The Vikings: A Memorable Visit to America
Exploring the New World a thousand years ago, a Viking woman gave birth to what is likely the first European-American baby. The discovery of the house the family built upon their return to Iceland has scholars rethinking the Norse sagas
- By Eugene Linden
- Smithsonian magazine, December 2004, Subscribe
Roughly 1,000 years ago, the story goes, a Viking trader and adventurer named Thorfinn Karlsefni set off from the west coast of Greenland with three ships and a band of Norse to explore a newly discovered land that promised fabulous riches. Following the route that had been pioneered some seven years before by Leif Eriksson, Thorfinn sailed up Greenland’s coast, traversed the Davis Strait and turned south past Baffin Island to Newfoundland—and perhaps beyond. Snorri, the son of Thorfinn and his wife, Gudrid, is thought to be the first European baby born in North America.
Thorfinn and his band found their promised riches— game, fish, timber and pasture—and also encountered Native Americans, whom they denigrated as skraelings, or “wretched people.” Little wonder, then, that relations with the Natives steadily deteriorated. About three years after starting out, Thorfinn—along with his family and surviving crew—abandoned the North American settlement, perhaps in a hail of arrows. (Archaeologists have found arrowheads with the remains of buried Norse explorers.) After sailing to Greenland and then Norway, Thorfinn and his family settled in Iceland, Thorfinn’s childhood home.
Just where the family ended up in Iceland has been a mystery that historians and archaeologists have long tried to clear up. In September 2002, archaeologist John Steinberg of the University of California at Los Angeles announced that he had uncovered the remains of a turf mansion in Iceland that he believes is the house where Thorfinn, Gudrid and Snorri lived out their days. Other scholars say his claim is plausible, although even Steinberg admits, “We’ll never know for sure unless someone finds a name on the door.”
The location of Thorfinn’s family estate in Iceland has surprisingly broad implications. For one thing, it could shed new light on the early Norse experience in North America, first substantiated by Helge Ingstad, an explorer, and his wife, Anne Stine Ingstad, an archaeologist. In 1960, they discovered the remains of a Viking encampment in Newfoundland dating to the year 1000. But the only accounts of how and why Vikings journeyed to the New World, not to mention what became of them, are in Icelandic sagas, centuries-old tales that have traditionally vexed scholars struggling to separate Viking fantasy from Viking fact. Steinberg’s find, if proved, would give credence to one saga over another.
By Steinberg’s admission, he found the imposing longhouse— on the grounds of one of northern Iceland’s most visited cultural sites, the GlaumbaerFolkMuseum—“by dumb luck.” For decades, visitors had gazed upon the field in front of the museum, unaware that evidence of one of the grandest longhouses of the Viking era lay just beneath the grass.
Steinberg did not start out trying to insert himself into a debate about Viking lore, but to survey settlement patterns during Viking times. With his colleague Doug Bolender of NorthwesternUniversity in Chicago, he had developed a method for using an electrical conductivity meter to detect buried artifacts. The tool—a cumbersome, 50-pound apparatus usually used to identify contaminated groundwater and locate pipes—sends alternating current into the ground. The current induces a magnetic field, and the tool then measures how the magnetic field varies according to the makeup of the soil and the objects buried in it. The two men fitted the electronic equipment into a 12-foot-long plastic tube and trekked around fields holding the apparatus by their sides, looking for all the world like slowmotion pole vaulters getting ready to vault.
The two first worked with Icelandic archaeologist Gud- mundur Olafsson, who was excavating the site of Erik the Red’s farmstead in western Iceland and had identified it as the place from which some of the explorers of the New World first set out. There, Steinberg and Bolender charted magnetic anomalies—possible signatures of buried walls and floors of turf houses. Then, Steinberg says, “Gudmundur would draw upon his knowledge of ancient Norse houses to imagine possible configurations underground so that we could refine the search.” By the end of 2000, Steinberg and Bolender could survey a field as quickly as they could walk.
An 18-person team they put together then settled on Skagafjord, on the north coast of Iceland, as the most promising place to conduct their studies. The area is dotted with rills, rivers and thousand-year-old fields green from the abundant rain and long, soft sunlight of summer days in the Far North. The territory was ideally suited to their technology, layered as it is with known volcanic deposits that coincide with important historical events, enabling the archaeologists to get a good fix on the ages of objects they found. “See, the soil reads like a book,” Steinberg says, standing in a trench on a farm near Glaumbaer that was the site of northern Iceland’s most powerful estate during Viking times. He points to a green layer that marks a volcanic eruption in 871, a blue layer from one in 1000 and a thick, yellow layer from yet another in 1104.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.









Comments (21)
+ View All Comments
I think that the Norse probably took a few inuit women from Greenland back to iceland and Norway. Thats how some "East Asian" genes are showing up in iceland.
Posted by Tim on January 11,2013 | 09:03 AM
I'm gonna agree with everyone here and say Demetrius is terribly misinformed and should take a look into a history book next time he decides to make a post. And however I understand that he would like to defend his culture (if you can call it that) in the same way I am currently doing (Vikings are the s#@t) Now not only did the vikings who were apparently "savages" Spread their Culture from as far as Iceland to The Middle East whereas the Spanish got to the South America and had their hearts set that it was india,and to top it all off these "highly civilized" spaniards butchered Countless Native Americans and ruined Several Civilizations which thanks to the spaniards we'll never get to know enough about to piece together how their society worked so yeah Demetrius Spanish are just sooooooo great. >:-(
Posted by ErikYeahlikeaviking on December 3,2012 | 07:59 PM
The abandonment of the settlements on Greenland in the 14th century has intrigued me for some years. That pioneers of this kind should disappear without fighting back somehow seems to be unnatural. Assuming that they were still pioneers leaves us with a few alternatives.
They could go back east to Iceland and Scandinavia, where the Plague had made room for that. Other destinations in Europe not to be forgotten. But why not imagine that these pioneers went further west? They knew the riches they craved were there so I feel convinced that some of them went. Others have suggested the same but have not been able to come up with enough evidence to support their claims.
Just how far did they penetrate into the continent? Modern DNA-testing may be able to help. My idea is not scientific, basically. I am a wooden shipwright and have for some time been wondering if the shape of the indian canoe, which in some areas resemble the norse ships,could help us decide approximately how far they got, assuming that the native boatbuilder would have thought it worthwhile to copy the foreign vessels. How far into the woods am I?
Posted by ole klemme on April 13,2012 | 04:39 AM
Does anyone ever stop to think why northeastern tribes such as the Iraquois Algonquin mohecan and probably most all of the tribes of that region look more european and not mongoloid as western tribes do?
They seem to have prominent straight noses of scandinavians.
HUM JUST THINKING.
Posted by Greg on February 9,2012 | 02:18 PM
Why does it seem that scandinavians are not given credit for being the first modern europeans. The fact they discovered america is one of the most important things to have ever been done by peoples of there time! What would modern history have been with out the viking's explorations trading and interbreeding with most of the world. Just wondering
Posted by on February 9,2012 | 02:01 PM
They didn't find "beach nuts" at LAM. They were butternuts ( also called white walnuts). And BTW they are Beech Trees, not Beach Trees!
Posted by Dick Jorgensen on January 3,2012 | 05:49 PM
"Tom McGovern, an archaeologist at HunterCollege in New York City, has spent more than 20 years reconstructing the demise of a Norse settlement on Greenland. In the middle of the 14th century, the colony suffered eight harsh winters in a row, culminating, in 1355, in what may have been the worst in a century. McGovern says the Norse ate their livestock and dogs before turning to whatever else they could find in their final winter there. The settlers might have survived if they had mimicked the Inuit, who hunted ringed seal in the winter and prospered during the Little Ice Age"
Looks like twenty years of modelling were wasted. Midden heaps from fifteenth century Greenland show the Norse diet was 80% fish in the final years in the final years of their settlement there.
The climate affected the Inuit just as much as the Norse. The Dorset Eskimo were forced into the northernmost reaches of Greenland and Ellesmere Island during the medieval warm period. The Thule migrated there as well and drove the Dorset to extinction with the dog, bow, and toggling harpoon. The Thule themselves were forced out of the northernmost latitudes and below the Arctic circle once the Little Ice Age hit, placing them in competition with the Norse. Perhaps the Norse were doomed from the start, we can't be certain. What is known is that the settlements in Greenland were obsolete once Europe obtained easy access to elephant ivory, endangering the market for walrus ivory, Greenland's only valuable export.
Posted by Ken on October 2,2011 | 06:59 PM
Great helped me on my project
Posted by pizza on January 13,2011 | 05:39 AM
Leaving later (and irrelevant) Europeans aside...
Linden seems to have cloaked the core of this article, the uncovering of a large Viking Age building in Iceland, with a fairly free ranging overview of the problem of matching the three Vinlander's Sagas to possible historic events.
There has long been (massive) debate about just how the tales of the Sagas might match any actual facts. Any modern reader of what are in truth long repeated *stories* needs to be aware that although there may be accurate elements, much is also intended as mere entertainment. On the other hand there is the proven archaeology uncovered in Canada, primarily at L'Anse aux Meadows, but also through the Arctic. That the house remains and small collection of artifacts at L'Anse aux Meadows Newfoundland are Norse in origin is certain.
One obvious flaw in Linden's thesis is that he seems to conclude the building complex at LAM needs to belong to only one of either of Leif or Thorfin. He appears to discard the more obvious interpretation - that the Saga tales actually describe entirely different locations.
That the Norse at LAM did in fact travel down at least to modern day New Brunswick is proven by artifacts. Both beach nuts and beach wood was found at LAM, trees which never grew further north than New Brunswick. People tend to always want to settle in desirable locations - so perhaps Thorfin's houses are sitting, unknown, under the buildings of some modern Canadian town.
Readers should remember that to Leif and the other Norse, *Vinland* was a vast territory, not merely a small exploration camp set on it's doorstep.
Frankly, given the extensive work we all undertook on the fine details on the exhibit 'Vikings - North Atlantic Saga' ( http://www.mnh.si.edu/vikings/start.html ), I do find this offering by Eugene Linden 'a bit shallow'.
Posted by Darrell Markewitz on October 5,2010 | 08:15 AM
i totally agree
Posted by rythm drummer on September 30,2010 | 10:59 AM
Red Feather has it.
Posted by Skáld on September 9,2010 | 11:32 PM
Haha, very good point, Red Feather!
Posted by Aratan "Fire Spirit" on March 26,2010 | 01:49 PM
well..i`m afraid america was already populated thousands of years before both Leiv Eriksson and colombus "discovered" it..so I belive someone dicovered it before any of them really. and they colonized it too :-)
Posted by Red Feather on February 10,2010 | 05:04 PM
Hatred of mankind is an obominous thing. We all need to be more tolerant of each other so that our own cultures do not disappear. Vikings, like native Americans were not savages; they were human beings just like you and I. In fact the Vikings are our ancestors, though their culture has been destroyed their blood still runs through our veins.
Posted by M Binkley on September 20,2009 | 10:55 AM
+ View All Comments