaking ppl that exists in north america , it doesn't change proven history. the fact of the first born white child born in north america was from Norway/Iceland , and that the first viking walked this land 500 years before columbus is part of our viking history in scandinavia. One spanish guy in here is talking about vikings as savages. That is right they were. But vikings were good craftsmen and tacticians during war and occupation. You can't just be a pure "monkey savage" to have as great success as the vikings had. I actually think spanish talking ppl should see the film by Mel gibson about spanish occupation of central and south americas. No, not savage at all ;)
Posted by kristianviking on January 17,2009 | 07:01 AM
To Will Sinclair: I have been studying and documenting sites in Colorado, US, since meeting Bill McGlone, Gloria Farley and companies in the field in 1988. There is incredible evidence, (i.e. glyphs marking equinox, cross-quarter days, etc., most with some form of significant Celtic Ogham) of incursions of Western Europeans into the Americas before the Vikings. Farley translated the Heavner Runestone in Oklahoma as Viking: http://www2.privatei.com/~bartjean/mainpage.htm I have located star charts and ship petroglyphs, filmed equinox shadow plays in caves, even Mithriams http://onter.net/story.html As Farley explains, the evidence is "In Plain Sight". Scott Monahan currently offers the best documentation: http://onter.net/story.html There is now DNA evidence of Europeans in theAmerica's N.E. dating beyond 13,000 years. I will be back in the field this fall continuing my own amatuer documentation with the goal of local presentations in Colorado. The sites are under threat of military training ground expansion and I will do my part to record what I can ... for posterity ... Truth? The evidence is on the rocks. I'm surprised there are no articles in the Smithsonian on the subject, and taken back by the resistance of the archaeological community to such theory. Archaeology should be a science, not a dogma. Douglas Young
Posted by Douglas Young on July 28,2008 | 11:02 AM
The Norsemen were quite late in the game of Europeans finding, using the resources found it North & Central America. Why not read the evidence in both of Professor Barry Fell's books, "America, B.C." and "Saga, America". Then increase your knowledge a bit more by reading of the findings of Gloria Farley in her book, "In Plain Sight". The musems where the findings of artifacts from the American B.C. period of history, unearthed, preserved & presented for inquisitive eyes are listed in all three books.By all means make an effort to read these outstanding non fiction books.
Posted by Will D. Sinclair on July 26,2008 | 11:46 AM
I love it when people with so little knowledge froth at the mouth. The only reason the Spanish ever amounted to ANYthing was because of the Moors and Jews, whom the kicked out in 1492. After that, Spain has only been a nation of bloody-handed seagoing plunderers and genocidal murderers who were not smart enough to keep from squandering all they stole on squabbling with the English (hey, Demitrius, can you say "Spanish Armada?" twice?). What they didn't spend on wars they gave to Rome. Not exactly a culture of geniuses. There has never been anything called "Spanish" culture. Anything that has ever been labeled "Spanish" that is cultural is because of the Moorish & Jewish influences. For all they stole, they have remained the most culturally and economically backward country in Europe! Anyone with enough intelligence to question the repressiveness of the Spanish system ended up in the clutches of Torquemada! And how about Columbus? He wasn't even a Spaniard, he was an Italian! So...the culmination of Spanish ...uh...culture...in the 20th century was the fascist regime of Franco? Compare what the Scandinavian nations are today to what Spain is today. Sure, a lot of people speak Spanish because they were seafarers, that is undeniable. But Viking culture has spread to and been in absorbed into virtually ALL of Europe (even Spain throught the visigoths as has been pointed out), through the Mediterranean, into italy, Russia (the "Russ" whom Russia was named after were Vikings) and so on. In the words of Bugs Bunny, "what a maroon."
Posted by Ellis D. Tripp on July 2,2008 | 03:33 PM
Demetrius, I'm sorry you feel attacked, but this article did not say anything derogatory about Spanish explorers or Spanish speakers. It shared some insights about the exploits of some Vikings who arrived in America (and eventually left--due, most likely to climate change) almost 500 years before an Italian explorer persuaded the monarchs of Spain (descendants of Visigoths--read Viking cousins) to back his expedition to the "Indies". Y te digo estas cosas no para decirte nada mala, sino para mostrarte que no hay porque sentirte enojado cuando estas leyendo de la historia ajena.
Posted by George Johnson on June 26,2008 | 07:02 PM
I really think Demetrius needs to take another look at Spanish History, That of both the Iberian Peninsula as well as the Americas, That possibly his own surname from Rodrigo,is of Viking or Sueve origin,that held sway in Spain. Also, everyone knows the Spanish "religion" imposed on native populations, was a brutality that caused the extinction of Taino and other tribes in the Caribe, after the enslavement, and diseases introduced by the Spanish in Central and South America,for the sole purpose to extract gold for it's cathedrals and fill the coffers of their regents. And if the current state of "Hispanic Culture" in the New World is any barometer of civilisation- I would rather live in Scandinavia any day !!!
Posted by E.J. Quinn on June 26,2008 | 11:11 AM
Were to start Mrs. Rodriguez? You are not 100% right or factual. The Vikings , they are Northern Europeans or Norse, as you call them is not a name of a people but a adjective- to go a Vikining meant to go exploring, colonizing, trading, etc... Although the Spaniards were great people worthy of great praise at times, they were alsosavages brutal in south America and other places and were blood thirsty for gold.Also mostly all European and Also asian countries fought the Muslims, all the way from the Greeks fighting the Persian Empire, the Crusaders Knights Hospitaller/Tuetonic Knights /Knights Templar etc...,to the European nations during WW1 ( Ottoman Empire ring a bell) also Spain has a large Muslim population. The Norse people of Northern Europe founded Iceland, Greenland had some of the most earliest legal systems, The Thing or Allthing,Were some of the worlds finest craftsmen, explorers, traders, seafarers, merchants, mercanaries for the Byzantine empire, poets and had a religion although not X-tian, also they created aform of writing called the Runes. I would have to write a whole dissertation to show how absurd your statement was. Yours was not the truth I suggest do some research before claiming something as fact when posting on a prestigous Scientific magazine. I am very happy to see this article and many others written in this fine magazine.I suggest a article on early Celtic Christianity also
Posted by Albie A Gogel on June 26,2008 | 06:37 AM
Im sorry to break up this fairy tale story but north america,central america,as well as south america and many more territory's are speaking spanish to this very day.And this is becuase the spanish are world renoune sea faring people,as well as conquerors,1000 of years fighting the muslims,and even before that remember who the romans were? take a western civ class the spanish were there best generals, as well as emperor ,Hadrian. I could go on but i will sum up that the norse were nothing more than savages, the vikings could never colonize a snow ball fight.History does not like to reconize that the spanish gave the indians in the new world horses and religion, but i know one thing that is certain what i comment is not fiction it is true,factual to 100% not opinion. SO those red heads up in new england sorry to say came off a boat and a journey that was made possible by the spanish 100 years before the bought there tickets.
Posted by Demetrius Rodriguez on March 2,2008 | 06:38 AM